Court dismisses bail of key accused in businessman's murder
The court denied bail to Ubais, aka T.M. Uwais, the prime accused in the case. However, bail was granted to Uwais' wife, K.H. Shamima, 32, the second accused, and P.M. Asneefa, 36, the third accused. Earlier, the fourth accused, Aysha, 40, had been granted bail.
The High Court had previously dismissed the bail application of the seventh accused, Saifuddin Badusha, 37. Two other accused are abroad, and Red Corner Notices have been issued for their arrest.
The case, which had initially stalled for nearly a year, gained momentum after being transferred to a special investigation team. According to investigators, the murder was part of a plot involving witchcraft.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Rising concern over conduct of lawyers in virtual hearings
NEW DELHI Born out of necessity during the COVID-19 lockdown five years ago, virtual courtrooms are now grappling with a different challenge – growing indiscipline among lawyers and litigants who flout decorum during online hearings. A virtual court hearing functions like a regular court proceeding but is conducted via video conferencing platforms. Once a matter is listed, parties and lawyers receive a secure video link to join the hearing remotely. The system was introduced during the pandemic, when physical courtrooms were shut to curb the spread of the virus, but the judiciary needed to continue functioning. The facility has proven a boon for lawyers, who can now attend multiple hearings across different courts, and even cities, within a single day, without the burden of travel. For litigants too, it has eased the hassle of appearing in person for each hearing. Screen-time shenanigans However, the system's flexibility has also led to blatant misuse. One egregious example involved a man attending a Gujarat High Court hearing from his toilet. In another case, also in Gujarat, a video went viral showing a senior advocate appearing to sip beer during a virtual session. In Delhi, the High Court recently took strong exception to a female lawyer who joined a hearing via mobile phone while walking through a public park. Though she claimed to be at the Agra court complex, the judge was unconvinced. 'Despite repeated directions, certain sections of the Bar have failed to understand the decorum of the court,' observed Justice Girish Kathpalia. He urged Bar Associations across Delhi to sensitise their members regarding proper conduct during virtual appearances. Justice Kathpalia reminded that the videoconferencing facility was extended to enable counsel to appear from their offices, thereby sparing them the ordeal of rushing between multiple court complexes. Former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, in February 2023, strongly supported the continued use of virtual hearings, saying, 'Technology is here to stay for the future, forever.' But recent developments underscore that its success depends not just on technical infrastructure, but equally on courtroom conduct. Senior advocate and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) president Vikas Singh did not mince words: 'Online hearing, which started more like a necessity, is being misused by lawyers. It is trivialising a solemn court function. Court hearings cannot be argued from a car, a park, or while having a beer. Strict guidelines must be enforced,' he told The Hindu. Missing penalties While the Delhi High Court, a pioneer in institutionalising video conferencing, issued comprehensive rules in 2021, these mainly focus on behavioural expectations. They mandate that 'participants wear sober attire', with advocates in professional dress as per the Advocates Act, 1961. The rules also state that participants must look into the camera, remain attentive, and refrain from multitasking. 'All proceedings conducted by a court via video conferencing shall be judicial proceedings, and all the courtesies and protocols applicable to a physical court shall apply to these virtual proceedings,' the rules say. However, no specific penalties are prescribed. Courts may invoke the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, or exercise their inherent powers in egregious cases. Senior advocate Sanjoy Ghose, whose post about the toilet incident went viral, advocated for clear penalties and their strict enforcement. 'There should be penalties prescribed, and they should be strictly enforced,' he told The Hindu. He also called for better awareness: 'Dos and don'ts must be clearly listed on court websites. Litigants may lack familiarity, but lawyers have no excuse.' Sharanya Tripathi, associate advocate at Jotwani Associates, called the trend 'deeply disrespectful to the court's dignity'. 'Everyone attending a virtual hearing, whether lawyer or litigant, must understand that appearing through a screen does not reduce the formality of the courtroom,' she asserted. 'If someone joins from an unsuitable location or behaves disrespectfully, the court should act promptly by removing the participant, imposing costs, or initiating contempt proceedings in serious cases,' Ms. Tripathi said. Courts could also hold legal representatives accountable for ensuring that their clients maintain proper decorum during virtual hearings, she added.
The Hindu
11 hours ago
- The Hindu
Social media posts: judicial magistrates cautioned against deviating from law while ordering remand
The Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court (HC) of Andhra Pradesh issued a circular on July 5, instructing the judicial magistrates in the State to satisfy themselves before ordering remand, particularly in cases relating to social media postings / comments, that the investigating officers complied with the law laid down in the Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar and Imran Pratapgarhi vs State of Gujarat judgments. It was mentioned in the given judgements that the magistrates should satisfy themselves that the accused committed repeated and multiple offences, and, if not ordered to be remanded to judicial custody, the accused might influence the witnesses or tamper evidence that the police require for custodial investigation. The Registrar observed that it had been brought to the notice of the HC that the judicial magistrates were remanding the accused in cases pertaining to social media postings / comments without adhering to the principles laid down in the above judgments. While quashing the FIR in the Imran Pratapgarhi vs State of Gujarat case, the Supreme Court held that, before registering an FIR involving speech, writing, or artistic expression (where the offences carry three to seven years of imprisonment), the police must conduct a preliminary inquiry under Section 173 (3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and such inquiry shall be preceded by an approval from the Deputy Superintendent of Police and the same must be concluded within 14 days. The judicial magistrates have to follow the circular scrupulously, and any deviation thereof would be viewed very seriously, and they would be rendering themselves liable for contempt of the HC, besides facing departmental inquiry.
Hans India
11 hours ago
- Hans India
One dead, 4 injured as Tazia touches high-voltage wire during Muharram procession in Jharkhand
At least one person died and four others were injured after a Tazia came into contact with an 11,000-volt overhead electric wire during a Muharram procession in Jharkhand's Giridih district on Sunday, officials said. The incident occurred in Chakosingha village under the Thodthambha outpost area. According to officials, as participants lifted a large Tazia on their shoulders as part of the traditional procession, it accidentally touched the high-tension wire, triggering a massive electric shock. Witnesses said five to six people collapsed immediately, writhing in pain after the shock. One of them died on the spot. The condition of two of the injured is said to be critical. All the injured have been admitted to the Giridih District Hospital for treatment. Confirming the incident Giridih Deputy Commissioner Ramniwas Yadav said that the administration responded promptly, providing immediate assistance and medical care. The tragedy led to panic and chaos in the procession, with the mood of mourning gripping the entire village. This is not the first such incident in the district. In 2023, a similar accident during Muharram in Chakmanjo village under Jamua police station limits claimed the life of a youth and left two others injured. That same year, in a separate incident in Petarwar, Bokaro district, four people were electrocuted and over 10 others sustained severe burns after a Tazia touched a high-voltage line. In view of recurring accidents, the Jharkhand State Electricity Supply Corporation (JSEB), following a directive from the High Court, issued clear guidelines last week regarding the permissible height of flags, Tazias, and tableaux in religious processions. However, despite the advisory, several processions across the state continue to flout the rules by carrying Tazias of excessive height.
