River Island at risk of administration amid rescue efforts
The high street fashion chain also needs to secure further funding later this year in order to preserve its future, according to documents shared with creditors.
The London-based company has laid out a major rescue plan which will see it shut 33 stores and pay reduced rents on a further 71 shops.
Landlords are being asked to cut rents for three years and potentially stop payments completely on some sites in a bid to stem losses.
The plan, which will also see it write off parts of its heavy debt pile, will need court approval next month.
River Island will need the backing of 75% of the group's creditors, predominantly landlords, at a hearing on August 7.
The company said talks with creditors have been positive and it expects to gain approval for the restructuring plan.
However, company documents first reported by the Telegraph warned that the company will be 'unable to pay its debts' by the end of the month if the plan is rejected.
It indicated that the company will not be able to keep trading if it fails on these payments and would therefore 'be subject to administration or other insolvency proceedings'.
The documents also highlighted that the company faces a £10 million 'funding need' in September, which could balloon to £50 million by next year.
A River Island spokeswoman said: 'River Island circulated its proposals for a restructuring plan to creditors on June 20.
'In combination with the company's ongoing transformation strategy, the plan is a proactive measure to place the company on a firm footing.
'We have been having positive conversations with key stakeholders and are confident that we will achieve approval of the plan in the next few weeks.'
River Island employs around 5,500 people and was founded in 1948 under the Lewis and Chelsea Girl brand before being renamed in the 1980s.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rathi hits back at claims FCA redress plan is unworkable
FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi has pushed back against claims from the motor finance industry that the regulator's proposed redress scheme for discretionary commissions is too difficult to implement, saying lenders must stop 'haggling' and focus on delivering fair outcomes for consumers. Speaking to the Financial Times, Rathi directly addressed industry complaints that the Financial Conduct Authority's plans to compensate customers for car loans dating back as far as 2007 were 'completely impractical' due to patchy record-keeping. 'Now is not the time to haggle with us, but to help put things right for consumers,' he said. 'We know it is difficult. But you can't say the law has been broken and it is too difficult to even try to put things right.' His comments follow the FCA's announcement of a six-week consultation on an industry-wide compensation scheme, which could result in payouts totalling between £9 billion and £18 billion. The scheme is intended to address cases where customers were unfairly charged higher interest rates due to discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) — a practice banned by the FCA in 2021 but widely used prior to that. The proposal has prompted concern within the motor finance sector, particularly around how firms will access loan and commission records from as far back as 2007. Stephen Haddrill, director general of the Finance & Leasing Association (FLA), warned earlier in a statement: 'We have concerns about whether it is possible to have a fair redress scheme that goes back to 2007, when firms have not been required to hold such dated information, and the evidence base will be patchy at best.' Legal risk contained, operational risk rises The FCA's move comes on the heels of a Supreme Court judgment on three test cases — Johnson v FirstRand Bank, Wrench v FirstRand Bank, and Hopcraft v Close Brothers. The ruling narrowed the legal basis for many claims by confirming that car dealers did not owe fiduciary duties to customers. However, it upheld findings of unfair treatment in cases where commission payments significantly inflated interest charges and were poorly disclosed. The judgment gave the motor finance sector some legal relief, as it removed the risk of a broader wave of litigation. Shares in lenders such as Lloyds, Close Brothers, and Bank of Ireland rose following the ruling. But the court's backing for the FCA's interpretation of 'unfair relationships' has left the door open to regulatory-led redress, which Rathi is now urging firms to support. 'If industry works with us, then we can get this moving quickly,' Rathi said. 'If, however, people want to continue to litigate this and have cases going through the courts for many, many more years, then of course it is going to take longer.' Redress path unclear and costly The FCA has yet to decide whether the redress scheme will be 'opt-in' — requiring customers to apply for compensation — or 'opt-out,' in which lenders proactively repay customers unless they decline. 'An opt-out scheme might take longer because firms have to go and look for all the addresses and track down customers who may have moved,' Rathi said. 'An opt-in scheme may be quicker, but will be less comprehensive.' The regulator estimates most compensation payouts will be under £950 per agreement, but the overall burden for banks and car finance providers could be significant. Fitch Ratings has estimated that lenders may be on the hook for £5 billion to £11 billion, depending on the final scope of the scheme. The remainder would likely fall to non-bank and captive auto finance firms. "Rathi hits back at claims FCA redress plan is unworkable" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alcopops are back in fashion, says Smirnoff Ice owner
The maker of Smirnoff Ice and Guinness has said alcopops are back in vogue as young people start to drink more alcohol after years of abstinence. Nik Jhangiani, interim chief executive of Diageo, said there was a 'huge opportunity' to win over Generation Z as it noted a boom in demand for premixed cocktails and alcopops. He said Gen Z customers who were drinking for the first time were doing so by consuming spirits and pre-made cocktails, reversing a previous trend where younger generations were introduced to alcohol through beer. It comes after data from drinks experts IWSR showed that 73pc of Gen Z have consumed alcohol in the previous six months, compared with 66pc two years ago. Ready-to-drink cocktails such as BuzzBallz have surged in popularity in recent months, with the brand one of the fastest growing drinks ranges in the UK. The drinks, which became popular after going viral on TikTok, are known for their brightly coloured packaging and quirky names such as Lotta Colada and Watermelon Smash. Mr Jhangiani said Diageo was seeing more young people buying spirits, with the drinks giant well placed to 'offer a huge range of choices' including more flavours and calorie choices. He said Diageo had once been a leader in alcopops with its Smirnoff Ice brand, adding that the company would 'rightfully have the ability to gain that [position] back', with plans to boost sales of Smirnoff Ice drinks again. The company launched a new advertising campaign for the brand across more than 20 countries in June. Diageo has also previously credited younger people, particularly women, for boosting sales of Guinness. Mr Jhangiani's comments came as profits fell 28pc to $4.3bn (£3.2bn) in the year to July compared with a year earlier as it said it would take a $200m hit from Donald Trump's tariff war. The company is also battling a slowdown in consumer spending. Diageo said on Tuesday it would ramp up a cost-cutting programme to revive the business, removing $625m (£470m) of costs over the next three years, $125m higher than previously planned. Last month, Diageo appointed Mr Jhangiana as its new interim chief executive, after abruptly parting ways with previous boss Debra Crew. Diageo shares rose as much as 6pc as investors were buoyed by the cost-saving plans. 登入存取你的投資組合
Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Inside The Curious Tale Of Whisky's 100 Rarest Casks
In 1994, Mark Reynier convinced a near-shuttered Ardbeg distillery to fill 100 "swan song" casks, an act that created some of the rarest whisky in the world and unknowingly pioneered the private cask investment movement. getty Today, Ardbeg can charge $21 million (£16 million) for a cask of whisky, but back in 1994 they were shuttered, barely operational and running intermittently on a team borrowed from Laphroaig. Quietly one man, enamoured by the quality of the whisky, petitioned the distillery to fill him 100 casks. They were to be the swan song of the Ardbeg distillery as it was then, and have gone on to become some of the most elusive casks on the market. Earlier this month Bunnahabhain distillery became the first established Islay distillery to offer casks direct to the public in over a decade. It may herald the start of a new era for the industry of private cask investment, but as is so often the case, it is just a new version of an old story. Mark Reynier, possibly best known for reviving the Bruichladdich distillery, was the man behind the parcel of unicorn Ardbeg casks. Yet it was a story I only came across by chance when reading Heavenly Peated , a comprehensive history of the Ardbeg distillery. Intrigued, I reached out to Reynier to find out more about the original Islay cask investment, and the birth of a new movement. Mark Reynier has an enviable resume. He is the co-founder of independent bottler Murray McDavid, the executive behind the revival of Islay's Bruichladdich Distillery, and founder of Ireland's terroir‑driven Waterford Distillery. But before all of that, in 1984 Mark Reynier founded La Réserve wine merchants. In the beginning it was a fine wine retail business and in his own words: 'I thought there was no point putting Johnny Walker on the shelf, everyone sells that. So I'll do nothing. Just Armagnac, Cognac, Eau-de-vie… Single malt didn't even register at the time.' A pivotal visit from Gordon Wright introduced Mark Reynier to Springbank, revealing a world beyond generic blends and sparking the very ideas that would shape his career in whisky. Mark Littler LTD Luckily a visit from Gordon Wright introduced Reynier to Springbank, Cadenhead single cask releases, and the idea that whisky did not just have to be a generic blend. It was a pivotal moment for Reynier, but of course it wasn't just him who needed to be convinced. They had a fantastic product, but they needed to find a way to get it in front of more people. Reynier wasn't a fan of the single cask bottlings of the time because they were too inconsistent for his customers who he was already having to turn away from wine. 'I remember selling some bottles to a customer, saying it was the best thing since sliced bread, and then realizing it wasn't the same barrel when the guy brought it back, complaining. And that's when the idea of mine came about. Because I can't sell a bottle with confidence not knowing whether it's brilliant or ordinary, so what else can I do with this great product?' The tradition of a godparent buying a godson a port pipe to lay down for adulthood was already beginning to fade in the 1980s. There was the sheer cost of port to contend with, and the fact that most people, even the very wealthy, did not have the space or the inclination to lay down an entire lifetime's worth of port. Casks of single malt whisky, which had to be matured in bond in Scotland, solved both issues. 'By the time I looked into it, a pipe of Graham's port would've cost you £30,000, not exactly practical. That's when I had the idea: what about whisky instead? You could buy a whole cask for around £1,000. It was more affordable yet still had that same sense of occasion and legacy. I gave my own godson a barrel of whisky, and that's where the idea for offering Springbank casks to private individuals really came from.' Working Direct With The Distilleries Reynier was working directly with Springbank at the time. Through La Réserve he would broker small parcels of casks, selling them to his customers, and when they ran out simply requesting another parcel. 'It was great fun to do. We'd ask them to distill between 30 to 50 barrels, and then we'd sell those barrels to whoever wanted them. And then we repeat, and that's also when we did the Ardbeg.' At the time Ardbeg was owned by Allied Distillers, who also owned Laphroaig. They'd effectively shut Ardbeg down and were only running it sporadically using the same team as Laphroaig. Until finally Allied Distillers decided to shut it all together. Reynier was having none of it. 'I can remember thinking at the time, this whisky is extraordinary. Why are you shutting it down?' Mark Reynier Reynier convinced them to fire up the distillery one more time for an exclusive run of 100 casks. It wasn't just the casks Reynier was after though, he also had his eye on the distillery itself. 'I tried to buy Ardbeg outright. I thought I was the only one negotiating with them, but then Glenmorangie swooped in and bought it. Still, I like to think that without that push, it might have quietly disappeared altogether.' The Rarity of Ardbeg The whisky in those casks of Ardbeg remains some of the rarest in existence. 'I've seen just one of those bottles out in the wild. Just one. I often wonder where the rest ended up. They were stored at Cadenhead's, so maybe they've been quietly bottled and sold without the distillery name. It wouldn't surprise me' Reynier told me. Only a handful of these casks have ever surfaced publicly. In 2022, an Ardbeg 1994 hogshead fetched £205,000 at auction. Another near-identical cask made headlines when it became the subject of a Which? investigation after a pensioner was misled into selling it for just £30,000 to an unscrupulous cask firm. From near-permanent closure to becoming one of the most coveted names in single malt, the history of Ardbeg distillery is a story of survival and extraordinary peated whisky. Universal Images Group via Getty Images Springbank and Macallan casks that were sold in a similar era include the record breaking £1,000,000 cask sale. Those casks are scarce too, but by contrast to the 1994 Ardbeg parcel, they could almost be called common. It was 1994 when the casks were filled for him and his purchase of Ardbeg fell through, but undeterred from his plan, Reynier switched his sights to another historic Islay distillery. 'It would've been the first time someone had bought a distillery from outside the whisky industry. No one had done it before. I had a plan drawn up. But when it fell through, I moved on, and that's when I turned my attention to Bruichladdich.' The Birth Of Direct Cask Sales? Spurred by the success of his cask sales under La Réserve, when Reynier reopened Bruichladdich he did so with his own direct to the public cask sales offering. Before that other brokers had offered casks from other distilleries—the controversial Macallan 1989 casks are one interesting example—but to my knowledge this was the first time that a distillery had done it themselves. Springbank would follow suit with their own direct offerings, Arran distillery too when they opened. Even Macallan at one point had its own direct cask sale offering. I've seen the brochure offering casks that would one day be worth hundreds of thousands carefully exalted to potential investors. It was a time of innocence and opportunity in the burgeoning industry. Eventually those initial distillery offerings would stop, but the appetite was there. Brokers and dealers working more like Reynier in the days of La Réserve would take small parcels from the secondary market or negotiate parcels directly with distilleries. But it all followed on from Reynier, and one hundred of the rarest casks ever sold to the public.
