BTIG Stays Bullish on Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) Amid Sportsbook Optimism
While the company's revenue guidance didn't impress investors, the strategy management is taking is what's exciting. The company is wise enough to leverage its most profitable regions, particularly Africa and Canada, which are the key revenue drivers. Some analysts believe that if Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE:SGHC) is able to manage a revenue growth of 30% to 40%, the profits derived from Africa will almost double.
A reputable investor betting on a sports event, confidently placing a wager online.
That's not it. The giant isn't hitting a pause on product innovation either. From new betting products to gaming offerings, Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE:SGHC) is not only retaining existing customers but also attracting new ones. What's truly impressive is that the management knows that the art is in efficiently utilizing the costs, and not in driving down costs. Through this, the execution of strategic partnerships and the building of brand strength become quite easy.
Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE:SGHC) is a Guernsey-based online sports betting and gaming operator. With a presence in Africa, the Middle East, the Asia-Pacific, Europe, North America, and South/Latin America, the company operates through two segments: Betway and Spin.
While we acknowledge the potential of SGHC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money.
Disclosure: None.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
Thank you, Massachusetts millionaires!
It's time to thank the people involved in the millionaires tax — including the millionaires — without whom Massachusetts would not continue to be among the 'Our state thrives on eds and meds, and those are things particularly under the axe,' said Phineas Baxandall, research director at the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center. 'It's fortuitous that some counterbalance from the Fair Share income has been there.' For the second year in a row, revenues from the surtax have Advertisement The Fair Share Amendment specifies that revenues collected on taxable income — not assets — above $1 million be spent only on education and transportation. In the fiscal year just ended, revenues from the surtax Now other high-income states — which tend to be blue states — are A cautionary note: Proponents of the Fair Share Amendment intended that its benefits be used to enhance programs in education and transportation, not substitute for shortfalls. 'These investments have been life-changing for individuals and communities,' said Max Page, president of the Massachusetts Teachers Association, a central player in the Raise Up coalition that fought for the surtax. 'That's why I am concerned that it not become simply a way to backfill cuts by Trump.' Advertisement The idea, he said, 'was not just to prevent cuts; it was always to build a better society.' After voters in Massachusetts passed a hefty cigarette tax in 1992, legislators It's difficult to know whether the surtax is driving rich people from the state. But A state that invests in its future is a state that believes in itself. Despite serious headwinds from Trump's baneful policies, Massachusetts is working to stay a healthy, brainy, welcoming place, a place that values innovation, a clean environment, and world-class health care and education. A place where everybody — from multimillionaires on down – wants to live. Renée Loth's column appears regularly in the Globe.
E&E News
a few seconds ago
- E&E News
US soybean farmers hope Brazil probe can help rebuild Chinese market
American soybean farmers have lost billions of dollars worth of sales in China and other markets because of President Donald Trump's first trade war in 2018. Now, they hope his trade actions against their archrival Brazil will help bring back that export market. In particular, they are cheering the Trump administration's new investigation into Brazilian farmers' conversion of Amazon forestland into new soybean acreage — a long-term practice that accelerated last decade when China turned to Brazil to replace American suppliers. Advertisement 'As a result of the trade war and the incentives it provided to Brazil to significantly increase production, the U.S. soybean industry now faces enormous competition with Brazil in every export market, not just China,' Caleb Ragland, president of the American Soybean Association, told the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative in a set of comments this week regarding the investigation.
E&E News
a few seconds ago
- E&E News
California voters still support high-speed rail but don't think it will be finished, says poll
California voters have not given up on the state's high-speed rail project, even though they aren't confident it will ever be completed, according to an exclusive POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll. What happened: Sixty-two percent of the 1,445 registered voters polled said they support the state continuing construction on the rail line that is supposed to link the Bay Area to Los Angeles, but which has been beset by delays and massive cost overruns. The poll revealed a sharp partisan split on the project, which has served as a political punching bag for the Trump administration: 62 percent of Republican voters said the project is too expensive or mismanaged and should be canceled, while only 21 percent of Democrats took that stance. More than half of independents — 55 percent — said construction should continue. Democrats' support for high-speed rail, however, is far from absolute. While a third of respondents said they back California spending more state funds after President Donald Trump's Department of Transportation canceled $4 billion in federal grants, 38 percent said they will support continued construction only if the project keeps to its current budget. Advertisement Despite their support, Democratic voters are not confident that the rail line will be built all the way from San Francisco to Los Angeles. Just 27 percent said there's a high likelihood the project will be finished, while 47 percent said there's a low likelihood and 26 percent were unsure. Those numbers largely mirrored feelings across political affiliation, as 23 percent of Republicans and 20 percent of independents said there's a high likelihood the project will be completed. The project, originally slated for completion by 2020, is expected to open its initial line connecting Bakersfield to Merced in 2033, with no projected date for final completion. The project is now estimated to cost up to $128 billion, nearly four times its original $33 billion price tag.
