logo
Kganyago calls for emerging markets, developing countries to address insurance protection gap

Kganyago calls for emerging markets, developing countries to address insurance protection gap

Eyewitness News6 days ago
JOHANNESBURG - South African Reserve Bank (SARB) governor Lesetja Kganyago has called for emerging market and developing economies to urgently address the widening insurance protection gap in the face of growing natural disasters.
The calls from Kganyago and other central bank governors come amid an alarming increase in natural catastrophes, including hurricanes, typhoons, wildfires, and floods across the world.
ALSO READ: SARB's Kganyago says global debt crisis had shifted into a new paradigm
South Africa is among countries recently devastated by deadly floods, with more than 400 lives lost in KwaZulu-Natal in 2022 and 100 lives claimed in June's floods in the Eastern Cape.
Climate action, financing, and insurance gaps are on the agenda at the G20 finance track meetings currently underway in KZN on Friday.
Kganyago addressed some delegates on the matter on the sidelines.
'For central banks, policymakers, and supervisors, bridging this protection gap is part of building macro financial resilience.'
President of the World Bank Group Ajay Banga said the cost of uninsured losses in natural disasters ends up on the public balance sheet as debt.
'Insurance can help but for insurance to work, high quality development is a necessary precondition. It simply cannot function in the face of poor infrastructure, unreliable data or chronic underinvestment. Without that foundation, insurance premiums would just be too expensive.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What to expect from the South African Reserve Bank's interest rate decision this week
What to expect from the South African Reserve Bank's interest rate decision this week

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

What to expect from the South African Reserve Bank's interest rate decision this week

As the SA Reserve Bank prepares for its interest rate decision on July 31, economists discuss the potential for a rate cut and its implications for consumers facing rising food prices and inflation. Image: IOL / AI The prospects of a rate cut ahead of the SA Reserve Bank's (SARB) Monetary Policy Committee's (MPC) next interest rate decision on July 31, appear positive, but it's not a clear-cut case, economists said on Monday. 'The market currently expects a cut in the key repo rate by 25 basis points — which would be the third reduction this year,' said Thys van Zyl, Chief Executive of Everest Wealth Advisory. 'A lower interest rate would bring welcome relief to consumers.' He warned that while headline inflation remains relatively low, food price inflation is now at its highest level in over a year, which poses risks to interest rate expectations as well as consumer spending. Dr Elna Moolman, Standard Bank's group head of macroeconomic research, also believes the current inflation rate supports the case for an imminent interest rate cut, and although she expected inflation to rise over the coming months, it should remain 'reasonably benign'. However, Van Zyl warned that the central bank may be reluctant to cut rates too aggressively if global food and oil prices continue to trend upwards. 'Earlier this year, it was anticipated that the Reserve Bank could cut interest rates one or two more times in 2025," Van Zyl said. "Following the January and May reductions totalling 50 basis points, it's increasingly likely that we'll see only one more cut this year – and perhaps not before year-end.' Uncertainty surrounding the proposed 30% tariffs on South African exports to the US is another factor weighing on the economy, he added, as these could impact export-driven industries such as manufacturing, mining and agriculture. 'This uncertainty, combined with rising inflation, puts policymakers in a difficult position – trying to support growth while also protecting the rand and price stability.' Consumer Price Inflation (CPI) rose to 3% in June, up from 2.8% in May. This was the first time in three months that inflation returned to within the Reserve Bank's 3% to 6% target range. However, CPI remains well below the 5.2% seen this time last year. Food prices remain higher than expected, particularly red meat, after a bout of the foot-and-mouth disease, yet consumer goods inflation remains subdued. Johann Els, chief economist at Old Mutual, said the weak overall pricing pressure in the economy justifies a further 0.25 percentage point interest rate cut this week. ALSO READ: Understanding the impact of rising inflation on SA's interest rates Potentially lower inflation targets later in the year or in 2026 could also jeopardise the interest rate situation for South Africans going forward. South African Reserve Bank (SARB) governor Lesetja Kganyago has strongly advocated for the country to lower its inflation target from 4.5% to 3%. Experts argue that a lower inflation target would improve price stability, reduce borrowing costs, and enhance investor confidence in the long term. However, many feel it would entail some short-term 'pain' for the sake of long-term gain. Yet tightening monetary policy could be a dangerous move in the current economic climate, warns Frederick Mitchell, chief economist at Aluma Capital. 'Conventional wisdom suggests that raising interest rates can curb inflation, yet in the current environment, where inflation remains subdued but economic growth is threatened, tightening monetary policy may exact an economic toll without addressing the underlying trade issues,' Mitchell said. IOL Business

Will South Africans be blessed with another interest rate cut this week?
Will South Africans be blessed with another interest rate cut this week?

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Will South Africans be blessed with another interest rate cut this week?

Inflation data currently supports an interest rate cut, but it's not a clear cut case. Image: AI The South African Reserve Bank's (SARB) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is set to make its next interest rate decision on Thursday, July 31, and while the prospects of a rate cut appear positive, it's not a clear cut case according to economists. 'The market currently expects a cut in the key repo rate by 25 basis points - which would be the third reduction this year,' said Thys van Zyl, Chief Executive of Everest Wealth Advisory. 'A lower interest rate would bring welcome relief to consumers.' However he warned that while headline inflation remains relatively low, food price inflation is now at its highest level in more than a year, which poses risks for interest rate expectations as well as consumer spending. Consumer Price Inflation (CPI) rose to 3% in June, up from 2.8% in May. This was the first time in three months that inflation returned to within the Reserve Bank's 3% to 6% target range. However, CPI remains well below the 5.2% seen this time last year. Food prices remain higher than expected, particularly red meat thanks to foot-and-mouth disease, yet consumer goods inflation remains subdued. Johann Els, chief economist at Old Mutual, said the weak overall pricing pressure in the economy justifies a further 0.25 percentage point interest rate cut this week. ALSO READ: Understanding the impact of rising inflation on SA's interest rates Dr Elna Moolman, Standard Bank's group head of macroeconomic research, also believes the current inflation rate supports the case for an imminent interest rate cut, and although she expects inflation to rise over the coming months, it should remain 'reasonably benign'. However, Van Zyl warned that the central bank may be reluctant to cut rates too aggressively if global food and oil prices continue to trend upwards. 'Earlier this year, it was anticipated that the Reserve Bank could cut interest rates one or two more times in 2025. Following the January and May reductions totalling 50 basis points, it's increasingly likely that we'll see only one more cut this year – and perhaps not before year-end,' Van Zyl said. Uncertainty surrounding the proposed 30% tariffs on South African exports to the US is another factor weighing on the economy, he added, as these could impact export-driven industries such as manufacturing, mining and agriculture. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ ''This uncertainty, combined with rising inflation, puts policymakers in a difficult position – trying to support growth while also protecting the rand and price stability'. Potentially lower inflation targets later in the year or in 2026 could also jeopardise the interest rate situation for South Africans going forward. South African Reserve Bank (SARB) governor Lesetja Kganyago has strongly advocated for the country to lower its inflation target from 4.5% to 3%. Experts argue that a lower inflation target would improve price stability, reduce borrowing costs and enhance investor confidence in the long term. However, many feel it would entail some short term 'pain' for the sake of long-term gain. Yet tightening monetary policy could be a dangerous move in the current economic climate, warns Frederick Mitchell, chief economist at Aluma Capital. 'Conventional wisdom suggests that raising interest rates can curb inflation, yet in the current environment, where inflation remains subdued but economic growth is threatened, tightening monetary policy may exact an economic toll without addressing the underlying trade issues,' Mitchell explained. IOL Business

BRICS and G20 poised to reshape geopolitical landscape
BRICS and G20 poised to reshape geopolitical landscape

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

BRICS and G20 poised to reshape geopolitical landscape

President Cyril Ramaphosa addressing the G20 High Level Opening Session on the margins of the 79th Session of the General Assembly in New York. South Africa assumed the G20 Presidency this year under the theme 'Solidarity, Equality and Sustainable Development'. Image: Kopano Tlape| GCIS Ashraf Patel In 2025, the scale, scope, and velocity of Trumpism are so disruptive that new forms of partnerships are evolving in ensuring the global governance consensus and saving UN Multilateralism. The Global South nations, especially G77, desperately need multilateralism to function and for fair WTO and WHO to work in order to broaden the benefits of trade, financial reforms and any hope for the UN SDGs. The BRICS Rio communique in July is significant. The 130-point plus final declaration, not only thoroughly detailing every major issue, with calculated moderation, but resolutely setting a trademark BRICS tone – and a clear set of humanistic values – focused in three strategic pillars: economy-finance; designing a new global security framework; and cultural and people-to-people exchanges, the over-arching umbrella of inclusiveness and mutual respect. The following week, the G20 Finance Ministers (minus the US ) meeting in Zimbali was unable to reach a consensus statement on key issues of global minimum tax and African debt relief. While both the BRICS and G7 core are members of these groupings, prioritising different themes and modalities is proving illusory. Saving Multilateralism Both G20 and BRICS blocs are converging out of necessity at this moment in time. The BRICS Rio July 2025 declaration is groundbreaking in its scope and depth and committee clarity in saving the UN system and reforming multilateral institutions for common development and humanity, adopting the Leaders framework, declaration on Climate Finance, AI Governance and Partnership on Elimination of Diseases. (BRICS Rio Declaration ) In an age where AI is leading to deepening inequalities and disruptions, the BRICS commitment to AI Governance shows a deep commitment to multilateralism. Aligned to the UN Pact for the Future, the BRICS declaration is rooted in UN principles that balance both Digital Industrialisation, AI inclusion and privacy safeguards. There is good alignment with both G7 and G20 and the new EU AI Act. Ruptures in peace, security and climate pathways Despite these new alignments between both Global North and South formations in saving multilateralism, it is in the area of Peace and Security where major real geopolitics come into play. The BRICS plus is anchored in the Non-Aligned movement, while the core G7 is still committed to preserving Western hegemony. Indeed, the announcement by NATO and EU core states in increasing defence budgets to 5% of GDP - and the drastic cuts in development aid is sobering and will negatively impact the UN Development agenda. Here, realpolitik rooted in geo-political fractures is laid bare in the grave conflicts of Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan, DRC, Libya and numerous war zones. Here, the UN SC have so far failed to find consensus. Groups such as the Hague Group, which are examples of responsible nations committed to international law, are converging to confront the Genocide in Gaza, and such formations can catalyse new UN reforms and preserve the UN Charter. Finance reform and the African Debt crisis Last week's G20 Finance ministers meeting and the lack of any concrete agreement on Africa's debt crisis or global minimum tax expose the lack of coherence in the G20 model. The G20 Common Framework is essential in committing nations to financial reforms. So far, ministers are engaged in merely the 'MDB Roadmaps', essentially talks about talks, a painful road that does not guarantee a global finance and tax deal. Sadly, given that the G20 in 2025 is billed as the African Union's year, its core development agenda relevant to Africa is still elusive, and unlikely to bear fruit. SA is now 'treading lightly 'as we hand over our G20 baton to the Trump administration later this year, which has stated it will ignore most of our G20 agenda. The EU's Climate Moment of Truth arrives. Another area that is unravelling is the pathways to climate change mitigation. The EU, which has been the standard bearer of climate and the 'Just Energy Transition JET agenda, faces its moment of Truth. The scale of scope of Europe's Big Oil scouring Africa is a throwback to the early 20th-century colonialisation of Africa. Today, it's Oil giants - BP, Total, Shell, ENI - are making a big play for oil and gas in African states like Angola, Mozambique and Nigeria. This is akin to the early 20th century great oil frontier. In South Africa, Shell Oil is embroiled in yet another controversial exploration in the Karoo and Northern Cape. Meanwhile, South Africa's leading coal export destination are EU nations including Germany and the UK that are supposedly at the forefront of the Just Energy Transition (JET). The EU and G7's signature JET project is riddled with contradiction and will make the UN COP 30 deal much more difficult, as the EU wants 'Green cake and Oil'. The EU's CBAM program further raises trade barriers for Africa, leading to further deindustrialisation and job losses, thus fuelling the migration crisis northwards. Its glaring contradictions are no longer tenable as the EU is no different from the Trump administration's stated policy- 'Drill Baby Drill'. The EU is drilling for oil in Africa and globally, but not in their backyards. As the Trump 2.0 trade wars and economic nationalism deepens, an unlikely alliance of G20, BRICS and G77 can play a central role in saving multilateralism, the UN and global governance- but each with a vastly different focus and modalities. Will a new consensus emerge and the centre hold or rupture? * Ashraf Patel is a Senior Research Associate at the Institute for Global Dialogue, UNISA. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store