logo
Parents' plan to raise €60,000 to employ extra teacher refused by primary school patron

Parents' plan to raise €60,000 to employ extra teacher refused by primary school patron

Irish Times6 hours ago
A plan by parents at a Dublin primary school to privately employ a teacher for €60,000 to avoid pupils being educated in 'supersized' classes has been turned down by its patron body, the
Archdiocese of Dublin
.
Belgrove Infant Girls' School in Clontarf, Dublin 3
, will lose a teacher in September following a drop in enrolments last year.
It means pupils going into first class will be amalgamated from three classes into two for part of the school day, resulting in enlarged class sizes of 34 pupils.
Average primary class sizes nationally are 22.5 pupils, and the Government has pledged to reduce the average to 19 pupils.
READ MORE
Eamonn Broderick, the parent of a six-year-old child who is due to progress to first class in September, said most parents were willing to fund the appointment of a teacher which they estimated would cost about €60,000 or €600 per family.
'We were confident we would have the money together quickly,' he said. 'This is a relatively affluent area. Earlier this the school was able to raise €40,000 to do up the yard in a week. The school indicated they would need about €60,000 for a 10-month contract, as well as PRSI, insurance, etc.'
However, the school's patron body, the Archdiocese of Dublin, told the principal in recent weeks that the move was not possible on the basis that a 'school cannot appoint a mainstream teacher and pay via private funds', records show.
The school, meanwhile, has told parents that several appeals against the reduction in teacher numbers were unsuccessful and that every effort had been made to make the transition to amalgamated classes as 'smooth as possible'.
It said the arrangement was for one year only, as the school's enrolment figures have since rebounded, and it will regain a teacher in September 2026.
A letter to
Minister for Education Helen McEntee
, signed by 237 parents, says the planned class sizes for first class pupils are 'too large' and increase the potential for 'negative impacts on learning quality and the teaching environment for students'.
The letter states that enlarged classes will also 'further reduce the available special education teaching resources to an unacceptably low level'.
A spokesman for the Department of Education said pupil enrolments on the previous September 30th are the key factor for determining staff resources at schools.
While an appeal by the school had been considered by an independent primary staffing appeals board, it was unsuccessful. The board's decision is final.
'The configuration of classes and the deployment of classroom teachers are done at local school level,' the spokesperson added. 'The department's guidance to schools is that the number of pupils in any class is kept as low as possible, taking all relevant contextual factors into account [eg, classroom accommodation, fluctuating enrolment, etc].'
Parents' representatives met the school principal and chair of the board on June 19th last to express their concerns over the move.
Minutes of the meeting show parents asked the school to provide further communication so all information could be 'properly conveyed' to the wider school community.
However, the school declined and said that they had been advised by Catholic school managers 'not to have a public meeting', according to minutes of a meeting on June 19th last.
Mr Broderick, meanwhile, said many parents were worried that the new arrangement would disrupt and dilute children's education, but felt their concerns were not being listened to by those in authority.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parents' plan to raise €60,000 to employ extra teacher refused by primary school patron
Parents' plan to raise €60,000 to employ extra teacher refused by primary school patron

Irish Times

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Parents' plan to raise €60,000 to employ extra teacher refused by primary school patron

A plan by parents at a Dublin primary school to privately employ a teacher for €60,000 to avoid pupils being educated in 'supersized' classes has been turned down by its patron body, the Archdiocese of Dublin . Belgrove Infant Girls' School in Clontarf, Dublin 3 , will lose a teacher in September following a drop in enrolments last year. It means pupils going into first class will be amalgamated from three classes into two for part of the school day, resulting in enlarged class sizes of 34 pupils. Average primary class sizes nationally are 22.5 pupils, and the Government has pledged to reduce the average to 19 pupils. READ MORE Eamonn Broderick, the parent of a six-year-old child who is due to progress to first class in September, said most parents were willing to fund the appointment of a teacher which they estimated would cost about €60,000 or €600 per family. 'We were confident we would have the money together quickly,' he said. 'This is a relatively affluent area. Earlier this the school was able to raise €40,000 to do up the yard in a week. The school indicated they would need about €60,000 for a 10-month contract, as well as PRSI, insurance, etc.' However, the school's patron body, the Archdiocese of Dublin, told the principal in recent weeks that the move was not possible on the basis that a 'school cannot appoint a mainstream teacher and pay via private funds', records show. The school, meanwhile, has told parents that several appeals against the reduction in teacher numbers were unsuccessful and that every effort had been made to make the transition to amalgamated classes as 'smooth as possible'. It said the arrangement was for one year only, as the school's enrolment figures have since rebounded, and it will regain a teacher in September 2026. A letter to Minister for Education Helen McEntee , signed by 237 parents, says the planned class sizes for first class pupils are 'too large' and increase the potential for 'negative impacts on learning quality and the teaching environment for students'. The letter states that enlarged classes will also 'further reduce the available special education teaching resources to an unacceptably low level'. A spokesman for the Department of Education said pupil enrolments on the previous September 30th are the key factor for determining staff resources at schools. While an appeal by the school had been considered by an independent primary staffing appeals board, it was unsuccessful. The board's decision is final. 'The configuration of classes and the deployment of classroom teachers are done at local school level,' the spokesperson added. 'The department's guidance to schools is that the number of pupils in any class is kept as low as possible, taking all relevant contextual factors into account [eg, classroom accommodation, fluctuating enrolment, etc].' Parents' representatives met the school principal and chair of the board on June 19th last to express their concerns over the move. Minutes of the meeting show parents asked the school to provide further communication so all information could be 'properly conveyed' to the wider school community. However, the school declined and said that they had been advised by Catholic school managers 'not to have a public meeting', according to minutes of a meeting on June 19th last. Mr Broderick, meanwhile, said many parents were worried that the new arrangement would disrupt and dilute children's education, but felt their concerns were not being listened to by those in authority.

Smaller apartments, with fewer features, to be allowed in attempt to tackle housing crisis
Smaller apartments, with fewer features, to be allowed in attempt to tackle housing crisis

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Smaller apartments, with fewer features, to be allowed in attempt to tackle housing crisis

New guidelines to allow for smaller apartments and higher numbers of small units in individual developments are likely to be approved by the Government this week in a bid to cut the costs of apartment construction and reduce prices for buyers. The measures, reported in The Irish Times last month , are to be brought to the Cabinet by Minister for Housing James Browne . Mr Browne said the steps were among measures being introduced by him this summer to prompt a 'radical step-change' in the supply of housing. A new housing plan, he said, would be presented by Government as soon as possible, though that is not expected until after the updated National Development Plan is agreed later this month. Government sources expect the housing plan will not be ready until autumn. READ MORE The new rules for apartments will not affect standards for energy ratings, disability access and fire safety, but rather focus on design stipulations that the industry has said was adding cost to development. It is expected that the minimum floor area for apartment sizes would be reduced and the requirements for design features such as dual aspects and balconies would be relaxed. Developers say that the standards they are required to build to are the highest in Europe, making Irish apartments more expensive than anywhere else. Government sources say that changing the standards will enable developers to build more apartments in individual developments, cutting the final cost and leading to cheaper prices for purchasers. They hope that the measures could cut the final cost of apartments by between €50,000 and €100,000 each. The Government has repeatedly indicated that central to its housing strategy is an effort to attract more private investment into the market. Declining private investment has seen a slump in the number of apartments being built, especially in Dublin. 'We've been way too cautious and way too against getting the private sector involved,' Mr Browne told RTÉ One's The Week in Politics on Sunday. But Sinn Féin's housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin condemned the latest plans to change apartment standards as 'utter madness' that would do nothing to address viability challenges. He said the moves would push up the value of land and therefore developers' costs. Large crowds gathered in Dublin city on Saturday as part of an all-island housing demonstration urging the Government to act on the crisis . Led by the Community Action Tenants Union (CATU), and backed by more than 80 other trade unions and organisations, protesters marched through the city centre from the Garden of Remembrance towards Molesworth Street.

Expect plenty of cribbin' and moanin' as the budget games begin
Expect plenty of cribbin' and moanin' as the budget games begin

Irish Times

time16 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Expect plenty of cribbin' and moanin' as the budget games begin

The budget games are under way, right enough. Impending decisions about spending priorities for next year and into the future are now the unavoidable context of every political exchange – especially those within Government , some of which you'll see, most of which you won't. They are the subtext of every interview, news story and speech between now and October. As ever, the management of expectations at the centre is essential at this stage. At the recent National Economic Dialogue Paschal Donohoe solemnly warned of deep uncertainty about the future and that (inconveniently) positive headline economic figures so far this year mask 'considerable vulnerabilities'. 'The mood music is changing,' Donohoe warned. His party leader saw 'dark clouds on the horizon'. For the Taoiseach , 'challenging,' was the mot juste. In the Dáil this week, Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers returned to the theme. READ MORE 'We face significant economic uncertainty,' he said. 'Everyone in this House needs to realise the level and degree of ... corporate risks that exists right now.' As the Bert used to say during the late stage hubris of the Celtic Tiger, sure this is all cribbin' and moanin' and talkin' down the country. Still, you can see what they're at. The country and its political system have become accustomed to massive giveaway budgets, and cannot contemplate restraint. Well, let me qualify that thought: everyone can contemplate restraint, just not for themselves. Everyone has a demand for extra spending, sourced from the public purse. Some have a good case; all believe they deserve priority. Much of our media – especially RTÉ – is in the habit of promoting the causes of all comers relentlessly and uncritically. Of course, RTÉ might feel a special affinity with bodies looking for money from the Government. But still. Some context would not go amiss – how much would this cost? What is the existing budget? Where might the money come from? What should not be done in order to pay for this? What taxes should be increased? The list of supplicants for greater public funding is literally unending. A casual glance at a political correspondent's inbox gives a flavour of the requests bombarding the budget ministers: extra provision for education for people with disabilities; extra funding for school capitation; VAT cuts for the embattled hospitality industry; a €25 per week increase in welfare rates; this week's cause celebre – retaining the €1,000 discount on fees for third level students; and so on, and so on. [ The Irish Times view on college fees: Government has a choice to make Opens in new window ] Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan played a more subtle hand. Speaking at the Free Legal Advice Centre in Dublin, he said it was clear that Ireland has 'a big problem' with domestic violence. He would like to provide more resources for Flac and for civil legal aid – but 'I'm limited in terms of budget'. He is getting to the heart of the entire question of budgeting: it's all a question of priorities. Few people would quibble with increasing the budget for legal aid to ensure that people can have access to justice and to the protection of the law, when that question is taken in isolation. But governments cannot take any of these questions in isolation – they must weigh it all up as part of a coherent and credible whole of Government budgetary plan. Within the justice budget, for example, how does that measure up as a priority against recruiting more gardaí? Or fixing the problem of prison overcrowding? Or supporting the victims of crime? Or rehabilitating young people who have fallen into criminality? And how should the justice allocation be compared to the other budgets within Government? Should justice be constrained so that we can spend more money on health? On disabilities? On child poverty? Not so simple now, is it? And, yes, you might want to do all these things. But you can't. Anyone who pretends you can isn't being straight. You have to choose. Now let's not feel too bad for Messers Donohoe and Chambers. It may be hard being in charge of budgets during a time of plenty, but it's better than being Rachel Reeves . As the tears rolled down Reeves' cheeks in the House of Commons on Wednesday, both sterling and the UK's standing in the bond markets were headed in the same direction. Whatever the problems of prosperity that Jack and Paschal have to manage, they are far, far preferable to the other kind of problem, now facing Reeves and her prime minister. Better to have surpluses than deficits. So you might think that an overriding national priority would be to maintain steady and stable public finances. To do that, the budget ministers and the leaders of the Government parties have decided, they must eliminate the once-off giveaways of the last three budgets. 'We can't and we won't' continue with them, Donohoe told Ivan Yates on Newstalk on Thursday. But how firm is that determination? My sense is that Donohoe's is rock solid. He is not, however, in charge of the Government. Both Simon Harris and Micheál Martin, while ruling out another goody basket of one-off giveaways, have insisted that they will also seek to help people with rising costs in the budget. Does this signal a middle ground will be found? This week's controversy over student fees shows just how hard it is to withdraw benefits to which voters have become accustomed. Does the Government have the political will and the capacity to restrain itself and take politically difficult but necessary decisions to position the country for future growth and to protect it against future adversity – or will we cross our fingers, plough on and hope for the best? We'll see. But I know one thing: the politics of no hard choices never, ever ends well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store