logo
Fewer people claimed non-dom tax status in UK ahead of Government crackdown

Fewer people claimed non-dom tax status in UK ahead of Government crackdown

There were about 73,700 people claiming non-domiciled tax status in the year ending in April last year, according to estimates from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).
This was 400 fewer than the 2022-23 tax year, or a dip of about 0.5%.
The number of non-doms, according to self-assessment tax returns, stood 3,900 below that in the tax year ending 2020.
It indicates a slowdown in the number of people claiming the tax status following a post-pandemic resurgence.
Non-domiciled means UK residents whose permanent home, or their 'domicile' for tax purposes, is outside the UK.
The regime meant that so-called non-doms paid tax in the UK only on income generated in the UK – meaning any income earned overseas was exempt from British taxation.
However, the Labour Government abolished the non-dom tax status in April following backlash that wealthy residents could enjoy the benefits of living in the UK without paying as much tax.
Previous chancellor Jeremy Hunt estimated that scrapping the regime would raise about £2.7 billion for the Treasury by 2028-29.
Recent data showed the UK saw the biggest fall in billionaires on record amid the Government non-dom clampdown.
The Sunday Times Rich List said there were fewer of the world's 'super rich' coming to live in Britain.
HMRC's data published on Thursday showed that some £9 billion was raised from non-doms paying income tax, capital gains tax and national insurance last year.
This was a £107 million increase on the prior year, despite the dip in the number of individuals.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brits 'not safe' as Putin 'challenges world order', warns ex-NATO chief
Brits 'not safe' as Putin 'challenges world order', warns ex-NATO chief

Daily Mirror

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Brits 'not safe' as Putin 'challenges world order', warns ex-NATO chief

Lord Robertson of Port Ellen said the UK was "underprepared" and that citizens in the country were "not safe" amid increased threats coming from Russia and China Britain and its people are not safe amid crumbling army preparedness, a former NATO chief has warned Parliament. ‌ Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, who co-wrote the Strategic Defence Review (SDR), said the UK is lacking in ammunition, training, people, logistics, and medical capacity. He told the upper chamber: 'Bearing in mind the difficult world that we live in and have to survive in, this is what I firmly believe: we are underinsured, we are underprepared, we are not safe. ‌ 'This country and its people are not safe. The British people are faced with a world in turmoil, with great power competitions spilling over now into conflict, with constant grey zone attacks on our mainland, and with Russia – often with the co-operation of Iran, China and North Korea – challenging the existing world order. ‌ 'We simply in this country are not safe.' The Labour peer wrote the review alongside the former commander of the joint forces command, General Sir Richard Barrons, and defence adviser Dr Fiona Hill. Artificial intelligence, drones and a £1 billion investment in homeland missile defence all form part of the review's plan to keep the UK safe in the face of threats from Vladimir Putin 's Russia and the rise of China. ‌ As peers debated the review on Friday, Lord Robertson said: 'When we say in the report that we are unprepared, it is an understatement. We don't have the ammunition, the training, the people, the spare parts, the logistics, and we don't have the medical capacity to deal with the mass casualties that we would face if we were involved in high intensity warfare. 'Over the years, and I suppose I must plead guilty to that as well, we took a substantial peace dividend, because we all believed that the world had changed for the better.' He continued: 'Sadly, we were not alone in that. There may have been over-optimism, but at worst wishful thinking, but the brutal, full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Putin's Russia three years ago was a savage wake-up call for all of us. ‌ 'This world we now live in has changed out of all recognition, and we have got to change as well.' Lord Robertson told the upper chamber he is 'confident' the review will 'intimidate our enemies, inspire our friends, invigorate our defence industry, and make our country safer'. Conservative shadow defence minister Baroness Goldie pressed the Government to be specific about the amount of money and timing needed for defence spending to reach 3 per cent of GDP. She said: 'In this exciting and brave new world for defence, the elephant in the room is money, and none of this excellent aspiration proposed by the review means anything without attaching pound signs to the proposals. 'Ambition must translate into specific financial commitment." Former military chief Lord Stirrup said the Government's spending would need to be restructured to be 'anywhere near 3.5 per cent of GDP for defence by 2035'. 'There is no sign of any urgency on any side of the political divide on addressing this crucial matter,' the crossbench peer added.

Labour hands councils powers to secretly inspect landlords' properties
Labour hands councils powers to secretly inspect landlords' properties

Telegraph

time22 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Labour hands councils powers to secretly inspect landlords' properties

'Powers of entry are intrusive by their nature. If they are to be exercised without prior warning, there must be rigorous justification, robust checks and balances and explicit limits to prevent overreach. That bar has not been met. 'These amendments risk tipping the balance too far, undermining transparency and weakening the very safeguards that protect landlords and tenants alike,' he added. It means landlords may be hit with fines from inspections they didn't know were happening. It could leave them footing the bill for tenants' negligence, such as failing to properly ventilate a property to prevent mould. The maximum penalty that a council can issue to a landlord without needing to go to court is £30,000. If the Renters' Rights Bill becomes law, this will increase to £40,000. The British Landlords' Association welcomed the changes as 'in everyone's best interests'. But Sajjad Ahmad, its chief executive, warned against 'sneaky inspections'. He said: 'Inspections should not be done without landlords present. Everyone should be there, as well as the tenants and council officers. This means you can more easily get a solution, rather than issues going on and on.' When the bill passes, Awaab's law will also be applied to the private rental sector. The law forces landlords to take immediate action to remove mould and damp, after two-year-old Awaab Ishak died from respiratory issues caused by exposure to black mould. Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, parliamentary under-secretary of state for housing, told members of the House of Lords that giving notice can lead to 'unscrupulous landlords hiding evidence of breaches'. The Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, which called for the removal of the 24-hour period, has welcomed the news. Mark Elliott, the institute's president said: 'We are delighted that the Government has recognised the need to remove this requirement, which has long been a barrier to effective enforcement of housing legislation. 'The current requirement provides an opportunity for the landlord to appear at the inspection, which can be an intimidating experience for the tenant making the complaint. 'Local authorities should be able to conduct such visits without giving the landlord 24 hours' notice, permitting private conversations with the tenant before the local authority contacts the landlord to notify them if works are required.' Changes for landlords The renters' rights amendments also need to be passed in the House of Commons. The bill – due to come into force this autumn – will also abolish so-called 'no fault' evictions, introduce an ombudsman for the private rental sector and make enforcement against rogue landlords stronger. It also means landlords will be forced to wait three months before taking action against non-paying tenants. Rentals that fall short of energy efficiency standards will be banned by 2030, costing landlords an average bill of £10,000 to bring their properties up to code. The increasingly hostile business environment under Labour is forcing landlords to sell up. The number of UK properties available to let has hit an all-time low of 284,000, falling 18pc in the year to March, according to analytics firm TwentyCi. The National Residential Landlords' Association (NRLA) said that 'the majority of responsible landlords must not be treated as though they are part of the problem'. A spokesman said: 'The amendment passed in the House of Lords raises concerns. The NRLA is supportive of effective enforcement, but it is important that actions taken by enforcement bodies are proportionate to the issue being investigated and seek to work with all involved to achieve the best possible outcome. 'We urge the Government to ensure that any new enforcement measures are applied in a targeted and proportionate way.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store