School board candidate Jennifer Kerns says she's ready to be heard
After running for the St. Joseph School District Board of Education in 2023 and losing by 28 votes, Jennifer Kerns has some experience and is ready to get boots on the ground with her campaign.
'I've been on the sidelines for years doing the PTA stuff with the Parents and Teachers Association,' Kerns said. 'It's a big deal to have the parent engagement and to support our staff and teachers.'
Kerns said serving on so many local boards and committees, such as the PTA, Project Graduation, InterServ and the Philanthropic Educational Organization, she understands community needs.
'I listen to all of them, I get to see what our community needs,' Kerns said. 'I get to hear what the teachers and the staff needs, and it's important that we support them and then the community as well.'
Kerns said heading into the April 8 election that will see two people chosen for the school board, she has certain policies she wants to focus on.
One is academics.
'You know, our scores are slowly getting better, but we're still under the state level that we need to be at,' Kerns said. 'We need to look at our academics, we need to look at what our teachers and staff needs to give our kids the best education because they go hand-in-hand.'
Kerns also said teacher retention and recruitment, having additional classroom resources and community involvement are also something's she wants to advocate for.
Kerns also said, one of her daughters has already gone through the District, and the other one is currently attending school in the SJSD- Showing Kerns is no stranger to the District.
One big item candidates are sharing their opinions on ahead of the election, are the efforts to foster Proposition two- a bond initiative which would support the construction of two new high schools.
'However it's voted is up to the community now,' said Kerns. 'Whether they vote for, you know, the new high school or whether they don't vote for it, we've gotta move forward from there no matter what.'
Whichever way the the bond issue is voted, Kerns said she's ready to 'get her hands dirty' when it comes to moving forward with the District's long-range plan.
Regardless of how you vote, Kerns said it's important to make sure your voice is heard.
'If we want to see change, if we want to move forward, then you gotta go vote,' said Kerns.
You can learn more about the candidates for the St. Joseph School Board every Tuesday through the end of March.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Former Austin mayoral candidate sues over TRE ballot language
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A former Austin mayoral candidate is challenging the city over how it is presenting a tax rate election to voters in November. Last week, Austin City Council approved its budget for next fiscal year and set a property tax rate, which is high enough that it triggers a tax rate election, or TRE, in November. Council members also approved an ordinance ordering that special election to be held on Nov. 4. Austin signs off on $6B+ budget, triggering property tax rate election If voters approve the new tax rate, the average homeowner's property tax bill will go up by a total of $302.14 annually. The ordinance council members passed, ordering the TRE, lays out the rules of the election and what will appear on the ballot for voters. According to the ordinance, the TRE will be under Proposition Q on November's ballot, and it will say, 'this is a tax increase,' and describe what the money will go toward. However, Jeffery Bowen, a candidate in the 2024 Austin mayoral race, filed a lawsuit this week claiming that the ballot language as described in the ordinance doesn't make it clear that the property tax hike would be recurring, and that the ballot's description of what taxpayers would get out of the increase is not clear enough. Austin Mayor Kirk Watson, who defeated Bowen for the seat of city mayor last November, provided KXAN with the following statement: 'The City of Austin is confident the ballot language is appropriate and meets all legal requirements. We also have confidence in the court system and will respond in that venue.' The full lawsuit can be viewed below. Original Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus with App_1755530250Download According to the ordinance, the ballot will be prepared to permit voting 'FOR' or 'AGAINST' Proposition Q, which will state the following: CITY OF AUSTIN PROPOSITION QTHIS IS A TAX INCREASE Approving the ad valorem tax rate of $0.574017 per $100 valuation in the City of Austin for the current year, a rate that is $0.05 higher per $100 valuation than the voter-approval tax rate of the City of Austin, for the purpose of funding or expanding programs intended to increase housing affordability and reduce homelessness; improve parks and recreation facilities and services; enhance public health services and public safety; ensure financial stability; and provide for other general fund maintenance and operation expenditures included in the fiscal year 2025 -2026 budget as approved or amended by City Council. Last year, the ad valorem tax rate in the City of Austin was $0.4776 per $100 valuation. According to Bowen's lawsuit, Bowen hand-delivered a letter to the city council on Aug. 13 that outlined the deficiencies in the ballot language, and demanded that the council 'fulfill its nondiscretionary duty to adopt ballot language for the tax increase election that does not mislead voters about the tax increase proposition.' The lawsuit alleged that, 'instead, the Austin City Council prescribed its own ballot language for the tax increase proposition that will grossly mislead voters and promote its passage.' The first issue the lawsuit alleged was that city council violated Texas law that was set forth by the Texas Supreme Court in Dacus v. Parker (Tex. 2015) because the ballot language does not explain the 'purpose' of the tax increase in definite and clear terms. The lawsuit specifically pointed out the phrase of the ballot that states, 'and provide for other general fund maintenance and operation expenditures included in the fiscal year 2025-2026budget as approved or amended by City Council,' alleging that several parts of the phrase 'mislead' voters. It also said the ballot language fails to meet Dacus standards because 'several of the program descriptions are misleading for vagueness and non-neutral advocacy.' The other issue the lawsuit alleged was that the ballot is also too vague to establish an enforceable 'contract with the voters,' because it does not describe exactly how the current council and future councils could spend the money. The lawsuit said that because the tax increase would be a 'forever tax,' the ballot language should be 'definite and clear and become the foundation on which voters and taxpayers can rely—if the proposition passes—for how this huge tax increase will be spent, not only by this City Council but by all City Councils in the future.' Bowen's suit, which was filed in the Third Court of Appeals in Austin, asks the court to 'issue a writ of mandamus ordering and compelling the Mayor and City Council of the City of Austin to promptly hold a validly called meeting of the Council to adopt ballot language that corrects each the deficiencies in the Council-adopted ballot language noted above so as to have accurate language on the November 4, 2025 ballot.' In other words, Bowen is asking the court to force the mayor and city council to change the ballot language for the proposition. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
06-08-2025
- Yahoo
Voters in Neosho, Newton County reject use-tax propoals Tuesday
NEOSHO, Mo. — Voters in Neosho and Newton County rejected use-tax proposals in their respective jurisdictions Tuesday. Neosho residents rejected the plan, known as Proposition A, by a vote of 584 to 223, with more than 72% voting "no." Newton County residents rejected their plan, also known as Proposition A, by a vote of 1,665 to 846, with more than 66% voting "no." A use tax is a tax placed on purchases online from companies that do not have a physical presence in Missouri. The rates would have been the same as the existing sales taxes in those areas, 1.65% in Newton County and 3% in the city limits of Neosho. The state of Missouri already charges a use tax on purchases at 4.225%, the same as the state sales tax. Joplin residents in Newton County have been paying a use tax rate of 3.125% since 2023. Voters approved it in the November 2022 election. The county use tax would have been used mostly to fund moving sheriff's deputies and other county employees to the Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement System, or LAGERS, which offers better retirement benefits for county employees than the current system, known as the County Employee Retirement Fund. This was the second time in two years that Neosho voters rejected a use tax. They shot down a use tax in April 2025 by a vote of 570 to 603. At that time, Neosho City Manager David Kennedy had estimated the tax would bring in $300,000 to $400,000 annually based on state estimates, and the revenue was to be used to build a water park to replace Neosho's aging swimming pool. This time, the city proposed using the money, if passed, toward improved salaries and benefits for police officers and firefighters and to make improvements to roads and bridges. Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
04-07-2025
- San Francisco Chronicle
Politicized kids? Rogue teachers? A contentious education battle hasn't calmed in S.F.
As the U.S. has split into divisive camps over racial issues, transgender rights, the war in Gaza, women's health and more, the teaching of ethnic studies has become among the most contentious educational fights in California and other states, dividing communities and turning formerly friendly PTA parents into adversaries. Not even liberal-minded San Francisco has escaped the battle. Ethnic studies has become something of a symbolic punching bag for what some call public education overreach, where ideology and activism subvert the basic objectives of reading, writing and 'rithmatic. Based on the state Department of Education's definition, the curriculum is meant to focus on the histories, cultures, struggles and contributions of historically marginalized groups, which are often untold in conventional U.S. history courses. That includes addressing the causes of racism and other forms of bigotry — ultimately so that young people develop a 'social consciousness and knowledge' to contribute to the public good and strengthen democracy. Some school districts across the country have argued over whether to teach the course at all. More frequently, the debate in the Bay Area and elsewhere has centered on what to teach and how to teach it. Should it foster awareness and pride in students from diverse backgrounds or focus on white supremacy, racism and other forms of oppression to help students understand the world? And what should parents or students do when educators venture into personal opinions and promote their own political views? 'There are folks who would prefer that we don't have any of these conversations in schools,' said Anna Klaster, principal of San Francisco's Independent High School and president of the administrators union. 'On the other side there are folks who think we should be having all the conversations.' Klaster said she has seen parents opt their kids out of English classes because a reading assignment included a gay protagonist or because a text referenced magic. At the same time, she has had to help a teacher who was uncomfortable with the way her students wanted to talk about controversial subjects in her classroom. 'Everyone has feelings around this,' Klaster said. In San Francisco, efforts to appease vocal community members riled up about ethnic studies haven't seemed to work. During the past school year, some community members, as well as conservative organizations outside the state, have raised concerns about the content of ethnic studies courses, saying they were antisemitic, or promoted anti-capitalist activism, or dwelled on white supremacy, among other issues. It was the first year freshmen were required to take the year-long course, which the school board had added as a graduation requirement. While district officials reportedly considered pausing the course for a year, they will instead replace the district's controversial, homegrown curriculum with off-the-shelf content this fall. That didn't calm critics, either. While the district hasn't officially selected which coursework to use, one possibility is 'Voices,' created by a national social studies textbook publisher, which a group of parents and community leaders immediately panned. It 'promotes 'dismantling of privilege,' and encourages students to see themselves as part of a political movement,' the oppositional group said in a statement Thursday. 'Students are instructed to create protest art, reflect on how they are 'complicit in injustice,' and explore 'how to resist systems of power.'' The group called on the district to suspend the graduation requirement and make the course an elective while initiating an open process to adopt an ethnic studies curriculum. 'This so-called curriculum indoctrinates our students to believe in the premise that capitalism is inherently exploitative of certain minority groups,' said district parent Jason LaMacchia in the statement. 'This is a political point of view, not critical thinking, and it has no place being taught as fact in a public school setting.' While opposition to ethnic studies has been loud, it's unclear how widespread it is. Last year, the district saw just three complaints related to curriculum through the uniform complaint process, although officials did not identify the courses and it was not immediately known if the investigation into each was complete. Parents and students can also raise concerns about instruction at the school level with administrators or teachers, and there are procedures to address them, Klaster said. San Francisco school board member Matt Alexander said that the issues raised about ethnic studies really apply to all subjects, but have been targeted at one specific course. 'The teacher's job is not to have an opinion,' he said. If you start out with the answer, you've undermined the students ability to think for themselves. I think studying protest movements is important, but telling somebody what to think is not good at all.' Alexander noted that ethnic studies has a 'ton of support' and research showing that, academically, ethnic studies was a boon for city students. More than 11,000 San Francisco high school students took the elective course between 2008 and 2023, most commonly freshmen, with 36% of ninth graders enrolled in the 2022-2023 school year, according to a study by the UC Irvine School of Education. Intriguingly, students who took the course had GPA nearly 0.2 grade points higher in all subjects compared to those who didn't — considered a 'large effect' in education policy research, authors said. The higher grades were seen across all demographics and likely pushed between 400 and 700 students into eligibility for the University of California, which requires a 3.0 GPA, according to the study. One city parent said the course was arguably the best class his freshman son took at Lowell High School last year, with 'critical thinking skills, creativity of teaching methods, and material covered.' 'As we experienced it at Lowell this year, Ethnic Studies is basically a very solid history class with a critical perspective,' Jack Brown said in an email to the Chronicle. 'I should note that I was personally very skeptical at the beginning of the year, worried that my son's class would be superficial identity politics, sloganeering, but that was not at all the reality.'
