Amid Oppn walkout, Amit Shah hails PM Modi for giving Pak ‘befitting reply'
Shah was speaking in the Rajya Sabha even as the Opposition walked out in protest over the PM's absence from the Upper House during a special discussion on Operation Sindoor.
'I want to tell the Congress that POK was given by you, and only the BJP government will bring it back,' he said.
'Look at the coincidence that they died of bullet wounds in their heads. After the Pahalgam attacks I was requested by the family members of the killed to shoot the culprits in their heads, and coincidentally their demands have been fulfilled,' Shah said on the killing of the three terrorists.
He also accused the Congress of creating the bogey of hindu terror in response to the 26/11 Mumbai attack. 'I proudly declare to the world... Hindus can never be terrorists' Shah said.
The Opposition criticised the PM for not being present and speaking in the Rajya Sabha, as he had done a day before in the Lok Sabha. The government said its prerogative was to decide who will reply, but the Opposition dubbed the PM's absence as an 'insult to the House'.
As soon as Shah rose to speak, Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, Mallikarjun Kharge, said, 'Members had demanded that after 16 hours of discussion, the Prime Minister should be present and address the House…Most of our questions are directed at him. It's not that you (Shah) are not capable of replying...But if the PM is present and still chooses not to come, it is an insult to the House.'
As the opposition closed ranks and walked out, Shah slammed Kharge.
'He (Kharge) is not allowed to speak on important issues. The BAC decided that the discussion will be for 16 hours, and who will reply will be decided by the government. I know why they are walking out…for all these years, to protect their vote bank, they did not do anything to prevent terrorism,' he said.
Congratulating the armed forces for the precision strikes on terror camps in Pakistan during Operation Sindoor and more recently for Operation Mahadev, which led to the killing of three terrorists involved in the April 22 Pahalgam attack that left 26 people dead, Shah slammed the Congress for failing to take a tough stance against terrorism.
'If the Congress had been in power, they would have declared Pakistan innocent. Congress has no moral right to question the BJP on terrorism. Today, we have a Prime Minister who responds with BrahMos missiles, not dossiers,' he said, criticising the Congress for not taking decisive steps against terror operatives.
He said the party was opposed to the Prevention of Terrorism Act or POTA, a law passed in Parliament during the BJP rule in 2002 and scrapped it right away when it came to power in 2004.
Responding to the Congress's charge about the timing of Operation Mahadev, the minister said he had wanted the terrorist responsible for the 'barbaric killing' of tourists in Pahalgam dead within days of the attack. Taking potshots at the Congress, he said, '...It is the mentality of the Congress party… in front of the whole world (P) Chidambaram proved that they will not be scared to support Pakistan for their vote bank; they will not be scared to save LeT for the sake of the vote bank. I also ask why they were killed today. They should've been killed much before.'
Shah said the terror attack was used to deliver a message that Pakistan will not allow Kashmir to become free from terrorism. 'I want to give a message too… Kashmir will be free of terrorism,' he said, pointing out that the PM on April 24 has assured that those responsible for the attack would be punished 'beyond their imagination'.
He credited the PM for giving the armed forces the 'operational freedom' to choose the time and the action in response to the Pahalgam attack.
Shah also responded to Opposition criticism over US President Donald Trump's repeated assertion that he mediated a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, and said the pause was in response to the Pakistani DGMO's request.
'During Operation Sindoor, terrorists who were responsible for attacks during the UPA regime were killed,' he said.
Shah cited the names of terrorists associated with the Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed who were killed during the May 7 operation across nine locations in Pakistan and PoK. Terrorists such as Dawood Ibrahim had fled the country during the Congress regime, he said.
Criticising former Union minister P Chidambaram, Shah said, 'Why does Chidambaram need proof? Who is he trying to save—Pakistan or the LeT?'
He said the forensic evidence and eyewitness accounts confirmed the involvement, and accused Lashkar's front, The Resistance Front (TRF), for executing the attack. 'Chidambaram questions if Operation Sindoor was decisive. Was (war in) 1965 or 1971 decisive? Then why did terrorism grow under the Congress?' he said.
Shah lashed out at the party and said it was under Jawaharlal Nehru's premiership that Indian territory was lost to China.
'After the Indo-China war, Prime Minister Nehru gave away 38,000 square kilometers of Indian territory to China. At that time, the US had suggested that India should be made a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council instead of China. But the Congress government declined, pushing a case for China,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Young boy in unnecessary urgency': Tejasvi Surya hits back at DK Shivakumar's dig over metro delay
BJP MP Tejasvi Surya on Wednesday hit back at Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar for calling him a 'young boy in an unnecessary urgency' over his repeated demands for early inauguration of the Yellow Line Metro in Bengaluru. BJP MP Tejasvi Surya accused the Congress party of indulging in 'politics of delay'.(Sansad TV) Sharing a strongly worded post on X, Surya said he is indeed in a hurry, because he does not believe public infrastructure should take decades to complete. 'I refuse to accept 8.5 years for a 2 km flyover. I represent a generation of Indians who want change now, not in some indefinite future,' he wrote. (Also Read: Bengaluru's Ballari Road may get 2.2-km tunnel to ease Hebbal congestion: Report) Surya accused the Congress party of indulging in 'politics of delay' and drew a contrast between past Congress regimes and the current BJP-led government. 'He comes from a party where Indira Gandhi would lay the foundation stone, and Sonia Gandhi would inaugurate it decades later. I represent a New India under Modi where our Govt starts work on the project and also inaugurates it,' he said. Citing Bengaluru's severe traffic congestion, Surya said the city is 'choking' and that it is ordinary citizens, not ministers, who suffer due to missed deadlines and bureaucratic delays. 'I'm in a hurry because my city is choking. Because commuters waste hours stuck in traffic,' he added. Challenging Shivakumar to list any concrete effort he made to expedite the Yellow Line project, Surya questioned his involvement during key phases of the project. 'Where was he when the project was stuck in land acquisition? Where was he when we were fighting for a full-time BMRCL MD? Where was he when we had to coordinate across ministries and manufacturers to ensure timely delivery of rolling stock?' he asked. He also pointed out that while he led a citizens' march demanding a firm inauguration date, Shivakumar 'turned up three days before the PM's visit to orchestrate a media circus.' Concluding his post, Surya reiterated his commitment to fast, accountable governance. 'I believe Bengaluru deserves better. I believe in politics of performance, not tokenism and photo-ops. This is not the era of slow-motion politics. This is the era of fast-track governance,' he said.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Chandigarh: MP Tewari calls for probe into surge in e-challans
A day after director general of police Sagar Preet Hooda ordered a halt to manual challaning by traffic police, MP Manish Tewari welcomed the move, noting it followed his query in Parliament about challans issued from 2019 to 2025. He said the operationalisation of the Integrated Command and Control Centre (ICCC) was a positive step but flagged concern over the exponential rise in e-challans between 2022 and 2025. MP Manish Tewari (HT File) Tewari has demanded a detailed investigation into the ICCC's functioning, citing public harassment and humiliation due to excessive challans. He appreciated Chandigarh Police's decision to restrict manual challaning to only visible violations but stressed accountability was needed to ensure fairness and transparency in the AI-driven system managing traffic enforcement in the city. Congress backs traffic reforms Chandigarh Congress chief HS Lucky met DGP Sagar Preet Hooda on Wednesday, appreciating recent reforms to make the city's traffic challaning system more transparent and citizen-friendly. He also raised key law and order concerns, including women's safety, drug abuse, community policing, and the need for enhanced police visibility and responsiveness.
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
If America goes after India's oil trade, China will benefit
WHEN WESTERN countries began boycotting Russian oil in 2022, India saw an opportunity. Some 2.6m barrels a day (b/d) of crude once destined for Europe were available—at a sweet discount. India, which bought next to no oil from Russia in 2021, pounced. It has remained Russia's biggest customer ever since. Today it imports nearly 2m b/d of Russian 'sour", heavy crude, representing 35-40% of its crude imports. The supply reduces India's import bill at a time when the world's fastest-growing big economy burns ever more petroleum. Local refiners make a killing by processing the stuff into fuels that they then export at full cost. For three years Ukraine's allies did not object, and the strategy looked savvy. Now it is in jeopardy. Irked that Vladimir Putin is making no effort to end his campaign in Ukraine, on August 6th President Donald Trump slapped an extra 25% tariff on India, which he accuses of funding Russia's 'war machine". A bill vowing levies of up to 500% on countries that buy Russian oil is making its way through Congress. Meanwhile, the European Union's 18th package of sanctions will ban refined products made from Russian crude in January. The tariffs will hurt but the bans lack bite. Indian refineries—other than those backed by Rosneft, a Russian oil giant—source most crude from outside Russia; they can argue their products are not made from Russian stuff even if there is some in the blend. That makes the EU ban hard to enforce. Mr Trump's hope is to bring down Russia's oil revenues in order to force Mr Putin to halt his offensive. Preventing Russian oil from reaching foreign markets, however, could push global prices up, which would be politically uncomfortable for America's president. All this might explain why the market remains calm. There is still potential for a storm. Unlike China, which imports 2m b/d from Russia, India does not have a history of defying American sanctions. When Uncle Sam pledged to penalise anyone buying Iranian oil during Mr Trump's first term, India swiftly complied. This time the White House is 'serious about pressuring India to go to zero", says a source familiar with its thinking. Placid markets may embolden Mr Trump. He could supplement his tariffs with threats that any bank, port or firm facilitating Russian sales will be cut off from American finance. What if he did? First, India would race to find new supplies. Its refiners have already reduced Russian orders by 40-50%, estimates a trader. In theory, Middle Eastern countries, which have 3.5m b/d in spare capacity, could provide additional help, along with producers from Africa and elsewhere. In practice, a lot of Gulf supply is already committed to East Asia through long-term contracts, and much is a lighter type than the 'Urals" for which Indian refiners would be looking. Russia, meanwhile, would struggle for buyers. Chinese refiners could absorb more oil, and the country's leaders have shown they can retaliate successfully against Mr Trump's tariffs, but they do not want to end up reliant on any single supplier. Such analysis dictates that, were America to insist on immediate compliance, global oil prices would jump, perhaps to over $80 a barrel. Mr Trump could not countenance that for long. Very soon he might introduce waivers phasing in the restrictions over six months, allowing markets to adjust—a repeat of 2018-19, when soaring prices in the wake of Mr Trump's sanctions against Iran forced America's president to soften his approach. An oil glut is expected early next year, which might accommodate tough-but-phased-in Russian sanctions. Given enough time, India would probably manage to replace most of its current Russian supply, albeit at a higher cost (Urals crude currently trades at a $5-10 discount to other comparable grades). The margins of Indian refiners would be crushed. As they retreated from the market, the winners would be their Chinese rivals, which have been restocking fast in recent months, giving them plenty of firepower. Being less exposed to American sanctions, they would also continue to buy Russian crude—at a growing discount.
