Nacha Supports Executive Order to Eliminate Federal Check Payments, Citing Cost Savings and Fraud Reduction
'The federal government has long been a leader in adopting electronic payments, and fully transitioning away from paper checks is a significant step that will benefit American consumers and businesses while saving the federal government money,' said Jane Larimer, President and CEO of Nacha.
In 2024, the Treasury Department originated more than 1.86 billion ACH payments, moving more than $8.5 trillion through the ACH Network for purposes ranging from Social Security benefits and tax refunds to vendor and Medicare payments. The same year, the federal government issued approximately 36 million paper checks. Nacha's comments noted that if the Treasury Department had used ACH payments instead of checks, 'the direct savings to the federal government would have been over $68 million.'
In its comment letter, Nacha emphasized that transitioning away from checks is more a matter of policy choices and implementation than technical readiness. With the widespread availability of no-cost bank accounts, mobile and online banking, prepaid cards and payment apps, Nacha urged the Treasury Department to minimize hardship exceptions that result in the continued use of paper checks. Nacha also noted that any person, business or organization that writes a check to the federal government has a bank account from which an electronic payment can be made.
Other Nacha recommendations included:
Expanding account validation to mitigate fraud and reduce improper payments.
Leveraging existing banking information across federal agencies to streamline Direct Deposit enrollment.
Shortening the Treasury's ACH credit settlement times, bringing it in line with standard ACH timing in the private sector.
The full comments are available here. For more information on Direct Deposit and Direct Payment and the ACH Network, visit DirectDeposit.org and DirectPayment.org.
About Nacha
Nacha governs the thriving ACH Network, the payment system that drives safe, smart, and fast Direct Deposits and Direct Payments with the capability to reach all U.S. bank and credit union accounts. There were 33.6 billion ACH Network payments made in 2024, valued at $86.2 trillion. Through problem-solving and consensus-building among diverse payment industry stakeholders, Nacha advances innovation and interoperability in the payments system. Nacha develops rules and standards, provides industry solutions, and delivers education, accreditation, and advisory services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republicans round up votes for a ‘big, beautiful' blur
As Republicans scrounged for House votes to pass their far-reaching tax and spending bill on Wednesday, hours ahead of the presidentially-preferred July 4 deadline, they pointedly avoided getting into some details of what exactly they'd passed. 'Our Country will make a fortune this year, more than any of our competitors, but only if the Big, Beautiful Bill is PASSED,' President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social. Republicans found themselves promoting pieces of the bill that had already been taken out or watered down. They defended its reductions to Medicaid funding, on the basis that they might get reversed by a future Congress; they lauded its breaks for Social Security, even though they were relegated to simply offering a tax deduction to people who happen to also receive Social Security. GOP leaders pushed into the night to get the votes needed for final passage, which could still come as soon as the late hours of Wednesday. In the meantime, Democrats who might have supported parts of the bill in a vacuum instead tried to sort fact from hyperbole, and were set on voting against all of it. 'The taxes for the wealthy and special interests are permanent, but the new tax cuts aren't,' said Rep. Sarah McBride, D-Del. 'It's just ridiculous.' Beneath the confusion is a familiar reality for Trump: His 'big, beautiful bill,' which would extend a suite of 2017 tax cuts, add new ones, and cut health care spending to make up some of the difference, does not achieve some of what he ran on. That has not stopped him — or GOP lawmakers — from saying it does. One promise, of 'no taxes on Social Security,' had been bent into a four-figure tax deduction — $4,000 in the House's version of the bill, $6,000 in the Senate version that may replace it. But a fact sheet shared by House Speaker Mike Johnson on Wednesday repeated the claim the bill simply ended Social Security taxes outright. Another Trump promise, to not cut Medicaid, morphed into work requirements designed to remove people from the program, on the assumption that they might find jobs and get insurance coverage that way. Republicans like Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who had inveighed against Medicaid cuts, dropped their opposition. To sell the bill, Republicans separated Medicaid recipients into two camps, as delineated by House Majority Leader Steve Scalise. Republicans distinguished between the 'truly disabled and needy,' whom they argue the 60-year-old program was designed to help, and those who should be paying or working for their health care. That second group includes noncitizens covered by state health care programs, as well as people in states that had adopted the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. But the Senate-passed version of the bill did not actually cut off Medicaid for noncitizens — another source of confusion. A memo from the House Freedom Caucus that urged party leaders to add back 'protection against illegals getting Medicaid,' linked to a study of noncitizens receiving nutrition assistance, not Medicaid. And a House proposal to create savings funds for children — first named MAGA accounts, now named TRUMP accounts — lost a requirement that the parents have a Social Security number on the way to Senate passage, theoretically allowing undocumented parents to take advantage. 'I don't like that,' South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman, one of the House Freedom Caucus members who wanted more changes in the bill, told Semafor of that change. 'Illegals shouldn't get a paycheck.' Several of the changes that House Republicans obscured — and lamented, at turns — on Wednesday came thanks to the Senate's nonpartisan parliamentarian, a referee who has similarly trimmed Democratic ambitions in the past. Yet that didn't help party leaders' case as they kept pushing into Wednesday night. As in 2017 and 2021, the party with full control of government in Washington was using the budget process to pack as much as it could into a package that only needed 51 votes to get through the Senate. Like the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and the 2021 American Rescue Plan, it would transform the country with a mix of cuts, benefits, and incentives — and by undoing the opposition party's most recent work. Republican resistance to final passage on Wednesday was largely about whether the bill would do enough to undo former President Joe Biden's legacy. 'They jammed in the provision that guts the Green New Scam reforms that we put in place,' Texas Rep. Chip Roy told Steve Bannon, bemoaning that the final bill might not wipe out the Biden-era clean energy projects and tax credits that Republicans had overwhelmingly opposed. Led by the president, Republicans advertised the parts of the bills that polled the best — tax cuts, including an end to a tax on tips that began as a bipartisan effort to shore up Social Security in the 1980s. The bill could achieve a decade-long goal of rolling back the Affordable Care Act, but the president preferred to talk about it as a zero-cost reform. 'We're cutting $1.7 trillion in this bill, and you're not going to feel any of it,' he said at the White House last week. No congressional Democrat was considering a vote for the bill; House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said at a Wednesday rally that his party would vote 'hell no.' Outside of Washington, Democrats were pre-emptively warning that any benefit cuts voters might face would be Trump and Republicans' fault, not theirs. 'Hundreds of thousands of people are going to lose their health care if this gets signed into law,' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said on Tuesday. 'The state of Illinois can't cover the cost. No state, in the country, can cover the cost.' Democrats, frequently distracted by fights inside the party or by other Trump decisions, had spent weeks trying to bring the national conversation back to Medicaid. That effort even included Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral nominee in New York City, who responded to Trump's musing about whether he could deport him by accusing him of trying to distract from the GOP bill. 'I fight for the same people that he said he was fighting for,' Mamdani told reporters. The Trump administration started with a multipart premise that was always going to be impossible to meet: The 2017 tax cuts could be made permanent. New tax cuts could be delivered for blue-collar workers. And this could be paid for by repealing the 'Green New Scam' and getting rid of government waste. 'How much do you think we can rip out of this wasted, $6.5 trillion Harris-Biden budget?' future Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick asked Elon Musk at Trump's pre-election Madison Square Garden rally. 'Well, I think we can do at least $2 trillion,' said Musk. By DOGE's own estimate, it fell 90% short of that goal, finding $190 billion in spending cuts — a number that's been frequently disputed. An updated argument, which you could hear on the House floor this week, was that extending the 2017 tax cuts prevented a budget-busting recession. Tax cuts are free; health care is expensive, and anyone who might lose their health care coverage could be taken care of by the private sector. This has been a hard sell, even in a media environment where the president's critics on the right struggle to break through. Pro-Trump groups have found that voters support new tax cuts; other pollsters have found a lot of agreement with Democrats' criticism that Republicans are cutting benefits to pay for tax cuts for the rich. And the rapid process of moving this bill has led to confusion about what's actually in it. Whatever passes — if it passes — will achieve generational Republican goals, lowering taxes (most for wealthier Americans) and curtailing the post-Obama welfare state. But the Trump campaign had previously suggested that it could cut taxes without curtailing much of , besides tax credits for solar panels and Medicaid fraud. Before he quit the administration, Musk suggested that Americans might get a $5,000 DOGE dividend check from all the savings — an idea that still circulates in GOP fundraising emails. How popular is the reality of all this? I was struck at a Tuesday night rally for Virginia's GOP statewide ticket helmed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin that there was no mention of the mega-bill moving through Congress, 15 miles away. Just two months earlier, Youngkin joined most Republican governors on a letter that urged passage of whatever ended up being in the 'big, beautiful bill.' In the New York Times, Jacob S. Hacker and Patrick Sullivan the liberal case against the bill: 'Americans have yet to fully understand the special alchemy of inegalitarianism that defines it.' In Quartz, Joseph Zeballos-Roig the 'TRUMP Accounts' change. In the Wall Street Journal, the editorial board that the 'meh' bill 'has to pass,' despite some issues. 'The bill is more than anything the triumph of GOP political necessity, and the end of tax uncertainty is its main virtue.' For the progressive watchdog group Media Matters, Matt Gertz that since Trump took office again, Fox News mentioned 'Medicaid' only as frequently as it mentioned Joe Biden. 'While Fox personalities have at times defended or downplayed the bill's proposed Medicaid cuts, our data shows that the network is largely trying to avoid discussing them altogether.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mass. man charged for alleged role in NH-based $6.3 million Medicare scheme
A Massachusetts man is facing charges of health care fraud and money laundering for his alleged role in a scheme to defraud Medicare of millions using a New Hampshire-based medical equipment company. Leo Anzivino Jr., 34, of Teaticket, Mass., faces charges of conspiracy to commit health care fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and money laundering. He pleaded not guilty in U.S. District Court. A trial is scheduled to begin Aug. 19. According to a federal indictment, Anzivino Jr. acted as the straw owner of a durable medical equipment company, Advanced Medical Supply in Rochester and conspired with others to cause the submission of false and fraudulent claims to Medicare between December 2023 and March 2024. Anzivino and his associates allegedly submitted fraudulent Medicare billings for medical equipment that was medically unnecessary, not covered by Medicare, or never provided. The allegedly fraudulent claims totaled $6.33 million, and the conspirators reportedly received payments from the government totaling $2.85 million. Anzivino allegedly fraudulently opened a New Hampshire bank account for Advanced Medical Supply, claiming he would maintain exclusive control over it when it was in reality operated by one of his co-conspirators. Anzivino allegedly transferred the money from the New Hampshire account to a separate account in Massachusetts to try to hide the fact that a different conspirator actually controlled the money, charging documents allege. In April 2024, the FBI and other federal agencies were seen conducting "court-authorized activity" at Advanced Medical Supply. Kristen M. Setera, spokesperson for the FBI's Boston Division, confirmed federal agencies responded to the business, but declined to give a reason at the time. "The FBI and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General are conducting court-authorized activity," Setera wrote in an email. The government seized approximately $350,000 in assets tied to the alleged scheme.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump tells Powell to leave
The Big Story President Trump on Wednesday called for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to resign after the overseer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac called for Congress to investigate Powell over past comments to lawmakers. © Greg Nash ''Too Late' should resign immediately!!!' Trump posted on Truth Social, using his nickname for Powell. Trump also linked to an article from Bloomberg News detailing comments from Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte, a Powell critic who accused the Fed chair of lying to lawmakers during testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last week. Pulte said Powell lied to members of the panel when answering questions about renovations to the Fed's Washington, D.C., headquarters. When pressed by senators on the Fed's alleged $2.5 billion renovation plan, Powell said some of the more fanciful inclusions were part of older plans and have since been scrapped. Other costs, such as repairing elevators that go directly to board members' offices and marble fixtures, were basic upkeep of features that have always been in the building, he said. Pulte, however, accused Powell of deliberately misleading senators with 'deceptive' testimony and argued his statements were enough to qualify as adequate cause to fire him. Brett Samuels has more here. Welcome to The Hill's Business & Economy newsletter, I'm Sylvan Lane — covering the intersection of Wall Street and Pennsylvania Avenue. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads Key business and economic news with implications this week and beyond: Trump says Powell should 'resign immediately' President Trump on Wednesday called for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to resign after the overseer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac called for Congress to investigate Powell over past comments to lawmakers. Waffle House dropping egg surcharge Waffle House announced Tuesday it would drop a surcharge added to restaurant orders in February due to skyrocketing egg prices. Trump tariffs would cost US employers $82.3B: Analysis Midsize U.S. businesses could face a $82.3 billion to $187.7 billion hit if President Trump sticks to his sweeping tariff plans — creating the potential for price hikes, layoffs and hiring freezes for many employers, according to a new analysis. Tax Watch What to know about the $6,000 'senior deduction' in GOP megabill The Senate's version of the 'big, beautiful bill,' passed on Tuesday, includes a $6,000 tax deduction for Americans 65 or older. The provision does not entirely end taxes on Social Security, but it would zero out the Social Security tax burden for 88 percent of seniors, according to an estimate by President Trump's Council of Economic Advisers. That's up from 64 percent of seniors who are currently exempt from Social Security taxes, meaning about 14 million additional seniors will benefit from the change. The version of Trump's megabill that squeezed through the Senate yesterday would offer a tax deduction of $6,000 to seniors making up to $75,000 individually, or $150,000 on a joint return. The deduction is lowered for incomes above that level, and phased out altogether for seniors with individual incomes of more than $175,000, or $250,000 jointly. Seniors can currently claim a standard deduction of $15,000 (or $30,000 for couples), plus an additional senior-specific deduction of $2,000 (or $3,600 for couples). The Senate bill would also raise the standard deduction by a few hundred dollars. Tax Watch is a regular feature focused on the fight over tax reform and extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts this year. Email a tip {{if !contains( Report')} {/if}}{{if !contains( Report')} {/if}} The Ticker Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: In Other News Branch out with more stories from the day: After Diddy's conviction, here's where his business ventures stand LOS ANGELES (AP) — Sean 'Diddy' Combs has been acquitted of the most serious charges in his federal … Good to Know Business and economic news we've flagged from other outlets: What Others are Reading Top stories on The Hill right now: Davidson flips to 'yes' on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), who in May voted against the House GOP's version of President Trump's megabill, said Wednesday that he's a 'yes' on the Senate-passed legislation. Read more Live updates: House appears stuck as GOP leaders fight for votes on Trump megabill The House is in a holding pattern as GOP leaders lean on Republican holdouts to allow President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' to advance. Read more What People Think Opinions related to business and economic issues submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow!
