SNP quango ‘promotes surgery to cut size of male breasts'
Russell Findlay highlighted the inclusion of a body called This is Remarkable Ltd in the Scottish Government's current directory of public organisations.
Its website features blog posts on rhinoplasty and guides on the best vaping liquids and male breast-reduction clinics in South Korea.
The company is currently in liquidation and has not filed accounts since 2022. However, the website contains a contact address in Bali.
Mr Findlay cited it as evidence that the SNP does 'not even know where their money is going' and argued that Scottish Government bodies should not be focused on 'reducing the size of moobs '.
His intervention came after he used his speech to the Scottish Tory conference on Saturday to unveil plans for a taxpayer savings act to rein in wasteful public spending and slash bureaucracy.
The legislation would cut the number of quangos by a quarter, bring business leaders into government to identify savings and cut red tape in the NHS and other bodies.
'Ineffective, bloated state'
The £650 million of savings would be used to deliver income tax cuts worth an average of £444 per worker.
Around 600,000 people are employed in Scotland's public sector, making up 22 per cent of the total workforce, compared to about 17 per cent in the UK as a whole. They are also paid on average £2,400 per year more north of the Border.
Mr Findlay told BBC Scotland's Sunday Show: 'The size of the state under the SNP has grown to an extremely ineffective, bloated state. It costs far too much money.
'The hard-working taxpayers are paying for all that. Just today, I was looking at the list of government agencies and quangos on the Government's official website, and there was a link taking you to an entity that is offering those jobs and male breast-reduction surgery.
'You know, I believe the Scottish Government should be focused on cutting waste, reducing waste – not reducing the size of moobs. The Government do not even know where their money is going. It is obscene.'
The Tories said he was referring to This is Remarkable Ltd, which was included in the Scottish Government's most recent directory of public bodies, published on March 27 this year.
The firm was previously known as Investors in People Scotland before it rebranded in 2017. Liquidators were appointed in December 2022.
'Ridiculous waste of money'
The firm's last set of accounts highlighted a difficult financial situation, with the company's turnover falling from £2.1 million to £1.4 million.
One blog on its website lists the best gynecomastia clinics providing male breast surgery in South Korea this year.
Mr Findlay also criticised £4 million a year being given to Criminal Justice Scotland, which he said published guidance on avoiding the word 'criminal' due to concerns over stigma.
'Some of the things it promotes is policing of language. It tells the public they should not call criminals criminals. This is just a ridiculous waste of money,' he said.
He said 5,500 public sector workers in Scotland were earning over £130,000 a year and John Swinney, First Minister, could not 'put his hand on heart' and say 'every one of these jobs actually delivers for the taxpayer'.
A Scottish government spokesman said: 'This week we will unveil our public service reform strategy, which will focus on driving efficiencies, integration and a shift to prevention.
'This is Remarkable Ltd – previously known as Investors in People Scotland – was an agency that focused on support for business and employee engagement. It has ceased operating and it will be removed from the list of public bodies.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Rachel Reeves to cut ‘bats and newts' in boost to developers
Rachel Reeves is preparing to strip back environmental protections in an effort to boost the economy by speeding up infrastructure projects. The chancellor is considering reforms that would make it far harder for concerns about nature to stop development, which she insists is crucial to restoring growth and improving living standards. The Treasury has begun preparing for another planning reform bill and is thinking about tearing up key parts of European environmental rules that developers say are making it harder to build key projects. Labour ministers have repeatedly insisted that their current planning overhaul will not come at the expense of nature, promising a 'win-win' system where developers will pay to offset environmental damage. But Reeves is understood to believe that the government must go significantly further, after expressing frustration that the interests of 'bats and newts' are being allowed to stymie critical infrastructure. She has tasked officials with looking at much more contentious reforms, which are likely to provoke a furious backlash from environmentalists and cause unease for some Labour MPs. A smaller, UK-only list of protected species is being planned, which would place less weight on wildlife — including types of newt — that is rare elsewhere in Europe but more common in Britain. Developers would also no longer have to prove that projects would have no impact on protected natural sites, under plans that would abolish the 'precautionary principle' enshrined in European rules. Instead, a new test would look at risks and benefits of potential projects. Further curbs to judicial review are also being considered by Reeves to stop key projects being delayed by legal challenges from environmentalists. No decisions have been made, but work is underway and Treasury sources acknowledged there was a growing belief that the government needed to go further, as Reeves says she wants to make boosting Britain's sluggish productivity the centrepiece of her autumn budget. She argued this week that building more infrastructure such as roads and railways were crucial to this aim. A Planning and Infrastructure Bill currently going through parliament attempts to encourage development through a 'nature restoration fund' through which developers will be allowed to press ahead with projects by setting up schemes elsewhere to offset their environmental impact. • The grid is struggling — and our green future hangs in the balance But the plan has been criticised by environmental groups while also attracting scepticism from some developers, who fear it will not work in practice and do little to speed up building. Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, who stood down as energy minister in May, is urging his former colleagues to go further to achieve Labour's promise of 150 major infrastructure projects. 'While I think the planning bill will work for housing, I don't think it is sufficiently focused on the major infrastructure projects, so it is encouraging that the Treasury is going to have another look at whether we've really got this right,' he said. 'The government has to face up to the tensions in the Habitat Regulations which are making it hard to build essential infrastructure and the reality is that at some point someone needs to make a hard decision and say 'on some things, you just have to press ahead'.' The rules, which incorporate the EU Habitats Directive into British law, ban killing of hundreds of species, including types of bats, news, voles, snails, spiders, insects and woodlice. Developers must prove there is no risk to protected sites and species before being allowed to go ahead with projects, under rules which critics say impose an 'impossibly high standard' on vital projects. Reeves is increasingly sympathetic to such criticism, after repeatedly hitting out at 'ridiculous' environmental protections. She said last month that she cared 'more about the young family getting on the housing ladder than I do about protecting some snails', after a speech in January in which she said developers should be able to 'focus on getting things built, and stop worrying about bats and newts'. Sir Keir Starmer has also expressed frustration with the ability of campaigners to delay projects through legal challenges, and is already introducing rules which limit judicial review to override the 'whims of nimbys'. Campaign groups and residents, who currently have three opportunities to apply for judicial review, which will be reduced to two, or one in cases deemed by a judge 'totally without merit'. Reeves is now considering allowing only one opportunity to bring any challenge. Some Labour MPs and peers want her to go further by using dedicated acts of parliament to prevent any legal challenge to specific named projects. The plans are at an early stage and are likely to cause tension with ministers in other departments who have pledged to protect the environment. Paul Miner, of the countryside charity CPRE, said targeting habitats regulations would 'take us backwards rather than forwards on nature recovery', adding: 'We urge the government to drop the worn-out 'builders versus blockers' narrative which wrongly frames climate and nature as being in conflict with economic growth.' Becky Pullinger, of the Wildlife Trusts, said maintaining environmental standards was 'essential if we are to achieve targets to protect and restore the natural world which is suffering huge declines, saying Reeves should abandon 'the myth that deregulation will lead to economic growth'. But Robbie Owen, head of infrastructure planning at Pinsent Masons, said: 'Ministers are finally realising that their rhetoric about reform doesn't match up up the reality of their bill. We have been saying to ministers and officials all year that the bill needs to go further and it seems that message has finally been heard.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Now Salmond's widow takes on his legal battle with ministers over sex probe
Alex Salmond 's widow is to pick up her late husband's £3million compensation claim that he raised against SNP ministers. Moira Salmond is pursuing the legal action started almost two years ago over a flawed sexual misconduct investigation by the Scottish Government. The case concerns possible wrongdoing by officials while Nicola Sturgeon was First Minister. Reporting the development, the Sunday Mail said the reclusive 88-year-old had been galvanised by attacks on Mr Salmond in Ms Sturgeon's memoirs, Frankly. A family friend said Mrs Salmond was 'upset and angered by the continued attempts to smear Alex in the book' with 'ridiculous and inaccurate' allegations. 'It has only strengthened her resolve to make sure the full truth comes out and Alex's name is cleared,' they told the paper. Now executor of Mr Salmond's estate, his widow has assembled a legal team including a KC and two junior counsel in readiness for a court battle. The friend added: 'Her case against the government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that. 'Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him.' Ms Sturgeon's book includes disputed claims Mr Salmond had 'consensual affairs', opposed gay marriage and failed to read the 650-page independence white paper. The MSP also denied there had been any 'conspiracy' to ruin Mr Salmond's reputation – a claim the former Alba Party leader maintained until his death at the age of 69 last October. Ms Sturgeon said her former mentor 'would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him'. She also claimed he 'impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy – government, police, Crown Office', adding: 'He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all.' Ms Sturgeon and Mr Salmond fell out spectacularly in 2018 after it emerged her government had investigated misconduct complaints made against him by two female civil servants. Mr Salmond had the probe struck down at the Court of Session within months as unfair, unlawful and 'tainted by apparent bias', and was awarded £512,000 in legal costs. He was later cleared of 13 sexual assault charges at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020. He launched the Alba Party as a rival to the SNP a year later. The former First Minister, who admitted he could have behaved better towards women on occasions, had always denied any criminality. He sued the Scottish Government in November 2023 alleging there had been misfeasance – a knowing abuse of power to harm others – by various civil servants under Ms Sturgeon and sought damages of around £3million. Promising a 'day of reckoning', he said at the time: 'Not one person has been held accountable. With this court action that evasion of responsibility ends.' In a Court of Session hearing last August, Mr Salmond's lawyer said the police were probing whether one senior civil servant 'gave a false statement under oath' to a Holyrood inquiry that was probing how the sexual harassment claims were handled. The action was frozen when Mr Salmond suffered a fatal heart attack in North Macedonia. But Mrs Salmond's legal team is now reactivating proceedings. A Scottish Tory spokesman said: 'It's hardly surprising Moira Salmond is deeply disappointed that her previous calls for privacy to grieve have been ignored by Nicola Sturgeon.' Ms Sturgeon's spokesman declined to comment. The Scottish Government said: 'It would not be appropriate to comment on live litigation.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Trans ruling set to be big issue for SNP at next election
John Swinney's 'fear of activists' within the SNP has prevented him from implementing the Supreme Court ruling which asserts sex is defined by biology, a feminist campaign group has said. For Women Scotland (FWS) won the backing of the UK's highest court in April for its case that the legal definition of sex in the Equality Act is based on sex at birth, not by which gender people may want to be identified by. However, the SNP government has faced criticism for not implementing the ruling to enforce single-sex spaces for biological men and women in public sector services such as schools and prisons. Susan Smith, a director of FWS, which is taking the Scottish government to court for the second time over the issue, told LBC News that 'fear of activists' in the SNP was preventing ministers from implementing the ruling. She argued that its policies, including delaying implementing the ruling and making gender self-ID easier, were likely to backfire on the party in Scottish parliament elections next year. Sections within the SNP base still strongly support the policies pursued by Nicola Sturgeon, despite these now being viewed as costing the party wider public support. Swinney was 'risking making this an election issue', Smith said. John Swinney risks a lawsuit damaging him shortly before the Holyrood election next year JANE BARLOW/PA 'If we do end up going to court that will be close to the 2026 election and I cannot understand why John Swinney would want to preside over another humiliating legal defeat,' she said. Swinney had agreed to meet FWS to discuss the issue but later pulled out, saying he 'had a lot on his plate', Smith claimed. 'I think he'll be wishing had met with us,' she added. 'I don't know if the Scottish government thinks we'll get bored and go away but we won't.' The new legal action wants a court ruling on the legality of Scottish government's policies in prisons and schools. Under official guidance, men and boys who claim to have switched gender to female can enter single-sex women's spaces. The guidance also allows for biological males to compete against girls in school sports if they say they identify as female. • Hadley Freeman: Scotland is sullied by the cult of gender ideology Police Scotland became one of the first public services to exclude trans men and women from spaces such as toilets and changing rooms in offices and police stations designated for biological men and women last month. But the Scottish government is yet to update its advice to the wider public sector, including the civil service, schools and prisons, totalling hundreds of thousands of employees, saying it is waiting for official guidance from the UK-wide Equalities and Human Rights Commission. FWS said it had been left with 'little choice' but to take the Scottish government to court again after nationalist politicians refused to abandon gender self-ID policies, which the group says are now clearly in breach of the law. Formal proceedings began on Friday with the lodging of court papers. The Scottish government has 21 days to respond. The Scottish government said it would not comment on a live legal action.
