New autism discovery paves way for personalized care
subtypes of autism
is a major step toward understanding the condition's genetic underpinnings and improving care, researchers reported in Nature Genetics.
According to researchers, the four autism subtypes can be categorized as: Behavioral Challenges, Mixed Autism Spectrum Disorder with Developmental Delay, Moderate Challenges, and Broadly Affected. Each subtype exhibits distinct developmental, medical, behavioral and psychiatric traits, and importantly, different patterns of genetic variation, the researchers said.
The findings are drawn from a study of more than 5,000
children with autism
, ages 4 to 18, and nearly 2,000 of their nonautistic siblings. The study looked for nearly 240 traits in each individual, from social interactions to repetitive behaviors to developmental milestones.
While the four subtypes may share some traits - like developmental delays and intellectual disability - the genetic differences suggest distinct mechanisms are behind what appear on the surface to be similar characteristics.
The timing of genetic disruptions and the effects on brain development differ with each subtype, researchers found.
As a result, some of the genetic impact of autism may occur before birth, while other effects may emerge as children grow, according to the study.
"What we're seeing is not just one biological story of autism, but multiple distinct narratives," study co-leader Natalie Sauerwald of the Flatiron Institute in New York said in a statement.
"This helps explain why past genetic studies (of autism patients) often fell short," she said. "It was like trying to solve a jigsaw puzzle without realizing we were actually looking at multiple different puzzles mixed together. We couldn't see the full picture, the genetic patterns, until we first separated individuals into subtypes."
WEARABLES MAY IMPROVE CARE OF CHILDREN AFTER SURGERY
Young children recovering at home after surgery might someday wear fitness trackers to speed detection of complications, new research suggests.
Presently, surgeons must rely on the children themselves, or their parents, to describe new symptoms after hospital discharge. As a result, complications are not always caught at early stages.
At the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 103 children each received a Google Fitbit - a commercially available activity, sleep and heartbeat monitor worn on the wrist like a watch - to wear for three weeks starting immediately after appendectomy. Rather than just monitoring the usual metrics captured by the Fitbit, the researchers modified the devices' algorithms to look for deviations from the circadian rhythms of a child's activity and heart rate patterns.
The new algorithms were 91% accurate at flagging early signs of postoperative complications, up to three days before the children's doctors would later diagnose them, the researchers found upon reviewing the data.
The devices were 74% accurate at identifying kids who were free of complications, they reported in Science Advances.
Eventually the researchers hope to develop a real-time system that analyzes data automatically and sends alerts to children's clinical teams.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
17 hours ago
- News18
What's Really Causing Obesity? It's Not Just Junk Food or Sitting Too Much
Globally, it's defined by a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or above. But for Asian populations, including Indians, the danger zone begins at a lower BMI (≥25), thanks to our higher risk of developing metabolic issues even at modest weight levels, according to WHO guidelines. Factors Driving Obesity For a long time, physical inactivity was seen as the main cause of obesity. But a 2025 study published in PNAS and reported by The Washington Post challenges that belief. It highlights that high-calorie diets, especially those loaded with ultra-processed foods, are a major driver of obesity. Conducted across 4,000 individuals from various nations, the study found that daily energy expenditure is similar across lifestyles, from hunter-gatherers to urban office workers, suggesting that dietary excess, not lack of exercise, fuels weight gain in industrialised nations like India. While the debate continues between those who blame inactivity, those who blame diet, and those who believe both play a role, this study underscores the need to prioritise reducing processed food consumption in public health strategies. Dietary Factors: How the Indian Plate Has Changed Urbanisation and rising incomes have completely transformed how India eats. The once-wholesome Indian plate—filled with whole grains, lentils, and fresh vegetables—is increasingly being swapped for high-calorie, low-nutrient junk food. According to The Lancet (2019), urban Indian households now consume twice as many ultra-processed foods as rural ones. These products are often loaded with refined sugar and unhealthy fats, creating a steady surplus of calories. At the same time, fibre intake is falling. As per ICMR's 2020 dietary guidelines, less than 30% of Indians get enough daily fibre, which is troubling since fibre is essential for satiety and digestion. Even our snacking culture has shifted; roasted chana and fruits are being pushed aside by deep-fried snacks and sweets. The National Institute of Nutrition (NIN, 2019) directly linked frequent street food consumption to higher BMI in urban youth. The Sedentary Epidemic It's not just about what we eat; how little we move is another major part of the problem. Desk jobs, long hours in front of screens, and vehicle-heavy commutes have drastically reduced physical activity. According to the Indian Journal of Medical Research (2021), only 10–15% of urban Indians meet the WHO's recommendation of 150 minutes of moderate weekly exercise. The numbers are even starker for women. A BMJ Open (2020) study found that 40% of Indian women get less than 30 minutes of physical activity daily, largely due to cultural constraints and household demands. The result? More weight gain and a greater risk of long-term health issues. Biological Factors: Genes, Hormones, and More For Indians, biology itself adds to the challenge. Research published in Nature Genetics (2018) reveals that Indians are genetically predisposed to abdominal obesity, the most dangerous type, where fat accumulates around vital organs. This means we often face metabolic risks at much lower BMIs than people in the West. Hormonal issues also complicate things. PCOS affects about 20% of Indian women, and hypothyroidism is found in nearly 10% of adults, as per the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology (2020). Both conditions can lead to weight gain and make it harder to shed excess fat, even with lifestyle changes. Socioeconomic Factors: A Double-Edged Sword India's economic rise has brought better access to food, but not necessarily better nutrition. While people can afford more food variety, awareness around healthy eating hasn't kept up. According to the WHO's 2022 report, urban middle-class families now spend 20% more on packaged food than they did ten years ago. The latest NFHS-5 data (2019–21) reflects this trend starkly: 30% of urban women are obese, compared to 15% in rural areas. But rural India isn't far behind anymore; the numbers there are climbing too, hinting at a spreading crisis. Mind-Body Connection: The Emotional Side of Eating Mental and emotional health have a surprisingly big role in India's obesity story. The Indian Journal of Psychiatry (2021) found that 35% of urban Indians eat emotionally when stressed, typically reaching for high-calorie, sugary comfort foods. advetisement Sleep also plays a role. The ICMR (2020) found that sleeping less than 6 hours a night can double your risk of obesity. That's because poor sleep disrupts hormones that control hunger and fullness, making people more likely to overeat. Cultural Habits: When Celebrations Turn Caloric India's vibrant culture can also contribute to weight gain, especially during festivals, weddings, and family gatherings. NIN (2019) data shows that during Diwali or wedding season, people often consume 3000–5000 calories per day. That's well above the recommended intake. Even outside festivals, restaurant culture contributes to the problem. A Journal of Food Science study (2020) found that the average Indian restaurant meal is 1.5 times larger than what's nutritionally appropriate, encouraging chronic overeating. The Health Impact And How To Turn Things Around The ripple effects of obesity are serious. It's a major factor in India's diabetes epidemic (7.5% of adults) and is linked to 28% of all urban deaths from cardiovascular disease, according to The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (2021). advetisement
Time of India
5 days ago
- Time of India
New autism discovery paves way for personalized care
London: The discovery of four different subtypes of autism is a major step toward understanding the condition's genetic underpinnings and improving care, researchers reported in Nature Genetics. According to researchers, the four autism subtypes can be categorized as: Behavioral Challenges, Mixed Autism Spectrum Disorder with Developmental Delay, Moderate Challenges, and Broadly Affected. Each subtype exhibits distinct developmental, medical, behavioral and psychiatric traits, and importantly, different patterns of genetic variation, the researchers said. The findings are drawn from a study of more than 5,000 children with autism , ages 4 to 18, and nearly 2,000 of their nonautistic siblings. The study looked for nearly 240 traits in each individual, from social interactions to repetitive behaviors to developmental milestones. While the four subtypes may share some traits - like developmental delays and intellectual disability - the genetic differences suggest distinct mechanisms are behind what appear on the surface to be similar characteristics. The timing of genetic disruptions and the effects on brain development differ with each subtype, researchers found. As a result, some of the genetic impact of autism may occur before birth, while other effects may emerge as children grow, according to the study. "What we're seeing is not just one biological story of autism, but multiple distinct narratives," study co-leader Natalie Sauerwald of the Flatiron Institute in New York said in a statement. "This helps explain why past genetic studies (of autism patients) often fell short," she said. "It was like trying to solve a jigsaw puzzle without realizing we were actually looking at multiple different puzzles mixed together. We couldn't see the full picture, the genetic patterns, until we first separated individuals into subtypes." WEARABLES MAY IMPROVE CARE OF CHILDREN AFTER SURGERY Young children recovering at home after surgery might someday wear fitness trackers to speed detection of complications, new research suggests. Presently, surgeons must rely on the children themselves, or their parents, to describe new symptoms after hospital discharge. As a result, complications are not always caught at early stages. At the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 103 children each received a Google Fitbit - a commercially available activity, sleep and heartbeat monitor worn on the wrist like a watch - to wear for three weeks starting immediately after appendectomy. Rather than just monitoring the usual metrics captured by the Fitbit, the researchers modified the devices' algorithms to look for deviations from the circadian rhythms of a child's activity and heart rate patterns. The new algorithms were 91% accurate at flagging early signs of postoperative complications, up to three days before the children's doctors would later diagnose them, the researchers found upon reviewing the data. The devices were 74% accurate at identifying kids who were free of complications, they reported in Science Advances. Eventually the researchers hope to develop a real-time system that analyzes data automatically and sends alerts to children's clinical teams.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
6 days ago
- First Post
Big fat problem: Why 'eat less, move more' mantra might not always work to fight obesity
For years, people living with obesity have been given the same basic advice: eat less, move more. But while this mantra may sound simple, it's not effective for all. Genetics, childhood experiences, cultural norms, economic disadvantage, psychological health, mental illness and even the kind of job you have all play a role and cannot be ignored read more Advertisement While behaviour change has a place, focusing on it exclusively creates a dangerous narrative: that people who struggle with their weight are simply lazy or lack willpower. Image for Representation. Reuters For years, people living with obesity have been given the same basic advice: eat less, move more. But while this mantra may sound simple, it's not only ineffective for many, it can be deeply misleading and damaging. Obesity is not just about willpower. It's a complex, chronic, relapsing condition and affects around 26.5 per cent of adults in England , and 22.1 per cent of children aged ten–11 in England. A new report estimates the rapidly growing number of people that are overweight or obese costs the UK £126 billion a year . This includes £71.4 billion in reduced quality of life and early mortality, £12.6 billion in NHS treatment costs, £12.1 billion from unemployment and £10.5 billion in informal care. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Food campaigners and health experts have called for urgent government action , including expanding the sugar tax to more products, restricting junk food advertising and mandating reformulation of ultra processed foods. As Henry Dimbleby , author of a government-commissioned independent report called the National Food Strategy , warned: 'We've created a food system that's poisoning our population and bankrupting the state.' Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. Without significant policy change, these costs are projected to rise to £150 billion a year by 2035. Despite this, much of the UK's approach continues to frame obesity as a lifestyle issue that can be tackled by emphasising personal responsibility. But this framing ignores the bigger picture. We now understand that obesity is multifactorial . Genetics, childhood experiences, cultural norms, economic disadvantage, psychological health, mental illness and even the kind of job you have all play a role. These aren't things you can simply change with a Fitbit and salad. obesity is multifactorial. Genetics, childhood experiences, cultural norms, economic disadvantage, psychological health, mental illness and even the kind of job you have all play a roleImage courtesy: Pixabay/Representational This broader perspective isn't new. In 2007, the UK government's Foresight report mapped out the complex web of factors behind rising obesity rates, describing how modern environments actively promote weight gain . This 'obesogenic environment' refers to the world we live in. Its one where high-calorie, low-nutrient foods are cheap and everywhere, and where physical activity has been engineered out of everyday life, from car-centric cities to screen-dominated leisure time. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These environments don't affect everyone equally. People in more deprived areas are significantly more exposed to conditions that drive obesity, such as food deserts (areas with limited access to affordable, nutritious food), poor public transport and limited green space. In this context, weight gain becomes a normal biological response to an abnormal environment. Why 'eat less, move more' isn't helping Despite growing awareness of these systemic issues, most UK obesity strategies still centre on individual behaviour change, often through weight management programmes that encourage people to cut calories and exercise more. While behaviour change has a place, focusing on it exclusively creates a dangerous narrative: that people who struggle with their weight are simply lazy or lack willpower. This narrative fuels weight stigma, which can be incredibly harmful. Yet data shows a clear link between higher rates of obesity and deprivation, especially among children . There is a clear link between higher rates of obesity and deprivation, especially among children. Image for Representation. Reuters It's clear many people still don't understand the role of structural and socioeconomic factors in shaping obesity risk. And this misunderstanding leads to judgement, shame and stigma, especially for children and families who are already vulnerable. What should good obesity care look like? Instead of outdated advice and blame, we need a holistic, stigma-free and science-informed approach to obesity care, one that reflects current Nice guidelines and the Obesity Health Alliance 's recommendations. There are several things that need to be done. First, we should recognise obesity as a chronic disease. Obesity is not a failure of willpower. It's a relapsing, long-term medical condition . Like diabetes or depression, it requires structured, ongoing support, not short-term fixes or crash diets. Second, we need to tackle weight stigma head-on. Weight-based discrimination is widespread in schools, workplaces and even healthcare settings. We need training for professionals to reduce bias, promote inclusive care and adopt person-centred, non-stigmatising language . Discriminatory practices must be challenged and eliminated. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Third, deliver personalised, multidimensional support. Treatment plans should be tailored to each person's life, including their cultural background, psychological history and social context. This includes shared decision-making, regular follow-up and integrated mental health support. Instead of outdated advice and blame, we need a holistic, stigma-free and science-informed approach to obesity care. Image for Representation. Pixabay And fourth, focus on changing the environment, not just people. We must shift the focus to the systems and structures that make healthy choices so hard. That means investing in affordable, nutritious food; improving access to physical activity; and tackling inequality at its roots. Need for a systemic shift Obesity isn't just about what people eat or how often they exercise. It's shaped by biology , experience and the environment we build around people. Framing it as a personal failure not only ignores decades of evidence – it actively harms the very people who need support. If we want to reduce stigma, improve health outcomes – and avoid a £150bn crisis – then the 'eat less, move more' era must come to an end. What we need instead is a bold, compassionate, evidence-based systems approach – one that sees the whole person and the world they live in. Lucie Nield , Senior Lecturer in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Sheffield and Catherine Homer , Associate Professor of Obesity and Public Health, School of Sport and Physical Activity , Sheffield Hallam University STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article .
