&w=3840&q=100)
Piyush Goyal meets Belgian Defence Minister, Minister-President of Flanders
According to a Ministry of Commerce and Industry release, this engagement follows HRH Princess Astrid of Belgium's March 2025 visit to India, during which her meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi underscored the shared ambition to unlock new avenues for collaboration in trade, technology, defence, agriculture, life sciences, innovation, skilling, and academic exchanges.
The over 300-member Belgian Economic Mission, led by Princess Astrid, infused fresh momentum into this dynamic bilateral relationship.
Both sides reaffirmed their commitment to building on this momentum to forge resilient, future-focused ties that enhance mutual growth and contribute to a more integrated global economic framework, per the Ministry of Commerce and Industry.
The discussions highlighted growing economic synergies and focused on scaling bilateral trade, fostering industrial collaboration, and deepening investments in strategic sectors such as semiconductors, clean energy, defence production, and pharmaceuticals.
The Flanders region, recognised as Belgium's economic engine, was highlighted as a critical partner with its advanced manufacturing ecosystem, R & D infrastructure, and its strategic role as a European gateway, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry said.
With India already the world's fastest-growing major economy and widely expected to remain so over the next two decades ahead--driven by a young, aspirational population and a dynamic reform-oriented environment--the growth story presents an unprecedented opportunity for India and Belgium.
The two sides reaffirmed their shared vision of mutual prosperity and resilient economic cooperation amidst evolving global challenges. Minister Goyal reflected on India's transformative economic journey over the past decade, emphasising reforms that have empowered citizens and entrepreneurs alike. "The last eleven years have not only been about economic upliftment, but about enabling aspirations," he stated.
The meeting also reviewed progress in EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations, with both parties recognising the need to address tariff and non-tariff barriers to enhance market access. Minister Goyal reiterated India's position as a trusted and long-term economic partner for Europe's growth, remarking, "India is not just a market of the future--it is a collaborator of trust."
Belgium remains one of India's most significant economic partners in Europe. It is India's fifth-largest trading partner within the EU, with bilateral trade reaching USD 15.07 billion in 2023-24. Belgian FDI in India totalled USD 3.94 billion from April 2000 to September 2024, including a remarkable 39 per cent growth--USD 1.1 billion--in the past year alone.
Bilateral cooperation spans a wide array of sectors, including defence manufacturing, green hydrogen, nano-electronics, nuclear medicine, and pharmaceutical R & D, reflecting the expanding depth and strategic nature of the Indo-Belgian economic relationship.
Both sides agreed to strengthen high-level engagements and facilitate regular visits by business delegations to accelerate trade and investment outcomes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
India should tweak trade and foreign policies to deal with Trump
The US' 25 per cent tariffs on goods imported from India, 'plus an unspecified penalty' for buying Russian oil and weapons, has not come as a big shock to New Delhi as this was almost evident from the relatively lukewarm response of the stock market which, though in the red, was almost flat in the early hours of Thursday. This, however, does not mean that there will be, or has been, no adverse effect of US President Donald Trump's decision on India. In April, he announced tariffs of up to 27 per cent on Indian goods, though these were later paused. With the latest deadline approaching this Friday, India waited with bated breath. This was because Trump has frequently criticised India's trade practices, labeling it a 'tariff king' and a 'big abuser' of trade ties. 'But now I'm in charge, and you just can't do that,' he said in a social media post. Delhi's response came from the Narendra Modi regime's pledge to attach 'utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs.' Also, it 'will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest.' Since April, both sides have been engaged in intense trade negotiations, with tone and expectations shifting over time. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said discussions with Indian officials have been constructive but acknowledged India's long-standing protectionist stance. Trump, he added, is determined to secure deals that significantly open foreign markets to US goods. Agriculture and dairy remain major sticking points. The US has long sought greater access to India's farm sector, viewing it as a lucrative market. But, India has resisted such moves, citing food security, livelihood concerns, and the welfare of its millions of small farmers. Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal reaffirmed India's stance, calling agriculture a sensitive sector and pledging to protect farmers' interests. Bilateral trade between the two nations stood at $190 billion in 2024, with Trump and Modi aiming to raise this to $500 billion. India has already lowered tariffs on products like Bourbon whiskey and motorcycles, yet the US still runs a $45 billion trade deficit with India. Trump's recent announcement, however, must be seen in a broader perspective, one that includes geopolitics and diplomacy in general. The US President's annoyance with Delhi has more to do with its dalliance with nation groupings and policies he regards as inimical to Washington's interests. For instance, he intensely dislikes BRICS; he also doesn't seem to be fond of the rhetoric of the Global South. And, of course, he is not happy with India buying arms and oil from Russia. While India has long championed strategic autonomy in foreign affairs, some of its current geopolitical alignments warrant re-evaluation. Membership in BRICS, for example, has yielded no benefits on the critical issue of access to rare earth elements. If participation in such groupings only provokes major partners like the US without delivering economic or strategic advantages, its continuation is worse than pointless; it is harmful. Similarly, India's persistence in maintaining close ties with Moscow, despite significant shifts in the global order, has not resulted in meaningful gains. Russia is increasingly aligning with China, diminishing its value as a strategic counterweight for India. These realities suggest the need for a broader reassessment—not just of trade policy, but of foreign policy priorities as a whole.
Economic Times
40 minutes ago
- Economic Times
'$600B investment': White House Press Secy Karoline Leavitt unveils massive US-EU trade deal details
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt hailed the newly announced US-EU trade deal as a historic milestone, calling it the beginning of a broader economic boom. She emphasised the administration's commitment to expanding US global trade power and strengthening economic ties with key allies. Show more 03:08 02:07 01:01 02:15 05:23 04:09 01:33 03:04 03:41 05:49 01:02 09:48 01:45 05:29 03:06 05:16 17:48 09:21 02:30 01:32 01:58 09:32 10:17 02:33 04:25 01:45 10:53
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Tariff war delays Tata Steel UK breakeven, says CEO Narendran
Mumbai: Tata Steel's plans to turn around its loss-making UK operations have been delayed by at least six months due to global trade disruptions and the spillover effects of US tariffs, the company's top executives said in an interview. Despite the setback, the executives expressed confidence about the company's broader international strategy, including securing Dutch government support to decarbonize its Netherlands operations, and defended its capacity expansion plans in India amid global concerns of steel overcapacity. India's second-biggest steelmaker by capacity had earlier guided for an Ebitda (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) breakeven in the UK by the end of the second quarter of FY26. The new target is the final quarter of this fiscal year. In its April-June quarter results announced on Thursday, Tata Steel reported that its UK operation's Ebitda loss narrowed to £41 million in the June quarter of this fiscal compared to £80 million reported in the last quarter of FY25. The company's chief executive officer T.V. Narendran said while there was a delay in achieving Ebitda breakeven due to the direct and indirect effects of the tariffs announced by US President Donald Trump, the company was moving in the right direction. 'Because of tariffs, our exports to the US (from the UK) are impacted," Narendran said. Even the company's customers like British carmakers were facing the heat from the tariffs, compounding the business impact for Tata Steel, he added. An influx of steel from other countries also made a difference. 'Japanese and Korean steel, which would have otherwise gone to the US, is looking for alternate markets. It came to the UK because the UK has not been as fast as the EU in setting tighter quotas for imports," the chief executive said. Chief financial officer Koushik Chatterjee added that the journey from Ebitda breakeven to net profit breakeven for Tata Steel UK would not take that long. 'The good thing is that there is no tax implication in the UK because we have a huge amount of unabsorbed tax losses. The asset value is low, so the depreciation is low and debt is mostly working capital," said Chatterjee. 'So once we get to Ebitda positive with sufficient cushion, it's not a big ask (to achieve net profit)," he said. Earlier this month, at the Tata Steel annual general meeting, Tata Sons chairman N. Chandrasekaran set a new goal of achieving net profit from the company's UK operations in the current fiscal year. 'I feel that the UK should be PAT (profit after tax) positive, so the company is working towards making it profitable," said Chandrasekaran, who echoed shareholder concerns. 'We expect the UK this year to perform much better than last year and it will definitely be Ebitda positive." Tata Steel shares closed 2.12% lower on Thursday on the BSE at ₹157.92, underperforming the benchmark Sensex, which fell 0.36% on the stock exchanges. The Netherlands' Scenario Meanwhile, the steelmaker said its negotiations with the Dutch government were progressing well for fiscal support to overhaul its steelmaking operations in the Netherlands towards more environmentally sustainable processes. It plans to replace two blast furnaces over the coming years with electric arc furnaces (EAFs)–like it did in the UK–to cut emissions. All stakeholders, including Tata Steel India, Tata Steel Netherlands, the Dutch government, and the local provincial government will soon sign a non-binding letter of intent. That will be followed by a binding agreement once the Netherlands elects a new government later this year. 'Even though the current Dutch government has fallen and elections are scheduled for October, our project is part of a Parliament-endorsed initiative. That allows us to continue negotiations and proceed with the non-binding agreement," said Chatterjee. The agreement on the blast furnaces involves two phases. During phase one, the company will install an EAF and then shut down one blast furnace. The second phase is planned for the mid-2030s when the remaining blast furnace will be shut. Blast furnaces are large units that use the heat from coke to convert iron ore into purified molten metal for further processing into steel. EAFs do this process using electricity without any coke, thus cutting emissions. India needs more capacity The oldest steelmaker in Asia responded to theNew York Times'claim that there was oversupply of steel in the world and that Tata Steel's operations were suffering due to this overcapacity. The two executives defended the company's strategy to expand capacity. 'The larger question isn't about overcapacity,"said Narendran. 'It's about where that capacity exists and whether it's in a competitive geography. For a country like India, which will consume 500 million tons of steel, should we really import 300 million tons from China? And what happens if China stops supplying tomorrow?" Steel is a strategic resource for national infrastructure, automotive, defence, and capital goods sectors, making self-sufficiency critical, Narendran pointed out. 'Even Europe, which was unsure about keeping its steel industry alive, now wants to retain capacity," he said. 'Every geography wants to ensure it can meet its own demand." The top executive questioned why high-cost steel producers like Japan and South Korea export significant volumes of steel despite lacking cost or raw material advantages. 'At least China offers cheap steel. But why should Japan or Korea be exporting steel when they're not low-cost producers?" he said. According to Chatterjee, overcapacity discussions, particularly by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), often ignore ground realities. 'Europe and the US de-industrialized by outsourcing to China," he said. 'Now, with changing global priorities like supply chain security and carbon taxes, countries are reassessing. For India, with its abundant raw materials, skilled labour and growing infrastructure needs, not building capacity would be foolish." The issue of overcapacity exists in regions where it's no longer needed. Rationalizing it globally is the real issue. Steel should be produced where it's most competitive, said Chatterjee.
