
Capitol rioter Pamela Hemphill rejects Trump's Jan. 6 pardon
On Jan. 6, 2021, Hemphill was among the thousands of Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol building in Washington, D.C., to protest the 2020 presidential election results.
She pled guilty to one misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating or picketing in the Capitol building and was sentenced to two months in jail, 36 months of probation and $500 restitution.
On Jan. 20, Trump pardoned more than 1,500 people charged in the Capitol attack.
In an April 2 letter to Sen. Risch that Hemphill shared with USA TODAY, the Pardon Attorney's office said it noted her "non-acceptance" of the pardon.
"Our Office will not issue Ms. Hemphill a certificate of pardon and will refrain from requesting any notation of pardon on her criminal history record," the letter says.
A spokesperson for Sen. Risch said the senator's office regularly assists constituents with matters pertaining to federal agencies and declined to reveal additional details about Hemphill's case.
The Office of the Pardon Attorney and the White House did not immediately respond to request for comment.
'It was not OK that day'
The 72-year-old said she pursued formally turning down the pardon because she wanted to be honest.
"How could I live my life knowing that I was guilty and then I took that pardon?" she said. "It's kind of like a message that it was OK that day - it was not OK that day. That was the worst day of my life."
She said choosing to speak out against Trump's Jan. 6 pardons has been difficult at times, citing backlash she's received from some Trump supporters. But "it's been worth it to know that maybe there's another Pam out there that might listen to me and and get away from the MAGA call," she said.
"The benefits of being honest with yourself outweigh any of the smear campaigns you might get or the backlash, because you sleep good at night," she said. "It's inner peace."
Hemphill said she started to reconsider her support of Trump about six months after she was released from prison in 2022.
"It's been a gradual process, it's not like I had a white light experience," she said.
Since then, Hemphill has spoken out against Trump and his narrative surrounding the Capitol attack. She also voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.
Can a presidential pardon be rejected? How Capitol rioter turned it down
According to the Constitution, a pardon can be rejected by the person it is tendered to.
After Trump issued pardons for the Jan. 6 defendants, Hemphill said she initially wrote a letter to the Office of the Pardon Attorney asking to not be included in the act.
Sen. Risch's office helped her file the correct paperwork, she said, and about a month later they received the formal letter acknowledging her "non-acceptance" of the pardon.
Jason Riddle, a New Hampshire man who served 90 days in jail for participation in the attack, said in January that he also rejected the pardon, according to New Hampshire Public Radio. It's unclear whether any other individuals charged in the riot have turned down Trump's pardon.
Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at melina.khan@usatoday.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity
Teachers, social workers, nurses and other public workers would be cut off from a popular student loan cancellation program if the Trump administration finds their employer engaged in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose,' under a new federal proposal released on Friday. The Education Department took aim at nonprofits or government bodies that work with immigrants and transgender youth, releasing plans to overhaul the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Opponents fear the new policy would turn the loan forgiveness benefit into a tool of political retribution. The proposal would give the education secretary the final say in deciding whether a group or government entity should be excluded from the program, which was created by Congress in 2007 to encourage more college graduates to enter lower-paying public service fields. The proposal says illegal activity includes the trafficking or 'chemical castration' of children, illegal immigration and supporting foreign terrorist organizations. 'Chemical castration' is defined as using hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common for transgender children or teens. President Donald Trump ordered the changes in March, saying the loan forgiveness program was steering taxpayer money to 'activist organizations' that pose a threat to national security and do not serve the public. The public will be given 30 days to weigh in on the proposal before it can be finalized. Any changes would take effect in July 2026. Under current rules, government employees and many nonprofit workers can get their federal student loans canceled after they've made 10 years of payments. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and employees of public hospitals, along with nonprofits that focus on certain areas. The new proposal would exclude employees of any organization tied to an activity deemed illegal. The Education Department predicts that fewer than 10 organizations would be deemed ineligible per year. It doesn't expect a 'significant reduction' in the percentage of borrowers who would be granted forgiveness under the program, according to the proposal. Yet the agency acknowledges that not all industries would be affected evenly. Schools, universities, health care providers, social workers and legal services organizations are among those most likely to have their eligibility jeopardized, the department wrote. It did not give more specifics about what 'illegal' actions those groups were taking that could bar them from the program. But the proposal suggests that performing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that outlaw it would be enough. If a state or federal court rules against an employer, that could lead to its expulsion from the program, or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that includes an admission of wrongdoing. Even without a legal finding, however, the education secretary could determine independently that an organization should be ejected. The secretary could judge whether an organization participated in illegal activity by using a legal standard known as the 'preponderance of the evidence' — meaning it's more likely than not that an accusation is true. Once an organization is barred from the program, its workers' future loan payments would no longer count toward cancellation. They would have to find work at another eligible employer to keep making progress toward forgiveness. A ban from the Education Department would last 10 years or until the employer completed a 'corrective action plan' approved by the secretary. Critics blasted the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellation. Kristin McGuire, CEO of the nonprofit Young Invincibles, which advocates for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to confuse borrowers. 'By using a distorted and overly broad definition of 'illegal activities,' the Trump administration is exploiting the student loan system to attack political opponents,' McGuire said in a statement. The Education Department sketched out its plans for the overhaul during a federal rulemaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help hash out the details — a process known as negotiated rulemaking. But the panel failed to reach a consensus, which freed the department to move forward with a proposal of its own design. The proposal released on Friday included some changes meant to ease concerns raised by the expert panel. Some had worried the department would ban organizations merely for supporting transgender rights, even if they have no direct involvement in gender-affirming care. The new proposal clarifies that the secretary would not expel organizations for exercising their First Amendment rights. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at


Daily Mirror
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump 'whispers "I'll help you" to Vladimir Putin' before meeting in major WW3 warning
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin participated in a red carpet greeting on Friday afternoon, with the US President receiving sharp criticism for the glowing reception, sparking further fears of WW3 Donald Trump appeared to show immediate support for Vladimir Putin as they met for crunch talks in Alaska this evening, with a lip reader detailing the moment he whispered "I'll help you". The two world leaders were all smiles as they touched down in Alaskan capital Anchorage this evening for Ukraine ceasefire talks, with the pair appearing best of friends while strolling along the red carpet to Mr Trump's awaiting Presidential limousine. Their body language made a positive impression in Russia, where state-aligned media outlets praised the "friendly" greeting. A lipreader has now shed light on what the two actually said to one another as their initial conversation was drowned out by the sounds of American jets flying in celebratory formation overhead. READ MORE: Trump-Putin LIVE: US President and Russia leader smirk on red carpet after loving handshake Speaking to The Mirror, lipreader Nicola Hickling said the first thing Mr Trump said to his Russian counterpart was "finally", with the two exchanging a few more words as they walked towards the President's car. She added that, as the two shook hands, Mr Trump added: "You made it, fantastic to see you and appreciated." Ms Hickling added the President then took a "sharp intake of breath through his teeth" before Putin responds with an olive branch, saying: "Thank you — and you. I am here to help you." She said Mr Trump said "I'll help you" in response. At this point, the two leaders were already in motion, walking down the red carpet laid for them both while seeming to speak amicably, but lipreader Ms Hickling said Mr Trump stressed the "serious" nature of the meeting. At one point in the conversation, Putin appeared to suggest he would "bring it to a rest" while the US President responds: "I hope it does." As they turned towards the limousine - which Mr Trump has named 'The Beast' - Ms Hickling said Mr Trump told his companion: "Come on, let's get straight into the vehicle. We need to move forward, both giving it attention." After the two arrived at the podium for their first official photos together, Ms Hickling said Mr Trump took the lead again by trying to make "a good impression". She said he told Putin: "Thank you. Let's shake hands — it gives a good impression." In response, she said Putin delivered a straightforward "thank you". The initial meeting of the Russian and US leaders has immediately raised eyebrows, with Mr Trump being sharply criticised for his glowing reception of Putin. Ukrainians, who have said they are "disgusted" by the red carpet treatment, have not been represented in the meeting, with the country's president Volodymyr Zelensky saying there should be trilateral talks involving himself. He said ahead of the talks on Wednesday: 'Everything concerning Ukraine must be discussed exclusively with Ukraine. We must prepare a trilateral format for talks.'


Scottish Sun
32 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Trump-Putin latest: Vlad gives Don thumbs-up as US president greets tyrant with handshake in Alaska ahead of peace talks
Scroll down to see our live coverage of today's meeting WAR TALKS Trump-Putin latest: Vlad gives Don thumbs-up as US president greets tyrant with handshake in Alaska ahead of peace talks Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump and Vladimir Putin shook hands and smiled at each other as they landed in Alaska for a historic peace summit. The Russian president looked relaxed as he walked down a red carpet towards Trump - giving the US leader a thumbs-up before greeting him with a warm handshake. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Trump shakes hands with Putin on the tarmac Credit: AFP 4 Putin gave Trump a thumbs-up as he walked down the red carpet in Alaska Credit: Sky News 4 Trump salutes as he walks down the red carpet with Putin by his side Credit: Reuters 4 Trump and Putin meet during a US-Russia summit on Ukraine at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska Credit: AFP Trump was seen giving Putin a round of applause after the pair touched down at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. The US president flew a B2 stealth bomber over Putin head as they greeted each other before having a moment alone in Trump's limo - nicknamed The Beast. It was the first time in almost a decade that Putin had set foot on US soil - despite being a wanted war criminal. During a photo op, Putin was heckled by journalists over whether he was 'ready to stop killing civilians' - and Trump dodged questions on how he could trust Putin. The pair met moments after the White House revealed the summit would be a three-on-three meeting - with Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff joining Trump. Putin, on the other hand, will bring in Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov. Volodymyr Zelensky said he is "counting on America" as Trump and Putin prepare to meet for crunch talks. He said he hopes the peace summit between the two leaders leads to a trilateral meeting to get Ukraine involved in the peacemaking process. In a lengthy post on X, wrote: "The key thing is that this meeting should open up a real path toward a just peace and a substantive discussion between leaders in a trilateral format – Ukraine, the United States, and the Russian side. "It is time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America. "We are ready, as always, to work as productively as possible." Trump says tyrant Putin's need to kill 'might be in his genes' but onslaught 'hurts his negotiations' as leaders head to Alaska for Ukraine peace summit It comes after Trump blasted Putin for continuing to attack Ukraine and said his urge to kill "might be in his genes". The high-stakes talks could last up to seven hours, the Kremlin said earlier - and will be followed by a press conference. Before the summit kicked off, residents in Anchorage held protests about Putin being allowed to set foot on US soil due to him facing an arrest warrant over war crime allegations. Trump echoed some of the protesters' thoughts as he spoke to reporters ahead of his first face-to-face meeting with Putin in six years. He said: "In [Putin's] mind, it helps him make a better deal if they can continue the killing. "Maybe it's a part of the world, maybe it's a part of his fabric, his genes, his genetics, but he thinks it gives him strength in negotiating. "I think it hurts him." Trump also warned that Russia faces "very severe" consequences if Putin doesn't appear interested in agreeing to a peace deal during the summit. Don voiced concerns about how Putin might behave during the talks - comparing the summit to a chess game. Read our live blog for the latest on the Trump and Putin peace talks...