
How One Dose of Psilocybin Treats Depression
Welcome to Impact Factor , your weekly dose of commentary on a new medical study. I'm Dr F. Perry Wilson from the Yale School of Medicine.
The story of our lives is etched into the pathways of our brains. Some of those pathways are positive, giving us a sense of self-worth, a resilience to adversity. Some are maladaptive, promoting anxiety, fear, and depression. The pathways lead to actions, and those actions tend to reinforce the pathways. Anxiety breeds anxiety, depression breeds depression.
I think this is part of the reason why problems with mental health are so difficult to treat; our brains are molded into these problematic self-reinforcing configurations and we keep falling into the same ruts. And yes, talk therapy and SSRIs can help to nudge us out of those ruts; work to create new, more productive ruts; and improve our health. But those gains can be difficult to maintain over time.
But what if there were a reset button in our brains? What if we could step outside of those ruts, even for a few hours, and see the pathways for what they are? What if we could start over?
It seems too good to be true, and, to be clear, it may be, but data continue to emerge that the chemical psilocybin — the psychoactive component of so-called 'magic mushrooms' — may do just that. And it may do it after just a single dose.
Magic mushrooms are on my mind — no, not literally — this week thanks to this article, appearing in the journal Cancer . Note the famous final author, Ezekiel Emanuel. It's a small, phase 2 trial of psilocybin, a single 25 mg dose, among individuals with cancer and major depressive disorder.
What's interesting about this study is the duration of follow-up: 2 years. Most psilocybin studies end after a few months, making the long-term implications of treatment unclear.
Here's the setup: Thirty patients (average age, 58 years; 70% women; 80% White) were enrolled, and everyone got the same intervention here. There is no control group.
The intervention occurred over 8 weeks. They first had four visits with a psychotherapist for screening and psychological work, preparatory to receiving the drug. Then they received 25 mg of psilocybin, in a monitored setting, where they remained for about 6 or 7 hours. After that, there were four more psychotherapy visits to integrate the psychedelic experience. Eight weeks, one visit a week, basically.
At multiple timepoints, a participant's mental health was evaluated using some standardized surveys: the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale.
Let's talk about these scales for a moment before I show you the results of this study. The depression scale used here gives scores ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores being consistent with worse depression. Patients have reported that a reduction by 5 points would be clinically meaningful. A meta-analysis of SSRI therapies showed that these common antidepressant drugs lead to an average reduction of around 3 points vs placebo. Of course, some people do better and some do worse; I just wanted to do some level setting.
Let's look at the psilocybin study. At baseline, participant depression scores ranged from about 10 to 45 or so — pretty significant pathology. By the end of the 8-week intervention period, the average reduction in depression score was 20 points. That is a huge effect.
True, there is no placebo group here, so that 20-point reduction includes the placebo effect, which can be significant in depression trials, but I find it hard to believe that this is all placebo.
We can triangulate the placebo question a bit from this study, 'Single-Dose Psilocybin for a Treatment-Resistant Episode of Major Depression,' which appeared in The New England Journal of Medicine in 2022.
This was a placebo-controlled trial among people with severe, treatment-resistant depression and used the same depression scale as the study we're talking about today. The psilocybin group had a 12-point improvement and the placebo group a 5.5-point improvement — a net difference that is still around twice as effective as SSRIs.
Of course, the concern about placebo effect is somewhat academic. Especially for conditions like depression, there's a reasonable argument to be made that we shouldn't care whether the effect is mediated biologically or via placebo or both; if it works, it works.
Improvements on the anxiety scale were also impressive. At 8 weeks, there was a 17-point improvement from baseline.
But the most interesting part of this study is the long-term follow-up, which was available for 28 out of the original 30 participants. At 2 years of follow-up, more than half of participants had scores on the depression scale that were less than 50% of their baseline scores — an average reduction of 15 points. Similar effects were seen on anxiety scores.
How might all this work? How can a drug, a molecule like this, lead to sustained changes in serious psychological conditions?
There are a lot of theories. But let's look at the mechanism of action of psilocybin itself. Psilocybin binds to a particular receptor in the brain called the serotonin 2A receptor — in my opinion, the most interesting receptor in the entire brain.
Other substances that bind to this receptor? Mescaline and LSD. Certain mutations in this receptor predispose to schizophrenia as well. And it's hard not to see the parallels between some symptoms of schizophrenia: the sense of unreality, the paranoia, the hallucinations — and the experiences of taking some of these psychedelic drugs. Of course, the drugs are self-limited. Well, at least the acute effects are.
But how are they therapeutic? Some researchers are using a new term to describe drugs like psilocybin: psychoplastogens. The science suggests that one-time use of these agents can allow for a sudden increase in neural plasticity, allowing new neuronal connections to form where they wouldn't in other conditions, and for older connections to break down and restructure. If our brains are etched with the stories of our lives, if our behaviors deepen and reinforce those psychological ruts, psychoplastogens like psilocybin may loosen the soil, so to speak.
This may suggest that those concomitant psychotherapy sessions are actually a critical component of this type of therapy. Perhaps the psilocybin shakes loose some maladaptive pathways, but putting them together in a healthy way still takes work. It wouldn't surprise me if that is the case, and it's a good reminder to those of you reading this that these drugs are not a panacea for mental health. In fact, we're really just beginning to explore the possibilities and the risks in this space. The promise is there, for sure. How many of us wouldn't want to hit 'reset' on some of the maladaptive thinking patterns we have? But for now, the use of these agents for therapeutic purposes really needs to be done under the supervision of a medical professional with experience.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How This Forgotten Healthcare Stock Could Generate Life-Changing Returns
Key Points CRISPR Therapeutics' first approved therapy, Casgevy, was a breakthrough. One of Casgevy's biggest achievements may be demonstrating the viability of CRISPR Therapeutics' strategy. The biotech company could soar if it can follow up that win with more clinical and regulatory milestones. 10 stocks we like better than CRISPR Therapeutics › Over the past few years, the market hasn't been kind to somewhat speculative, unprofitable stocks. CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ: CRSP), a mid-cap biotech, fits that description. The company's shares are down by 24% since mid-2022. The S&P 500 is up 50% over the same period. Despite this terrible performance, there are reasons to believe that CRISPR Therapeutics could still generate life-changing returns for investors willing to be patient. Here's how the biotech could pull it off. CRISPR Therapeutics' first success CRISPR Therapeutics' first approval was for Casgevy, a treatment for sickle cell disease (SCD) and transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT), which it developed in collaboration with Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Before Casgevy, no CRISPR-based gene-editing medicine had been approved. While it became the first, it still faces some challenges. Ex vivo gene-editing therapies require a complex manufacturing and administration process that can only be performed in authorized treatment centers (ATCs). Moreover, they're expensive. Casgevy costs $2.2 million in the U.S. Getting third-party payers on board for that is no easy feat. Still, CRISPR Therapeutics and Vertex Pharmaceuticals are making steady progress. As of the second quarter, CRISPR Therapeutics had achieved its goal of activating 75 ATCs. It had also secured reimbursement for eligible patients in 10 countries. The two companies estimate there are roughly 60,000 eligible SCD and TDT patients in the regions they have targeted. Let's say they continue to strike reimbursement deals and can count on third-party coverage for 70% of this target population (42,000 people), then go on to treat another 30% of that group in the next decade (12,600 patients). Assuming they could extend that $2.2 million price tag to those countries, Casgevy could generate more than $27.7 billion over this period. Based on its agreement with Vertex, 40% would go to CRISPR Therapeutics, or roughly $11.1 billion over a decade. That's not bad, but it's not that impressive either. So, while Casgevy could contribute meaningfully to CRISPR Therapeutics' results -- and may even reach blockbuster status at some point -- the medicine may primarily serve as a proof of concept to demonstrate that the biotech's approach can be effective. Substantial progress with its first commercialized product will help the stock price. But the company's performance will depend even more on future clinical and regulatory milestones, especially as it shows with Casgevy that it can manage the intricacies and complexities of marketing gene-editing medicines. Can the pipeline deliver? CRISPR Therapeutics has six candidates in clinical trials, which isn't bad at all for a mid-cap biotech company. One of its leading programs is CTX310, a potential therapy designed to help reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients with certain conditions. CTX310 is already producing encouraging clinical trial results. Additionally, it's an in vivo medicine, meaning it bypasses the need to harvest patients' cells to manufacture therapies; in vivo gene-editing treatments are easier to handle than their ex vivo counterparts. The company's path to creating life-changing returns hinges on its ability to deliver consistent clinical and regulatory wins over the next few years for CTX310 and other important candidates. If CRISPR Therapeutics can successfully launch several new products in the next five to seven years, its shares are likely to skyrocket. In the meantime, under this scenario, the company would succeed in making gene-editing medicines more mainstream. This would encourage third-party payers to get on board -- and healthcare institutions, and perhaps even governments, to help push for more ATCs, since there'd be a greater need to accommodate these treatments. Can CRISPR Therapeutics achieve this? In my view, the biotech stock is on the riskier side, but does carry significant upside potential. There's a (small) chance the gene-editing specialist will deliver life-changing returns in the next decade, but investors need to hedge their bets. It's best to start by initiating a small position in the stock, then progressively add more if CRISPR Therapeutics lands more wins. Should you invest $1,000 in CRISPR Therapeutics right now? Before you buy stock in CRISPR Therapeutics, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and CRISPR Therapeutics wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Prosper Junior Bakiny has positions in Vertex Pharmaceuticals. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends CRISPR Therapeutics and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Here's How This Forgotten Healthcare Stock Could Generate Life-Changing Returns was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio


Fox News
43 minutes ago
- Fox News
Frustrated man says pregnant sister's food habits forced him to lock up groceries
A frustrated man turned to Reddit after his pregnant sister kept eating his food without asking, leading to an outpouring of support. In a post on the popular platform, the 30-year-old man shared that his 31-year-old sister had recently left her husband and moved in with him. "I have a small apartment, but I let her move in because she had nowhere else to go and she's six months pregnant," he wrote. "I wasn't very pleased about this situation, but she is my sis, after all." At first, things were going fine – until his food started disappearing. The man wrote that he has very specific foods for his fitness goals and that his sister has been eating these — including his expensive shakes, post-run snacks and meal preps. "I'm pretty disciplined about what I eat because I am in bulk stage and hitting the gym regularly," he wrote. "I portion things, label them and plan for the entire week. But every other day something's gone. Makes me crazy." When confronted about her eating habits, the sister responded by shrugging or blaming hormones. "I asked her to replace things she finishes or at least ask before taking something. … She refuses to do anything about it," he said. When the man resorted to buying a small mini-fridge and putting it in his bedroom, the sister accused him of "treating her like a thief." "I calmly told her I was tired of my groceries disappearing and that this was the easiest way to avoid fights," he said. "Now she's sulking and has told our parents, after her failed marriage, her brother is also alienating her." "Sibling relationships are often the hardest ones we ever deal with." The man sharing his story on Reddit also reported that his mother called him and said that "pregnancy isn't easy," especially with his sister's situation. "I don't think I'm being cruel … I just want my food to be left alone. A part of me understands she is going through trouble. But at my expense?" he concluded. Commenters almost unanimously sided with the man. "Where is she going to stay once the baby is born? You have got bigger problems than groceries, if she won't even contribute to food costs," one person observed. "Tell your mother to come get your sister, so she can be sure that your sister is being taken care of," another chimed in. "Boundaries must be put in place with no apologies." California-based relationship expert Audrey Hope told Fox News Digital the central issue of the disagreement goes far beyond food. "Sibling relationships are often the hardest ones we ever deal with," she noted. "And there [may be] a primal wound that began long ago in childhood that went unnoticed and unhealed." Hope also said that the pregnant sister "was probably pampered" as a child, leading to her entitlement as an adult. "Boundaries must be put in place with no apologies," she advised. "The sibling with the apartment needs to know that he is being mistreated, and it is time to own his self-esteem and self-love and put up strong boundaries."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Covid is rising. New vaccines may not be ready until mid-September.
Coronavirus infections are climbing again, marking another summer wave as children go back to school. But this uptick arrives with an added layer of uncertainty because it's unclear when and which Americans can receive updated vaccines this fall. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. Daniel R. Kuritzkes, chief of the division of infectious diseases at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, said the current rise looks similar to seasonal bumps in previous years and is not driving a surge in severe illness. This is the new rhythm of covid waves. Many people are getting sick - some feeling lousy - especially after returning from vacation and conferences. Most probably won't even know it's covid because the symptoms can be indistinguishable from a cold or other respiratory bug. Yet hospitals are no longer flooded with patients because immune systems are much better trained to fight the virus five years after it arrived. But Kuritzkes and other medical and public health experts worry that delays and confusion surrounding the vaccines will limit access for those who need them the most: Adults ages 65 and older and people who have chronic conditions, weakened immune systems or are pregnant. The federal committee that would recommend the updated coronavirus vaccine is not expected to meet until at least mid-September, according to industry employees and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share sensitive information. By that point, the summer covid wave could be over, but Americans could still get a boost of immunity ahead of an expected winter wave. Here's what to know about the latest with covid and how to protect yourself: - - - What does the data show? Several metrics tracked by the CDC show a midsummer uptick of coronavirus underway in the United States. Viral levels in wastewater started rising in late June and are considered high in the West, South and Midwest and headed that direction in the Northeast, according to Marlene Wolfe, principal investigator and co-program director of WastewaterSCAN, a private initiative that tracks municipal sewage data. The levels of virus are roughly one-third of the levels recorded a year ago, when the country was experiencing an unusually large summer covid wave. Emergency room data suggests infections are disproportionately affecting children. As of Aug. 7, coronavirus diagnoses accounted for 2.18 percent of emergency room visits among children up to age 11, the largest jump of any age group. Still, some experts caution that numbers are still very small. Aaron Milstone, a pediatric infectious-disease specialist at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, said most children now have some level of hybrid immunity from prior infection and vaccination. But vaccines still play a key role in giving a child's body a robust immune response, he said. 'Parents get frustrated that they get their kids the vaccine and they still contract it, but the biggest point is that they didn't die or get severe illness,' said Milstone. 'It's like wearing a seat belt. It doesn't prevent an accident, but it decreases the likelihood of dying from one.' - - - What are the latest variants? Coronavirus is always evolving to become more transmissible or adept at overcoming the frontline immune defenses that stop infections. The current predominant variant is XFG, according to CDC wastewater tracking. XFG is an offshoot of the JN.1 subvariant of omicron that became dominant in the winter of 2023-2024. The Food and Drug Administration has advised vaccine manufacturers to update their formulas to target the JN.1 lineage, specifically using the LP.8.1 strain that was dominant in the spring and is closely related to XFG. The latest variants do not appear to cause worse symptoms or have significant differences compared with its predecessors, according to Scott Roberts, an assistant professor of infectious diseases at Yale School of Medicine. - - - What's the latest with vaccines? For the coming fall season, the FDA has not yet approved an updated coronavirus vaccine. In recent years, the agency has typically signed off on an updated version by late August or early September in order for pharmacies and doctors' offices to place orders. But the agency is expected to narrow its approval for the vaccine to those 65 and older, as well as others considered at high risk for severe disease. The new approach marks a significant shift from past years when the shots have been broadly available, including to children and generally healthy adults. Once the FDA gives the greenlight, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices decides who should get the shots. Most insurers must pay for ACIP-recommended vaccines. Most of the newly appointed members of that committee have been critical of U.S. coronavirus vaccine policy. It's unclear whether Americans who are not considered high risk could still pay out-of-pocket to get a coronavirus vaccine off-label. That depends on the willingness of - and legal restrictions on - health care providers who would administer shots. Most Americans have at least one condition that puts them at higher risk of severe illness from covid. Physical inactivity, asthma, obesity, smoking and mood disorders are among the widespread risk factors highlighted under the new FDA framework for coronavirus vaccine approval. AHIP, the major insurance lobby, has said its members are committed to maintaining coverage of vaccines for the upcoming respiratory virus season. The FDA may not sign off on Pfizer's updated coronavirus vaccine for children between the ages of six months and 4, the company said in a statement, adding the change has nothing to do with the safety and efficacy of the shot. However, the agency recently granted full approval to Moderna's shot for young kids at risk of severe disease. The CDC stopped offering specific coronavirus vaccine guidance to pregnant women. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has strongly criticized that move, noting research has shown the virus can be dangerous for expecting mothers and cause birth complications. - - - How can I protect myself and others? Public health experts say the best way to protect yourself from covid is to stay up-to-date on vaccines. The 2024-2025 vaccine formula is still available. But it might be harder to find because some doctors and pharmacies may have decided not to restock their supplies while they wait for a new version to arrive. The CDC recommends two doses of the vaccine for people who are 65 and older or are immunocompromised. Jessica Justman, an infectious disease specialist at Columbia University, said if someone in those groups had not yet received their second dose, they should go ahead and get it now, especially if they anticipate increased exposure such as attending a large indoor gathering. The primary purpose of vaccination is to reduce the risk of severe disease, hospitalization and death. For those wanting to avoid infections completely, experts advise wearing surgical or KN95/N95 masks, avoiding crowded indoor settings and ventilating rooms. For those who get infected, the CDC guidance to resume normal activities is to wait until your symptoms are improving and you have been fever-free for 24 hours without using fever-reducing medication. Then you should take precautions for an additional five days, such as social distancing and masking. - - - Rachel Roubein and Lena H. Sun contributed to this report Related Content Ukraine scrambles to roll back Russian eastern advance as summit takes place Her dogs kept dying, and she got cancer. Then they tested her water. D.C.'s homeless begin to see the effects of Trump's crackdown Solve the daily Crossword