
‘I'm desperate to invest but afraid of piling more inheritance tax on my daughters'
Rachel Reeves's inheritance tax raid means it's growing ever harder to escape paying death duties.
The Chancellor's decision to strip pensions of inheritance tax relief as well as freezing the nil-rate band until 2030 means the number of estates liable to pay the death levy is forecast to more than double by the end of the decade, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility.
John Dixon is hoping to buck the trend. He has so far made few plans for how best to pass on his inheritance to his two daughters, but the death of his late wife Valerie in October has spurred him into action.
He says: 'Some of the inheritance tax rules are baffling. I'm concerned if I leave things as they are, I'll find myself in the 40pc bracket [the rate of tax charged on an estate above the threshold] and it's something I desperately want to avoid.'
The nil-rate band allows Mr Dixon to pass on £325,000 without incurring death duties, and he can pass on a further £175,000 if he leaves his home to a direct descendant. As his wife's allowance was unused, it means he can effectively pass on up to £1m to his daughters tax-free.
But, if Mr Dixon is going to avoid paying inheritance tax, he needs to act quickly. A highly successful career in the telecommunications industry has left the 74-year-old with an extensive portfolio of savings and investments.
He has amassed £320,000 in cash savings, including £50,000 sitting in his current account, on which he only earns 2.5pc interest on the first £25,000. He also holds the maximum £50,000 in premium bonds, while the rest of his cash sits in a number of different savings accounts.
Mr Dixon also has a stocks and shares Isa worth £53,000 after his wife's funds were transferred to his account. He says he does not regularly make use of the £20,000 tax-free allowance.
He says: 'I've got way too much in cash savings and I know it's ridiculous how much is in my current account. I'm desperate to get it out of there and put it somewhere where it can't do any harm in terms of additional taxes.'
Additionally, he owns his home outright and had it recently valued at £950,000, and a combination of the basic state pension and two workplace pensions provides an annual net income of around £43,000 a year.
As well as a positive attitude to addressing his finances, Mr Dixon is aided by a clean bill of health.
'I am from the North East and we would say 'I'm as fit as lop'. Everything works. I've got my own hair, my own teeth and, bar a few aches and pains of course, nothing desperately wrong.'
He also stays fit by playing 18 holes of golf four times a week, something that has provided great comfort.
'Since Valerie died, I found myself playing a lot more because it helps enormously to think about something else and not being dragged back to her death and all of the sadness associated with that.
'Golf has been enormously helpful in that respect and the guys that I play with regularly have also been very helpful and supportive.'
Dan Caps, investment manager, Evelyn Partners
Based on the figures Mr Dixon has provided, his estate is made up of his home – valued at £950,000 – his cash savings of £320,000 and his Isa of £53,000. All of this brings his estate to £1.3m. Mr Dixon will also need to think about any personal effects and chattels that may need to be considered.
Mr Dixon has confirmed that his wife's nil-rate band is unused, and the good news is this will pass to him automatically. Mr Dixon should also be able to benefit from both his and his wife's additional residence nil rate band, which was introduced in 2017. As such, he can pass on the first £1m of his estate free from inheritance tax, while any excess over this level will be subject to inheritance tax at 40pc.
It is worth bearing in mind that Mr Dixon would begin to lose the benefit of the resident nil-rate band should his estate exceed £2m on his death, but given the valuation this currently seems unlikely.
So, based on the above estate value of £1,323,000, Mr Dixon's current inheritance tax liability is in the region of £129,200.
There are several steps Mr Dixon can take to mitigate inheritance tax, and he has already mentioned he is exploring gifts out of surplus income. As Mr Dixon's income exceeds his expenditure, he is able to give away the surplus and this will immediately fall outside his estate for inheritance tax.
Mr Dixon should be able to demonstrate that these funds are not necessary to meet his standard of living, and a regular pattern to these gifts helps evidence this. As with all gifts, these should be documented, which will help when it eventually comes to dealing with his estate.
In addition to this, Mr Dixon could gift some of the funds he holds in cash or in his Isa, and he tells us he has 'way too much' in cash savings. Larger gifts are subject to the potentially exempt transfer rules, which means they will fall outside Mr Dixon's estate seven years after the gift is made.
Before Mr Dixon gives away large sums, he should think whether he may need these funds for himself in the future – to meet any care fees, for example. He should plan carefully and think about talking to a financial planner, who will be able to construct a cash flow forecast for him, which will give him greater confidence when making gifts.
There are also lots of other ways to mitigate inheritance tax, including life assurance policies, investments which attract business relief and are free from inheritance tax after two years of ownership, and other smaller annual gift exemptions.
All inheritance planning strategies require some form of trade-off and often a combination of a number of different strategies is most suitable. Again, a financial planner will be able to help Mr Dixon review all the options available to him.
Gary Steel, senior wealth planner, Canaccord Wealth
The first step would be to consider Mr Dixon's current plans given his recent change in circumstances. Does he want to stay in his current home? What changes does he see for himself in the future? We need to make sure he has sufficient funds and flexibility to enable him to live the lifestyle he wishes while also planning for the future.
I would also recommend that Mr Dixon reviews his will at this stage to make sure his wealth is passed to his daughters on his death. He should also ensure he has drafted suitable Lasting Power of Attorney documents – a qualified lawyer would be invaluable here.
Mr Dixon's wife died less than two years ago, so it should be possible to vary her will – assuming she passed her estate to her husband – to pass some of her wealth to their daughters. This would reduce the value of Mr Dixon's estate for inheritance tax purposes.
As well as making gifts from surplus income, up to £3,000 per tax year can also be gifted by Mr Dixon, which is immediately free of inheritance tax. HMRC Form 403 shows how to calculate surplus income.
But before making gifts, Mr Dixon needs to carefully consider his own requirements. A key factor is to ensure he has enough money for the rest of his life. A detailed cash flow analysis with a financial adviser will help him explore various 'what if' scenarios, help him make informed decisions and give peace of mind as he moves into the next stage of his life.
The remainder of Mr Dixon's cash could be invested to achieve potentially greater returns than bank deposits, as well as keep pace with inflation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
New Grantham £8m council depot 'taking shape' ahead of opening
A new £8.8m council depot is "taking shape" ahead of opening, an authority Kesteven District Council (SKDC) plans to take control of the depot in Turnpike Close, Grantham from contractor Lindum Group on 30 October, with a go-live date scheduled for 1 authority said it would accommodate a range of services including waste, park maintenance and street cleaning, along with more than 250 cabinet member for property and public engagement, Councillor Richard Cleaver, described the new depot as "future-proofed and sustainable". Clearance works have begun at the current depot in Alexandra Road, which was built in the 1970s and is at the end of its operational life, a spokesperson old depot will remain in operation until the handover has taken place and SKDC said it was continuing to assess options for the site's future completed so far includes the steel structures for the main depot building and external roof and external cladding are being added, and joinery work is scheduled in the next few authority said Lindum Group was working on the lorry parking area and work would start on the main car park said it had allocated £500,000 in addition to the build cost for mobilisation to relocate its services and staff from the existing said the new depot would "improve welfare and working conditions for our brilliant staff". Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices


Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BrewDog has its beers axed by nearly 2,000 pubs as bars turn away from embattled brewer - as CEO warns it will make loss for third year in a row
BrewDog's beers have been axed by almost 2,000 pubs across Britain as the embattled brewers' popularity continues to wane. The company's range of draught beers have disappeared entirely from around 1,860 pubs in the last two years, according to private industry data. The blow means BrewDog's UK distribution has been cut by more than a third. It also shows that its best-known beer, Punk IPA, has suffered the worst loss after being removed from 1,980 pubs – a 52 per cent decline in distribution. Pubs are now reducing their offerings or opting for rival beers such as Camden Town and Beavertown instead. The data, which was seen by the Telegraph, revealed most of the pubs scrapping BrewDog beers are part of large chains, removing a key source of revenue for the brewer at the same time as it struggles to revive its fortunes. The collapse in BrewDog's UK distribution comes as CEO James Taylor recently told investors that its financials did not make for 'happy reading'. BrewDog has recorded losses of £59m in 2023 and £30.5m in 2022. Mr Taylor admitted in a recent interview that the company would be making another loss this year. Mr Taylor is the second new CEO to take over since founder James Watt stepped back amidst a flurry of accusations of improper conduct. An industry insider believes the pub retrenchment will make BrewDog ever more reliant on JD Wetherspoon, whose 794 pubs now make up a significant chunk of its remaining distribution. Lauren Caroll, BrewDog's chief operating officer, said: 'Independent brewers across the board have felt the squeeze from the economic pressures hitting the pub trade. 'With costs rising and consumers watching their spend, pub groups have been narrowing their ranges, and brewery-owned pubs are putting more emphasis on their own brands. 'It's not just us – every independent brewer has been affected. We saw the trend coming, which is why we've shifted focus to high-impact channels like festivals, stadiums, and independent [pubs].' Last month, the company announced the closure of 10 of its own branded bars across the UK, including its flagship site in Aberdeen, after deciding they were not 'commercially viable'. And the chain had started the year by closing six pubs across the world, including two in England, three in Europe and one in England. BrewDog has weathered a number of publicity storms in recent years as its reputation has taken a hammering. But it has also faced stiff competition from new entrants into the 'craft beer' market. It was founded in 2007 by James Watt and Martin Dickie, rising to prominence in the 2010s amid a surge in demand for independent beers and hoppy IPAs. Watt showed a knack for marketing and drove up the brand's popularity with stunts such as driving a tank through London and brewing what it claimed was the world's strongest beer. However in recent years, the company's fortunes have started to turn after it emerged staff reported being unhappy working there. BrewDog is on its third CEO in just over a year after Watt stepped back from the role in May 2024, three months after Ofcom rejected a complaint he had lodged against the BBC after it made a documentary outlining misconduct allegations. He denied claims that he made female bartenders feel 'uncomfortable' and 'powerless' and that he would take intoxicated women on private late-night tours of the brewery. He then married Made In Chelsea media personality Georgia Toffolo earlier this year, and has become a frequent critic of the Labour government on LinkedIn. The self-described BrewDog 'Captain' faced a number of improper conduct allegations in 2021 concerning female staff, and was revealed to have invested in Heineken, contrasting with his brewery's anti-establishment 'punk' image. Months before he quit, he announced that the firm would pay staff the 'real' Living Wage as calculated by the Resolution Foundation as it struggled to turn a profit. The firm is continuing to weather accusations of an image problem after ditching its claim to be 'carbon negative' after it ditched offsetting schemes that it claimed were both too expensive and not efficient enough to justify the label. It had already been criticised for using the label by advertising watchdogs, and was slammed by environmentalists for its claim of creating a carbon-negative forest in Scotland after it was revealed that half of the 500,000 saplings had already died. Despite this, CEO James Taylor told the Grocer in June that he did not believe the firm had an image problem. He said: 'It's boring to focus on data, but the data says consumers think of us as a business that produces really high-quality beer. That's how we're perceived by the vast majority of the public.' Further criticism has been heaped on BrewDog's decision to sell a stake in the company to the American private equity firm TSG Consumer Partners in 2017, which minted Watt and Dickie as millionaires. BrewDog's latest blow comes as a political storm continues to rumble over the Government's lack of support for the pub trade. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been blamed for pushing restaurants and pubs into 'survival mode' as two venues have shut per day for the first half of 2025. Data shows the number of hospitality sites plunged by 374 to 98,746 sites at the end of June, sparking fresh concerns about the fight for survival faced by many businesses. It means that the sector is now 14.2 per cent smaller than at the start of Covid in March 2020, with more than 16,000 net closures over the past five years. Researchers pointed to a cocktail of costs, including higher National Insurance contributions for employers, business rates and wages. The worrying figures come just weeks after TV star and landlord Jeremy Clarkson, told The Mail on Sunday that penalising business rates had left publicans 'like Butch and Sundance at the end of the movie – taking fire from absolutely everywhere'.


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock calls for Keir Starmer to scrap two-child benefit limit - and suggests 'Robin Hood' wealth tax to fund it
Labour must scrap the two-child cap on benefits to lift children out of poverty, former party leader Neil Kinnock has said as he called for a 'Robin Hood' wealth tax. Lord Kinnock claimed rising levels of poverty 'would make Charles Dickens furious' and claimed the Tories had undone hard work that was begun by Gordon Brown. The 83-year-old, who led Labour in opposition from 1983 to 1992, is the latest senior party figure to urge the current Government to end the two-child limit on benefits. The two-child benefit limit was brought in by the Conservatives in 2017 and restricts child tax credit and universal credit (UC) to the first two children in most households. But organisations working in the sector argue that an estimated 350,000 children would be lifted out of poverty immediately at a cost of £2billion if it was scrapped. Speaking to the Sunday Mirror, Lord Kinnock acknowledged the Government may not be able to scrap the two-child cap 'all at once'. He added: 'But I really want them to move in that direction because the figures are that if that did occur it would mean that about 600,000 kids fewer are in poverty.' Lord Kinnock suggested such a move could be funded by a wealth tax on the 'top 1 per cent', saying: 'I know it's the economics of Robin Hood, but I don't think there is anything terribly bad about that.' He claimed that over the decade and a half the Conservatives were in power, child poverty gradually rose. The Labour peer told the newspaper: 'In 15 years, starting from a position where beneficial change was taking place, we've got to the place that would make Charles Dickens furious. 'It's been allowed to happen because the kids are voiceless and their parents feel powerless. I defy anybody to see a child in need and not want to help.' The two-child limit has been long-criticised by Labour backbenchers as a driver of child poverty. Former Labour prime minister Mr Brown recently said ending the two-child limit, as well as the benefit cap, would be among the most effective ways of reducing child poverty. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has left the door open to a rise in gambling taxes after Mr Brown urged her to raise levies to cover the cost of lifting the two-child cap. The Institute for Public Policy Research believes reforms to gambling levies could generate the £3.2billion needed to scrap the two-child limit and benefit cap. The think tank's research said axing the policies could lift half a million children out of poverty and 'reverse years of rising hardship for low-income families'. Ministers are expected to set out plans to tackle child poverty this autumn, and campaign groups have said it must contain a commitment to abandon the two-child limit. Economists have warned tax rises in the autumn are likely needed to plug a hole in the public finances left by poor economic figures and U-turns on welfare, prompting speculation about which areas Ms Reeves might target. There were more than 1.6million children living in households in England, Wales and Scotland affected by the two-child benefit limit in April, according to figures published by the Department for Work and Pensions last month. Work and pensions minister Alison McGovern told the Commons on July 15 that the Child Poverty Task Force will look at 'all the levers across incomes, costs, debt and local support that we can pull to prevent poverty, including social security reform'. But she added at the time that the Government will not commit to lifting the two-child benefit cap until it is clear how it will be paid for. The Government's child poverty strategy had been due to be published in spring, but was subsequently delayed until autumn to align with the Budget. The Daily Mail has contacted the Department for Work and Pensions for comment.