California board approves $2M to protect, provide legal services to illegal immigrants amid Trump crackdown
The Alameda County Board of Supervisors in Oakland decided at Tuesday's regular meeting to set aside around $2.2 million for communities in their area in response to President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration, at the request of the board's ad hoc Alameda County Together for All Committee.
"I'm committed, and I believe Supervisor [Elisa] Marquez is also committed, to making sure the board, the public, has more information and that this work is truly effective in reaching every single person in this community that is potentially at risk," Supervisor Nikki Fortunato Bas, chairwoman of the committee, said at the meeting.
Minutes from the meeting show that the board approved the use of $50,000 to the Asian Pacific Islander Legal Outreach to "provide legal services and advocacy to marginalized immigrant communities." The money is being pulled from the District 5 Prior Year Savings fund and the Discretionary Services and Supplies funds.
The board also approved up to $700,000 to be used by Centro Legal de La Raza to establish a Rapid Response Hotline, Know Your Rights training sessions, pre-emptive legal services and community volunteer network response coordination.
The organization describes itself as a "legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income, immigrant, Black, and Latinx communities through bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy."
Trabajadores Unidos Workers United was also approved for up to $500,000 to be used on "resources and preparation to immigrant and refugee communities, including training, mutual aid, and neighborhood resources."
"TUWU believes in upholding the power of working-class immigrants through forging class consciousness and growing the leadership of low-wage immigrant workers," the organization says on its website. "TUWU seeks to abolish workplace exploitation through organizing, political education, and direct action that shifts power to the hands of the working class."
The California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice was also given up to $1 million for legal services.
According to its website, the CCIJ's mission is to "utilize coordination, advocacy, and legal services to fight for the liberation of immigrants in detention in California."
"For the community work, the proposal is that the county would fund half of one year's budget and there's private fundraising happening to fund the other half," Fortunato Bas said, in part.
Supervisor David Haubert said the funding is "a community effort" and is being made possible through a "public/private partnership," emphasizing the financial burden is not solely on the county.
Fortunato Bas said in a Facebook post on Wednesday that one-third of Alameda County residents are immigrants and "half of our children grow up in a household with at least one immigrant parent."
"We are a diverse county, and our community needs protection. The policies of the federal administration are causing fear among our residents," she wrote, in part. "The unanimous vote of the Board of Supervisors demonstrates our county's commitment to our immigrant and refugee communities, who will have more access to critical information, services, and legal support."
The money approved on Tuesday comes after the board authorized $1.3 million in February for the Alameda County Public Defender Office's Immigration Unit, which provides deportation defense and legal services to illegal immigrants facing deportation, according to NBC Bay Area.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump aides create loyalty list ranking corporations by support
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump's aides have created a scorecard ranking hundreds of companies based on their efforts to support his signature tax cut law, a White House official said Friday. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The list ranks 553 different businesses as either 'strong, moderate, or low' partners on the megabill, which extended and expanded tax cuts from the president's first term and provided billions of dollars in additional funding for immigration enforcement. It's not clear how the scores will affect the way the federal government deals with the firms, but the official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, suggested that companies' rankings could change based on present and future support for presidential initiatives. Trump has made unusual, high-profile interventions in the business world since returning to the White House in ways that critics have said run counter to the Republican Party's traditional commitment to free-market capitalism. The president has defended himself as a pro-business leader. Recently, the Trump administration has considered taking an equity stake in Intel Corp. (INTC) and got Nvidia Corp (NVDA). and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) to pay the government 15% of revenues from chip sales to China. The creation of the list comes as Trump has struggled to sell the public on the benefits of the legislation. Just 32% of Americans say they approve of the tax and spending bill versus 46% who disapprove, according to a Pew Research poll released this week. The president's job approval sat at just 38% in the same survey. But the administration is ratcheting up efforts to sell the benefits of the legislation, with Trump on Thursday holding an event at the White House to tout a new $6,000 deduction for seniors on Social Security benefits. Cabinet officials have scheduled events across the country in support of the legislation. Companies favorably ranked by the White House included DoorDash Inc. (DASH) and Uber Technologies Inc. (UBER), according to Axios, which first reported the existence of the list. The rideshare companies have touted a provision that allows some taxpayers to deduct as much as $25,000 in reported cash tips from their income taxes. Airlines including United Airlines Inc. (UAL) and Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL) were credited for their efforts supporting the bill's $12.5 billion allocation for new air traffic control infrastructure. Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
They are twisting the 14th Amendment out of shape
Every American citizen owes a debt of gratitude to John Mercer Langston, architect of the 14th Amendment and founding dean of the Howard University School of Law. His writings and speeches are critical to understanding the current implementation of the most important provision of the U.S. Constitution. Just a month after the ratification of the 13th Amendment in December 1865, Langston spoke about the interpretations by several attorneys general that African-Americans could not be citizens. As the first Black person to address the Missouri legislature on Jan. 9, 1866, Langston said, 'Indeed, it has not been uncommon for distinguished officials, occupying high positions in the State and National Governments, to make the assertion that ours is and shall remain a white man's Government.' However, he continued, that is not what the Founders decided. 'It was South Carolina that made the proposition, when the Articles of Confederation were under consideration in Congress, to insert the word 'white' between the words 'free' and 'inhabitants,' in the fourth article of that document, and make it read that 'the free white inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States.' Eleven States were called upon to vote on this proposition. Each State had one vote. Eight States voted against it, two States for it, and one State was divided in her vote. Thus, as early as 1778, with an unusual unanimity, our Fathers branded this word and set their seal of disapprobation upon the unjust discrimination which it imports.' In fact, Langston notes that the franchise was available. 'When the Constitution was ratified, free colored men voted in a majority of all the States. They voted in New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and North Carolina.' Between 1812 and the Dred Scott decision, Langston decries a 'National apostacy in this matter.' He cited an 1843 ruling by Attorney General H.S. Legere that a Black applicant for land could not be considered a citizen. Langston was leader of the Equal Rights League from 1864-1868, the political movement that shepherded the 14th Amendment. The 4 million Africans in the U.S. had the same issue that sparked the American Revolution — taxation without representation. 'It has always been our fortune to be held to a full discharge of all the obligations and duties which citizenship imposes, while it has ever been our misfortune to be denied well-nigh all the privileges, advantages, and rights, it naturally confers,' said Langston. 'We have been taxed and denied representation. We have paid to the government the full debt of our allegiance; and then we have been denied the protection due its defenders.' The novel and contrived interpretation that the 14th Amendment bans use of race leaves out its role as repealing the Dred Scott decision. The same Congress that approved the 14th Amendment by two-thirds of both houses would charter the Freedmen's Bank and Howard University. Sixteen civil rights acts since 1866 have underscored the covenant with African American citizens to realize the protections of the Constitution. Myriad congressional findings have confirmed that has not happened yet. There is no equivalency between those institutions and the violent gangs proscribed in the three Force Acts during the 1870s. In fact, the Justice Department was founded in 1870 specifically to protect African-Americans from violent former Confederates. On July 30, 1866, 200 Union Army veterans gathered in the Mechanics Institute in New Orleans to ponder a new state constitution. Former Confederates surrounded them and massacred them, an outrage which propelled the passage of the 14th Amendment. Now the site of the Hotel Roosevelt, this spot is sacred for American democracy. The military takeover of cities led by Black woman politicians such as Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. evokes the same echoes of New Orleans and the Wilmington, N.C. race riot of 1898 that unseated an elected Black city government. The currently contemplated Texas mid-decade redistricting scheme comes right out of the Black Codes playbook that sparked the Joint Reconstruction Committee. All Americans need to heed the sage wisdom of Langston, who has provided a stable framework for democracy across the globe.
Boston Globe
8 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
President Trump ramps up takeover of Washington's police department. Here's what to know.
Why is Trump taking over the police in DC? The Republican president this week announced he's taking control over Washington's police department and activating National Guard troops to reduce crime, an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. But District of Columbia officials say the action isn't needed, pointing out that violent crime in the district reached historic 30-year lows last year and is down significantly again this year. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Can he do that? Advertisement D.C.'s status as a congressionally established federal district gives Trump a window to assert more control over the the district than other cities. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser didn't offer much resistance at first, allowing city workers to clear homeless encampments and work closely with federal immigration agents. But on Friday, the heavily Democratic district asked for an emergency court order blocking Trump officials from putting a federal official in charge of D.C. police. So who is in charge of police in Washington? Right now, it's unsettled. Trump's administration announced Thursday that the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration will take over the police chief's duties, including authority over orders issued to officers. It's unclear where the move leaves the city's current police chief, Pamela Smith, who works for the mayor. Smith says upending the command structure would be a 'dangerous' threat to law and order. Advertisement What's at stake The showdown in Washington is the latest attempt by Trump to test the boundaries of his legal authority to carry out his tough-on-crime agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. What are the federal troops doing in DC? About 800 National Guard troops are being activated, with Humvees parked along the Washington Monument and near Union Station. Troops have been spotted standing outside baseball's Nationals Park and neighborhood restaurants. The White House says guard members aren't making arrests but are protecting law enforcement officers who are making arrests and helping deter violent crime. Trump says one of the objectives will be moving homeless people far from the city. How long can this go on? Trump has the authority to do this for 30 days and says he might look into extending it. But that would require congressional approval. Whether Republicans in Congress would go along with that is unclear. Some D.C. residents have protested against the increased police presence. For some, the action echoes uncomfortable historical chapters when politicians used language to paint predominantly Black cities with racist narratives to shape public opinion and justify police action. Will Trump try to take control in other US cities? Washington is very different from any other American city, and the rules that govern it give the federal government much more control than it would have anywhere else. Whether Trump is using this as a blueprint for how to approach cities — largely Democratic cities — that he wants to exert more control over remains to be seen. Advertisement
