logo
The latest generational divide: How to hold a phone

The latest generational divide: How to hold a phone

Washington Post6 days ago

Young people hold their phones upright to do everything: texting, making video calls, scrolling on social media. Most egregiously, they record videos vertically — an act that causes consternation among Gen Xers and boomers when these generations are forced to squint at the resulting strip of video on their TVs or computers, the picture flanked by huge swaths of squandered screen space.
The plague of vertical videos is likely to get worse. Some 56 percent of Gen Zers and 43 percent of millennials find social media content more relevant than traditional TV shows and movies, according to a Deloitte survey. Even Netflix recently announced that it will pilot a 'TikTok-like' feed of virtual video on its mobile app.
Still, passions run deep when it comes to our screen real estate. In fact, we've seen this movie before. In the 1950s, the film industry began to shoot movies in wider aspect ratios to distinguish themselves from conventional 'full screen' televisions with a 4:3 aspect ratio. Frustration ensued over the incompatibly shaped screens, lasting until Americans largely transitioned to high-definition wide-screen TVs in the early 2000s.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Theatrical films couldn't fit 4:3 TV screens without using a crude cropping technique called 'pan and scan.' Discarding part of the original picture violated the director's vision, some argued, and led to unseen actors speaking from the void. An alternative method, called 'letterboxing,' could be deployed to preserve the entire image. But showing the full width of the movie meant inserting large black bars above and below the image — it was like watching a movie through a mail slot.
Fast forward to today's smartphone-dominated culture, and something I call 'picket-fencing' now irks viewers. This technique involves displaying columns of nothingness to the left and right of a vertically shot video on a wide-screen TV — like viewing a picture through a slot in a picket fence. (Ironically, vertical videos would have been a much better fit on 4:3 screens.)
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
I understand the younger generation's reluctance to turn their phones sideways. Social media platforms are designed for vertical scrolling; holding a phone horizontally may feel awkward and unnatural. However, as a member of the elder generations, I empathize with the aversion to this new-age vertical eyesore: If God intended for us to shoot vertically, he would have created man with one eye above the other.
To hold a phone vertically or horizontally? I've created an accessible table to break down this generational clash over smartphone orientation.
11 of 11 Thoughts on a chain of vertical-screen movie theaters called 'Profile Cinemas'?
😃
Yay!
🙃
Meh.
10 of 11 The solution I prefer for ill-fitting video
📱
Turning my phone 90 degrees
🖥️
Reinstalling my TV on a pivoting stand and praying the software flips the screen 90 degrees
9 of 11 Which types of scenes are more annoying to watch?
🚩
Scenes with horizontal shots of human pyramids or flags getting lowered
🎭
Scenes with vertical shots of actors conversing from opposite sides of frame
8 of 11 I'd swap my TV for an even wider model if given the opportunity.
🙃
Meh.
😃
Yay!
7 of 11 What are your sources of solace?
📱
TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat
🎞️
The Criterion Collection
6 of 11 Do you walk down the street looking at your phone?
📱
Yes
🌎
Never!
5 of 11 Which sport do you prefer to watch?
🧗‍♀️
Rock climbing
🎾
Tennis
4 of 11 What's your retort in the debate?
🧒
These old farts may as well be screaming: 'Kids, get off my lawn!'
😇
'If the director meant for us to watch 'Charlie's Angels' in 9:16, they'd have given us just one angel.'
3 of 11 What makes you grumpier?
📱
Being criticized for not holding your phone correctly
📺
Being forced to watch vertical videos on your widescreen TV
2 of 11 My natural-born aspect ratio is ...
📱
9:16
🖥️
16:9
1 of 11 Which lifestyle would feel most comfortable for you?

Influencing
🥔
Being a couch potato
← Drag left or click
Drag right → or click
Congrats!
You are in Team Horizontal! You see the full picture, and think wide.
left right
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New York Knicks Hold Home Court Against Indiana Pacers
New York Knicks Hold Home Court Against Indiana Pacers

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New York Knicks Hold Home Court Against Indiana Pacers

New York Knicks Hold Home Court Against Indiana Pacers originally appeared on Athlon Sports. In a pivotal game 5 for the New York Knicks, they definitely came out hungry and ultimately beat the Indiana Pacers 111-94. Advertisement The first quarter came at the Pacers like a whirlwind. Jalen Brunson, determined for this not to be his last game of the season, came out dropping 14 in the first quarter. The Pacers had three early turnovers and some cold shooting to start the game found them trailing by four at the end of the first. Karl-Anthony Towns showed that his knee was not a problem, taking on an early double team to finish at the rim twice to start the quarter. Obi Toppin would respond for the Pacers, attacking the rim aggressively to score two buckets at the rim for the Pacers to bring them back within three. With Brunson getting an early rest, Josh Hart would come in and provide a calming hand to his team while facilitating the offense. Midway through the second quarter, the Knicks found themselves leading by eight. Both teams would fall into a bit of a shooting slump, but would continue to attack the rim with the hopes of getting to the free-throw line. In an interesting split, the Pacers had 17 points from their starters and 17 points from their bench. Brunson would return after the Knicks went plus-seven while he was on the bench getting a much-needed rest. The third quarter started with the Knicks leading by 11, and the Pacers desperately needing to get Tyrese Haliburton going, who had only four points in the first half. Brunson would pick up right where he left off in the first half while scoring seven of the Knicks' first points in the quarter. With the Pacers' inability to rebound the basketball, they found themselves down by 16 points early. Advertisement Turnovers virtually took Indiana out of the game, as the lead ballooned to 20 points at the halfway point of the third. Towns would pick up his fourth personal foul, which would cause him to go to the bench. Toppin would come in again and provide a lift off the bench, cutting the lead to 13. However, sloppy ball-handling and shooting helped the Knicks increase the lead back up to 20 points. Down by 17 points to start the fourth, the Pacers definitely needed to make some adjustments if they hoped to climb back into this game. Pascal Siakam would force a turnover from Hart, finding Bennedict Mathurin for the transition bucket. Haliburton only had seven field goal attempts at the end of regulation. Ultimately, their efforts proved not to be enough. The series now shifts back to Indiana for a pivotal Game 6. Related: Indiana Pacers Must Solve This Key Issue to Close Out New York Knicks Related: Injury Report, How to Watch, Odds for Pacers vs. Knicks Game 5 This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on May 30, 2025, where it first appeared.

Pascal Siakam's Awkward Interaction With Indiana Reporter Goes Viral
Pascal Siakam's Awkward Interaction With Indiana Reporter Goes Viral

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pascal Siakam's Awkward Interaction With Indiana Reporter Goes Viral

Pascal Siakam's Awkward Interaction With Indiana Reporter Goes Viral originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Indiana Pacers lost in Game 5 to the New York Knicks, falling 111-94. Bennedict Mathurin led the Pacers with 23 points off the bench, although after the game, Indiana made it clear that they simply did not put forth the effort needed to win. Advertisement "We obviously didn't play with the level of force that we needed to," said head coach Rich Carlisle. "We're gonna have to play much better." His players agreed and made it clear to both the media and fans that they would play stronger in Game 6 on Saturday, although one reporter was not satisfied with that answer. Gregg Doyel of the Indianapolis Star, who has been banned from Indiana Fever games after an uncomfortable interaction with Caitlin Clark last season, was back to his usual shenanigans. 'How is it possible to not play hard enough in Game 5?" he asked Pascal Siakam. 'What are you talking about?" countered the veteran forward. "They played harder than us. It's okay. We played hard. They played harder. What's your point? I don't get it.' Advertisement Siakam, understandably, was already frustrated with the loss, and Doyel's line of questioning didn't help, although the reporter kept pushing the issue. 'You good?" Siakam interrupted. "You good, bro? You're looking for something I know, but damn." A video of the exchange has amassed over six million views on social media, with the vast majority of fans commenting to defend Siakam or lambast Doyel. "Is the pressure getting to Siakam or is this just bad reporting?" asked FanSided's social media account. "They're about to ban Gregg Doyle from any Indy sports coverage," posted a fan. "He already had Caitlin uncomfortable last season, and they barred him from covering her. Now look." Advertisement Doyel's line of questioning was awkward, although he did bring up a decent point. Do the Pacers have what it takes to close out the series? They will have a second chance in front of their home fans on Saturday. Check out the All Pacers homepage for more news, analysis, and must-read articles. Related: Indiana Pacers Broke Two Rivals and New York Knicks Could Be Next Related: Injury Report, How to Watch, Odds for Pacers vs. Knicks Game 6 This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on May 31, 2025, where it first appeared.

Neuralink brain implant helps Arizona man regain control of his life
Neuralink brain implant helps Arizona man regain control of his life

Fox News

time35 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Neuralink brain implant helps Arizona man regain control of his life

Elon Musk's Neuralink brain implants are designed to help individuals with disabilities — and the implant's first user told Fox News on Friday about the revolutionary technology. Arizona native Noland Arbaugh, the first Neuralink brain implant patient, joined "The Will Cain Show" to discuss how the device has helped him regain control of his life. "I'm just beyond grateful," Arbaugh told Fox News host Will Cain. "It's an incredible privilege to be a part of this." "To have someone like Elon Musk — one of the most powerful men in the world, so involved, so interested in affecting my life and people with disabilities right now — I can't even put it into words," he continued. He also thanked the Neuralink employees for supporting him on his medical journey. "They are the hardest workers that I've ever met in my life, and they have such a passion for helping people," he said. In 2016, Arbaugh was involved in a swimming accident, leaving him paralyzed from the shoulders down. Facing the rest of his life with significantly reduced mobility, he remarked on how limited his life felt before receiving the Neuralink implant. "I just wasn't really doing much," Arbaugh said. "I wasn't getting out of my house, I wasn't being able to communicate with the world." "After Neuralink, I feel like I have a purpose," he added. "I just want to become a functioning member of society… It's been an incredible journey, and I am incredibly grateful." The Neuralink brain implant is a "fully implantable, cosmetically invisible, wireless brain-computer interface (BCI) designed to restore autonomy to people with paralysis. It enables users to operate their phones and computers with just their thoughts," a capability Neuralink calls "Telepathy," according to its website. "It's all through my motor cortex and my brain, and all those neurons firing with machine learning and AI," Arbaugh said. "It syncs up, and that's how I control the computer." Arbaugh added that it took some time for him to learn how to successfully use the implant, but he is excited about the potential of the device. "There is a learning curve, if you will," he said. "You calibrate the implant, so you do certain things, do certain actions, think certain things — over time, the algorithm will learn your intentions and give you control." Arbaugh said he looks forward to the next chapter in his life now that he has more autonomy than he ever did since becoming quadriplegic, but he won't forget how Musk and Neuralink helped him regain that confidence. "They have changed my life in ways that they may never fully understand," he said. "I don't think I could ever thank them enough for all that they've done for me."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store