Court upholds Arkansas' school indoctrination bans
The big picture: A three-judge panel from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the bans do not violate students' free speech rights because the government can lawfully dictate what is taught in schools, the Arkansas Advocate reported.
Zoom in: Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders' sweeping education law, the LEARNS Act of 2023, includes a section on "prohibited indoctrination."
It's defined as communication by a public school employee or guest speaker that compels a person to adopt, affirm or profess an idea that people of a legally protected group like race, sex or religion are inherently superior or inferior or that people of a protected group should be discriminated against.
The law specifically calls critical race theory "prohibited indoctrination."
Context: Critical race theory holds that racism is baked into the formation of the nation and ingrained in the U.S. legal, financial and education systems, Axios' Russell Contreras writes. It was developed in law schools in the late 1970s and early 1980s and does not teach that members of any race, group, religion or nationality are superior.
Some scholars argue that race-based policies, like affirmative action, or those that take race into account, like redistricting protections, are needed to address racial inequity.
Flashback: U.S. District Court Judge Lee Rudofsky temporarily halted implementation of the indoctrination section of LEARNS from going into effect in May 2024.
What they're saying: The First Amendment right to receive information doesn't authorize a court to require the state to retain curriculum materials or instruction, even if information was removed for political reasons the Arkansas Advocate reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
Trump team rethinks Gaza strategy after six months of failure
"We need to do some serious rethinking," a visibly frustrated Secretary of State Marco Rubio told a group of hostage families on Friday after the latest round of Gaza talks broke down, two people who attended the meeting tell Axios. The big picture: Six months into his presidency, President Trump is no closer to ending the war in Gaza. The humanitarian crisis is worse than ever, negotiations are deadlocked, and the U.S. and Israel are increasingly isolated internationally. Trump campaigned on ending the war and bringing the hostages home. As it drags on, and images of starving Palestinians are shared all over the world, cracks are emerging in the MAGA base over Trump's support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's maximalist war strategy. The breakdown in ceasefire talks — which came after Hamas didn't accept the latest ceasefire terms and Israel withdrew its negotiators in protest — could be a turning point for the administration's policy. Driving the news: Trump signaled Friday that it's time for Israel to further escalate the war to "get rid" of Hamas and "finish the job." Israeli officials weren't sure whether that was a negotiating tactic or a genuine change of course from Trump — a "green light" for Netanyahu to use even more extreme military measures. "It's terrible what happened with Hamas. Tapping everybody along. We'll see what happens. We'll see what response Israel has to that. But it is getting to be that time," Trump told reporters after landing in Scotland on Friday. Behind the scenes: While meeting with hostage families at the State Department Friday, Rubio said several times that the administration needed to "rethink" its strategy on Gaza and "come to the president with new options," according to the sources. Zoom in: Over the past six months, Trump has given Netanyahu an almost free hand to do whatever he wants in Gaza — from military operations, to hostage negotiations, to the distribution of humanitarian aid. While White House officials say Trump is genuinely disturbed by the killing of Palestinians and wants the war to end, he has applied virtually no pressure on Netanyahu to end it in the last few months, according to Israeli officials. "In most calls and meetings Trump told Bibi, 'Do what you have to do in Gaza.' In some cases he even encouraged Netanyahu to go harder on Hamas," one Israeli official told Axios. The other side: Netanyahu accused the Biden administration of holding Israel back, including by limiting some arms deliveries. He claimed that once Trump took office and Israel installed a new military chief, he would finally be liberated to defeat Hamas. In private, he even put a timetable on it: three months. Trump gave Israel the 2,000-pound bombs Biden wouldn't send, along with many more weapons, and ceased any public criticism over the killing of Palestinian civilians. But the results of Israel's military operations over the last six months aren't much different than before — the Israel Defense Forces have systematically destroyed more and more of Gaza, killing thousands of Palestinians in the process, but Hamas has not been eliminated. Flashback: Trump and his envoy Steve Witkoff had a big role in reaching a ceasefire and hostage deal in January, days before the inauguration. But they allowed Netanyahu to violate that deal by not negotiating seriously on its next phase. Israel resumed the war unilaterally in March. Rubio noted in Friday's meeting that neither he nor Trump had ever liked the incremental format of the Biden-era deal, with short-term truces in exchange for the release of some hostages. A State Department official with details of the meeting said that while Rubio did indicate he did not believe the incremental approach was sustainable in the long term, both he and Trump recognized it had to be handled that way in January. Between the lines: Netanyahu preferred that format for domestic political reasons, so as not to have to commit to ending the war. Despite his reservations, Trump endorsed it during the ensuing rounds of talks, which thus far have all failed. The only exception to that failure was when Trump bypassed Netanyahu to secure the release of U.S. citizen Edan Alexander. Rubio made clear in the meeting on Friday that he still doesn't think the incremental approach is the right one and hinted that it might be time to explore a more comprehensive approach to end the war and free all the remaining hostages, according to sources in the room. Zoom out: Trump was one of the first world leaders to warn publicly that Palestinians were starving in Gaza, but he has also been far less critical than his predecessor of Israel's policies to limit the entry of aid. Trump endorsed the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an effort to deliver aid in Gaza through a private U.S. company and not through the UN in an effort to ensure Hamas couldn't commandeer it. While the GHF did manage to get food to some of the population in Gaza, hundreds of Palestinians have been killed while making their way to the aid centers. State of play: The humanitarian situation in Gaza is at its worst point since the beginning of the war 20 months ago, with 122 Palestinians dying of starvation in recent weeks, according to the health ministry in Hamas-controlled Gaza. The Palestinian death toll since the war began stands near 60,000. Nearly all Western leaders have been urging Israel with increasing desperation to stop the fighting and allow in more aid — making Trump's "finish the job" message all the more jarring by contrast. "The humanitarian catastrophe that we are witnessing in Gaza must end now," France, Germany and the U.K. said in a joint statement Friday. "Withholding essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable." The bottom line: Israel and the U.S. are together on a diplomatic island, seen by many of their allies as jointly responsible for the dire situation.
Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
Progressive upstarts shake up 2025 mayoral races
Left-wing challengers to sitting Democratic mayors are shaking up at least four major races this year, tapping into exploding anger at the party's establishment leaders. Why it matters: The races will offer early clues into the mood of progressive voters and the direction of the Democratic Party ahead of the midterms and the 2028 election. The big picture: Zohran Mamdani's victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary sparked a political earthquake after the 33-year-old democratic socialist ran a grassroots campaign focused on affordability in America's largest city. His win garnered national coverage and highlighted the divisions within the Democratic Party over its direction on the war in Gaza, anti-poverty programs and public spending. He's one of many left-wing candidates from diverse ethnic backgrounds jolting Democratic cities. In Minneapolis, state Sen. Omar Fateh, another young democratic socialist, claimed the local Democratic Party's endorsement this month for mayor over two-term sitting Democratic Mayor Jacob Frey Fateh's endorsement came at a convention of party insiders, not a citywide primary that might have been more favorable to Frey, whom critics see as too cozy with police and big business. Still, the endorsement was a significant coup for left-wing activists. It was the first rebuke of a sitting mayor by party members in more than 80 years. Fateh, the son of Somali immigrants, has supported rent control since before "freeze the rent" became a Mamdani campaign slogan. In Seattle, Katie Wilson, the co-founder and general secretary of a transit advocacy group, is seeking to unseat Mayor Bruce Harrell in a nonpartisan race. Wilson says Harrell — a lawyer who previously served three terms on the city council — has been too focused on removing homeless encampments around the city while failing to provide adequate services and shelter beds. Records show Wilson has been outpacing other challengers in fundraising. In Albuquerque, N.M., Alex Uballez, a former U.S. attorney under President Biden, is challenging fellow Democratic Mayor Tim Keller, who has faced criticism over crime, development mishaps and the police chief's behavior. Uballez, the son of a Chinese immigrant mother and an L.A. Chicano musician, is running on a progressive platform that prioritizes protecting immigrants and combating income inequality. What they're saying: "People don't feel their needs represented and they want leaders who will work as hard as they do to make things better," Uballez said in a statement to Axios. Uballez said the status quo isn't working and voters are ready for a change in Albuquerque. "Locally, career politicians backed by corporate interests have presided for years over skyrocketing costs of living and out-of-control homelessness," Wilson's campaign said in a statement. Reality check: Democratic incumbents aren't going down without a fight. They are organizing other elected Democrats to help take on the progressive upstarts while dismissing the processes that fostered the progressive mavericks' rise. For example: "This election should be decided by the entire city rather than the small group of people who became delegates," Frey campaign manager Sam Schulenberg said in a statement about the Minneapolis race. Between the lines: The races show that progressive voters are fired up and looking for candidates that reflect their values, Alexis Anderson-Reed, president of the progressive civic engagement network State Voices, tells Axios. "I'm seeing our base expanding even more, and it's becoming more multi-generational, multi-racial," Anderson-Reed said. What we're watching: The reaction by the Democratic Party to the progressive upstarts could dampen or galvanize left-leaning voters ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Newsweek
8 hours ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Hit By Legal Roadblock
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration suffered a legal blow on Friday when a New York district court judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking its move to cut National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) grants from Authors Guild members on First Amendment grounds. Judge Colleen McMahon issued the injunction which is expected to remain in place until the case is heard in full. Newsweek contacted the NEH and President Trump, via the White House press office, for comment on Saturday outside of regular office hours. The Context With Republicans enjoying slim majorities in both the Senate and House in addition to their control over the White House, the courts have emerged as one of the chief impediments to Trump administration policy. In recent months, courts have struck down punitive measures introduced by President Trump against legal firms previously involved in cases against him, blocked a bid to strip thousands of Haitian migrants of legal protection and struck down sanctions aimed at International Criminal Court employees. What To Know Judge McMahon's preliminary injunction prevents funds previously awarded to Authors Guild members, and subsequently removed by the Trump administration, from being reallocated until a trial is held on the merits of the case itself. The money was allocated by the NEH, a federal agency that funds research and education across the humanities, before some was stripped back by the Trump administration. President Donald Trump speaking to the media as he arrives at Glasgow Prestwick Airport on July 25, 2025 in Prestwick, Scotland, UK. President Donald Trump speaking to the media as he arrives at Glasgow Prestwick Airport on July 25, 2025 in Prestwick, Scotland, UK. Andrew Harnik/GETTY McMahon ruled much of this was politically motivated, with Termination Notices handed to intended recipients making reference to Trump Executive Orders targeting "DEI [diversity, equity and inclusion] programs" and "Radical Indoctrination." She said a grant to one academic working on a book about the history of the Ku Klux Klan was flagged by the administration as being connected to DEI, while other intended recipients had grants withdrawn because they were issued under the Biden administration. A class-action lawsuit was filed by the Authors Guild against the NEH and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), formerly led by Elon Musk. What People Are Saying In her judgment McMahon said: "Defendants terminated the grants based on the recipients' perceived viewpoint, in an effort to drive such views out of the marketplace of ideas. This is most evident by the citation in the Termination Notices to executive orders purporting to combat 'Radical Indoctrination' and 'Radical' … DEI Programs,' and to further 'Biological Truth.'" She continued: "Far be it from this Court to deny the right of the Administration to focus NEH priorities on American history and exceptionalism as the year of our semiquincentennial approaches. "Such refocusing is ordinarily a matter of agency discretion. But agency discretion does not include discretion to violate the First Amendment. Nor does not give the Government the right to edit history." What Happens Next A trial on whether the Trump administration has the authority to strip NEH grants from Authors Guild members as it did is expected to take place in due course.
