
Politicians want you to pay for ‘cashless bail.' It's dangerous and expensive
By Michelle Esquenazi
Published August 18, 2025
"Cashless bail" is one of the most misleading phrases in modern politics. Reform advocates coined it, the media amplified it, and it stuck. The reality? What we provide is secured bail — a constitutionally protected, privately funded system that ensures defendants appear in court and protects the public, all without costing taxpayers a dime.
Ironically, the term "cashless" could make us sound like the good guys. We accept all forms of payment. We take the financial risk. We are legally liable for producing defendants in court. We operate 24/7 — making payroll, paying taxes, freeing the accused in an accountable way, and, when necessary, tracking fugitives so victims are protected and prosecutions move forward. Courts and judges who still have secured bail know it works, because we have skin in the game. The New Jersey Example
In 2016, New Jersey passed the Bail Reform Act, removing the accused's right to bail and replacing private secured bail with a taxpayer-funded pretrial release bureaucracy. Here's what happened:
CINCINNATI ASSAULT: POLICE CHIEFS RIP LEADERS OVER BAIL LAWS, 'GAPS IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS' No right to bail – defendants can now be held without release until trial.
Taxpayer burden – counties spend millions annually to operate pretrial programs once handled at no cost by the private sector.
Accountability removed – bondsmen, motivated to ensure court appearances, have been pushed out.
The results were predictable. Ed Forchion, a Marine veteran and self-described "peaceful political pothead," was held for 447 days on a witness tampering charge tied to a Facebook post — not a violent crime — without the possibility of bail. I offered the prosecutor a $2 million secured bond to secure his release. They couldn't take it. Why? Because New Jersey no longer recognizes the right to bail.
TRUMP DEMANDS END TO CASHLESS BAIL, SAYS 'COMPLETE DISASTER' DRIVING CRIME IN CITIES, ENDANGERING POLICE
The costs are staggering. In 2016, the New Jersey Association of Counties sued the state because there was no funding in county budgets for this massive new mandate. Today, residents continue to pay millions each year for a system that is less accountable and less effective than what it replaced. Where It's Headed
Tennessee is now on track to follow New Jersey's path and other states are considering similar changes. Once the suggested right to bail is stripped away, it's nearly impossible to restore. The shift is always the same: from private accountability to public expense, from a proven, self-funded system to a costly government program.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION The "Cashless" Myth
Every politician who has signed onto "bail reform" gets paid whether they work or not. They don't understand what we do because they're chasing a funded narrative. If tomorrow's narrative was "funeral home reform," they'd be after multi-generation, family-owned funeral homes with the same zeal.
MURDER VICTIM'S MOTHER SOUNDS OFF ON GOV. PRITZKER'S NO-CASH BAIL: 'THIS IS WHAT HE WANTED'
The truth is simple: "cashless bail" isn't about making the system fairer. It's about replacing private industry with government bureaucracy — funded by you, the taxpayer. A Better Way Forward
President Donald Trump demonstrated leadership on post-conviction reform. Now is the time to address pretrial justice reform. The Eighth Amendment suggests that the accused have the right to bail, and it's time to defend it nationally.
The costs are staggering. In 2016, the New Jersey Association of Counties sued the state because there was no funding in county budgets for this massive new mandate.
A balanced approach is possible — one that maintains judicial discretion, protects public safety, and ensures defendants appear in court without shifting the financial burden to taxpayers. Secured bail achieves all of this.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Congress should act now to protect the bail before more states follow New Jersey's failed example. Without action, the cost to taxpayers will climb, accountability will drop, and victims will be left waiting for justice.
We in the private bail industry are ready to work with leaders who understand the vital role of private enterprise in the criminal justice system. We are, as I like to say, the "Coal Miners of Criminal Justice" — doing the hard, unglamorous work that keeps the system running, even when the lights are off. Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/politicians-want-you-pay-cashless-bail-its-dangerous-expensive
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelensky, EU Leaders Meet Trump in Historic White House Talks
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy meets with General Keith Kellogg, U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Ukraine, in Washington D.C., ahead of Zelensky's meetings with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House on August 18, 2025. Credit - Ukrainian Presidency/Anadolu via Getty Images President Donald Trump is scheduled Monday afternoon to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, where six months ago the two leaders engaged in a televised shouting match that threw into doubt how long the U.S. would continue its support for Ukraine against a Russia invasion. Zelensky is returning backed by an extraordinary delegation of European leaders determined to present a united front against Russia to Trump, days after Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska ended without any concrete steps toward a peace agreement. Zelensky is expected to be joined by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Mark Rutte, Secretary-General of NATO, is also attending. According to the White House schedule, Trump will first meet with Zelensky at 1:15 p.m. before greeting the European leaders, followed by a multilateral meeting with all parties at 3:00 p.m. Zelensky and the other world leaders will face the challenging task of trying to retain Trump's support for his country's defense against Russia as Trump has made public statements in line with Putin's positions for a peace agreement, including asserting that Zelensky must accept territorial concessions and that Ukraine must end efforts to join NATO. In a Sunday post on Truth Social, Trump asserted that Zelensky could end the war "almost immediately" by agreeing to these terms, framing Ukraine as having the primary responsibility to resolve the conflict initiated by Russia's 2022 invasion. This stance, coupled with Trump's rejection of Ukraine's NATO membership aspirations, has raised concerns among Ukrainian officials and European allies about diminishing U.S. support for Kyiv's sovereignty. Zelensky has repeatedly rejected ceding territory to Russia over the course of the war, emphasizing that it must end the war on terms that safeguard Ukraine's sovereignty. Ahead of the meeting, Macron said that 'if we show weakness today in front of Russia, we are laying the ground for future conflicts,' highlighting broader concerns that any forced compromise could embolden Moscow and threaten European security in the years ahead. The high-stakes discussions will largely focus on securing robust security guarantees for Ukraine, exploring potential pathways to a sustainable peace, and countering Russia's ongoing aggression while navigating Trump's push for a rapid resolution that aligns with his deal-making approach. Russian attacks on Ukraine have continued amid the ongoing diplomatic talks. Just hours before Zelensky's meeting with Trump, Russian strikes on the cities of Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia killed at least 10 people, including a child, and injured dozens of others, according to Ukrainian authorities. Zelensky has called the timing of the strikes an attempt by Putin to put pressure on Ukraine to accept its terms. Zelensky is expected to press for a NATO-style security framework, potentially involving multinational peacekeeping forces, to deter future Russian incursions without relying solely on U.S. support, which has become increasingly uncertain under Trump's leadership. The outcome of the meeting could reshape the trajectory of the war and U.S.-European relations. A failure to secure firm commitments from Trump risks leaving Ukraine vulnerable and could strain the transatlantic alliance, while a successful push for security guarantees and continued support might strengthen Ukraine's position against Russia. This is a breaking news story and will be updated. Write to Nik Popli at Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say
ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising violated the Constitution, a federal appeals court says, because blocking Big Tech from telling customers about the tax violates the companies' right to free speech. Supporters say Maryland needed to overhaul its tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise. The tax focuses on large companies that make money advertising on the internet such as Meta, Google and Amazon, who say they're being unfairly targeted. The ongoing legal fight is being watched by other states that are considering taxes for online ads. Maryland estimated the tax could raise about $250 million a year to help pay for a sweeping K-12 education measure. Maryland's law says the companies must not only pay the tax, but avoid telling customers how it affects pricing, with no line items, surcharges or fees, said the appeals court Friday in siding with trade associations fighting the tax. Judge Julius Richardson cited the Colonial-era Stamp Act, which helped spark the Revolutionary War, and wrote that 'criticizing the government — for taxes or anything else — is important discourse in a democratic society.' The plaintiffs contended Maryland lawmakers were trying to insulate themselves from criticism and political accountability by forbidding companies from explaining the tax to their customers. 'A state cannot duck criticism by silencing those affected by its tax,' the judge wrote. The unanimous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a decision by U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby and sends the case back to her with instructions to consider an appropriate remedy in light of the panel's decision. Trade groups praised the decision. 'Maryland tried to prevent criticism of its tax scheme, and the Fourth Circuit recognized that tactic for what it was: censorship,' said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said in a statement. The law imposes a tax based on global annual gross revenues for companies that make more than $100 million globally. Under the law, the tax rate is 2.5% for businesses making more than $100 million in global gross annual revenue; 5% for companies making $1 billion or more; 7.5% for companies making $5 billion or more and 10% for companies making $15 billion or more. The law has been challenged in multiple legal venues, including Maryland Tax Court, where the case is ongoing. The Maryland General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats, overrode a veto of the legislation in 2021 by then-Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican. Brian Witte, The Associated Press
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration said to discuss taking 10% in Intel, Bloomberg News reports
(Reuters) -The Trump administration is said to discuss taking a 10% stake in American chipmaker Intel, Bloomberg News reported on Monday, citing a White House official and other people familiar with the matter. Shares of the company were down 3.8%. The federal government is considering a potential investment in Intel that would involve converting some or all of the company's grants from the U.S. Chips and Science Act into equity, the report said. Trump, who met Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan on August 11, has taken an unprecedented approach to national security. He has pushed for multibillion-dollar government tie-ups in semiconductors and rare earths such as a pay-for-play deal with Nvidia and an arrangement with rare earth producer MP Materials to secure critical minerals. Tan, who took the top job just over six months back, has been tasked to turnaround Intel. Federal backing could give Intel more breathing room to revive its loss-making foundry business, analysts said, but it still suffers from a weak product roadmap and challenges in attracting customers to its new factories. Sign in to access your portfolio