
South Carolina becomes early hot spot for potential 2028 candidates
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) traveled through rural South Carolina during a two-day tour this past week, while Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (D) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) are expected to head to the state later this month.
Over on the Republican side, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) is speaking at a South Carolina GOP fundraiser next month, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) recently made trips to South Carolina and Iowa, according to Axios reports.
The moves have raised speculation over whether some candidates are laying early groundwork for possible White House bids in 2028 and what role South Carolina will play in the next presidential cycle's calendar.
'I don't read it any other way,' said South Carolina Democratic National Committee (DNC) member Carol Fowler, regarding the high-profile Democrats visiting the state, which was the first official Democratic primary location in 2024.
'I believe that they're at least contemplating it,' she added, referring to potential White House bids.
Only months into President Trump's second term, the chatter in political circles is moving fast to 2028. Govs. Wes Moore (D) of Maryland and Tim Walz (D) of Minnesota traveled south in May to participate in the South Carolina state party's Blue Palmetto Dinner and Democratic State Convention, respectively. The two men also appeared at Rep. James Clyburn's (D-S.C.) annual fish fry.
Moore has said he's not running for president in 2028. A source close to his campaign noted that the Maryland governor had traveled to the state earlier this year after canceling a trip to South Carolina that had been planned during the 2024 election. The source also noted that the governor visited two companies while he was there regarding potential expansion opportunities in Maryland.
Earlier this past week, Newsom traveled to several rural counties in the Palmetto State in an event the state party billed as a way 'to connect directly with communities that have too often been overlooked by Republicans in power.'
Beshear, meanwhile, will make multiple stops in the state next week, including participating in a dinner hosted by Georgetown County Democrats and speaking at the South Carolina AFL-CIO Convention.
Next week, Khanna is doing a town hall, which the congressman said in a statement to The Hill is part of his 'Benefits Over Billionaires tour to help flip the House in 2026 and hear how Trump and [Vice President] Vance's bill will hurt families already struggling to get by.'
Youngkin will speak in August at the state GOP's Silver Elephant Gala.
To be sure, South Carolina is not the only early primary state that has received attention from potential 2028 hopefuls.
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg visited Iowa earlier this year; Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) is heading there next month. Former U.S. Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel is slated to head there in September, according to Axios.
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) spoke in April at the New Hampshire Democratic Party McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club Dinner. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), who ran for president in 2020 and lost in the primary, campaigned for Rep. Chris Pappas (D-N.H.) this past week. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) traveled to the state last year.
Out-of-state travel is not unusual, particularly for sitting lawmakers and governors who may be asked to speak at events or fundraisers.
Some Democrats don't necessarily think all of these notable names are vying for the White House. The trips could be a way to shore up better support for Democrats in the region.
'They realize that we have to win the South,' South Carolina Democratic Party Chair Christale Spain said.
To win in other places, 'we've got to have an investment of time and resources to get these voters engaged and off the bench so that we can elect more members of Congress, so that we can elect more members of the U.S. Senate,' she explained.
Whatever the reason, the early primary state visits have brought 2028 front and center by mid-2025. Some Democrats have acknowledged the visits to the state feel a little earlier than usual.
Still, experts in the Palmetto State say there's good reason for potential hopefuls to be crisscrossing the state.
'Running in South Carolina, it helps candidates prove their mettle,' state GOP chair Drew McKissick explained. 'I mean, it's a big enough state to test grassroots support and fuel organization skills and so forth, but it's also small enough to get around and over the course of the day and test your retail skills.'
The recent visits to South Carolina have also raised questions about whether it will remain first in Democrats' lineup of early contests for the presidential nomination. The DNC has said it wants to ensure fairness in the process of selecting its early calendar slate.
'The DNC is committed to running a fair, transparent, and rigorous process for the 2028 primary calendar. All states will have an opportunity to participate,' DNC Deputy Communications Director Abhi Rahman said in a statement.
But some state party chairs are beginning to weigh in.
Iowa Democratic Party Chair Rita Hart made clear in a statement that she wanted Democrats to reconsider the calendar, as the Hawkeye State has historically enjoyed its status as the first caucus.
'I do expect to have tough and direct conversations with the DNC regarding our Iowa caucuses and the serious concerns surrounding the Biden 2024 calendar,' Hart said. 'National Democrats let Trump get a head start in the 2024 campaign by excluding Iowa. We simply can't afford to be ignored again.'
Several Democratic chairs of early presidential primary states, however, suggested that battle could be hard-fought.
'We have a history of picking the nominee, number one … Iowa can't say that. New Hampshire can't say that, and our voters take this very seriously,' said Spain, the South Carolina Democratic Party chair.
'South Carolina's going to be fighting for South Carolina, and I'm assuming that she's doing the same thing for her state.'
Spain and other DNC members from South Carolina have had discussions with Democrats running to serve on the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee — or other standing committees — regarding their position on South Carolina and the 2028 primary calendar.
The DNC is holding elections for at-large member positions and several standing committees in August, though the Rules and Bylaws Committee is seen as being particularly influential in the nominating calendar process.
New Hampshire Democratic Party Chair Ray Buckley in a statement said the Granite State's importance 'cannot be understated' and noted that the four-state calendar of Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina 'was a system that not only worked, the four early states worked well together.'
'Granite Staters value retail politics and grassroots organizing like no other state. That is why New Hampshire continues to have a pivotal role in the presidential nominating process,' he said. 'The importance of New Hampshire as a purple battleground state cannot be understated in the general election for the White House and building a US Senate and House majority.'
Nevada Democrats, however, maintain that their demographics are indicative of the country at-large.
'We're a microcosm of the rest of the U.S., showing this country's diversity of cultures and communities,' Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) told The Hill in a statement. 'If you're a presidential candidate and can win our votes, your message will resonate with voters across the United States.'
While the discussion over the calendar is just beginning, Democrats hope the different states can unite as the party prepares to take back the White House.
'I really think Democrats make a mistake if they think this is a fight between four early states,' said New Hampshire-based Democratic strategist Jim Demers, who worked on former President Biden's write-in campaign last year.
'I think we really need to look at what's the best lineup of states so that we come out of the primary process in a very strong position.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
5 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style
Vice President JD Vance criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Wednesday for trying to 'mimic' President Trump's style on social media. In an interview on Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle,' the vice president said Newsom's revamped approach to online messaging misses the 'fundamental genius' that has fueled Trump's appeal. 'This idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic Donald Trump's style — I think that ignores the fundamental genius of President Trump's political success,' Vance said, 'which is that he's authentic.' 'He just is who he is,' Vance added. The comments came after Fox News host Laura Ingraham noted Democrats 'are still doing their 2024 autopsy' and seem to have concluded that they need to be tougher and 'be more like Trump in tone' to win future elections. Vance said that lesson is misguided. 'Look, the autopsy for the Democrats — some free political advice from the president of the United States — is stop sounding like crazy people,' Vance said. 'That really is all it is.' 'You've got to be yourself,' Vance added after criticizing Newsom's approach. 'You've actually got to talk to people honestly about the issues. I don't think it's that complicated: Don't be a crazy person. Be authentic.' Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, in recent days has rolled out a revamped messaging strategy that mirrors Trump's signature social media style. The California governor has posted rants in all-caps letters, he's assigned nicknames to his political opponents, and he's referred to his legislative proposals and political rallies as 'beautiful.' While Newsom's approach has been embraced by many Democrats, who have struggled to find their footing since losing the 2024 election, the governor has faced criticism from some Republicans and Fox News hosts. 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ('RATINGS KING') SAVING AMERICA,' Newsom's office posted earlier this week, responding to that criticism.


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict California's congressional map. 'Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,' reads a brief order posted to the docket. Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters' approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election. Republicans' legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting effort. Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state's high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the redistricting effort. The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers' attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats' strategy would be 'comically absurd.' In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is 'not the end of this fight.' 'This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats' plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,' the statement reads. 'We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,' it continued.