Huge news! 20% of HECS debt for former uni students in NSW will officially be wiped
Is all HECS debt being wiped in NSW?
Not quite, but the legislation will see a huge 20 per cent of HECS debt wiped across Australia. According to the Australian Federal Government, 3 million Australians will benefit from the initiative, with an estimated $16 billion in debt being wiped across the country.
When can I expect my student debt reduction?
Though the measure has been officially passed, it's expected to take a few weeks to come into effect. That being said, the debt-wiping move will be applied before the 1 June indexation, applying retrospectively to debts that have existed up until now.
What do I need to do to reduce my HECS debt?
You don't need to do anything – over the next few weeks, the Australian Tax Office will apply the debt reduction to your HECS debt as it was on 1 June 2025, before the latest round of indexation was applied. From then on, you'll start saving.
How will HECS payments change?
The changes to the HECS system will include moving the threshold at which you start paying back your HECS. Students will be required to start paying back their loans only once they're earning $67,000 (a figure that previously sat at $54,435). These changes are expected to save Aussie former students an average of $680 every year – that's a very solid budget for a weekender.
It might be worth noting that the adjustments do not apply to people earning $180,000 or more.
Are more reforms coming for higher education in NSW and Australia?
Education Minister Jason Clare has hinted at further reforms that could be put into place across Australia, including adjusting university course fees to be more reflective of industry salary averages, and filling skills shortages by reducing fees for courses such as teaching, nursing, and psychology. Stay in the loop: sign up for our free
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump fires labor statistics chief hours after data showed jobs growth slowed
Donald Trump fired of the federal government official in charge of labor statistics, hours after data revealed jobs growth stalled this summer, prompting accusations that he is 'firing the messenger'. The US president claimed that Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of labor statistics, had 'faked' employment figures in the run-up to last year's election, in an effort to boost Kamala Harris's chances of victory. Trump later claimed: 'Today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad'. He produced no evidence for these allegations, and insisted that the US economy was, in fact, 'BOOMING' on his watch. But Friday's employment figures told a very different story, and raised questions about the state of the labor market since Trump's return to office. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' McEntarfer was contacted for comment. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) confirmed in a brief statement that she had been dismissed. William Wiatrowski, the agency's deputy commissioner, will serve as acting commissioner. Trump's abrupt announcement came as administration officials scrambled to explain a lackluster employment report. Not only did jobs growth fail to meet expectations in July, but previous estimates for May and June were revised significantly lower. The president was promptly accused of trying to hide accurate statistics. 'Trump is firing the messenger because he doesn't seem to like jobs numbers that reflect how badly he's damaged the economy,' said Lily Roberts, managing director for inclusive growth at the Center for American Progress, a thinktank, said. 'Politicizing our country's collection of data on what's going on in the economy … will make it harder to create an economy that makes sure everyone has a good job,' added Roberts. 'Borrowing from the authoritarian playbook fuels more uncertainty that will cost Americans for years to come.' Paul Schroeder, executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, described the president's allegation as 'very damaging and outrageous', adding: 'Not only does it undermine the integrity of federal economic statistics but it also politicizes data which need to remain independent and trustworthy. This action is a grave error by the administration and one that will have ramifications for years to come.' McEntarfer is a widely respected economist and veteran employee of the federal government. She previously worked at the US Census Bureau under George W Bush and at the US census bureau under Barack Obama, Trump and Joe Biden. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion In January 2024, before McEntarfer's confirmation for her current post by the US Senate, her nomination was backed by four former BLS commissioners. In a letter also signed by organizations including the American Statistics Association and a string of senior economists, they said there were 'many reasons' to confirm McEntarfer as commissioner of labor statistics, citing her 'wealth of research and statistical experience'. She was ultimately confirmed by a vote in the Senate, with 86 votes cast in favor and eight against. Gene Sperling, chair of the national economic council under Bill Clinton and Obama, and who worked as an official under Biden, said he expected Trump to 'destroy the credibility' of economic data when his administration suffered its first bad jobs report. 'Now: first bad job report, and he just fired BLS head over absurd claims of bias,' Sperling wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer was 'outrageous but not surprising', said Julie Su, former acting US labor secretary under Biden. 'He hates facts, so he blames truth-tellers.' The US 'needs and deserves trustworthy economic data', added Su. 'This is a pathetic attempt by the president to gaslight everyone about the consequences of his disastrous economic policies.'
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
US payrolls revisions jolt markets, making Fed look behind the curve
NEW YORK, Aug 1 (Reuters) - News of a surprise weakening in the U.S. labor market last month jolted investors on Friday, as hefty revisions to past months raised fears the Federal Reserve may have been flying blind in recent months and may need to play catch-up with interest rate cuts. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 73,000 jobs in July after rising by a downwardly revised 14,000 in June, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said in its employment report on Friday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls increasing by 110,000 jobs after rising by a previously reported 147,000 in June. The report comes two days after the U.S. central bank left unchanged its benchmark interest rate and avoided signaling imminent rate cuts, dialing back market expectations for an easing at the next policy meeting in September. That changed dramatically on Friday, with odds for a 25 basis point cut in September jumping to around 81% after the data from 38% on Thursday, according to CME Group data. "The Fed's job is becoming increasingly difficult based on the deterioration of the economic data," said Matthew Miskin, co-chief investment strategist at Manulife John Hancock Investments. "These revisions are massive and really are a game changer to the Fed's reaction function, and so I think this Fed meeting is one that they'd like to revise." Revisions for May and June came in well above the norm, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said. It gave no reason for the revised data but noted that "monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors." May's nonfarm payroll gain was slashed by 125,000, from 144,000 to just 19,000, while June's downward revision was by 133,000. In total, employment over the two months is now 258,000 lower than initially reported. "It is painfully obvious that the U.S. government has an improper model for payroll calculations," said Michael Green, portfolio manager at Simplify Asset Management. "If you don't have reliable data, you make bad policy." Spencer Hakimian, founder of macro hedge fund Tolou Capital Management, said layoffs across several government departments, part of U.S. President Donald Trump's plans to reduce wasteful government spending, have prompted him to rely more heavily on alternative measures of economic strength than just government data, such as credit card data, and data from Truflation, an independent inflation index alternative to official government inflation measures. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in a press conference on Wednesday the labor market remained strong, and that the central bank was still in the early stages of grasping how Trump's overhaul of import taxes and other policy shifts would play out for inflation, employment, and economic growth. "Had those figures been the initial prints a month or two ago it would have significantly changed the labor market narrative over the entire summer," said Adam Hetts, global head of multi-asset and portfolio manager at Janus Henderson Investors, in a note. Treasury yields, which move inversely to bond prices, dropped after the data, with benchmark 10-year yields down by a whopping 15 basis points in mid-morning trade at 4.251% from about 4.4% before the data was published - their biggest daily drop since April. Two-year yields were down by about 20 basis points to 3.753% from 3.951% earlier on Friday, registering their biggest daily decline since August last year. Stocks declined too, also weighed on by Trump's latest tariffs salvo. The benchmark S&P 500 index .(.SPX), opens new tab was down 1.5% in late morning trade, bringing stocks to their lowest since early July. The deterioration in the labor picture comes amid steep U.S. tariffs on large trade partners that - while not as high as feared earlier this year - are still largely expected to worsen inflation and slow economic activity. "With job creation at stall-speed levels and the tariff headwind lying ahead, there's a strong possibility of a negative payroll print in the coming months which may conjure up fears of a recession," said Jeff Schulze, head of economic and market strategy at ClearBridge Investments.
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
US labor market cracks widen as job growth hits stall speed
WASHINGTON, Aug 1 (Reuters) - U.S. employment growth was weaker than expected in July while the nonfarm payrolls count for the prior two months was revised down by a massive 258,000 jobs, suggesting a sharp deterioration in labor market conditions that puts a September interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve back on the table. The Labor Department's closely watched employment report on Friday also showed the unemployment rate rose to 4.2% last month as household employment declined. Labor market resilience has shored up the economy amid headwinds from President Donald Trump's aggressive trade and immigration policies. Import duties are starting to boost inflation, raising the risk that the economy could experience a period of tepid growth and high prices, known as stagflation, which would put the U.S. central bank in a difficult position. Domestic demand increased at its slowest pace in 2-1/2 years in the second quarter. "The president's unorthodox economic agenda and policies may be starting to make a dent in the labor market," said Christopher Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBONDS. "The door to a Fed rate cut in September just got opened a crack wider. The labor market is not rolling over, but it is badly wounded and may yet bring about a reversal in the U.S. economy's fortunes." Nonfarm payrolls increased by 73,000 jobs last month after rising by a downwardly revised 14,000 in June, the fewest in nearly five years, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls would increase by 110,000 jobs after rising by a previously reported 147,000 in June. Estimates ranged from no jobs added to an increase of 176,000 positions. Payrolls for May were slashed by 125,000 to only a gain of 19,000 jobs. The BLS described the revisions to May and June payrolls data as "larger than normal." It gave no reason for the revised data but noted that "monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors." Economists have raised concerns about data quality in the wake of the Trump administration's mass firings of federal workers. Employment gains averaged 35,000 jobs per month over the last three months compared to 123,000 a year ago. Uncertainty over where tariff levels will eventually settle has made it harder for businesses to plan long-term, economists said. Though more clarity has emerged as the White House announced trade deals, economists said the effective tariff rate was still the highest since the 1930s. Trump on Thursday slapped dozens of trading partners with steep tariffs, including a 35% duty on many goods from Canada. Trump, who has demanded the U.S. central bank lower borrowing costs, stepped up his insults aimed at Fed Chair Jerome Powell, posting on the Truth Social media platform, "Too Little, Too Late. Jerome "Too Late" Powell is a disaster." The Fed on Wednesday left its benchmark interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range. Powell's comments after the decision undercut confidence the central bank would resume its policy easing in September as had been widely anticipated by financial markets and some economists. Powell is focused on the unemployment rate. Financial markets now expect the Fed to resume its monetary policy easing next month after pushing back rate-cut expectations to October in the wake of Wednesday's policy decision. The case for a September rate cut could be reinforced by the BLS' preliminary payrolls benchmark revision next month, which is expected to project a steep drop in the employment level from April 2024 through March of this year. The Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages data, derived from reports by employers to the state unemployment insurance programs, has indicated a much slower pace of job growth between April 2024 and December 2024 than payrolls have suggested. Stocks on Wall Street were trading lower on the data and latest round of tariffs. The dollar fell against a basket of currencies. U.S. Treasury yields dropped. Job gains in July continued to be concentrated in the healthcare and social assistance sector, which added a combined 73,300 jobs. Retail employment increased by 15,700 jobs and financial activities payrolls rose by 15,000. There were small job gains in the construction and leisure and hospitality industries, which economists attributed to ongoing immigration raids. Several industries, including manufacturing, professional services and wholesale trade shed jobs. The share of industries reporting job growth, however, rose to 51.2% from 47.2% in June. Federal government employment dropped by another 12,000 positions and is down 84,000 since peaking in January. More job losses are likely after the Supreme Court gave the White House the green light for mass firings as Trump seeks to slash spending and headcount. But the administration has also said several agencies were not planning to proceed with layoffs. The unemployment rate increased to 4.248% before rounding last month. It declined to 4.1% in June also as people dropped out of the labor force, and remains in the narrow 4.0%-4.2% range that has prevailed since May 2024. The government's immigration crackdown has reduced labor supply, as has an acceleration of baby boomer retirements. Economists estimated the economy now needs to create less than 100,000 jobs per month to keep up with growth in the working-age population. About 38,000 people left the labor force, which was offset by a drop of 260,000 in household employment. The labor force participation rate fell to 62.2% from 62.3% in June, now down for three straight months and capping the rise in the jobless rate. "Without the participation rate decline, the unemployment rate would have added another tenth to a solid 4.3%," said Michael Gapen, chief U.S. economist at Morgan Stanley. "Immigration restrictions have and will continue to have a chilling effect on participation and will continue to add to downward pressure on the unemployment rate." The number of foreign-born workers fell by 341,000. Economists said this decline along with the drop in the labor force kept annual wage growth at a lofty 3.9%. There were more part-time workers and a jump in the number of people experiencing long bouts of unemployment. The median duration of unemployment increased to 10.2 weeks from 10.1 weeks in June. "One gets the sense that due to trade and immigration policy the domestic economy and labor market are paying a price," said Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM US. "Stagflation is the best description of the domestic economy as we enter the second half of the year."
