logo
EU set to delay implementation of bank trading rule

EU set to delay implementation of bank trading rule

Irish Examiner23-05-2025

The European Commission is set to recommend a fresh delay to the adoption of new trading book rules that govern the trading activities of banks, pushing implementation back to 2027.
The bloc is likely to delay the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book to January 2027 as it waits for clarity on how the US plans to implement the Basel rules, sources said, asking not to be identified discussing internal debates. A spokesperson for the commission in Brussels didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Europe's plan to implement the trading regulations this year was derailed after the US failed to agree on its own version of a wider package of capital rules, which is known as Basel Endgame in industry parlance. Washington's appetite for introducing the entire package have been thrown into further doubt by US president Donald Trump's administration, which has signalled a broad deregulation agenda.
The EC has already pushed back the implementation of the FRTB to 2026 avoid putting lenders such as Deutsche Bank and BNP Paribas at a disadvantage to their US competitors.
It launched a consultation earlier this year on options including another one year delay or for introducing temporary tweaks to the measures that would make them less burdensome.
A person familiar with discussions said Financial Services Commissioner Maria Luis Albuquerque told a recent finance ministers meeting that while a formal decision had not yet been taken, the consultation responses were overwhelmingly in favor of another one year delay. The final decision must be ratified by the College of Commissioners.
With the US plans up in the air, countries including France have been putting pressure on the commission to further delay the rules to preserve a level-playing field with those rivals. They've also argued the delay would free up capital that could then be used to offer loans and stir growth in their economies.
Bloomberg

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Irish factory output slumps in April as US stockpiling wanes
Irish factory output slumps in April as US stockpiling wanes

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Irish factory output slumps in April as US stockpiling wanes

Irish factory output fell sharply in April, the Central Statistics Office (CSO) said on Monday, despite a strong start to the year, particularly for multinational-dominated manufacturing industries including pharmaceuticals. Industrial production slumped by 13.7 per cent in April from the previous month after US President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs on imports from Europe and other trading partners. However, the CSO warned that the figures are volatile due to the highly globalised nature of the Republic's industrial base. On a rolling three-month basis, factory output volumes and values surged in the three months to the end of April amid rapid expansion in the economy's multinational-dominated pharmaceutical, computer and electronics sectors and stockpiling of goods by US companies in advance of Mr Trump's tariffs. READ MORE Industrial production, the volume of output from all manufacturing units based in the Republic, climbed 13.2 per cent between February and April compared with the previous three months and 35.6 per cent from the same period last year. Industrial turnover, the value of manufacturing output, also climbed by almost a quarter, the CSO said. How to manage your pension in these volatile times Listen | 37:00 This was largely driven by a sharp increase in output from the highly globalised 'modern' manufacturing sector, which includes pharmaceutical and computing companies, which climbed by 41.8 per cent compared with the same period last year. By contrast, there was a 0.7 per cent decline in output from the traditional manufacturing sector in the 12 months to the end of April, the CSO said. [ Simon Harris warns US of tariff impact on pharma and microchip sectors Opens in new window ] Still, the monthly decline in production volumes between March and April is likely a harbinger of further volatility in the face of significant uncertainty on either side of the Atlantic around US trade policy. April's decline was concentrated in the multinational-dominated modern industrial sector, where production fell by almost 15 per cent, compared with just 0.9 per cent in the traditional sector. Colin Cotter, a statistician in the agency's enterprise statistics division, said it should be noted that the figures reflect contract manufacturing activity and outsourcing in the multinational sector. AIB's latest purchasing managers' index for the manufacturing May, based on a survey of producers, indicated that Irish factories remained in expansion mode last month despite a slight decline in output. Some Irish firms recorded subdued spending by US clients, but concerns about the impact of tariffs and global economic uncertainty had eased slightly in May. Overall, however, industrial production in the Republic reached its highest levels since 2022 in the early part of the year as US firms brought more goods into the world's largest economy before Mr Trump's so-called liberation day tariffs were announced.

Business leaders converge on Washington to halt Trump's foreign investment tax
Business leaders converge on Washington to halt Trump's foreign investment tax

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Business leaders converge on Washington to halt Trump's foreign investment tax

Dozens of executives from some of the world's biggest companies will travel to Washington this week to push back against a plan to raise taxes on foreign investments in the US, warning it may hit millions of American jobs. The lobbying drive is targeting a provision in Donald Trump 's budget bill, which if approved by Congress would allow the US to impose additional taxes on companies and investors from countries that it deems to have punitive tax policies. Investors, US companies with foreign owners and international firms with American operations, could all be affected by Section 899 of the bill, which executives fear could cause a drop in corporate investment and a retreat from US assets. Jonathan Samford, president of the Global Business Alliance, told the Financial Times that representatives from about 70 companies would meet members of Congress this week and Section 899 would be 'a central topic'. READ MORE The threat of higher taxes has unsettled the lobby group's almost 200 foreign-owned companies in the US, which include most of the big pharma and medical device companies that have significant operations in Ireland as well as CRH, Guinness parent Diageo, Jameson parent Pernod Ricard and Kerry Group. Many of them fear a hit to the 8.4 million jobs they provide in America. 'I think there is growing momentum to get rid of this provision in the Senate,' said Mr Samford. 'Senators recognise that it's counterproductive to the economic vision for the administration, which has made a big point about trying to get more investment to the US.' A leading financial trade association is also planning for its members to travel to Washington this week to meet treasury officials and Republican members of the Senate banking committee to argue against Section 899. Beth Zorc, chief executive of the Institute of International Bankers (IIB), said: 'As passed by the US House of Representatives, Section 899 will stifle foreign direct investment, risk financial market disruptions and endanger American jobs in states and communities across the country.' The US operations of foreign banks underwrite more than 70 per cent of debt issuance for foreign companies in the US, representing almost a third of total dollar-denominated debt issuance, the IIB said. The foreign banks said they lent more than $1.3 trillion (€1.14 trillion) to US companies in 2023 and their financing of international companies supported $5.4 trillion of foreign direct investment in the US by foreign headquartered companies, generating $270 billion of revenue. The IIB, which represents some of the world's biggest banks including HSBC, BNP Paribas, Royal Bank of Canada, UBS, Bank of China and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial, as well as AIB and Bank of Ireland, is expected to push for a one-year delay to the tax rises and for a reduction in the scope of the measure. 'We encourage the Senate to address concerns about this provision and to consider modifications that will help preserve international investment in American jobs and businesses,' Ms Zorc told the FT. The measure targets countries with what the US calls 'unfair foreign taxes'. Most EU countries, the UK, Australia, Canada and others around the world would be affected, according to law firm Davis Polk. For foreign investors, Section 899 would increase taxes on dividends and interest on US stocks and some corporate bonds by five percentage points every year for four years. It would also impose taxes on the American portfolio holdings of sovereign wealth funds, which are at present exempt. Republicans in Congress have searched for ways to keep the cost of Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill down; Section 899 would raise $116 billion over the next decade, according to the non-partisan joint committee on taxation. Still, the overall bill would add $2.4 trillion to the US debt by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Jason Smith, the chairman of the tax-writing House ways and means committee, said recently that he hoped Section 899 was not imposed because other countries would change their laws in response. 'A big concern is that foreign governments, based on agreements entered by the Biden administration, are trying to suck away billions of dollars from US companies,' said Mr Smith. 'This is a way to help put them in check so that they understand that if they do that to US businesses, there will be consequences for their actions. Hopefully it'll never take effect.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Price hikes forcing shoppers to buy less in a bid to save money
Price hikes forcing shoppers to buy less in a bid to save money

Irish Independent

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Price hikes forcing shoppers to buy less in a bid to save money

The cost-of-living squeezed also means that getting the best price is the main priority for shoppers. People are making choices about where to shop best on the prices they can get, according to the latest KPMG Next Gen Retail Survey. The survey found that close to six out of 10 shoppers say that getting the best price is the main priority when deciding where to shop. The findings come as recent statistics showed that the price of a weekly shop is rising at more than double the general rate of inflation. Figures from grocery data firm Kantar last week showed grocery prices were up 4.96pc by May 18, compared to the same 12-week period last year. Kantar said we now have a clear 'tipping point' when inflation goes above 3pc to 4pc. This is when shoppers start to feel it in their wallets, and they change their behaviour, Kantar said. KPMG found that almost a third of Irish shoppers feel less financially secure now compared to the start of the year. The research highlights significant financial pressure that Irish consumers are under, and a risk of further consumer price pressure as the impact of tariffs take effect. Questioning was conducted by Red C in early April, after US President Donald Trump make his first announcement on tariffs. Head of consumer, retail and manufacturing at KPMG David O'Kelly said the future for shoppers was unsettling. ADVERTISEMENT Learn more 'This research highlights the significant financial pressure Irish consumers are under as we move through 2025. 'Financial uncertainty could be compounded by increased trade headwinds depending on the form of the threatened tariff changes. This dynamic creates a clear challenge to Ireland's retailers to optimise their supply chains and cost structures to maintain competitiveness,' he said. Researchers found that Irish shoppers are actively modifying their shopping behaviours to manage household budgets. More than half of the respondents (54pc) said they are now buying less items to save money. This is an increase from 50pc who said they are buying less when surveyed last October. Shoppers are using various tactics to stretch their shopping budgets. They are making more frequent use of retailer loyalty schemes to get lower prices. Shoppers are also actively seeking out products on promotions or discounts. They are buying more own-brand or value products, or cancelling monthly subscriptions are the main saving methods, the KPMG-commissioned survey found. The report reveals that females are notably more likely than men to implement various cost-saving measures. Loyalty schemes and discounts continue to influence consumer behaviour. Two in five report that discounts play a crucial role in their shopping decisions. People between the ages of 18 and 24, and those between the ages of 34 and 54 place an even higher importance on the use of discounts. Nearly three in five indicate that loyalty schemes drive their choice of retailer, with these programmes having a particularly strong impact on younger shoppers when deciding where to shop. Physical stores continue to be the preferred channel for essential purchases. The report found that 85pc of Irish adults still purchase groceries primarily in-store, a figure that has remained stable over the past year. Some 56pc of shoppers favour physical stores for homeware items. Just over a third of clothing shoppers also prefer in-person shopping experiences. Rural consumers are more likely to buy clothes and fashion online compared to urban residents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store