
12 members of congress sue trump administration to ensure access to ice detention centers
ICE Director Todd Lyons told a congressional committee in May that he recognized the right of members of Congress to visit detention facilities even unannounced. But DHS Secretary Kristi Noem told a different committee that members of Congress should have requested a tour of an immigration detention facility in New Jersey where a skirmish broke out in May. As President Donald Trump's immigration agenda plays out, detention facilities have become overcrowded, and there have been reports of mistreatment, food shortages, a lack of medical care, and unsanitary conditions, the lawsuit said. Congress has a duty to make sure the administration is complying with the law while operating the facilities, the lawsuit said. The recently passed budget bill allocates 45 billion for ICE detention – more than 13 times ICE's current annual detention budget, the lawsuit said. Members of Congress must ensure those funds are spent efficiently and legally, the suit said. But recent attempts by House members to visit facilities were blocked, the lawsuit said.
'These members of Congress could have just scheduled a tour; instead, they're running to court to drive clicks and fundraising emails,' DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin told the AP in an email. 'Requests for visits to detention centers should be made with sufficient time to prevent interference with the President's Article II authority to oversee executive department functions–a week is sufficient to ensure no intrusion on the President's constitutional authority,' she said. Also, 'ICE has seen a surge in assaults, disruptions, and obstructions to law enforcement, so any requests for tours of ICE processing centers and field offices must be approved by Secretary Noem,' McLaughlin said. When Rep. Veronica Escobar tried to visit the El Paso center on July 9, ICE told her that they could not accommodate her attendance and said it is now requiring requests to be made seven calendar days in advance, the lawsuit said. When the Democrat arrived at the center, she was denied entry. Rep. Jason Crow D-Colorado met a similar fate when he tried to visit the ICE Aurora Facility on July 20.
'ICE is holding men, women, and children in overcrowded rooms without beds, showers, or medical care – sometimes for days on end,' Chioma Chukwu, executive director of American Oversight, which filed the lawsuit with Democracy Forward, said. 'ICE's stonewalling is not only illegal – it's a brazen attempt to shield abuse from scrutiny.' While ICE is demanding a week's notice for detention center visits, it said it's prohibiting members of Congress from inspecting ICE field offices where some detainees are being held. When Rep. Daniel Goldman D-New York tried to tour the ICE New York Field Office in June, he was told his oversight authority doesn't apply there because it's not a detention facility. When Goldman went to the office, the deputy director barred his entry but confirmed that people were being held overnight, sometimes for several days, but the facility did not have beds or showers. Reps. Joe Neguse D-Colorado, Bennie Thompson D-Mississippi, and Jamie Raskin D-Maryland made a similar attempt to enter the ICE Washington Field Office in Chantilly Virginia on July 21 after learning that people were being detained there. But they also were turned away without being able to view the conditions at the site.
The other House members who are fighting for ICE access include: California Democratic Representatives Norma Torres, Raul Ruiz, Jimmy Gomez, Jose Luis Correa, and Robert Garcia. Also suing is Adriano Espaillat D-New York. 'No child should be sleeping on concrete and no sick person should be denied care; yet that's exactly what we keep hearing is happening inside Trump's detention centers,' Gomez said in a statement. 'This lawsuit is our message: We as Members of Congress will do our job, and we will not let these agencies operate in the shadows.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Arabiya
18 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
US reverses pledge to link disaster funds to Israel boycott stance
The Trump administration on Monday reversed course on requiring US cities and states to rebuke boycotts of Israeli companies in order to receive disaster funds, according to a statement, and deleted the earlier policy from its website. The Department of Homeland Security removed its statement that said states must certify they will not sever 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies' to qualify for the funding. Reuters reported on Monday that the language applied to at least $1.9 billion that states rely on to cover search-and-rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries and backup power systems, among other expenses, according to 11 agency grant notices reviewed by Reuters. This is a shift for the administration of President Donald Trump, which has previously tried to penalize institutions that don't align with its views on Israel or antisemitism. The disaster funding requirement took aim at the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement designed to put economic pressure on Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories. The campaign's supporters grew more vocal in 2023, after Hamas attacked southern Israel and Israel invaded Gaza in response. 'FEMA grants remain governed by existing law and policy and not political litmus tests,' said DHS Spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin in a statement on Monday afternoon. DHS oversees the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA in grant notices posted on Friday said states must follow its 'terms and conditions' to qualify for disaster preparation funding. Those conditions required that they not support what the agency called a 'discriminatory prohibited boycott,' a term defined as refusing to deal with 'companies doing business in or with Israel.' The new terms, posted later on Monday, do not include that language.


Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Rwanda accepts up to 250 deportees from the US under Trump's third-country plan
KIGALI: Rwanda agreed to accept up to 250 deportees from the United States under the Trump administration's expanding third-country deportation program, its government said US is seeking more deals with African countries to take deportees under President Donald Trump's plans to expel people who he says entered the US illegally and are 'the worst of the worst.'Rwanda government spokesperson Yolande Makolo confirmed the details in an email to The Associated Press. She didn't immediately give a timeline for the US has already sent 13 immigrants to two other African nations, South Sudan and Eswatini. It has also deported hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, El Salvador and Trump administration described the eight men sent to South Sudan and the five men sent to Eswatini last month as dangerous criminals who had been convicted of crimes in the US Both those countries have declined to give details of their deals with the USRwanda, an East African nation of around 15 million people, struck a deal in 2022 with the UK to accept migrants while their claims for asylum in Britain were being processed. That contentious agreement was criticized by rights groups and others as being unethical and unworkable and was ultimately scrapped, with Britain's Supreme Court ruling in 2023 that it was said in May it was in negotiations with the US over a deportation agreement.


Asharq Al-Awsat
4 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Pakistan Resumes Forced Expulsions of Afghan Refugees Despite UN Warnings
Authorities in Pakistan have resumed the forced deportations of Afghan refugees after the federal government declined to extend a key deadline for their stay, officials said Monday. The decision affects approximately 1.4 million Afghans holding Proof of Registration (PoR) cards, whose legal status expired at the end of June. Many had hoped for a one-year extension to settle personal affairs, such as selling property or concluding business, before returning to Afghanistan. In addition to PoR cardholders, around 800,000 Afghans hold Afghan Citizen Cards. Police say they also are living in the country illegally and being detained prior to deportations in the eastern Punjab, southwestern Balochistan and southern Sindh province. Monday's decision drew criticism from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the UN refugee agency. At least 1.2 million Afghans have been forced to return from Iran and Pakistan this year, according to a June UNHCR report. Repatriations on such a massive scale have the potential to destabilize the fragile situation in Afghanistan, where the Taliban government came into power in 2021. A July 31 government notification seen by The Associated Press confirms Pakistan's decision to repatriate all Afghan nationals holding expired PoR cards. It states that Afghans without valid passports and Pakistani visas are in the country illegally and must return to their homeland under Pakistani immigration laws. Police across Pakistan are detaining Afghans to transport them to border crossings, according to two government and security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. They said there are no mass arrests and police were told to go to house-to-house and make random checks to detain foreigners living in the country illegally. 'Yes, the Afghan refugees living in Pakistan illegally are being sent back in a dignified way,' said Shakeel Khan, commissioner for Afghan refugees in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. The latest operation is the most significant step yet under orders from federal government in Islamabad, he said. Rehmat Ullah, 35, an Afghan, said his family migrated to Pakistan's northwestern Peshawar city decades ago and now is preparing to return home. 'I have five children and my concern is that they will miss their education,' he said. 'I was born here, my children were born here and now we are going back,' he said. Millions have fled to Pakistan over the past four decades to escape war, political unrest and economic hardship. The renewed deportation drive follows a nationwide crackdown launched in 2023 targeting foreigners living illegally in Pakistan. The Interior Ministry, which oversees the campaign, did not immediately comment. Qaiser Khan Afridi, a spokesperson for the UN refugee agency, expressed deep concern over the government's recent actions. 'Sending people back in this manner is tantamount to refoulement and a breach of a state's international obligations,' Afridi said in a statement, urging Pakistan to adopt a 'humane approach to ensure voluntary, gradual and dignified return of Afghans' and praised the country for hosting millions of Afghan refugees for more than 40 years. 'We call on the government to halt the forcible return and ensure a gradual, voluntary and dignified repatriation process,' Afridi said. 'Such massive and hasty return could jeopardize the lives and freedom of Afghan refugees, while also risking instability not only in Afghanistan but across the region.'