
Boy (16) who suffered 'severe' injury after alleged delay amid doctors' row receives €1.9m
Dillon Brennan (16) was born on January 30th, 2009, at the hospital, which has been subject to investigation over patient safety, to Corinna Brennan, who is also his carer at their Athy, Co Kildare, home.
Advertisement
Mrs Brennan sued the HSE on behalf of her son for breach of statutory duty - alleged medical negligence - to adequately provide medical services to Mrs Brennan and her son in 2009 at the Co Laois hospital.
It was submitted that Mrs Brennan was due to give birth around January 25th, 2009, and had attended all of her antenatal appointments, culminating with a clinic at the hospital on January 29th, 2009, when no "significant abnormal conditions in relation to the pregnancy were present".
Mrs Brennan was admitted to the hospital on January 30th, 2009, five days after her due date, but had "slow and irregular" pain.
A cardiotocography trace (CTG) was carried out and was found to be "abnormal", as the unborn baby displayed "frequent decelerations" in his heart rate. However, despite the abnormal readings, the CTG was discontinued.
Advertisement
A second CTG was carried out at 8.45am the same morning that showed decelerations and abnormalities up to around 12.30pm.
It was claimed that then a syntocinon treatment - an injection involving the drug Oxycontin - was administered to augment labour.
It was claimed that the readings from the CTG were not reproduced in a legible fashion and were difficult to interpret.
A decision was made to deliver Dillon by emergency Caesarean Section, and Dillon was born at 1:36pm, allegedly 80 minutes after a decision to perform the Caesarean was made - 50 minutes outside the usual timeframe.
Advertisement
It was claimed that Dillon then suffered "extreme difficulties" with breathing, due to hypoxia, and that there was a delay in his resuscitation.
In addition, an altercation between members of the hospital staff occurred during the attempts at resuscitation of the plaintiff, it was alleged.
During a second attempt at intubation, a doctor was interrupted by an anaesthetic doctor without invitation who attempted to force an oxygen mask on the child, it was claimed.
It was alleged that the anaesthetist "brushed aside" the attending doctor and raised his voice, shouting "for f**k sake just bag him". The doctor was eventually able to drain meconium - a baby's first stool - from the child through suction, after which safe intubation was performed.
Advertisement
The doctor, it was submitted, was "considerably interrupted in his attempts to intubate and resuscitate the plaintiff by actions of the anaesthetist doctor".
In the aftermath of his birth, the plaintiff was noted as being in pain, jaundiced, vomiting with streaks of blood, having hypoxic metabolic acidosis, high blood pressure and in need of ventilation.
The plaintiff spent 11 days in intensive care, and an MRI scan showed the plaintiff's kidney and brain had an infarct resulting in "severe personal injuries", it was claimed.
At the High Court on Tuesday, Mr Justice Paul Coffey was told by John Healy SC, instructed by David O'Malley of Callan Tansey solicitors, for the plaintiff that a final settlement of €1.9 million for breaches of duty by the defendant, albeit without an admission of liability, could be recommended to the court for what he said was Mr Brennan's "turbulent" introduction to the world.
Advertisement
Mr Justice Coffey approved the settlement and addressed Mr Brennan, who was present in court, saying he was pleased to see Mr Brennan "looking so well and I wish you all the best for the future".
Reacting to the settlement, solicitor David O'Malley, in a statement on behalf the family, said that the family welcome it and "the security it will provide Dillon.
"They would like to acknowledge the efforts of the State Claims Agency and their legal representatives in facilitating mediation to resolve this case. The purpose of civil society is to prevent similar events reoccurring.
"The family questioned the birth, having witnessed the Portlaoise maternity enquiry and the aftermath in 2012.
"Unfortunately, the same avoidable failings, namely delayed delivery, inadequate CTG (cardiotocography) tracing and misuse of Oxytocin, still remain as main causes of hypoxia in Irish infants in 2025.
"Also, in the year 2025 there are no cooling units to counteract hypoxia in infants outside of Cork and Dublin.
"It truly is a second-tier maternity system outside of The Pale.
"The family echoes calls by advocate groups to urgently review maternity care in Ireland. One cannot think of a more important right than the right to breathe and be protected at birth," said Mr O'Malley.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Huge breast cancer breakthrough as scientists discover key way to prevent deadly disease
Scientists have discovered how breast cancer spreads to other parts of the body—and it could revolutionise how the disease is treated in its earlier stages. Scottish researchers discovered that cancer changes the metabolism—the way cells make and use energy—of specific immune cells. They found that they release a certain sort of protein, called uracil, which can be used as a 'scaffold' by cancerous cells, allowing them to grow on other organs. Scientists were able to block the uracil-powered scaffold from forming in mice. This restored the ability of the creatures' immune systems to kill secondary cancer cells, and stop the cancer from spreading. The scientists achieved this by blocking an enzyme called uridine phosphorylase-1 (UPP1), which produces uracil. They hope that detecting uracil in the blood may help spot early signs the cancer spreading—and blocking UPP1 with drugs could stop the spread before it even starts. The findings of the study, which was carried out in the labs of Professor Jim Norman and Professor Karen Blyth, were published in the Embo Reports journal. Lead author of the study, Dr Cassie Clarke, said: 'This study represents a major shift in how we think about preventing the spread of cancer. 'By targeting these metabolic changes as early as possible we could stop the cancer progressing and save lives.' Meanwhile, Dr Catherine Elliot, director of research at Cancer Research UK, said: 'Metastasis—when cancer spreads—is a major factor in breast cancer becoming harder to treat, especially if the cancer returns months or even many years later. 'This discovery gives us new hope for detecting and stopping metastasis early and ensuring people have many more years with their families and loved ones.' The research may also help stop the spread of other cancers to other parts of the body, too added Simon Vincent, chief scientific officer at Breast Cancer Now. 'Now we need more research to see if this new insight can be turned into new drugs that stop secondary breast cancer, and potentially other secondary cancers,' he said. The team of researchers at from the Cancer Research UK Institute and University of Glasgow are now testing the ability of drugs to prevent cancer occurring. It comes amid an alarming prediction earlier this year that breast cancer deaths in the UK will soar by more than 40 per cent by 2050. By the same year, globally, another study estimated there will be 3.2million new cases and 1.1million breast-related deaths per year if current trends continue. The disease is far more prevalent in those over 50, which is the age women typically experience the menopause. It is the most common type of cancer in the UK, taking the lives of around 11,500 Britons and 42,000 Americans each year. Early signs of the disease are a lump in the breast, swelling or lump in the armpit, change in size or shape of breasts, discharge of fluid from the nipple. Others include dimpling, a rash or redness on skin, as well as crusting, scaly or itchy skin on the nipple. Despite years of pleas from cancer charities, more than a third of women in the UK still do not regularly assess their breasts. However, it should be part of your monthly routine, so you can notice any unusual changes, charity CoppaFeel previously said. You can check in the shower, when you are lying down in bed or in the mirror before you get dressed. Because breast tissue isn't just found in your boobs, it's also important that men and women check the tissue all the way to their collarbone and underneath their armpit. There is no right or wrong way to check your breasts, as long as you know how your breasts usually look and feel, says the NHS. Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and affects more than two MILLION women a year Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. Each year in the UK there are more than 55,000 new cases, and the disease claims the lives of 11,500 women. In the US, it strikes 266,000 each year and kills 40,000. But what causes it and how can it be treated? What is breast cancer? It comes from a cancerous cell which develops in the lining of a duct or lobule in one of the breasts. When the breast cancer has spread into surrounding tissue it is called 'invasive'. Some people are diagnosed with 'carcinoma in situ', where no cancer cells have grown beyond the duct or lobule. Most cases develop in those over the age of 50 but younger women are sometimes affected. Breast cancer can develop in men, though this is rare. Staging indicates how big the cancer is and whether it has spread. Stage 1 is the earliest stage and stage 4 means the cancer has spread to another part of the body. The cancerous cells are graded from low, which means a slow growth, to high, which is fast-growing. High-grade cancers are more likely to come back after they have first been treated. What causes breast cancer? A cancerous tumour starts from one abnormal cell. The exact reason why a cell becomes cancerous is unclear. It is thought that something damages or alters certain genes in the cell. This makes the cell abnormal and multiply 'out of control'. Although breast cancer can develop for no apparent reason, there are some risk factors that can increase the chance, such as genetics. What are the symptoms of breast cancer? The usual first symptom is a painless lump in the breast, although most are not cancerous and are fluid filled cysts, which are benign. The first place that breast cancer usually spreads to is the lymph nodes in the armpit. If this occurs you will develop a swelling or lump in an armpit. How is breast cancer diagnosed? Initial assessment: A doctor examines the breasts and armpits. They may do tests such as a mammography, a special x-ray of the breast tissue which can indicate the possibility of tumours. Biopsy: A biopsy is when a small sample of tissue is removed from a part of the body. The sample is then examined under a microscope to look for abnormal cells. The sample can confirm or rule out cancer. If you are confirmed to have breast cancer, further tests may be needed to assess if it has spread. For example, blood tests, an ultrasound scan of the liver or a chest X-ray. How is breast cancer treated? Treatment options which may be considered include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone treatment. Often a combination of two or more of these treatments are used. Surgery: Breast-conserving surgery or the removal of the affected breast depending on the size of the tumour. Radiotherapy: A treatment which uses high energy beams of radiation focused on cancerous tissue. This kills cancer cells, or stops them from multiplying. It is mainly used in addition to surgery. Chemotherapy: A treatment of cancer by using anti-cancer drugs which kill cancer cells, or stop them from multiplying. Hormone treatments: Some types of breast cancer are affected by the 'female' hormone oestrogen, which can stimulate the cancer cells to divide and multiply. Treatments which reduce the level of these hormones, or prevent them from working, are commonly used in people with breast cancer. How successful is treatment? The outlook is best in those who are diagnosed when the cancer is still small, and has not spread. Surgical removal of a tumour in an early stage may then give a good chance of cure. The routine mammography offered to women between the ages of 50 and 71 means more breast cancers are being diagnosed and treated at an early stage. For more information visit or call its free helpline on 0808 800 6000 But one of the most popular methods online involves using the pads of your fingers. Examining your entire breast and armpit area, simply, rub and feel from top to bottom of the breast. You should also feel in semi-circles and in a circular motion around your breast tissue to feel for any abnormalities, according to a guide shared in a blog post by the University of Nottingham. Then look in the mirror for any visual lumps, skin texture and changes and changes in nipple shape or abnormal discharge. If you spot any changes, you should get it checked out by your GP. Women aged between 50 and 70 should also be attending routine breast cancer screenings.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Date set for 24-hour stroke treatment rollout at Royal Preston
A potentially life-saving stroke treatment will be available around the clock in Lancashire by early next year, according to the region's health board. The Royal Preston Hospital already offers the procedure, known as a thrombectomy, to suitable patients in Lancashire and South Cumbira – but only between 08:00 and 18:00 BST. The hospital was set to start offering the procedure at all hours of the day by September 2024, but the plan had to be pushed back because of difficulties recruiting staff. A meeting of the NHS Lancashire and South Cumbria Integrated Care Board (ICB) heard that the treatment would be offered 24 hours a day from 1 February 2026 at the latest. A thrombectomy is only utilised to treat strokes caused by a blood clot in a large artery in the brain. The procedure involves surgically removing the clot, but it has to be done soon after a stroke occurs to be Christopher Long recently warned that limited access to the procedure posed a life-threatening risk to patients in Lancashire and South Cumbria, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS). He issued the warning at an inquest earlier this year into the death of Michelle Mason, 45, who died at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary in June 2024 after suffering a treatment was "considered" in her case, but would not have been available at the time she needed it, the coroner heard. The ICB's acting medical director, Dr Andy Knox, told the meeting the hospital had now recruited enough interventional radiologists "to be able to fulfil the rota requirements" of 24-hour he said more time was needed to bring in a new consultant. Dr Knox said the ICB was pushing for the Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, which runs the Royal Preston Hospital, to roll out the 24-hour programme by October. However, he acknowledged it would place the hospital under additional pressure, adding: "We know that things will be in place by 1st February."He said co-operation had improved with other trusts within north-west England meaning patients from Lancashire and South Cumbria could be transferred elsewhere for a thrombectomy when required in the meantime. The LDRS has approached the trust for comment. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Hospitals are meant to cure and care for our loved ones, not destroy their quality of life
Among the daily cascade of statistics about the state of the NHS lie, as we all know, individual human stories and for some a quiet rage about how hospitals meant to cure and care for patients are destroying their quality of life. Last weekend, we 'celebrated' my older brother's 82nd birthday in a nursing home. Not where he or we had planned to spend it. In early April, he went into a West Midlands hospital with an infection, shortly afterwards diagnosed as pneumonia. He was in a four-bed section of a ward which appeared fairly well-staffed. But despite numbers, it's difficult to do one's job properly or competently when there's a dominant culture of not caring. A father of three and formerly a successful business owner, my brother has had dementia for several years now but, prior to his admission, he had a good quality of life. The pub one day or night a week for a zero beer with old friends and new, who made a fuss of him, meals out, and two days a week at dementia day care. Supported by a number of privately paid part-time carers, my sister-in-law cared for him so well, and he tucked into his food and watched his beloved sport on TV. So, what happened to all that? After four weeks in an NHS hospital, my brother was finally discharged, cured of pneumonia but unable to walk, doubly incontinent and having lost quite a lot of weight. He was not taken to the toilet but kept throughout in 'nappies'. My sister-in-law frequently had to tell staff when his bed was soaking wet. He lost weight because meals were deposited in front of patients – if you were able-bodied you ate, if not, or confused with dementia, the meal just sat there before it was taken away. Only one male nurse we saw made any attempt to help patients eat. Physio was initially offered but only when he was still very ill with pneumonia. When well enough, we asked for physio but were told he hadn't engaged. So, no physio, despite protests. He now sits in a wheelchair in what is an excellent nursing home paid for by his wife, after she discharged him, but the life he had is gone forever. Precious time was wasted at the hospital as unworkable home care packages were proposed. Having fractured her spine last summer lifting my brother from a fall and also recovering from an NHS treatment that has – at least temporarily – worsened her health, my sister-in-law can no longer care for him at home in the state he is now in. It's more than fortunate that she has the funds (for now) to pay for a nursing home. So many others have no choice but to be in the hands of cash-strapped councils. I've deliberately not shared my brother's name to protect his dignity and privacy, nor identified the hospital as a formal complaint will be made. I know that my brother's plight is not unique. But how can we ensure that the elderly and vulnerable, unable to speak for themselves, are not robbed of their mobility, dignity and quality of life as a result of such a short hospital stay. I'm angry and sad in equal measures, and determined to warn others who are older and liable to require hospitalisation, to beware. Your NHS may have some nasty surprises in store. Meanwhile, Secretary of State, it's too late for my brother, but what are you going to do and when to ensure that NHS hospitals are places of safety and prolong rather than shorten a decent quality of life?