Saudi Arabia, France seek support for declaration on two-state solution between Israel and Palestinians
The seven-page declaration is the result of an international conference at the UN this week, hosted by Saudi Arabia and France, on the decades-long conflict. The US and Israel boycotted the event.
'We call on you to support the document before the end of the 79th session of the general assembly by contacting the missions of Saudi Arabia and France in New York,' Saudi foreign minister Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud told the conference on Tuesday. The 80th UN general assembly is due to start in September.
The first step outlined in the declaration is to end the 22-month war between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
'After the ceasefire, a transitional administrative committee must be immediately established to operate in Gaza under the umbrella of the Palestinian Authority,' it reads.
The Palestinian Authority exercises limited self-rule in the West Bank under Israeli occupation.
The declaration supports the deployment of a temporary international stabilisation mission, mandated by the UN security council, and welcomes 'the readiness expressed by some member states to contribute troops'.
It calls on Israel's leadership to 'issue a clear public commitment to the two-state solution, including a sovereign and viable Palestinian state', to immediately end violence and incitement against Palestinians and to halt all settlement, land grabs and annexation activities in the occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem.
The declaration commits to adopting restrictive measures against violent extremist settlers and those who support illegal settlements, and adopting targeted measures 'against entities and individuals acting against the principle of the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine, through violence or acts of terrorism and in breach of international law'.
It also describes regional integration and independent Palestinian statehood as 'intertwined objectives'.
The document states: 'Only by ending the war in Gaza, releasing all hostages, ending occupation, rejecting violence and terror, realising an independent, sovereign and democratic Palestinian state, ending the occupation of all Arab territories and providing solid security guarantees for Israel and Palestine can normal relations and coexistence among the region's peoples and states be achieved.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Addressing South Africa's digital blind spot: Protecting children's rights in the digital age
Dr Bridget J Machaka. Image: Supplied. Dr Bridget J Machaka In South Africa, a new generation of children is growing up in a world where the digital and physical are inseparable. From smartphones in their pockets to online classrooms, social media, and biometric data collection at school gates, children's lives are increasingly shaped by technology. Yet our laws and policies are glaringly out of sync with this reality, a dangerous oversight that puts their safety, privacy, and access to education at risk. The digital world The digital revolution is not on the horizon, it is here. Globally, internet usage has surged past five billion people. In Africa, over 590 million people are online, and children make up nearly a third of all internet users. South Africa mirrors this trend, with growing access to smartphones and online platforms reshaping childhood experiences. The digital world is no longer a privilege or a pastime. It is the new public square and playground for children. Globally, children's rights frameworks have tried to catch up. The United Nations(UN) Committee on the Rights of the Child's General Comment No. 25 (2021) made it explicit: children's rights apply online just as they do offline. The African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child echoed this on the Day of the African Child (DAC) 2023 themed "The Rights of the Child in the Digital Environment'. The Committee affirmed that the digital space is not exempt from the protections children are entitled to under the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child. But has South Africa kept pace with this shift? Yes, our Constitution, and the Children's Act 38 of 2005 guarantee every child's right to protection and echo the core principles underpinning all children's rights: non-discrimination, the best interests of the child, survival and development, and child participation. These principles should guide all measures aimed at realising children's rights in the digital environment. Yet, in practice, these protections remain more theoretical than tangible in the digital sphere. South Africa's cornerstone privacy law, the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA), was a step in the right direction, introducing some protections for data. However, POPIA is not a child-centric law. It lacks the tailored protections, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability structures required to protect children in a rapidly evolving digital age. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Regulation It does not require platforms, schools, or service providers to assess how their digital systems affect children. Nor does it regulate how educational or health institutions collect, process, or store children's data. And when it comes to enforcement? Sporadic at best. Reports by Media Monitoring Africa have consistently shown how children remain exposed to harmful content on social media platforms, largely due to insufficient regulatory oversight. These reports also highlight how social media outlets continue disregard ethical standards by revealing the identities of child victims, suspects, or witnesses incases of abuse or crime. This reflects a broader systemic issue: the lack of proactive and child-centered enforcement of digital rights protections. The consequences are playing out in real time. Schools are collecting children's biometric data fingerprints, facial recognition, and learning analytics, often without meaningful parental consent or adequate protections. Learning platforms store sensitive information with minimal oversight. Such unchecked data practices not only breach privacy but risk normalising surveillance cultures in children's formative spaces. Unlike countries such as the United Kingdom, which adopted the Age-Appropriate Design Code to ensure digital services process children's data responsibly, South Africa has no binding standards tailored to the digital protection of children. As a result, children's digital lives are being mined, monitored, and monetised with few protections in place. Cybersecurity South Africa also lacks meaningful capacity-building incentives and strategies in cybersecurity essential for bridging the digital divide, building institutional competence, and addressing skills shortages and policy gaps. The absence of child-specific digital legislation, coupled with limited awareness among policymakers, continues to leave children's rights online dangerously under-prioritised. And it's not just about data and privacy, deeper systematic issues are emerging. Digital systems meant to make education more efficient are systematically excluding some of the most vulnerable children. For instance, a significant barrier arises from online application portals for school admissions being implemented in provinces such as Gauteng and the Western Cape. The experience of children being denied access to schools due to the use of online portals highlights the broader legal deficiency in South Africa's digital school environment. In a joint submission to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, SECTION27 and others highlighted that some parents have indicated the impossibility of completing the online admission process without an identity number. These online portals provide no guidance for applicants without identity documents, leaving them with no clear alternative means of applying. The parents further revealed that even when they visit schools in person they are often turned away by principals, who insists that admissions are processed exclusively through online applications. In the 2021 case of Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education, the court highlighted the ongoing and systematic exclusion of vulnerable children from schools, expressing serious concerns about how this exclusion continues in the emerging digital environment. Meanwhile, a darker side of the digital world is also emerging unchecked. Cyberbullying, online harassment, sextortion, and revenge porn are no longer fringe threats. They are everyday risks for South African children generally. Although, the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020 criminalises some of this behaviour, South Africa education system still lacks a standardised national policy on information and communication technology and cyber-safety. Teachers aren't trained. Law enforcement often lacks the tools or skills to help. In the vacuum, toxic cybercultures thrive and undermine children's mental health and safety. Child protection The message is clear: South Africa needs more than updated laws. We need a complete rethink of how we protect children (and their rights) in a digital age. What needs to happen? First, digital systems for education, health, and social services must stop being tools of exclusion. Where systems fail, inclusive alternatives, even manual options, must be available. Second, the enforcement of POPIA must be ramped up, especially in sectors dealing with children. Data collection should only happen with informed consent, clear safeguards, and accountability. The Information Regulator must take a proactive role, not just react when things go wrong. Third, child rights impact assessments must be mandatory before launching any digital service aimed at or used by children. Whether it's an EdTech platform, a school app, or a government portal, children's rights must be built in, not bolted on. Fourth, schools need enforceable cyber safety policies, backed by training for teachers, parents, and children alike. Digital literacy Digital literacy shouldn't be a nice-to-have. It should be part of every school's core curriculum. The oversight bodies like the Human Rights Commission and the Information Regulator must be properly mandated and resourced to protect children's digital rights effectively. We are standing at a crossroads. The digital world holds incredible promise for education, connection, and empowerment. But without a rights-based approach, it also risks deepening inequality, fueling harm, and widening the very gaps we are trying to close. South Africa must act with urgency and intention. Without decisive, child-centred digital intervention, we risk leaving another generation behind. *Machaka is a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Private Law at Stellenbosch University. Weekend Argus
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
World economies reel from Trump's tariffs punch
WASHINGTON - Global markets reeled on Friday after President Donald Trump's tariffs barrage against nearly all US trading partners as governments looked down the barrel of a seven-day deadline before higher duties take effect. Trump announced late on Thursday that dozens of economies, including the European Union, will face new tariff rates of between 10 and 41 percent. However, implementation will be on August 7 rather than Friday as previously announced, the White House said. This gives governments a window to rush to strike deals with Washington setting more favorable conditions. Neighboring Canada, one of the biggest US trade partners, was hit with 35 percent levies, up from 25 percent, effective Friday -- but with wide-ranging, current exemptions remaining in place. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees putting US exporters in a stronger position, while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy. Stock markets in Hong Kong, London and New York slumped as they digested the turmoil, while weak US employment data added to worries. Trump's actions come as debate rages over how best to steer the US economy, with the Federal Reserve this week deciding to keep interest rates unchanged, despite massive political pressure from the White House to cut. Data Friday showed US job growth missing expectations for July, while unemployment ticked up to 4.2 percent from 4.1 percent. On Wall Street, the S&P 500 dropped 1.6 percent, while the Nasdaq tumbled 2.2 percent. Political goals Trump raised duties on around 70 economies, from a current 10 percent level imposed in April when he unleashed "reciprocal" tariffs citing unfair trade practices. AFP | Patrick T. Fallon The new, steeper levels listed in an executive order vary by trading partner. Any goods "transshipped" through other jurisdictions to avoid US duties would be hit with an additional 40 percent tariff, the order said. But Trump's duties also have a distinctly political flavor, with the president using separate tariffs to pressure Brazil to drop the trial of his far-right ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro. He also warned of trade consequences for Canada, which faces a different set of duties, after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. In targeting Canada, the White House cited its failure to "cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs" -- although Canada is not a major source of illegal narcotics. By contrast, Trump gave more time to Mexico, delaying for 90 days a threat to increase its tariffs from 25 percent to 30 percent. But exemptions remain for a wide range of Canadian and Mexican goods entering the United States under an existing North American trade pact. Carney said his government was "disappointed" with the latest rates hike but noted that with exclusions the US average tariff on Canadian goods remains one of the lowest among US trading partners. 'Tears up' rule book AFP | RONALDO SCHEMIDT With questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals struck -- including with the EU and Japan -- the outcome of Trump's overall plan remains uncertain. "No doubt about it -- the executive order and related agreements concluded over the past few months tears up the trade rule book that has governed international trade since World War II," said Wendy Cutler, senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. On Friday, Trump said he would consider distributing a tariff "dividend" to Americans. Notably excluded from Friday's drama was China, which is in the midst of negotiations with the United States. Washington and Beijing at one point brought tit-for-tat tariffs to triple-digit levels, but have agreed to temporarily lower these duties and are working to extend their truce. Those who managed to strike deals with Washington to avert steeper threatened levies included Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea and the European Union. Among other tariff levels adjusted in Trump's latest order, Switzerland now faces a higher 39 percent duty. By Beiyi Seow
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
France carries out first aid airdrop in Gaza
Palestinians carry bags of flour that they obtained from aid trucks which entered Gaza through the Zikim crossing point, in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip. President Emmanuel Macron said Friday France had carried out its first airdrop of humanitarian supplies into Gaza, after UN-backed experts warn the Israeli-blockaded Palestinian territory was slipping into famine. "Faced with an urgent humanitarian crisis, we just conducted a food airdrop over Gaza," Macron said in English on X. "But airdrops are not enough. Israel must grant full humanitarian access to address the risk of famine," he said. He thanked France's Jordanian, Emirati, and German partners for their support.
