OPSC's plea against HC order to pay Rs 10 lakh to OJS aspirant rejected by SC
CUTTACK: The Supreme Court has dismissed the Odisha Public Service Commission (OPSC)'s special leave petition (SLP) seeking intervention against the Orissa High Court order to pay Rs 1 lakh compensation for procedural lapses that resulted in non-evaluation of an answer to a question in the case of a candidate who appeared for the Odisha Judicial Service (Main) examination.
In the order on Friday, a SC bench comprising Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta and Bijay Bishnoi said, 'Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, we are not inclined to interfere with the cost amount awarded by the high court in favour of the respondent - a young law graduate, who is aspiring to become a judicial officer.'
According to the case records, Jyotirmayee Dutta had appeared for the OJS Main Exam 2022. The results were declared on December 4, 2023, but she could not qualify for the next stage by a narrow margin of five marks.
On August 27, 2024, she filed a petition in high court alleging that a question in the Law of Property paper was left unevaluated, and its marks were not added to the total. If her answers had been properly scrutinised, she would have qualified for the next stage.
The high court then ordered for her answer script to be independently assessed by experts from three reputed universities. Though non-evaluation of a question was confirmed and marks were awarded for the question, the petitioner did not achieve the necessary marks to pass the examination.
Accordingly, the high court dismissed the petition on February 13 this year, but ordered, 'However, considering the mental trauma and financial burden the petitioner has endured in pursuing this case to highlight the said lapse, this court deems it appropriate to award compensation of
Rs 1 lakh to the petitioner, which shall be paid by the OPSC within a period of 60 days from the date of this judgment.' However, the high court clarified, 'It is made clear that the compensation is awarded to acknowledge the procedural flaw brought to light and to serve as a reminder for OPSC to maintain stricter scrutiny in its evaluation processes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Tesla not keen to manufacture in India: Minister HD Kumaraswamy
Electric Vehicle (EV) major Tesla is not interested in manufacturing in India but is looking at opening two stores, Union Heavy Industries Minister H D Kumaraswamy said on Monday. He, however, said that global EV makers like Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen-Škoda, Hyundai and Kia have shown interest in applying under the ministry's flagship Scheme to Promote Manufacturing of Electric Passenger Cars in India, notified in March last year. 'Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen-Škoda, Hyundai and Kia — all these companies have already shown interest. Tesla, we are actually not expecting from them. They (Tesla) are going to start two showrooms, they are not interested in manufacturing in India,' Kumaraswamy said at a media briefing. In February, US President Donald Trump had criticised Tesla's plan to expand in India, calling it 'unfair' to the US. 'Now, if (Tesla CEO Elon Musk) built the factory in India, that's okay, but that's unfair to us. It's very unfair,' he had said. Trump has since made similar objections to Apple's expansion plans in India. The heavy industries ministry also issued detailed guidelines on Monday under the EV manufacturing scheme, and will soon issue a notice inviting online applications. Under the scheme, approved applicants will be required to make a minimum investment of Rs 4,150 crore to produce EVs domestically, with defined domestic value addition (DVA) goals. In turn, they will be eligible to import a maximum of 8,000 completely built-in units (CBU) of electric four-wheelers per year, with a minimum import value of $35,000 at a reduced Customs duty of 15 per cent for a five-year period. The scheme is limited to global manufacturers with a revenue of at least Rs 10,000 crore per year, with fixed assets valued at a minimum of Rs 3,000 crore. 'The scheme is strategically crafted to position India as a global hub for electric vehicle manufacturing… By mandating domestic value addition targets, the scheme will further boost the 'Make in India' and 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat' initiatives, while empowering both global and domestic companies to become active partners in India's green mobility revolution,' Kumaraswamy said. Earlier, many believed the scheme was envisaged to attract Tesla to manufacture in India, after it complained of high duties on car imports, which can go up to 110 per cent. Shortly after the scheme was announced in March 2024, in the run-up to the Lok Sabha polls, Musk was expected to visit India and make a pledge to pump over $2 billion into a car manufacturing facility in the country. However, the visit was postponed after Musk cited 'very heavy Tesla obligations'. But, a few days after cancelling his India trip, Musk visited China — the company's second-largest market. In February this year, days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Musk in Washington, Tesla announced 13 job openings in India, including store manager, service advisor, business operations analyst, and customer engagement manager. As Tesla mulls over its operational goals in India, the company is facing increased competition from Chinese EV makers, particularly BYD, as global EV sales growth has tapered. Meanwhile, according to think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), it could take years before the first batch of EVs manufactured under the Centre's scheme hit the market. 'While announcement of the scheme guidelines is a positive step, the application process has not opened yet and is expected soon. Realistically, it may take another six months or more before selected firms are announced, and the first locally made EVs under this scheme are still some time away; for now, approved firms can keep importing fully built cars at the reduced 15% duty,' GTRI said in a release.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Nilambur all set for a four-cornered fight
Kozhikode: The electoral contest in Nilambur took shape on Monday as LDF candidate M Swaraj, TMC convener and former MLA PV Anvar and NDA candidate Mohan George filed their nomination papers. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Nilambur will see a four-cornered battle as the deadline for filing papers has ended. Swaraj filed his nomination papers at Nilambur taluk office after leading a procession with CPM politburo member A Vijayaraghavan and leaders PK Biju, PK Sainaba and others. He said support for the continuation of the LDF govt went beyond party lines. "It's not just LDF workers but people from across the political spectrum are with us. The support comes from their appreciation of the govt's welfare and development work," he said. When asked if Anvar's candidature would affect LDF's chances, he said no candidate would be able to stop LDF's victory. Meanwhile, Anvar, whose resignation led to the bypoll, filed his nomination papers at the taluk office after holding a roadshow from Chandakunnu. He said he was contesting under the banner of Janakeeya Prathipaksha Prathiroda Munnani (JPPM), an alliance supported by All India Trinamool Congress (TMC) and various groups representing farmers, labourers and traders. Aam Aadmi Party state unit also extended support and said they would back Anvar after getting approval from the national committee. Anvar said he would file a second set of nomination papers as an independent due to possible technical issues with using the TMC symbol as the party is not registered in Kerala. His affidavit showed assets worth Rs 52 crore, liabilities of Rs 20 crore and cash in hand of Rs 25,000. NDA candidate Mohan George filed his nomination papers after a roadshow with BJP state president Rajeev Chandrasekhar, BDJS leader Thushar Vellappally and BJP leader PK Krishnadas. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Chandrasekhar said that although the election was unnecessary, NDA was contesting to oppose the anti-development and opportunistic politics of LDF and UDF and to present a new development agenda for Kerala. He claimed George was not chosen just because of his Christian background. "Our party does not follow vote bank politics. He was picked for his ability to serve the people. He is an educated advocate with a clear vision for Nilambur's development and is committed to it," added Chandrasekhar. UDF candidate Aryadan Shoukath and SDPI candidate Sadik Naduthodi had submitted their nomination papers earlier.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Assam man says mother detained, Supreme Court to hear plea
The Supreme Court has agreed to take up next week a Habeas Corpus petition filed by a man from Assam, who alleged that his mother has been picked up for deportation, and her whereabouts since then are not known. Initially, the Bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma said it will tag the petition with a pending plea on illegal immigrants. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, however, urged the court to issue notice so that the State can reply. 'We don't know. Son doesn't know. Let them say. If she is in Bangladesh, it's another matter,' Sibal said, contending that the arrest of the petitioner's mother violated norms on arrest laid down by the SC in the D K Basu case. 'Your Lordships know she has to be produced within 24 hours. She is not produced. Picked up from the house. Directly in violation of the D K Basu judgment. SP (Superintendent of Police) goes to the house, picks her up and throws her. How can that be?' the senior counsel submitted. The petitioner, 26-year-old Iunuch (Yunus) Ali, has alleged that his mother Monowara Bewa was detained on May 24 after being called to the Dhubri police station on the pretext of recording her statement. The plea also sought a direction restraining the deportation or 'push back' of the detainee across any Indian border. Sibal said that the woman had previously filed a special leave petition (SLP) in the apex court, which is still pending, and that she had also been granted bail, yet she was being 'thrown out'. The SLP challenges the decision of the Gauhati High Court, which upheld a Foreigners Tribunal ruling declaring Bewa a foreigner – a decision that has remained under challenge before the apex court since 2017. Bewa was on bail since December 12, 2019, following a Supreme Court order in this regard. The court issued notice and fixed the hearing for early next week. The top court, however, refused to entertain a plea challenging the Assam government's move to deport Bangladeshis who have entered the country illegally. The Bench asked the petitioner, the All BTC Minority Students Union (ABMSU), to approach the Guwahati High Court. '69 people are being deported, please go to the Guwahati High Court,' the court said. On February 4, a Bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan had asked the state to do the needful to deport 63 declared foreigners. The government had then said that it was awaiting confirmation of their nationality. They were subsequently confirmed to be Bangladeshi nationals. The petition alleged that using this order as an excuse, the state 'has reportedly launched a sweeping and indiscriminate drive to detain and deport individuals suspected to be foreigners, even in the absence of Foreigners Tribunal declarations, nationality verification, or exhaustion of legal remedies.' Citing some of the alleged deportations, the plea argued that 'these instances are not isolated, but part of an emerging pattern where individuals are detained and deported without Foreigners Tribunal declarations, nationality verification by the MEA, or even an opportunity to appeal.' 'These instances reflect a growing pattern of deportations conducted by the Assam Police and administrative machinery through informal 'push back' mechanisms, without any judicial oversight or adherence to the safeguards envisaged by the Constitution of India or this court,' the ABMSU claimed.– With PTI
