Germany Hands Syrian Doctor Life for Torturing Assad Critics
A Syrian doctor who had practiced in Germany was sentenced to life in prison by a German court on Monday for crimes against humanity and war crimes after he was found guilty of torturing dissidents in Syria.
The 40-year-old, identified only as Alaa M. in accordance with German privacy laws, was found guilty of killing two people and torturing another eight during his time working in Syria as a doctor at a military hospital and detention center in Homs in 2011 and 2012.
The court said his crimes were part of a systematic attack against people protesting against then-President Bashar al-Assad that precipitated the country's civil war.
Assad was toppled in December. His government denied it tortured prisoners.
Alaa M. arrived in Germany in 2015, after fleeing to Germany among a large influx of Syrian refugees, and became one of roughly 10,000 Syrian medics who helped ease acute staff shortages in the country's healthcare system.
He was arrested in June 2020, and was handed a life sentence without parole, the Higher Regional Court in Frankfurt said in a statement.
The defendant had pleaded not guilty, saying he was the target of a conspiracy.
German prosecutors have used universal jurisdiction laws that allow them to seek trials for suspects in crimes against humanity committed anywhere in the world.
They have targeted several former Syrian officials in similar cases in recent years.
The plaintiffs were supported by the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights.
ECCHR lawyer Patrick Kroker called Monday's ruling "a further step towards a comprehensive reckoning with Assad's crimes".
Judges found that the doctor caused "considerable physical suffering" as a result of the torture inflicted on his victims, which included serious beatings, mistreating wounds and inflicting serious injury to the genitals of two prisoners, one of whom was a teenage boy.
Two patients died after he gave them lethal medication, the court statement said.
Monday's ruling can be appealed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Ukraine appoints new prosecutor general
KYIV: Ukraine's parliament on Tuesday appointed Ruslan Kravchenko, one of the key investigators of alleged Russian war crimes during the occupation of the Kyiv region in 2022, as prosecutor general. Kravchenko, 35, is now head of the state tax administration, and before that chaired the Kyiv region military administration. He was involved in the recording and prosecuting of alleged Russian atrocities in the town of Bucha, which was occupied for 33 days in the early stages of Moscow's full-scale invasion. Russia denies accusations of numerous executions, rapes and torture during the occupation. Kravсhenko was also a prosecutor in Ukraine's ousted President Viktor Yanukovych's treason case. The prosecutor general's post has remained vacant since October, after Andriy Kostin resigned following a scandal around officials receiving fake disability status and avoiding military service.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
European double standards on parade over Israel's war on Iran
Of all the reactions to Friday's unprovoked Israeli blitz on Iran, the European leaders' was the worst. None had the courage or the moral capacity to call it what it was: naked aggression against a sovereign state and a member of the UN. Interestingly, it was the leaders of the neighboring countries with a history of troubled ties to the Islamic Republic who were quick to condemn the Israeli attack as a clear violation of international law. One must view the European leaders' shameless position from a historical perspective. Whether it was the 2003 Anglo-American invasion of Iraq, NATO's bombardment of Libya in 2011, the genocidal war Israel is carrying out in Gaza or the stark aggression on Iran, European governments have been either directly and openly complicit or stood by and done nothing other than to lecture the world on the need to respect international law. European leaders have also proven time and again that they are merely blind followers of the US as it dictates controversial and often illegal policies about the Arab-Israeli conflict and the Israeli occupation and persecution of Palestinians. French President Emmanuel Macron's quick justification of Israel's attack on Iran was probably the worst. Other European leaders soon followed, parroting the ambiguous and misguided phrase that 'Israel has the right to defend itself.' Almost immediately, the UK's Keir Starmer, Germany's Friedrich Merz and the European Commission's Ursula von der Leyen were lining up to protect Israel and blame Iran for the most dangerous military escalation in the region since the first Gulf War. Not one leader denounced Netanyahu for his irresponsible call for regime change and the assassination of Iran's supreme leader Osama Al-Sharif One can understand the US bias in favor of Israel, no matter what it does. This has become a trait of successive American administrations, which have denied the Middle East a just and lasting settlement to the core of its instability and conflicts for decades. Israel's grip over US politics is well known. But one almost got duped by recent statements made by various European leaders who claimed that Europe must disengage and free itself from America's orbit. The illusion of such an awakening presented itself in the past few months, when European leaders attempted to distance themselves from the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over its genocidal war in Gaza. The EU tried, but failed, to make a distinction between its position against Russia's alleged crimes in Ukraine and its initial support of Israel waging a full-scale war on 2.2 million Palestinians in Gaza. Despite their apparent denunciation of Israel's Gaza war, the UK and Germany have continued to supply Israel with weapons that are being used against civilians in Gaza. So much for the crocodile tears European officials pretend to shed over the 55,000 Palestinians Israel has killed so far. But to go back to the Iran debacle, not one European leader has had the integrity to point to the fact that Israel launched its attack two days before the US and Iran were to hold a crucial sixth round of negotiations in Oman. US President Donald Trump had hinted that the two sides were close to an agreement on a nuclear deal. Not one leader even cited the testimony before Congress in March by US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, in which she clearly stated: 'The intelligence community continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon,' adding 'that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had not reauthorized the program he suspended in 2003.' And not one European leader pointed to the danger to the lives of millions in Iran and the entire region that might come from Israel's direct bombardment of Iran's numerous nuclear facilities. Not one leader bothered to denounce Netanyahu for his irresponsible call for regime change in Iran and the assassination of Iran's supreme leader. There was not one condemnation of Israel's killing of civilians, including Iranian nuclear scientists and their families. Also, European leaders have omitted to mention that Iran had already reached a deal with them, as well as the US, under which it agreed to put its entire civilian nuclear program under inspection and provided guarantees limiting its uranium enrichment. The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action deal was derailed by Trump, not Iran, under Netanyahu's relentless attacks and lies. That agreement was deposited at the UN. Iran was not the party that withdrew from the deal. European countries were threatened by Trump not to end economic sanctions imposed on Iran, even as Iran had honored its commitments. Even then, European leaders opted to throw Tehran under the bus rather than challenge Washington or point the finger at the warmongering Netanyahu. Whatever Israel does, it does with impunity because it knows that European leaders will not dare challenge it Osama Al-Sharif The application of double standards has become a trademark of European leaders' approach to this region's conflicts, especially where Israel's interests are concerned. Israeli violations of international law and conventions are treated with the utmost delicacy and tolerance. Whatever Israel does, it does with impunity because it knows that European leaders will not dare challenge it. Macron had mustered some courage recently and denounced Israel's use of humanitarian aid as a collective punishment against Gazans, only to be branded as an antisemite by Israel. He had contemplated recognizing a Palestinian state but was reprimanded by Israel, and now it appears he has decided to defer any move. He has even offered to join Israel in fighting Iran. Once again, we have proof of how Western leaders are intimidated by Washington when it comes to averting what could spiral into a regional and possibly a global war in the Gulf. It is worth remembering that it is Israel that refuses to join the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons or allow independent inspection of its nuclear program. And it was France that assisted Israel by supplying it with a nuclear reactor back in the 1950s. Israel deceived even the US by concealing the truth about its Dimona reactor while reportedly stealing, over a few years, between 200kg and 300kg of highly enriched uranium from a private nuclear materials processing facility, the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation, in Apollo, Pennsylvania, in the 1960s. By the end of the 1960s, Israel was believed to have built the first of at least 100 nuclear bombs. Israel is the country that has brought nuclear weapons into this region, with the help of France and the US. European leaders' feverish support of Netanyahu, a wanted war criminal, in his reckless war against Iran is inexcusable and shameless. It is an insult to European values and the people of this region. It proves once again that those leaders are sacrificing Europe's interests for the sake of an Israel gone rogue. And it demonstrates that, while Europe might be an economic giant — for now — it is, in fact, a political dwarf. Meanwhile, Israel's mass slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza continues unabated. Europe's silence is deafening.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Is the US' Syria policy empowering Turkiye?
The Trump administration's decision to withdraw 500 troops from eastern Syria in April, and its stated aim of drawing down more, appears part of a broader shift in US policy toward Syria. In the immediate aftermath of Bashar Assad's fall, Washington seemed hostile toward the new regime. Officials expressed concern about the background of Syria's new president, Ahmad Al-Sharaa, and warned Damascus about the fate of Syria's minorities and the possible resurgence of Daesh. Yet, in recent months, President Donald Trump has agreed to drop sanctions on Syria and appointed a new envoy to Damascus, as well as reducing the US' military footprint in the east. This does not necessarily indicate that the US is embracing Al-Sharaa, despite Trump's complimentary words when they met in Riyadh. Instead, it seems the White House is 'de-prioritizing' Syria: reducing both its hostility, in the form of economic and diplomatic sanctions, and its military presence. This will be welcomed by Damascus, but also by the new leadership's principal regional ally, Turkiye. Indeed, Ankara appears to be the major beneficiary of the new US approach. The de-prioritizing has three primary strands. The first was to begin lifting sanctions. After his surprising meeting with Al-Sharaa in Saudi Arabia, Trump agreed to remove the sanctions crippling Syria's economy, arguing it 'would give them a chance.' As well as granting immediate sanction relief in late May, the White House is reportedly preparing an executive order that will permanently rescind a raft of economic restrictions. The second strand is direct engagement with the new regime. After meeting Al-Sharaa in person, Trump appointed the US' ambassador to Turkiye, Tom Barrack, as special envoy to Syria. Within days, Barrack travelled to Damascus and symbolically raised the Stars and Stripes over the US ambassador's residence there, the first time it had flown since Washington closed the embassy at the height of Syria's civil war in 2012. It seems the White House is 'de-prioritizing' Syria: reducing both its hostility and its military presence Christopher Phillips The third strand is a reduction in troop numbers in eastern Syria. As well as removing 500 of the 2,000 troops in recent weeks, US forces are cutting their number of military bases from eight to one. There are further plans to lower the number of troops to under 1,000, with Trump himself keen to remove all US forces. Combined, these changes suggest Washington is, as Trump said, willing to give the new regime a chance and that it is not interested in being a prominent player in post-Assad Syria. These shifts reflect Trump's apparent change in approach to the Middle East since his tour of the Gulf in May. His general preference, as in his first term, is to reduce the US' footprint in the region, while prioritizing opportunities that increase US trade. He remains concerned with confronting Iran over its nuclear deal and offering broad protection to Israel but, beyond these core concerns, he seems willing to allow key allies like Saudi Arabia and Turkiye to take the lead in regional matters that do not interest him. Syria falls within this latter category. With the economy in a poor state, there are few opportunities for Trump to make money for now — despite the appeal of building a Trump Tower in Damascus — and, with Iran having exited the scene, staying in eastern Syria to frustrate Tehran has lost its salience. Israel remains concerned with events in Syria, having launched several raids since the fall of Assad, arguing it is concerned about protecting the Druze community. However, Trump has shown signs of frustration with Benjamin Netanyahu in recent weeks, suggesting Washington will not let Israeli opposition to Al-Sharaa direct its approach to Damascus. But if one US regional ally will be somewhat frustrated by the new approach to Syria, another will be delighted. Turkiye benefits from all three of the US policy changes. Turkiye is well placed to benefit from any Syrian reconstruction, with its energy and construction companies lined up to play a prominent role. Trump lifting the sanctions removes any barriers to Turkish companies pouring into Syria, which would provide a much-needed boost to Turkiye's flagging economy. Trump meeting Al-Sharaa gives Turkiye's ally increased legitimacy, making it easier for Syria to be reintegrated Christopher Phillips The US' engagement with Damascus is similarly beneficial. Trump meeting Al-Sharaa gives Turkiye's ally increased legitimacy, making it easier for Syria to be reintegrated into the international community, which would also benefit Ankara. Moreover, Trump's appointment of Barrack as Damascus envoy, a role he will perform alongside his ambassadorship to Turkiye, is a major boost. Barrack is believed to be sympathetic to Recep Tayyip Erdogan's government and playing the dual roles means he is more likely to view Syria through how it relates to Turkiye. But the biggest benefit for Ankara is the drawing down in the east, something Erdogan has wanted for years. The US has already put serious pressure on its eastern Syrian ally, the Syrian Democratic Forces, to integrate into Al-Sharaa's new leadership and reducing troop numbers puts them in an even more precarious position. Ankara has long sought the destruction or dissolution of the SDF, so the less US protection they have, the more the SDF's leaders will feel compelled to abandon the goals of autonomy that Turkiye so strongly opposes. Turkiye's recent forming of an anti-Daesh coalition with Iraq, Jordan and Syria is similarly part of a wider strategy to convince the US that Ankara can lead anti-Daesh operations in the region, lessening Washington's need to back the SDF. The question, of course, is whether Trump and his administration recognize that Turkiye benefits from its new position on Syria, and whether it cares. One reading is that Erdogan has skillfully manipulated Trump, who is known to like the Turkish president. But another reading is that Trump is aware of the benefits but is happy to empower Turkiye in Syria — and hold Ankara to account if things go wrong. Whatever the truth, Turkiye is reaping the rewards of Washington's new approach to Syria. However, with this power could come responsibility for Ankara if the situation worsens.
