Ohio workers waiting on long-delayed pandemic unemployment benefits will have to keep waiting
Stock photo from Getty Images.
Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Michael Holbrook has decided to delay his order directing the state to chase down unemployment benefits from the COVID-19 pandemic. His decision to stay his ruling allows the state to continue its appeal without having to get the ball rolling on securing the outstanding funding.
According to Ohio workers who brought the lawsuit, there could be as much as $900 million in stranded benefits.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The case centers on a round of supplementary benefits from early in the Biden administration. DeWine, like more than a dozen other Republican governors, turned that funding down arguing it would make people less likely to return to work.
But a state appeals court determined Ohio's unemployment statutes require the governor to secure all 'available advantages' and turning down the extra funding violated that charge. Earlier this month, Holbrook ordered DeWine 'take all action necessary' to secure the outstanding unemployment funds. The governor is appealing that decision.
In his order, Judge Holbrook acknowledged, 'while this court believes that the entry of a partial stay is in the best interest of all the parties, it is compelled to act within the bounds of the law.'
Attorneys for the workers had argued even if the judge agreed to stay parts of his ruling, the state should at least begin contacting federal officials about transferring money.
Ohio workers want court to order Gov. DeWine to protect unused unemployment funds
Holbrook's order cited procedural rules and Ohio Supreme Court precedent that effectively gives the state the benefit of the doubt when it comes to appeals. Under Civil Rule 62, government officials or agencies are entitled to a stay while their appeal plays out — in one case Holbrook referenced, 'as a matter of right.'
DeWine contends the appropriate course of action is to stay Holbrook's order because holding off would maintain the status quo. Attorney General Dave Yost, who represents the governor's office in court, argued court rules and Ohio supreme court precedent require a stay.
'The Supreme Court of Ohio has repeatedly interpreted Rule 62 to grant an automatic stay in favor of a state agency or state official,' Yost argued in court filings. 'And it has held that trial courts who refuse to do so err, regardless of the circumstances.'
Yost added that taking a wait-and-see approach to the appeals process is the best way to avoid confusion. It's been three years, Yost explained, since the program in question was shuttered. If the state follows the lower court judge's ruling immediately, but later wins the appeal of that decision, Ohio 'would need to un-enroll from the program yet again.'
Arguing before Judge Holbrook, Assistant Attorney General Ann Yackshaw argued that program enrollment data is now three years out of date, and that restarting the program will cost money. Although the Department of Labor covered administrative costs when the program initially ran, she argued federal officials have sent mixed signals about whether they will continue to do so.
'Denying the stay here would mean that the private taxpayers will be spending potentially millions of dollars to get the pandemic system back up and running and get it updated,' she said.
If it turns out the federal government refuses to cover costs or the state's appeal eventually succeeds, that money would be wasted.
'Once we go down that path, spend this money, we can't un-ring that bell,' she said.
Former Attorney General Marc Dann is representing the Ohioans who lost out on those supplemental benefits. In his brief opposing the state, Dann argued they're relying on a judicial rule when state and federal law should supersede it.
Federal law prioritizes getting unemployment benefits into the hands of workers who need them, and it requires the state to have coordinating language in its statutes as well. The point being that agencies can claw back funding later, but an unemployed worker needs help covering rent and groceries immediately.
'Thus, while the State can appeal this Court's judgment,' Dann's brief argued, 'it cannot use the appeal as a basis to further delay payment of (unemployment) benefits.'
He pointed to a 1970s case out of California in which the state's benefits agency delayed payment while an employer appealed an applicant's eligibility. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected California law as 'invalid and unenforceable' because it conflicted with the federal statute, Dann said.
Like the state, Dann argued, the point of a stay is to maintain the status quo, but with a new presidential administration in place and a budget process under way, 'the country's fiscal affairs are, to say the least, in flux.' The funding necessary to provide the missing benefits is vulnerable to clawback, and he insisted the best way to maintain their availability is to have them in hand.
'A stay should only be for the purpose of maintaining the status quo while the appeal proceeds,' he insisted. 'The only way to safely maintain the status quo would be to order the governor to ask for the money.'
Dann argued that even if Holbrook agreed that a stay was warranted for other parts of his order, like disbursing the lost unemployment funds, he should maintain the portion directing the state to start the process. But even if Holbrook nodded to the wisdom of a partial stay, he declined to take that step, and instead put his order on hold for the time being.
In an emailed statement, Dann wrote 'we are of course going to appeal this decision.'
He went on to note that they are separately trying to get the appeals court to force the governor's hand, and officially request the money from the U.S. Department of Labor.
'Why the governor continues to refuse to ask for and at least hold on to the $900 million in benefits to 330,000 Ohioans is still a mystery,' he said adding, 'we hope the governor will reconsider his decision and ask for the money so that its not reappropriated and lost forever, forcing us to perhaps have to sue the state for the money.'
Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
40 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Sam's Club makes big change to products as customers switch gears
Walmart's (WMT) Sam's Club has recently resonated well with consumers nationwide, despite growing competition and concerns about inflation and tariffs. In Walmart's first-quarter earnings report for 2025, it revealed that Sam's Club's net sales in the U.S. increased by almost 3% year-over-year, while membership income grew 9.6% due to growth in new members and renewal rates. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Sam's Club foot traffic in its stores even climbed by 2.7% year-over-year during the quarter, according to recent data from Related: Costco quietly limits customer purchases of a beloved product Despite this growth in consumer momentum, Sam's Club still lags behind its competitors as Costco's foot traffic increased by roughly 6% during the quarter, while BJ's spiked by 4%. Amid increased competition and in response to a growing consumer trend, Sam's Club has made a significant change to its food and beverage products. In 2022, the warehouse club pledged to remove certain ingredients that consumers may deem harmful from its Member's Mark food products by the end of 2025, while also focusing on items made through sustainable practices. Some ingredients Sam's Club has been striving to remove include artificial flavors, high-fructose corn syrup, aspartame, phthalates, and synthetic colors. "The Sam's Club member is at the center of everything we do, so as we continue to evolve the Member's Mark brand, we intend to develop items that are reflective of the ingredients, processes, and materials they want – and don't want – in their products," said Prathibha Rajashekhar, senior vice president of private brands and sourcing at Sam's Club, in a 2022 press release. Related: BJ's CEO warns customers of a harsh new reality in stores Now, so far in 2025,, Sam's Club claims it has banned 40 ingredients from 96% of its Member's Mark food and beverage products, and it plans to ban them from all products in this category by the end of the year, according to a recent press release. Sam's Club also said that it recently surveyed its members and found that 72% are "actively seeking minimally processed foods," while 90% said that they "either live or aspire to live a healthier lifestyle." "We take pride in the high-quality ingredients that go into our products, but what truly differentiates us are the ingredients we consciously leave out," said Sam's Club Chief Merchant Julie Barber in the release. The move from Sam's Club comes during a time when Americans across the country are increasingly becoming more health-conscious, a trend that skyrocketed after the Covid-19 pandemic. A recent survey by the International Food Information Council found that 79% of Americans said that they consider whether a food product is processed when deciding to purchase it. For example, seed oils - including canola, sunflower, and palm - have recently drawn scrutiny from consumers for contributing to inflammation in the body. The trend has pushed fast-food chain Steak n' Shake to remove these oils from its food. More Retail: Costco quietly plans to offer a convenient service for customersT-Mobile pulls the plug on generous offer, angering customersKellogg sounds alarm on unexpected shift in customer behavior Also, despite being approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, synthetic dyes such as Blue 1, Red 40, and Yellow 6, commonly found in processed foods, have come under fire for being linked to health issues such as cancer and hyperactivity in children. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the U.S. secretary of Health and Human Services, has even vowed to ban artificial dyes from all U.S. food products by the end of the year. "For too long, some food producers have been feeding Americans petroleum-based chemicals without their knowledge or consent," said Kennedy in an April press release. "These poisonous compounds offer no nutritional benefit and pose real, measurable dangers to our children's health and development. That era is coming to an end." During an earnings call in February, PepsiCo CEO Ramon Laguarta said there has been a "higher level of awareness" among American consumers about health and wellness, which is impacting sales. "We're seeing more conversation in social media about health and wellness, in general, and obviously, that's impacting consumption of food and consumption of beverages," said Laguarta. Even Kellogg CEO Gary Pilnick warned investors in May that the company's cereal category faced declining sales as consumers increasingly lean more towards new brands that focus more on health and nutrition. Related: Walmart suffers another major boycott from customers The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
Google offers buyouts to staff in latest round of cost cutting
Google has offered buyouts to staff in several divisions in a fresh round of cost cutting, according to a company statement and reports from several news outlets. It's not clear how many employees are affected, but the offers were made to staff in Google's search, advertising, research and engineering units, according to The Wall Street Journal. 'Earlier this year, some of our teams introduced a voluntary exit program with severance for U.S.-based Googlers, and several more are now offering the program to support our important work ahead,' a Google spokesperson, Courtenay Mencini, said in a statement. 'A number of teams are also asking remote employees who live near an office to return to a hybrid work schedule in order to bring folks more together in-person,' Mencini said. The tech company started trimming its headcount in 2023, when it announced that it was laying off 12,000 staff as the economic boom that fueled demand for online services during the COVID-19 pandemic started to fade.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Logistics GDP share rose in '24, not likely to drop: CSCMP report
New York–Spending in the U.S. on logistics rose in both absolute dollar terms and as a percentage of GDP, and it isn't likely to go down anytime soon. That was one of the primary conclusions of the annual logistics report released last week by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) at a media briefing in New York. This year's report was entitled 'Navigating Through the Fog.' Kevin Smith, the moderator of the panel and the president and CEO of Sustainable Supply Chain Consulting, joked about the title and the logistics environment. 'This should be an easy session today,' he said. 'Not much has changed.' The first part of the presentation was led by Korhan Acar, a partner at Kearney, the global management consulting firm that produced the report in conjunction with the CSCMP. Acar, referring to the title of the report, said 'I don't think it requires any explanation why we call it that, coming out of recent uncertainty.' The CSCMP report puts an estimate on what it calls total U.S. business logistics costs (USBLC). The increase last year was $133 billion, a jump of 5.4%, to $2.58 trillion, up from $2.447 trillion the prior year. The decrease from 2022 to 2023 was 8.3%. Despite that, the five year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in total USBLC is 8%. Acar said outlays for logistics in the U.S. last year were about 8.8% of nominal GDP. With that number having fluctuated mostly in about the 7.4% to 8% range through most of the post-COVID period, and now having reached 8.8%, Acar said 'we have started to stabilize.' But the base percentage of logistics spending as a percentage of GDP is stabilizing at a higher level than what was seen pre-COVID. 'If a higher basis forms, what this really means is that logistics costs have been increasing as a percentage of GDP,' Acar said. 'They're going to be a little bit more prominent and pronounced in the profit and loss statements of companies.' There could be a retraction back to pre-COVID levels, Acar said. But that is not likely given various trends. One of those trends is what Acar referred to as 'China plus one, China plus two,' which is an 'elongation of supply chains' where a company expands its base of suppliers beyond a total or near-total reliance on China and goes to one or two other suppliers. Given that sort of philosophical change, as well as a long list of other disruptions like Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, 'cost and logistics are not seeing any kind of downward pressure,' Acar said. 'So we do expect that to remain at an escalated baseline for next year as well.' The CSCMP report calculates the USBLC as the total of various segment expenditures as well as other activities, such as inventories. The biggest contributor to the increase in the total figure last year was the cost of water transportation, up 93.1% to $161.6 billion. That's an increase of $77.9 billion. And that means that increased waterborne logistics costs accounted for more than 58% of the total increase last year. Acar said increased costs related to restricted traffic through the Red Sea and Suez Canal due to Houthi attacks was the primary driver of that trend. But for total expenditures, motor carriers are at the top of the list. The USBLC compiled by the report's authors said full truckload transportation costs fell to $387 billion in 2024 from $408.7 billion a year earlier. In the bull truckload market of 2022, the spend total was $490 billion, so that the full truckload spend in 2024 was down more than $100 billion in just two years. LTL spend, according to the report, is remarkably stable: $66 billion in 2022, $66 billion last year, $64 billion in between. Widespread talk in the trucking sector that there has been a growing shift to private or dedicated fleets did show up in the CSCMP report. It said the category that CSCMP calls private or dedicated motor carrier spending was $541.4 billion last year. That was up from $528.4 billion a year earlier, and way up from $461.7 billion in 2022. The compound annual growth rate in the last five years for the category is 12.3%. In the report's summary for the 2025 outlook for motor carriers, the CSCMP report did a quick summary of 2024–'spot and contract rates for full truckload shipments modestly declined throughout the year'–but pivoted to talk about the 2025 outlook which is 'now clouded by escalating global geopolitical tensions.' 'For US carriers, tariffs may introduce new financial pressures that, combined with potential declines in freight volume, will continue to squeeze carrier margins,' the report said. 'As the market moves deeper into 2025, the trucking industry finds itself suspended in midair, waiting to see how these complex forces will unfold.' The report ticked off the potential impact on trucking from tariffs, most of which have been discussed extensively for many months, before and after 'Liberation Day.' Higher tariffs on trucks coming out of Mexico and Canada 'could drive up equipment costs and load to shortages,' the report said. Acar cited ATA warnings that a 25% tariff on imports from Mexico could add $35,000 to the cost of a new truck. An S&P Global Mobility report said a 9% increase in new truck prices could slice demand for new vehicles by 17%. Cutting back new truck purchases in favor of extending the life of an existing fleet could lead to higher maintenance costs. The end result, according to the CSCMP report: 'this situation could both accelerate the exit of existing carriers and discourage new entrants, resulting in a slower pace of fleet expansion.' Acar reviewed data from Morgan Stanley on contract and spot rates. He said based on conversations with shippers, it was unlikely contract rates would fall below the $2 per mile mark. 'For the majority of the shippers I know, pushing carriers to below the $2 mark is not going to be healthy, and it's going to start to cause some performance issues,' he said. 'That's why I think contract rates stay somewhere relatively over that $2 mark.' The presentation was followed by a panel discussion that included Paul Bingham, director of transportation consulting at S&P Global Market Intelligence (NYSE: SPGI); Andy Moses, senior vice president of solutions and sales strategies at Penske Logistics; Brendan Dillon, senior vice president of global inventory management, transportation and trade, at Target (NYSE: TGT); and Dr. Noel Hacegaba, chief operating officer at the Port of Long Beach (who spoke to FreightWaves on a separate topic after the presentation). In other notable findings in the report: RAIL: The growth of rail is hindered by inadequate transloading capacity and operators. The facilities, the CSCMP report said, 'is fragmented and underdeveloped, primarily operated by third-party providers that lack access to sufficient capital, and railroads are not incentivized to operate transloading facilities directly because doing so will undermine operating ratio.' But that underinvestment, the report said, leaves shippers with no choice but to turn to trucks, 'which erodes railroad revenues, drives up costs for shippers, increases road congestion and exacerbates environmental impacts.' 3PLs: 3PLs increasingly need to become 4PLs, the CSCMP report said. The cost-plus model won't work today, according to the report, and 3PLs must provide 'alternative routings…and more agile systems.' They also need to be able to provide 'multiple service options for contingency planning.' That may involve moving deeper into last mile capabilities, the report said. More articles by John Kingston One-day stock slide at Proficient may be tied to somewhat bearish investor presentation Parts supplier FleetPride's debt rating cut by Moody's, outlook still negative Truck transportation jobs up year over year for first time since 2023: BLS The post Logistics GDP share rose in '24, not likely to drop: CSCMP report appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data