Anurag Kashyap blasts AI-film Chiranjeevi Hanuman producer: Future for spineless
Kashyap's critique extended to questioning the film's authenticity. He was pointed in his disapproval of the industry's direction, saying, "This right here is the future for the spineless and cowardly so called artists in the Hindi Film industry. Well done Vijay Subramaniam." Such strong language underscores the filmmaker's frustration with what he perceives as a diminishing respect for human creativity.He concluded his note saying, "This right here is the future for the spineless and cowardly so called artists in the Hindi Film industry. Well done Vijay Subramaniam. Shame is not enough on you. You should be in the gutter (sic)."
In addition to Kashyap, filmmaker Vikramaditya Motwane also expressed concerns, sharing on social media, "And so it begins Who TF needs writers and directors when its 'Made in AI'."
Producer Vijay Subramaniam defended the project, while launching the film, stated, "With this film, we have the extraordinary opportunity to reimagine cultural storytelling for an audience that cherishes both tradition and innovation. Our approach is rooted in authenticity and cultural stewardship."The announcement of 'Chiranjeevi Hanuman' as a 'Made-in-AI' and 'Made in India' project has sparked significant discussion on social media. The film is based on the lore of Lord Hanuman, aiming to blend cultural storytelling with modern technology. While the project's backers argue in favour of innovation, critics express concern over the potential sidelining of creative voices in the industry.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Anurag Kashyap slams producer Vijay Subramaniam over AI generated film 'Chiranjeevi Hanuman'
Filmmaker Anurag Kashyap has called out producer Vijay Subramaniam for his AI-generated movie Chiranjeevi Hanuman- The Eternal, saying it represents a dangerous future for Hindi cinema. The 52-year-old shared the film's poster on Instagram with a note to Subramaniam, who is the founder and group CEO of talent management agency Collective Artists Network. Subramaniam has produced the project in collaboration with Vikram Malhotra of Abundantia Entertainment. "Any actor or anyone who calls themselves artists and has a spine will be and should be either questioning him or leaving the agency since he has proved that he thinks you're no match for his AI performance. "This right here is the future for the spineless and cowardly so called artists in the Hindi Film industry. Well done Vijay Subramaniam. Shame is not enough on you. You should be in the gutter," Kashyap posted. The director further said that companies are always looking out for themselves rather than the talent. "So much for looking after and representing the interests of creators. End of the day, all these agencies are only interested in making money off you and since they choose turkeys after turkeys for you and you're not making enough for them, they are going all AI," Kashyap added. In a follow-up comment on his post, Kashyap said he has no issues with artificial intelligence as nobody "can stop AI from taking over every field and the world". "My genuine grouse is with my friend Vijay Subramaniam, because he is the CEO of KWAN Collective. He represents the artists, the voice of artists and he is producing an AI FILM, when the industry needs corrections, especially from the agencies, who are very responsible for costs going up, actors career paths and writers, musician , filmmakers." ALSO READ: Anurag Kashyap calls out Tamil composers for anglicising film music Earlier, Kashyap's close friend, filmmaker Vikramaditya Motwane, had reacted over the film announcement in a post on his Instagram Stories. "And so it begins... Who TF needs writers and directors when it's 'Made in AI'? (sic)" the Black Warrant director wrote. Subramaniam had earlier told PTI in an interview that his aims to create films that merge modern technology with ancient stories that will cater to a younger audience with shorter attention spans.
India.com
6 hours ago
- India.com
Anurag Kashyap blasts Chiranjeevi Hanuman producer over AI film, 'You should be in gutter'
In a bold critique that has stirred the Indian film industry, acclaimed filmmaker Anurag Kashyap has openly condemned the upcoming AI-generated film Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal. Scheduled for release on Hanuman Jayanti 2026, this project is being promoted as entirely 'Made-in-AI' and 'Made in India.' Kashyap's sharp rebuke is directed at producer Vijay Subramaniam, who also leads the Collective Artists Network, an agency representing creative professionals. What did Anurag Kashyap say? Kashyap expressed his disapproval on social media, highlighting the contradiction of Subramaniam producing an AI-driven film while heading an artists' agency. He accused Subramaniam of prioritizing profit over the interests of human creators, stating, 'Any actor or anyone who calls themselves artists and has a spine will be and should be either questioning him or leaving the agency.' Kashyap further criticized the move as emblematic of a trend where agencies are more interested in monetizing AI than supporting genuine artistic talent. He concluded while saying, 'Well done Vijay Subramaniam. Shame is not enough, you should be in the gutter for this'. Vikramaditya Motwane on the use of AI The controversy has sparked broader debate within the industry about role of AI in filmmaking. Director and close aide of Anurag, Vikramaditya Motwane, also voiced concern, sharing film's announcement with the caption, 'And so it begins… Who TF needs writers and directors when it's 'Made in AI'?' This sentiment reflects growing unease about AI potentially displacing human creativity in cinema. Dhanush on the AI-generated ending of Raanjhanaa This incident is part of a larger conversation about AI's impact on the film industry. Previously, the re-release of Raanjhanaa as Ambikapathy in Tamil with an AI-generated alternate ending without the original director's consent raised ethical questions about artistic integrity. Filmmakers like Zoya Akhtar and Om Raut have expressed concerns about altering creative works without the creators' approval, emphasizing the importance of preserving the original vision. Story Highlights Anurag Kashyap criticizes the AI-generated film Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal, calling out producer Vijay Subramaniam for undermining human creators. The controversy has ignited a debate about AI's role in filmmaking and its potential to displace human creativity. Other industry figures, including Vikramaditya Motwane, have expressed concern over the increasing reliance on AI in creative processes. The controversy ties into broader concerns about AI in cinema, as seen with Dhanush's Ambikapathy's AI-altered re-release.
NDTV
10 hours ago
- NDTV
Vidya Balan Gave " Gaalis Before Her Final Audition" For Parineeta. Vidhu Vinod Chopra Reveals Why
New Delhi: It's been 20 years of Vidya Balan, as it has been for Parineeta. Her debut film was released in theatres on June 10, 2005. On this milestone occasion, the film is re-releasing in theatres again on August 29, 2025. At the special screening of the film, producer Vidhu Vinod Chopra revealed how the actress was frustrated with the endless rounds of auditions and even muttered some " gaalis". What's Happening Vidhu Vinod Chopra arranged a special screening of Parineeta earlier this week, where the majority of the cast was in attendance. The film is set to re-release in a restored 8K version on August 29, 2025. This year marks the 20th anniversary of the film. At the screening, Vidhu Vinod Chopra revealed that Vidya Balan was frustrated towards the end of the many auditions she had given for her role. So much so that she even gave some " gaalis". Vidhu Vinod Chopra said, "A lot of top heroines wanted to do Parineeta. But Pradeep Sarkar said there's a new girl from Chembur. So I said, 'Test this girl from Chembur.' I don't usually meet actors during screen tests. Vidya had gone through a lot of tests. Then I told Pradeep, 'Let's do one final test.' She was so exhausted by the process that she actually muttered gaalis before her final audition. I could see her saying, 'Who does he think he is?' By then, she had done 20-25 tests. But then she gave such a brilliant final test, it was unbelievable. I told Pradeep, call her immediately." Recalling the surreal moment when Vidya Balan received the confirmation call for her role in Parineeta, the actress said, "So Dada (Pradeep Sarkar) called, and I told him, ' Dada, I'm in the middle of the concert, I'll call you back.' But he said, 'No, Mr Chopra wants to speak to you.' So I said, 'Yeah, I'll call you after the concert.' So then Mr Chopra said, ' Teri zindagi badalne waali hai, bahar nikal (Your life is about to change, come outside).' I was like, 'What are you going to tell me, that I didn't get the part again?' I didn't think otherwise for a second, because I had gone through so many tests. But he said, 'Come out.' So I came out and he told me on the phone, 'You're my Parineeta.' And I started crying right there. It was a crazy moment." Rekha, Dia Mirza, Vidya Balan, Vidhu Vinod Chopra, Shreya Ghoshal and Rajkumar Hirani were among the few from the cast and crew of Parineeta who were present to celebrate the occasion. About Parineeta Vidya Balan plays the role of Lolita, who lives with her financially unstable Uncle. Since childhood, she has had feelings for her next-door neighbour, Shekhar, played by Saif Ali Khan. Shekhar's father, Navinchandra (Sabyasachi Chakraborty), is a wealthy but heartless businessman. Lolita soon discovers that Navinchnadra wants to seize her uncle's home and convert it into a hotel. She decides to seek help from the wealthy businessman Girish Sharma (Sanjay Dutt). However, misunderstandings arise when Shekhar suspects romance brewing between Lolita and Girish. In A Nutshell Vidhu Vinod Chopra recently revealed how Vidya Balan was tired of an endless loop of auditions for Parineeta, and it left her frustrated. The producer also added that at the end, she was perfect, and he had asked the director, the late Pradeep Sarkar, to call her immediately.
