BMW Design Shift Is About to Change Everything
BMW is embarking on a full-scale design revolution that will transform every vehicle in its portfolio. Dubbed the BMW Design Shift, this sweeping change will begin with the highly anticipated iX3 electric SUV, set to debut later this year, and extend to every model in the Bavarian automaker's lineup within the next four years.
This bold move represents more than just a new look—it marks a strategic pivot in BMW's design identity. At the heart of the BMW Design Shift is the Neue Klasse design language, a minimalist, forward-thinking aesthetic first showcased in 2023 through concept vehicles. Now, this design vision is going mainstream.
Group design chief Adrian van Hooydonk confirmed that the BMW Design Shift is not limited to electric models. Every car in BMW's stable—from the sporty 2 Series to the luxurious 7 Series and rugged X models—will adopt the new styling. 'We're ensuring that the Neue Klasse design becomes the defining face of every BMW,' van Hooydonk stated, noting that the rollout begins this year and will leave 'no car behind.'
Interestingly, the transformation will start with the recently updated 5 Series sedan. Despite launching a new generation in 2023, the 5 Series will receive a visual refresh incorporating the Neue Klasse design. Although it remains on the current CLAR platform, this facelifted model will serve as the vanguard of the BMW Design Shift. Other key models, including the X5, X2, X7, and 2 Series, will follow shortly.
Product development head Bernd Körber emphasized the speed and scope of the initiative, stating that the BMW Design will be completed within just three and a half years. This accelerated timeline reflects BMW's urgency to unify its brand image across all powertrains—combustion, hybrid, and electric.
While the Neue Klasse aesthetic will bring cohesion to the brand, BMW assures fans that individuality won't be sacrificed. Each model will retain unique design elements and character traits, ensuring that the Design Shift enhances diversity rather than eliminating it.
Initially intended exclusively for EVs, the Neue Klasse approach has since been extended to gas-powered models as well. The massive kidney grilles that once dominated BMW's front-end styling are expected to be replaced by sleeker, more refined surfaces and restrained detailing—hallmarks of the new design philosophy.
The BMW Design Shift isn't just a cosmetic update—it's a statement about the brand's future. With a lineup that will soon speak a common design language, BMW is positioning itself to remain a leader in both innovation and visual identity as the industry evolves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
UK ban on disposable vapes goes into effect
LONDON: A ban on disposable vapes goes into effect across the UK on Sunday in a bid to protect children's health and tackle a 'throwaway' culture. 'For too long, single-use vapes have blighted our streets as litter and hooked our children on nicotine,' junior environment minister Mary Creagh said. She said the government was calling 'time on these nasty devices' — a type of e-cigarette which are very popular with young people — and banning sales of single-use vapes or their supply in a crackdown on UK corner shops and supermarkets. Those caught flouting the ban will face a £200 fine, while repeat offenders risk up to two years in prison. Young people and children in particular have been attracted to cheap and colorful disposable vapes, which have snazzy flavours such as mint, chocolate, mango or watermelon, since they were introduced in the UK in 2021. In 2024, nearly five million disposable vapes were thrown away each week, according to Material Focus, an independent UK-based non-profit. More than 40 tons of lithium, a key metal used in the technology industry, was discarded each year along with single-use vapes — enough to power 5,000 electrical vehicles, the NGO said. Fire services have also warned about the risk of discarded vapes catching light among household rubbish. 'Every vape has potential to start a fire if incorrectly disposed of,' said Justin Greenaway, commercial manager at electronic waste processing company SWEEEP Kuusakoski. The new law, first proposed by the previous Conservative government, also aims to stem a rise in vaping. 'This new law is a step toward reducing vaping among children, while ensuring products are available to support people to quit smoking,' said Caroline Cerny, deputy chief executive for health charity Action on Smoking and Health . A recent ASH survey said 11 percent of adults vape, or about 5.6 million people, and 18 percent of 11 to 17 year olds — about 980,000 under-18s. Among vapers, some 52 percent of young adults aged between 18 to 24 preferred single-use vapes. The long-term health risks of vaping remain unclear. E-cigarettes do not produce tar or carbon monoxide, two of the most harmful elements in tobacco smoke. But they do still contain highly addictive nicotine. The upcoming ban has already led to a fall in disposable vapes. According to ASH, the use of disposables by 18-24-year-old vapers fell from 52 percent in 2024 to 40 percent in 2025. The UK ban follows similar European moves. Belgium and France became the first EU countries to ban sales of disposable vapes. Ireland is also preparing to introduce new restrictions. But critics have argued many users will simply switch to refillable or reusable vaping devices, which will limit the impact on nicotine consumption. And industry experts say the ban could lead to more illegal products entering the UK market. The bill 'only makes it illegal to sell disposable vapes — it does not prohibit their use,' warned Dan Marchant, director of Vape Club, the UK's largest online vape retailer. 'We risk a surge of illegal and potentially dangerous items flooding the black market.'
Arab News
13 hours ago
- Arab News
In the wake of the WEF's challenges, neutrality and good governance are paramount
Geneva, Switzerland, is a hub for international cooperation. The city has provided a venue for dialogue among governments and nongovernmental organizations alike since the early 20th century, bolstered by critical aspects of the Swiss DNA: neutrality, good governance and a tradition of dialogue for impact and peace. Since its founding in 1971, the World Economic Forum, under the leadership of its founder Klaus Schwab, started as a private foundation and eventually became an official Swiss international organization guided by the mission statement: 'Committed to improving the state of the world.' The WEF and its annual gathering in Davos evolved from a European industrial conclave into the world's most influential event for brand building, networking and addressing the topics of the day among political figures, business leaders, NGOs and the social sector. The WEF today, however, is facing an impasse. As a perceived neutral platform for dialogue, for decades the WEF offered a unique value proposition geopolitically, from the Cold War period through the Middle East peace process and the end of apartheid in South Africa. This neutrality came into question in 2022 following the war in Ukraine. At that point, the WEF followed political pressure from the US, the EU and Switzerland, turning away all stakeholders, political and civilian, from Russia, thereby taking sides in the conflict and stifling dialogue. When asked directly why the Russians were excluded, one WEF representative at the time cited the excuse that 'Russia invaded a sovereign country' as a justification for the WEF's unprecedented political stand. This situation has played itself out historically with the US-UK invasion of Iraq in 2003, when moral justifications regarding human rights violations were used on a selective basis to underscore what was later revealed to be the false pretense of weapons of mass destruction. Moreover, without skipping a beat, the following January, the WEF invited the US and UK governments, their allies and other stakeholders to Davos, despite their invasion of a 'sovereign country.' As a perceived neutral platform for dialogue, for decades the WEF offered a unique value proposition geopolitically. This fault line is one, which, compared to Western countries, counterparts from the Arab Gulf to the BRICS and the Global South have addressed in a more pragmatic way. Instead of focusing solely on the Western, pro-NATO enlargement narrative, they have considered, rightly, their own business and economic interests and interlinked global geopolitics over the principles of so-called sovereignty and invasion. In terms of its own internal governance, the WEF has come under scrutiny in the past few years following a series of journalistic reports, notably from The Wall Street Journal, which started with looking into gender and inclusion policies and which ultimately led to the resignation of the founder. In the last month in particular, several alleged governance questions have emerged about Schwab, his family, the board and select members of the management team. While independent investigations are underway under the eyes of the Swiss authorities, and innocence is presumed until proven otherwise, it is important that these events not neglect a critical aspect: these issues — if true — would not have occurred had proper measures been installed to ensure good governance, checks and balances, and the proper oversight of what is today an official Swiss international organization. According to the bylaws of the WEF, Schwab has the right to appoint his own successor and either he or a member of his immediate family sits on the board of trustees. Schwab will therefore likely continue to pursue his own case and deny the allegations of wrongdoing that have been lodged to protect his own personal reputation and, even more so, his legacy. The authorities and the current board of the WEF may need to find a compromise, including naming him honorary chairman and/or meeting other demands. Serious questions must be addressed about how so many alleged internal issues were allowed to precipitate over an extended period without board members supposedly being aware. Beyond the organizational culture that was variably criticized in the media, it appears as though board members failed to ask the right questions or address issues, as did the regulators, in compliance with Swiss law, which mandates regular audit. The current circumstances should therefore give the WEF pause to pose some of the difficult values-based questions for an organization that is charged with convening the world's elite around the most pressing global challenges. Moreover, the WEF's partners, notably business and wealthy governments, finance its $500 million annual budget. If the WEF is going to continue to accept these financial contributions, it must also be held accountable. Against this backdrop, and at a moment when global leadership is under great scrutiny and redefinition, multistakeholder leaders have options to choose between myriad different events and initiatives for building their influence and collaboration, ranging from the Milken Institute to the Future Investment Initiative. Now is the time, however, for the WEF to revisit its purpose and decide if it will become one of the many hubs for corporate networking and deal-making or if it will stay true to its DNA: serving as a neutral platform, with good governance and focused on real impact. • Khalid Abdulla-Janahi, chairman of Vision3, has over 30 years of experience in banking and financial services.
Arab News
14 hours ago
- Arab News
Energy is at the heart of any nation's digital expansion
Artificial intelligence and its accompanying infrastructure of data centers have become a defining technology within the global economic competition. This new need will have a direct impact on energy, with an expected surge in electricity demand. The need for high-capacity and stable power is making energy infrastructure a central focus of any nation's digital expansion. Indeed, without ample energy capacity, countries will be left behind. Needless to say, this puts the Gulf region in a great position, yet Europe will still need to figure out its way. There is no doubt that after years of misguided all-green obsession, many are now waking up to harsh realities. The disconnect between policymakers and the real world was symbolized in the energy field. We are finally witnessing a return to sanity. One energy source that had been attacked was perhaps one of the most efficient, even on emissions: nuclear power. It was what put France back on top of the European order and brought Germany to its knees. I have written this often and will never tire of saying it: Merci, Gen. de Gaulle. Indeed, today, if France has a greater chance at leadership in AI and tech, it is thanks to its nuclear power. It is also worth noting that on this point, President Emmanuel Macron was capable of making a U-turn and, after being negative on it, has once again pushed forward on nuclear energy. We are also seeing other European countries follow the same path. Italy's plan focuses on deploying advanced small modular reactors and advanced modular reactors to complement renewable energy sources. The government anticipates finalizing the legislative framework by the end of 2027, with projections indicating that nuclear energy could supply between 11 percent and 22 percent of the country's electricity by 2050. We are finally witnessing a return to sanity Khaled Abou Zahr In Germany, while the previous government completed a nuclear phase-out in 2023, the new administration under Chancellor Friedrich Merz is reconsidering this. Merz has criticized the earlier shutdowns and is exploring the development of small modular reactors, as well as potential collaborations with France on nuclear initiatives. The main issue with renewables is their intermittent nature and the continuous need for subsidies. Moreover, in a time of unstable international trade, most equipment comes from China, which poses a supply chain risk. We saw during the global pandemic how the pharma industry supply chain suffered due to its location in India. When it comes to manufacturing for solar, most production takes place in China. This is also a geopolitical and influential advantage for Beijing. While it is clear there are geopolitical consequences to any country's energy mix, there should never be a political, dogmatic view on economic decisions. This is the mistake Europe fell into for energy, and many other business and societal decisions. The European left, in alliance with Green parties, has imposed policies driven by ideology and not economic realism. Among these decisions were the hasty decommissioning of nuclear power, unrealistic decarbonization goals, and placing renewables on a pedestal. This is a topic that has deepened the divide between left and right. Will Europe be capable of shifting this trend and making the right decisions? It is clear that without nuclear power this will be impossible, and relying solely on renewables is a dangerous policy. Redundancies in power sources and distribution are an absolute necessity. The widespread blackout that hit Spain and Portugal last April is a stark reminder. The crisis was caused by a loss in a substation in Granada, followed by failures in Badajoz and Seville, which subsequently caused Spain's grid to disconnect from the broader European network and collapse within seconds. Political figures and energy executives pointed to Spain's increasing reliance on solar and wind power as a major contributing factor. This is also why, following this incident, other experts have ruled out a short-term rapid transition to net zero and said that the immediate exclusion of fossil and nuclear energy was unrealistic. Renewables are heavily subsidized in Europe Khaled Abou Zahr Another important point is that renewables are heavily subsidized in Europe, which can complicate the region's ability to compete globally. On top of that, layers of subsidies are being added — not just for renewable energy generation, but also for emerging technologies, startups, and scale-ups. While these measures seek to enhance innovation and energy transition, they ultimately place a financial burden on taxpayers and risk undermining Europe's competitiveness. In many cases, the main beneficiaries are external suppliers, such as Chinese manufacturers of solar panels or foreign providers of cloud infrastructure, rather than European industry or innovation. The reality is that following this new technology dominance race, there will be a need to do more than push fast for nuclear energy. For France, nuclear energy accounted for about 40 percent of its total energy supply. Moreover, nuclear power accounts for 65 percent of electricity generation. This is what has enabled France to position itself as the cornerstone of the new AI-led economy while other European countries lag. The announcement of new AI-focused data centers in Arizona close to nuclear plants confirms this trend. It is also worth mentioning that beyond ideological views, Paris maintains one of the lowest-carbon electricity grids globally. As we notice a bigger competition, not to say war, for AI with clear geopolitical alignments, Europe will need to sort out its energy mix and reintroduce nuclear energy as a main provider. There is no time to lose on this path, and the risks are too high to ignore. They should be inspired by the strategic foresight of Gen. de Gaulle, who understood the geopolitical independence nuclear energy would grant France. • Khaled Abou Zahr is the founder of SpaceQuest Ventures, a space-focused investment platform. He is CEO of EurabiaMedia and editor of Al-Watan Al-Arabi.
