New immigrant detention partnership nicknamed after iconic Indiana racetrack inspires backlash
However, the agreement is already prompting backlash in the Midwest state, starting with its splashy 'Speedway Slammer' moniker.
Here's a closer look at the agreement, the pushback and Indiana's role in the Trump agenda to aggressively detain and deport people who are in the country illegally.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem trumpeted the deal late Tuesday, saying Indiana would add 1,000 detention beds for immigrants facing deportation under a revived federal program.
On social media, DHS also posted an altered image of a race car emblazoned with 'ICE,' short for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The IndyCar-style vehicle is shown rolling past a barbed-wire prison wall.
'If you are in America illegally, you could find yourself in Indiana's Speedway Slammer,' Noem said, likening it to the controversial facility built in the Florida Everglades. She added that the new partnership will 'help remove the worst of the worst out of our country.'
However, the Indiana deal doesn't involve construction.
Federal funds will be used for space at the Miami Correctional Facility in Bunker Hill, roughly 75 miles north of Indianapolis. The prison's total capacity is 3,100 beds, of which 1,200 are not filled, according to Indiana Department of Correction spokeswoman Annie Goeller.
Officials did not say when the detentions would start. 'Details about the partnership and how IDOC can best support those efforts are being determined,' Geoller said.
The deal is part of the decades-old 287(g) program, which Trump has revived and expanded. It delegates immigration enforcement powers to state and local law enforcement agencies. Immigrants, attorneys and advocates have raised a number of concerns about the program, including a lack of oversight.
The Florida detention facility has prompted lawsuits and complaints about poor conditions and violations of detainees' rights. Authorities have disputed the claims.
Republican Gov. Mike Braun first announced the federal partnership on Friday.
'Indiana is not a safe haven for illegal immigration,' he said. 'Indiana will fully partner with federal immigration authorities as they enforce the most fundamental laws of our country.'
The outlandish name quickly drew backlash, notably from the town of Speedway, an Indianapolis suburb which is home to the iconic racetrack that hosts the Indianapolis 500.
'This designation was developed and released independently by the federal agency, without the Town's involvement or prior notice regarding the use of the name 'Speedway,'' officials from the Indiana town of roughly 14,000 said in a statement. 'Our primary focus remains the well-being of our residents, businesses, and visitors.'
IndyCar officials were also caught off guard.
'We were unaware of plans to incorporate our imagery as part of announcement,' IndyCar said, asking that its intellectual property 'not be utilized moving forward in relation to this matter.'
The altered image used by DHS featured an IndyCar with the No. 5, the same number as the only Mexican driver in the series.
'I was just a little bit shocked at the coincidences of that and, you know, of what it means,' IndyCar driver Pato O'Ward said Wednesday. 'I don't think it made a lot of people proud, to say the least.'
President Trump's border top border policy advisor Tom Homan said Wednesday that he didn't name the facility.
'But I'll say this, the work of ICE, the men and women of ICE, are trying to do their job with integrity and honor,' he told reporters at the White House. 'I don't want these names to detract from that.'
Leaders in the Trump administration have already singled out Indiana as key to their immigration agenda.
Braun, a first-term governor and former U.S. senator, has been a strong Trump supporter. In January, Braun signed an executive order directing law enforcement agencies to 'fully cooperate' on immigration enforcement.
The nation's newest immigration court opened in Indianapolis earlier this year as a way to address the backlog and divert cases from the busy courthouse in Chicago.
Federal and state leaders are also working on plans to use a central Indiana military base, Camp Atterbury, to temporarily house detainees.
'Indiana is taking a comprehensive and collaborative approach to combating illegal immigration and will continue to lead the way among states,' Braun said in a statement Tuesday.
Tareen writes for the Associated Press. Associated Press writer Will Weissert in Washington contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth subverts Congress by ordering racist Confederate monument's return to Arlington
The verbal gymnastics by our Defense secretary whenever he orders a Confederate monument to go back up is truly Olympian. To wit, Secretary Pete Hegseth just ordered the army to refurbish a 1914 Arlington Confederate Monument to the tune of $10 million and restore it by 2027. Hegseth called it a 'reconciliation monument … taken down by woke lemmings.' In his announcement, Hegseth avoids the actual name of the monument, 'The Arlington Confederate Monument.' In fact, nothing in his statement mentions the Confederacy at all. There's a reason for that: Congress passed a law in 2019 preventing the Department of Defense from naming or renaming anything after the Confederacy. Hence, 'reconciliation monument.' I study Confederate commemoration. This structure is one the cruelest, most racist monuments in the country, and its location at the sacred ground of Arlington National Cemetery makes it even more offensive. The monument clearly commemorates the Confederacy and its purpose — chattel slavery. It depicts a tearful, overweight enslaved woman, a 'mammy,' cradling the child of her Confederate enslaver, supporting him as he departs for war. The monument portrays faithful slaves and kind white masters, a historical lie. Slavery featured legal rape, torture and selling husband from wife, child from mother. The monument came down because Congress, with a Republican-controlled Senate, passed a law directing the Pentagon 'to remove all names, symbols, displays, monuments, and paraphernalia that honor or commemorate the Confederate States of America.' President Trump vetoed the $800 billion defense bill because it required the changing of nine base names like Fort Lee and Fort Benning that honored Confederates. Those bases were named during World War I and World War II, when the Army and the American South were segregated and few Black southerners could vote. Congress overturned Trump's veto with a supermajority. To execute that order, Congress created a Naming Commission on which I served as vice chair. We were no 'woke lemmings.' The eight commissioners appointed by Congress and the secretary of Defense included three Republicans, one Democrat, and four retired flag officers. When the commission members visited the Confederate monument in 2022, we were shocked by its overt racist imagery and anti U.S. sentiments. We voted unanimously to recommend removal. Hegseth and neo-Confederate groups argue that the Commission sought to 'erase history.' Not quite. Classes still study the Civil War, slavery, the Confederacy, and Jim Crow. Removing the names of bases named after confederate generals or racist monuments changed who and how we commemorate, our remit from Congress, not history. Hegseth further declares that the monument was done in the spirit of reconciliation. He gets his history grossly wrong. Reunion had already occurred in 1868 when President Andrew Johnson magnanimously granted amnesty for treason to all Confederates. By 1877, all the former rebelling states had full political rights and representation. In 1914, the Arlington Monument celebrated not reconciliation, but the victory of white supremacy. Before 1877, over 2,000 Black men held elective office, including a Black U.S. senator from Mississippi. By 1914, even though Mississippi and South Carolina were majority Black, almost no one of color could vote, much less hold office. Jim Crow triumphed. Reconciliation did not include 9 million African Americans in the South who lived in a racial police state without voting rights enforced by a terror campaign of lynching. In 1914, the NAACP's Crisis magazine counted 55 African Americans lynched. In Louisiana, three Black men were burned alive at the stake. Another mob doused a Texas man with gasoline and placed him in an 'oil-soaked, dry-goods box' and set him on fire. None of the perpetrators were ever brought to justice. Commemoration should inspire us. Who we commemorate should reflect our values. Instead of spending $10 million to restore that monument, we should commemorate the 1,800 United States Colored Troops and thousands of other U.S. Army Civil War soldiers buried in Arlington who helped destroy chattel slavery, freed 4 million men, women and children from human bondage, protected democracy and the saved the United States of America. By ordering the monument back, Hegseth is subverting Congress and the will of the American people. He is telling us that the values of 1914, white supremacy, and Jim Crow are this country's — and the Army's — values. This monument has everything to do with racism and nothing to do with reconciliation. Suggesting otherwise is a perversion of U.S. history and an insult to everyone buried in Arlington Cemetery. Brigadier General Ty Seidule, U.S. Army (Retired) served as the Vice Chair of the Naming Commission. His is the Hinchcliff Professor of History at Hamilton College and his forthcoming book with Connor Williams is A Promise Delivered: Ten American Heroes and the Battle to Rename Our Nation's Military Bases.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
NATO chief on whether Trump is at risk of rewarding Russia for invading Ukraine: ‘I don't think the risk is there'
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Sunday that he doesn't believe there is a risk that peace negotiations in Alaska with President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will reward Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. ABC News's Jonathan Karl asked Rutte on 'This Week' if he believed, like former national security adviser John Bolton does, that negotiations are sliding in Russia's favor, which could potentially reward the country for its invasion. 'No, I don't think the risk is there,' Rutte replied. 'And all my respects for John, and please send him my best regards, but I would not agree on this point with him. We have seen President Trump putting incredible pressure on Russia.' 'So, this is all clear evidence that President Trump is absolutely adamant to bring this war to an end, but also to keep maximum pressure on Putin,' Rutte later added. Rutte said the Friday meeting between to two leaders was important because it 'is testing Putin, how serious he is in this whole process, which will then have to continue after Friday, with Ukraine involved, with others involved, to bring this war to an end.' Trump and Putin are set to meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss peace negotiations. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited to the summit; however, the White House and the NATO Ambassador Matthew Whitaker said there is a possibility he will attend. Bolton, who was the national security advisor during Trump's first term, said Saturday on CNN's 'The Source' with host Kaitlan Collins, 'The only better place for Putin than Alaska would be if the summit were being held in Moscow.' 'So, the initial setup, I think, is a great victory for Putin,' he continued. On Aug. 6, Trump signed an executive order adding a 25 percent tariff on India's purchases of Russian oil, bringing the tariffs up to a total of 50 percent. The tariffs will be in effect 21 days after Trump signed the executive order. This was intended to let India negotiate with Russia; however, in the meantime, India's leader has reaffirmed its bipartisan relations with the Kremlin. 'We also reviewed the progress in our bilateral agenda, and reaffirmed our commitment to further deepen the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership. I look forward to hosting President Putin in India later this year,' Narendra Modi said. The NATO chief also mentioned Trump's actions within the international organization as proof that the president is dedicated to this peace deal. 'He was the one delivering the big success at the NATO summit, the 5 percent spending commitments in June, one of the biggest foreign policy successes of the U.S. in the last couple of years,' he said. Rutte also mentioned the deal struck in July between the Trump administration and NATO countries to send more weapons to Ukraine. The meeting in Alaska will discuss territorial claims. Last week, Putin shared a ceasefire agreement with the Trump administration, which asked for control of Eastern Ukraine. Zelensky adamantly opposed the deal by posting on X, 'Any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace.' Rutte said the negotiations would include talks about territory as well as 'security guarantees' and 'the absolute need to acknowledge that Ukraine decides of its own future, that Ukraine has to be a sovereign nation, deciding on its own geopolitical future, of course, having no limitations to its own military troop levels, and for NATO to have no limitations on our presence on the Eastern flank in countries like Latvia, Estonia and Finland.' Whitaker reassured on Sunday that no matter what deal is struck between the parties, there will be verification that both countries are acting towards peace.
New York Post
8 minutes ago
- New York Post
Lindsey Graham says Trump's goal is to prevent third invasion of Ukraine, wants Zelensky ‘to be part of the process'
One of President Trump's core objectives heading into negotiations with Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin will be to prevent a third invasion of Ukraine, according to Sen. Lindsey Graham. 'I am here to tell you that President Trump will end this war in a way to prevent a third invasion and not to entice China to take Taiwan,' Graham (R-SC), who went golfing with Trump on Saturday, told NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 'We're not out to humiliate Putin, we're out to get a deal to make sure there's no third invasion.' Graham didn't shed light on how Trump might go about trying to prevent a future invasion of Ukraine, but called for Kyiv to get security guarantees from European countries. Top Russian officials have previously been critical of the idea of Europe providing Ukraine with security. Russia infamously annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 and began its current, brutal invasion in February of 2022. 3 Sen. Lindsey Graham conveyed confidence that President Trump is aiming to prevent a third Russian invasion of Ukraine. AP 3 President Trump is set to meet with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. REUTERS The South Carolina Republican also suggested that the US should continue working to ensure Ukraine's military remains strong after the war concludes in order to deter future aggression. 'Militarily, we need to keep Ukraine strong, keep flowing them strong and modern weapons, and security guarantees with European forces on the ground as trip wires to prevent a third invasion,' he said. 'We want to end this with the sovereign, independent, self-governing Ukraine, and a situation where Putin cannot do this the third time without being crushed. This is really a dress rehearsal for Taiwan.' Trump is set to meet with Putin in Alaska on Friday. That meeting comes after Putin purportedly made offers to special envoy Steve Witkoff, though details about what the Kremlin tyrant put on the table are murky. Prior to the supposed breakthrough between Witkoff and Putin, Trump had threatened to impose steep secondary sanctions or tariffs against Russia. 3 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has hinted at skepticism over the Trump-Putin summit. The president gave Moscow a deadline of last Friday to either take steps towards peace with Ukraine or else he would pull the trigger on those economic penalties. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has worked to patch things up with Trump since their February Oval Office shouting match, has publicly argued that decisions on how to broker peace cannot be made without Ukraine. Zelensky has also cast doubt on territorial concessions to Russia. 'I do hope that Zelensky can be part of the process. I'll leave that up to the White House,' Graham said of the upcoming talks between Trump and Putin. 'I have every confidence in the world that the President is going to go to meet Putin from a position of strength, that he's going to look out for Europe and Ukrainian needs to end this war honorably.' The White House has reportedly toyed with the idea of having Zelensky attend the meeting with Putin. But Trump has made it clear publicly that he is willing to meet Putin without Zelensky. Graham also floated the division of Berlin as a model to settle the conflict between Russia over time. 'Think about East Berlin and West Berlin as the way a conflict can be settled, at least for a period of time. North Korea and South Korea [are] in a state of truce. There's never been a final settlement,' he said. 'I want to be honest with you. Ukraine's not going to evict every Russian, and Russia's not going to keep [everything]. So there will be some land swaps at the end,' he added. 'The goal for me, and I think President Trump, is to end it [the war] forever.'
