
15 Pitch-Perfect Strategies To Win Influencers And Build Partnerships
There's always strength in numbers, especially when it comes to elevating your brand's status in today's marketplace. In a digital economy, driven by social media comments and content marketing, connecting with influencers and high-ranking organizations to collaborate on potential projects is one of the fastest, easiest ways to increase brand awareness and growth. But how do you accomplish that goal if you are an unknown establishment, new to the industry?
With the right methods in place, demonstrating your company's value proposition and credibility doesn't have to be as tough as it sounds. Here are 15 ideas from Forbes Business Development Council members to help you get started with a pitch letter worthy of proposing a collab with any influencer or potential partner who knows little to nothing about your emerging brand.
Analyze your joint total addressable market size and highlight your market cap or valuation factors if applicable. Understand how your organization can fill a gap that exists in the partner's ecosystem, and focus on complementary areas that would add value to your joint customers. Voilà, you have a great start to your pitch letter! - Anoma Baste, Space Matrix
Start with the value prop—why this collab moves the needle for them. Then tie it to a clear use case, shared audience or mutual win. Keep it tight, relevant and confident. The first pitch isn't to close the deal, it's to earn the next conversation. - Aaron Biggs, Summit
As a leader, you must have a strong elevator pitch that's also easy to personalize for the audience at hand, whether that's tailoring it for their company or industry, their job title or their knowledge of your business. A great pitch must also include the "what's in it for me" message, clearly stating why they should care about the value your products or services deliver. - Toby Carrington, Seismic
Keep it short and visually appealing. Use one bold stat or achievement about your brand (for example, early traction or a unique feature) paired with a sleek design to grab attention and build credibility fast. - Vivek Vishal, Honeywell
Forbes Business Development Council is an invitation-only community for sales and biz dev executives. Do I qualify?
Lead with value. Show you've done the homework. Make it clear why this collab makes sense right now. Focus less on your intro and more on what's in it for them—their goals, their audience, their brand. Keep it tight, relevant and easy to say yes to. - Michael Fritsch, Smarter Operations
Start by learning about them. Look into their audience, how they communicate and what they seem to care about. Then, shape your message so it speaks directly to that. Point out where your brand fits with what they're already doing and show exactly how working with you could be useful for them, not just for you. - Max Avery, Digital Ascension Group
When crafting your pitch letter, show you understand the partner's brand and why the collaboration makes sense. Highlight how it can support their strategy and add value to their journey. Focus on strategic alignment and share execution ideas that fit their priorities. This goes beyond just commercial negotiations, demonstrating you've thought through the partnership's long-term potential. - Jayant Walia, Gainbridge
The most effective collaborations start with shared values. If your brand is still relatively unknown, your pitch to a potential partner should explain why you and why now. Then, shift the focus to them, articulating how this partnership would benefit their goals, audience or mission. Make it about co-creating something valuable together. - Raviraj Hegde, Donorbox
Business partners care about outcomes, so pitch the outcome. Lead with what this collaboration makes possible: revenue, reach, speed, relevance. Then prove you're the only one who can deliver it that way, right now. The best partners don't need convincing—they just need a reason to act. - Alexander Masters, MBA, BIDA, Siemens
I always keep it conversational and personal. I avoid sounding like a PR blast because that just feels cold and generic. Instead, I write like I'm talking to a peer—someone I respect, someone I'm genuinely curious about working with. I stay confident, but never salesy or robotic. - Bryce Welker, The CPA Exam Guy
Lead with a brief, authentic story that shares your brand's mission and connects to the influencer's values. Show you've done your homework, then highlight how the collaboration benefits them, their audience and your shared goals. Clarity and sincerity are key to turning a cold pitch into a meaningful opportunity. - Rahul Saluja, Cognizant
To craft a good pitch, deeply understand the influencer or partner's audience. Research their interests, challenges and expectations. Then, tailor your messaging, tone and unique selling points to highlight how your collaboration benefits them and their audience. Make the value clear—whether it's exclusive content, revenue potential or credibility enhancement—to ensure they see the opportunity. - Anna Jankowska, RTB House
Keep your letter short and clear. Avoid unnecessary words—it should be strict and to the point. All details can be discussed later; the goal of the first email is simply to get it opened and read. Use a catchy subject line, a clear structure, key figures and potential benefits. That's all you need. - Dima Raketa, Reputation House
Craft a concise pitch letter introducing your brand's mission and value. Highlight one key achievement, like a recent milestone, and propose a specific collab idea tailored to their audience. Include a link to a sleek one-pager with metrics and close with a clear CTA, like scheduling a 15-minute call. - Tomer Warschauer Nuni, PRIM3 Capital
Research their career, interests, target audience and pain points. Reference specifics like recent posts. Mention specific content they've created or a recent achievement. Say something like, "I saw your recent post about [specific topic], and it really resonated with me because ..." Showcase how you can help them with case studies, proving tangible results. - William DeCourcy, AmeriLife
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
10 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Stocks Hit Highest Since February on Jobs Surprise
Bloomberg Television brings you the latest news and analysis leading up to the final minutes and seconds before and after the closing bell on Wall Street. Today's guests are Bloomberg Television brings you the latest news and analysis leading up to the final minutes and seconds before and after the closing bell on Wall Street. Today's guests are Katie Nixon, Northern Trust, Betsey Stevenson, University of Michigan, Dan Dolev, Mizuho, Rashad Bilal & Troy Millings, Earn Your Leisure, Matthew Griffin, Bloomberg News, Barry Bannister, Stifel, Jess Menton, Bloomberg News, Ed Ludlow, Bloomberg News, Stacy Rasgon, Bernstein Research, Frances Katzen, Douglas Elliman, Brett Winton, Ark Invest, Tony Zaccario, Stretch Zone, Nicole Camarre, 43North. (Source: Bloomberg)


Washington Post
13 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century.


New York Times
19 minutes ago
- New York Times
Historic House v. NCAA settlement gets final approval, allowing schools to pay college athletes
By Ralph D. Russo, Stewart Mandel and Justin Williams A federal judge Friday granted final approval of the House v. NCAA settlement, a watershed agreement in college sports that permits schools to directly pay college athletes for the first time. The settlement, which resolves a trio of antitrust cases against the NCAA and its most powerful conferences, establishes a new 10-year revenue sharing model in college sports, with athletic departments able to distribute roughly $20.5 million in name, image and likeness (NIL) revenue to athletes over the 2025-26 season. Previously, athletes could earn NIL compensation only with outside parties, including school-affiliated donor collectives that have become instrumental in teams' recruiting. Advertisement The NCAA and the power conferences (ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC), as defendants in the settlement, also agree to pay nearly $2.8 billion in damages to Division I athletes who were not allowed to sign NIL deals, dating back to 2016. The damages will be paid out over 10 years, with most of the money expected to go to former power-conference football and men's basketball players. Universities can begin directly sharing revenue with college athletes starting July 1. Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, who previously ruled against the NCAA in the O'Bannon and Alston cases, granted approval roughly a year after parties agreed to settlement terms and nearly two months after a final approval hearing on April 7, where Wilken heard testimony from more than a dozen objectors. Lawyers for both the plaintiffs and defendants noted that the number of objections and opt-outs in the settlement represent a tiny fraction of the nearly 400,000 athletes in the certified class. However, some of those objectors delayed approval, largely citing the settlement's new roster limits. These limits, which replace sport-by-sport scholarship limits, cap the maximum roster size per team while allowing for every roster spot to receive a scholarship. Schools can offer scholarship funds — partial or full — as they see fit, which creates more potential opportunities. But as schools preemptively prepared to comply with those new limits, they removed roster spots for thousands of walk-ons, particularly in football, and partial scholarship athletes in non-revenue sports. In late April, Wilken offered an ultimatum, instructing the settlement parties to revise the terms in a way that mitigated any lost roster spots as a result of schools preparing for the new roster limits, or she would deny the whole agreement. Settlement lawyers responded with an amendment that allows for voluntary 'grandfathering' of any athletes who lost roster spots as a result of the roster limits, a status that will follow those athletes through the remainder of their eligibility, whether they return to their original school or transfer elsewhere. Advertisement The initial House v. NCAA case — brought by plaintiffs Grant House, a former Arizona State swimmer, and Sedona Prince, then an Oregon women's basketball player — was filed in June 2020. It challenged NCAA policy at the time that prohibited athletes from being compensated for the commercial use of their NIL rights or from sharing in the revenue generated from NCAA and conference television contracts. The case was later consolidated with two similar suits, Carter v. NCAA and Hubbard v. NCAA. The cases had not gone to trial. The NCAA and Power 5 conferences, fearful a verdict might result in much higher damages, agreed to a settlement in May 2024. Wilken granted preliminary approval in October 2024. The NCAA's traditional amateurism model, in which athletes could not receive any compensation beyond a scholarship, began to crumble in 2014 when Wilken ruled against the NCAA in a suit brought by former UCLA star Ed O'Bannon, who objected to his image being used in an EA Sports video game without his permission. Wilken ruled for the plaintiffs, but after an appeals court struck part of her decision, the only tangible effect was that schools began offering cost-of-attendance stipends. The next major case, Alston v. NCAA, made it to the Supreme Court, where the justices ruled 9-0 against the NCAA. Often mischaracterized as a case about NIL, Alston's main impact was that it allowed schools to provide athletes $5,980 a year in academic expenses. However, the lopsided decision left the NCAA vulnerable to additional legal challenges regarding rules that limited compensation, and it was delivered on June 21, 2021, nine days before numerous state laws allowing NIL payments were set to go into effect. The NCAA quickly scrapped most of its intended restrictions on NIL. In the years since, many athletes have entered into deals with local companies and struck lucrative endorsement deals with national brands like Gatorade and New Balance, as intended. But a far more common practice involves boosters using purported NIL deals to lure recruits or players from the transfer portal to their favorite school. The NCAA's enforcement division initially sought to punish schools that used NIL as a form of 'pay for play' or recruiting inducement, but when the University of Tennessee came under fire in early 2024, the state's attorney general sued, and a judge issued an injunction prohibiting the NCAA from enforcing those rules. Advertisement The amount of money being spent in the NIL arena has skyrocketed since 2021. Last year, Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork said the Buckeyes football team — which later won the national championship — was earning $20 million in NIL. CBS Sports recently reported that a number of men's basketball rosters have already topped $10 million for next season. To this point, collectives supporting specific schools have ruled the market, but administrators are hoping the House settlement will curtail that influence. In addition to schools being allowed to make NIL deals themselves, the new model also requires all outside NIL deals of more than $600 to go through a clearinghouse that will determine whether the payments are for a valid business purpose and reflect fair market value. Meanwhile, the settlement establishes an enforcement arm that will penalize schools that go over the $20.5 million cap. All of this will be overseen by the newly established regulatory body, called the College Sports Commission, which is in the process of shifting considerable oversight and control of college sports away from the NCAA and to the power conferences. The NCAA's Division I Board of Directors recently approved a series of proposals, pending settlement approval, that will strike 153 rules from the association's handbook and clear the way for the settlement terms to be implemented. The settlement represents a significant shift in college sports, but it will not mark the end of the NCAA's legal challenges. Among numerous ongoing cases, Johnson v. NCAA was filed in 2019 in Pennsylvania and seeks to have athletes classified as employees who are entitled to minimum wage compensation. The NCAA's efforts to dismiss the case have thus far been denied. Revenue sharing and third-party NIL constraints could also invite additional lawsuits on the basis of Title IX, antitrust violations and conflicts with state laws. NCAA and power conference stakeholders continue to pursue antitrust exemptions in the form of Congressional intervention, in hopes of codifying the settlement and its effectiveness moving forward. President Donald Trump has explored a new commission focused on the issues facing college sports, led by former Alabama head coach Nick Saban and billionaire Texas Tech board chair Cody Campbell, though it is paused as members of Congress pursue legislation.