logo
Rates have fallen to 2025 lows — but that's not helping the stock market

Rates have fallen to 2025 lows — but that's not helping the stock market

Yahoo28-02-2025

Interest rates have fallen since the start of the year, but that hasn't given stocks much of a boost.
The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield (^TNX) fell to its lowest level of the year this week, hovering around 4.3%. In theory, the sharp decline in rates should have given more juice to the stock market since investors no longer have to compete with ultra-attractive bond returns. Lower rates also typically translate to lower borrowing costs for corporations, which often boost earnings and lift share prices.
So why are markets stalling out? The S&P 500 (^GSPC) has sputtered, barely trading in the green since the start of the year, while the previously reliable Magnificent Seven players have largely lagged the broader indexes.
The reason may have to do with concerns over economic growth, according to Wall Street watchers.
Rates have declined as investors worry that President Donald Trump's tariff plans will hurt economic expansion and the labor market, potentially prompting the Federal Reserve to lower the cost of borrowing even as inflation remains elevated.
Recent data has highlighted growth concerns, marking the return of "bad news for the economy is bad news for stocks." Consumer confidence plummeted in February, notching its biggest monthly decline in nearly four years as 12-month inflation expectations jumped and recession fears escalated.
The latest consumer sentiment data also highlighted greater concerns around tariffs and the impact those and other policies could have on inflation and the broader economy.
"After having consistently beaten expectations at the back end of 2024, US macro data and survey releases have started to surprise to the downside," Joe Maher, assistant economist at Capital Economics, wrote on Tuesday. "That has led to a shift in expectations for Fed policy. Last month, only one 25 basis point cut was discounted into money markets by the end of this year, now at least two are priced in."
Bottom line: Rising inflation would squeeze consumers' purchasing power and weigh on demand at a time when the consumer is already feeling the pinch of higher prices. Less demand for goods means lower sales for companies, which would pressure profit margins and eventually force businesses to cut jobs and lay off employees.
If that happens, the Federal Reserve has already indicated it would step in to stop the bleeding, hence the market's recalibration of future rate cuts.
There are several reasons why economic growth could slow, and a lot has to do with the current administration's priorities.
President Donald Trump's trade policies, tariffs in particular, have been a consistent source of inflationary concerns, with many on Wall Street categorizing current and potential levies as a negative headwind for the economy, as they could increase the cost of goods and weigh on demand.
And while tariffs have dominated headlines, Trump's immigration policies, which include mass deportations, could be just as impactful when it comes to the stability of the domestic economy — the labor market, in particular.
"The immediate policy changes from the new administration (immigration enforcement and tariffs) are likely to weigh on growth while providing little relief on inflation," Morgan Stanley analyst Mike Wilson wrote in a note to clients on Monday.
As Yahoo Finance's Josh Schafer highlighted, immigration has helped drive the US economy, with 3 million immigrants per year entering the US between 2022 and 2024.
But Trump's crackdown could drive that number down to 1 million this year and 500,000 in 2026, according to Morgan Stanley. That reduction in the labor force suggests GDP could fall from the range of 2.5% to 3% seen over the past few years to 2% this year and 1% to 1.5% next year.
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, is also a sizable risk given the number of contract and federal workers.
"[DOGE] is off to an aggressive start and this is also likely a headwind to growth initially, as federal spending and headcount is reduced," Wilson said.
Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, added in a Saturday post that "the impact of DOGE layoffs and contract cuts" is a primary concern, estimating DOGE-related layoffs could total 1 million. (Disclosure: Yahoo Finance is owned by Apollo)
"Any increase in layoffs will push jobless claims higher over the coming weeks, and such a rise in the unemployment rate is likely to have consequences for rates, equities, and credit," Slok said. "The near-term downside risks to the economy and markets are growing."
Other data points have flashed warning signs.
Retail sales data for the month of January, for example, showed a significant decline in spending. Although Wall Street largely shrugged off the drop due to seasonality, Wilson argued this likely reflected consumers "still feeling the pinch of higher rates and perhaps more importantly, elevated price levels (i.e., 'affordability.')"
If those trends continue, growth will further be hammered as the consumer ultimately pulls back.
Of course, that remains a big "if," as multiple unknowns exist, particularly around policy implementation. And until it shows up in the data, economists have remained optimistic the economy will continue to grow above a 2% annualized rate.
But the risks are there. And investors are paying attention.
"In our view, the current US economic environment is one of the more unbalanced backdrops we have witnessed in our 35 years," Wilson warned. "While headline statistics appear 'healthy,' the average company and consumer do not appear to be feeling that way."
Alexandra Canal is a Senior Reporter at Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X @allie_canal, LinkedIn, and email her at alexandra.canal@yahoofinance.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal
Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal

The stock market was largely unmoved by the trade agreement the US struck with China. Market pros say investors expect the trade war to unfold much as it did during Trump's first term. The US and China made scant progress on key issues in their 2018-2019 trade dispute. The stock market has been encouraged by easing tensions between the US and China in recent weeks, but investors were largely unmoved by the announcement of a trade deal between the superpowers on Tuesday. US stock futures failed to climb on news of the deal late Tuesday evening. While markets are edging higher on Wednesday, that's largely because the consumer price index report for May showed inflation was tamer than expected at 2.4% year-over-year. Here's where major indexes stood at 10:20 a.m. ET: S&P 500: 6,055.26, up 0.28% Dow Jones Industrial Average: 42,997.65, up 0.31% (+130.78 points) Nasdaq Composite: 19,788.36, up 0.37% On the trade front, observers say it's looking more likely that the trade war will shake out like it did during President Donald Trump's first term, with talk of constructive deals even as tensions remain elevated. Simply put, investors see a long and winding path ahead, and knee-jerk reactions to trade announcements have largely subsided since the chaos of "Liberation Day" in April. The framework agreement announced on Tuesday outlines how the two nations will continue trade talks. Importantly, it involves China allowing exports of rare earth minerals, while the US eases up on restrictions for exports of advanced tech to China, like semiconductors. This embedded content is not available in your region. The reaction is far more muted than how the market reacted last month, when stocks popped after the US struck a rough framework deal with China that lowered tariffs between the nations for 90 days. Art Hogan, the chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth, told Business Insider that markets are reacting to trade talks similarly to when the US-China trade war first kicked off in 2018. He pointed to regular pullbacks in stocks during Trump's first term as traders digested the lack of progress in US-China negotiations. "We still have that muscle memory from Trump 1.0, that dealing with China is difficult and there's a multitude of issues," Hogan said. "I don't think we're going to solve this in short order and likely never solve it in the longer term." He added that markets are likely waiting for a more positive catalyst, pointing to more than 100 nations that have yet to strike a trade deal with the US. Peter Berezin, the chief global strategist at BCA Research, said the framework made only small progress on negotiations with China. "I would say that the 'deal' in London simply restores things to how they were right after Geneva," he told BI in an email. He added that he expected tariffs on China to remain high "for the foreseeable future." Strategists at Deutsche Bank also said that tariff talks appear to mirror the 2018-2019 period, when the US and China didn't make much headway in resolving key issues. Back then, the US said that China had unfair trade practices related to industries like agriculture and manufacturing. It also said China had unfairly transferred technology and stolen intellectual property from the US. Deutsche Bank pointed out that the agreement announced Tuesday skipped over fentanyl-related tariffs that Trump implemented against China earlier this year. "So while the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19," strategists wrote. "So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement." The agreement also appeared to lack detail that markets were looking for, David Morrison, a senior market analyst at Trade Nation, wrote in a note. "The big question is what kind of trade deals can the US negotiate that will be good enough to get the indices to fresh records?" he said. US stocks have whipsawed this year amid the turmoil surrounding tariffs and incremental news of trade agreements between the US and other countries. Indexes have erased their steep losses since the April 2 tariff announcements, with major averages now positive year-to-date. Read the original article on Business Insider

Trading Day-Good vibrations turn sour
Trading Day-Good vibrations turn sour

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trading Day-Good vibrations turn sour

By Jamie McGeever ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist I'm excited to announce that I'm now part of Reuters Open Interest (ROI), an essential new source for data-driven, expert commentary on market and economic trends. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, and you can follow us on LinkedIn and X. The US and China have reached a trade deal, or at least agreed on the framework of a deal, which together with surprisingly soft U.S. inflation data, gave markets a lift on Wednesday. But Wall Street's gains were mild, and they were later wiped out by rising tensions in the Middle East. In my column today I look at the 'equity risk premium' and other metrics that suggest relative U.S. equity and bond valuations are getting very stretched. More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. 1. China's latest trade truce with US leaves investors nonethe wiser 2. Dollar keeps losing market share but euro slow tobenefit: ECB study 3. US importers turn to brokers to navigate Trump-eratariffs, at a cost 4. When it comes to a US debt default, never say never 5. No longer the big outlier, Italy sees bond renaissance:Mike Dolan Today's Key Market Moves * Wall Street ends in the red, having earlier hit highslast seen in February-March. The S&P 500 falls 0.3%, the Nasdaqloses 0.5%. Consumer cyclicals sector falls 1%, and energy isthe best-performing sector up 1.5%. * U.S. stock market volatility, as measured by the VIXindex, falls to its lowest in almost four months earlier in theday. * Treasuries rally, also boosted by soft inflation and astrong 10-year auction. Yields end down as much as 7 bps, curvebull steepens slightly. * Oil hits a two-month high, rising more than 4% aftersources say the US is preparing to evacuate its Iraqi embassydue to heightened security concerns in the region. Brent crudereaches $69.77/bbl, WTI rises above $68/bbl. * Precious metals rise, led by a surge in platinum to a4-year high above $1,280/oz. Platinum rose as much as 5% and isup over 20% in June, which would be its best month since 2008. Good vibrations turn sour It's a "done" deal, according to U.S. President Donald Trump, although the he and Chinese leader Xi Jinping still have to finalize the wording of the trade agreement between the two superpowers and sign off on it. The main points of the deal appear to be: China will remove export restrictions on rare earth minerals and other key industrial components; U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods will total 55%; Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods will total 10%. Trump could not have been more enthusiastic in his praise for the agreement on Wednesday, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said 'deal after deal' with other countries will follow in the weeks ahead. Yet, judging by the relatively muted market reaction, investors are less enthused. And given the chaotic and unpredictable nature of the Trump administration's tariff announcements thus far, the irony of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent calling on China to be a "reliable partner" in trade negotiations will not be lost on some observers. Especially, one suspects, in Beijing. Based on these proposed China levies, and with the US expected to conclude more trade deals in the coming weeks, the overall U.S. effective tariff rate will be lower than feared a couple of months ago. That's a relief. But the effective tariff rate of around 15% that many economists expect will still be significantly higher than the 2.5% rate at the end of last year, and would be the highest since the 1930s. Also, as the May inflation figures showed, tariffs have yet to be felt on prices. Investors - and Fed policymakers, who meet next week - are in a state of limbo. How will corporate profits and consumer spending be affected? What proportion of the tariffs will companies "swallow", and how much will they pass on to their customers? Zooming out, inflation appears to be cooling around the world, although this trend is expected to reverse once tariffs start to fuel higher goods price inflation. Figures on Wednesday showed that U.S. consumer inflation and Japanese wholesale inflation were lower than expected in May. These reports follow similar numbers from Europe recently, and China remains stuck in its battle against deflation. Next up is India, which releases consumer inflation figures on Thursday, which are expected to show annual inflation slowed to 3.0% in May, the lowest in more than six years. Another focus for investors on Thursday will be the auction of 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds. US stocks-bonds warnings flash amber again Calm has descended on U.S. markets following the 'Liberation Day' tariff turmoil of early April. But Wall Street's rally has revived questions about U.S. equity valuations, as stocks once again look super pricey compared to bonds. Since the chaotic days of early April, U.S. equities have rebounded fiercely, with the S&P 500 up 25%, putting the Shiller cyclically adjusted price-earnings (CAPE) ratio for the index in the 94th percentile going back to the 1950s, according to bond giant PIMCO. Stocks are looking expensive in absolute terms, and in relation to bonds. The equity risk premium (ERP), the difference between equity yields and bond yields, is near historically low levels. According to analysts at PIMCO, the ERP is now zero. The previous two times it fell to zero or below were in 1987 and 1996–2001. In both instances, the ultra-low ERP precipitated a steep equity drawdown and sharp fall in long-dated bond yields. "The U.S. equity risk premium ... is exceptionally low by historical standards," they wrote in their five-year outlook on Tuesday. "A mean reversion to a higher equity risk premium typically involves a bond rally, an equity sell-off, or both." But reversion to the mean doesn't just happen by magic. A catalyst is needed. Equities have recovered largely because they were oversold in April, trade tensions have been dialed down, and investors remain confident that Big Tech will drive solid AI-led earnings growth. So even though huge economic, trade, and policy risks continue to hang over markets, there is no sign of an imminent catalyst that would cause an equity market selloff. CHEAP FOR A REASON The flip side of equities looking expensive is that bonds look like a bargain. Indeed, the relative divergence between stocks and bonds is such that, by one measure, U.S. fixed income assets are the cheapest relative to equities in over half a century. Using national flow of funds data from the Federal Reserve, retired strategist Jim Paulsen calculates that the total market value of U.S. bonds as a percentage share of the total market value of U.S. equities is the lowest since the early 1970s. "Since the aggregate U.S. portfolio is currently aggressively positioned, investors may have far more capacity and desire to boost bond holdings in the coming years than most appreciate," Paulsen wrote last week. But bonds are 'cheap' for a reason. Washington's profligacy – the reason ratings agency Moody's recently stripped the U.S. of its triple-A credit rating – and inflation worries have kept yields stubbornly high. The term premium - the risk premium investors demand for holding long-term debt rather than rolling over short-dated loans - is the highest in over a decade, reflecting concerns about Uncle Sam's long-term fiscal health. And the diagnosis here shows no signs of improving. Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' is expected to add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, likely putting more upward pressure on yields. Of course, equity investors do seem to be pricing in a very rosy scenario, and the past few months have shown how quickly the market landscape can change. The U.S. economy could weaken more than expected, the trade war could escalate, or there could be a geopolitical surprise that causes bond yields and equity prices to fall. Investors should therefore be mindful of the warnings being sent by ERPs and other absolute and relative valuation metrics. However, they should also remember that stretched valuations can get even more stretched. As the famous saying goes, markets can stay irrational longer than investors can remain solvent. What could move markets tomorrow? * India CPI inflation (May) * UK trade (April) * UK industrial production (April) * ECB's Jose Luis Escriva and Frank Elderson speak atseparate events * Brazil retail sales (May) * $22 billion U.S. 30-year Treasury note auction * U.S. weekly jobless claims * U.S. PPI inflation (May) Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. (By Jamie McGeever; Editing by Deepa Babington) Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline
Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that Donald Trump is again intending to move the goalposts for his global tariff policy. The United States is fast approaching the end of the president's 90-day pause on his sweeping global tariffs on July 9, but while testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday, Bessent said that 'Liberation Day' Part 2 may not come to pass so soon. 'I would say, as I have repeatedly said, that there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those. And it is highly likely that those countries that are negoti—or trading blocs, in the case of the EU—who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue good-faith negotiations,' Bessent said. 'If someone is not negotiating, then we will not,' he added. The Trump administration has not even vaguely approached its initial promise to crack 90 deals in 90 days, only announcing two unfinished deals, with the U.K. and China. Crucially, Trump's paltry set of terms with China isn't even a deal. China referred to it as merely a 'framework,' while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said it was a 'handshake for a framework' that both Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping need to approve. Trump seems intent on running the country's economic policy in 90-day increments, prolonging economic uncertainty that has roiled the markets and sent prices rising. But the president's failure should hardly come as a surprise, as the stated purpose of his tariffs—not to ensure economic prosperity but to bring U.S. trading partners to their knees—defies all logic and reason. With only two half-deals made, and a suddenly unclear horizon, it's not clear how TACO Trump will ever reach the goal of 200 trade deals he'd claimed to have made in April. Especially considering that there aren't even that many countries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store