logo
President Donald Trump's new tariffs give some countries a break, while shares and US dollar sink

President Donald Trump's new tariffs give some countries a break, while shares and US dollar sink

Chicago Tribune7 days ago
BANGKOK — U.S. President Donald Trump's new tariff rates of up to 41% on U.S. imports from dozens of countries drew expressions of relief Friday from some countries that negotiated a deal or managed to whittle them down from rates announced in April. Others expressed disappointment or frustration over running out of time after hitting Trump's Aug. 1 deadline for striking deals with America's trading partners.
The new rates are due to take effect on Aug. 7, but uncertainty over what Trump might do next remains. The way ahead for China, which runs the largest trade surplus with the U.S., is unclear after talks earlier this week in Stockholm produced no deal. Trump has yet to say if he'll extend an Aug. 12 pause on painfully high import duties on Chinese products.
The reaction from financial markets was muted. Benchmarks fell in Asia, with South Korea's Kospi dropping nearly 4% after the tariff rate for the U.S. ally was set at 15%. The U.S. dollar weakened against the Japanese yen, trading at more than 150 yen per dollar.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his government was disappointed by Trump's move to raise the U.S. tariff on goods from America's northern neighbor to 35% from 25%, effective Friday. Goods transshipped from unspecified other countries face a 40% import duty.
Trump cited what he said was a lack of cooperation in stemming trafficking in illicit drugs across the northern border. He also slammed Canada's plan to recognize a Palestinian state and has expressed frustration with a trade deficit largely fueled by U.S. oil purchases.
'Canada accounts for only 1% of U.S. fentanyl imports and has been working intensively to further reduce these volumes,' Carney said in a statement.
Many of Canada's exports to the U.S. are covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement and face no tariff. But steel, lumber, aluminum and autos have been subject to still higher tariffs.
Switzerland was reeling after Trump ordered a 39% tariff rate for the land of luxury watches, pharmaceuticals and financial services. That was up from his original proposal of a 31% duty.
'The Federal Council notes with great regret that, despite the progress made in bilateral talks and Switzerland's very constructive stance from the outset, the U.S. intends to impose unilateral additional tariffs on imports from Switzerland,' the government said in a post on X. It said it would continue to seek a negotiated solution.
The surprisingly high rate 'is likely to be negotiated down in future and, importantly, pharmaceutical goods still appear to be exempt for the time being,' said Adrian Prettejohn, Europe economist at Capital Economics. However if the rate remains it would cut Swiss GDP by 0.6% and more if pharmaceuticals are not exempted, he said.
Novartis, the Swiss pharmaceutical giant, said in a statement that it remained 'committed to finding ways to improve access and affordability for patients.' The Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry says it is 'very disappointed and surprised' and added that 'we expect that the Swiss authorities continue to negotiate and find a better solution.' Swiss luxury watch brands — with products that cost tens of thousands of euros and up — are expected to be hit hard by the tariffs.
Swatch and Rolex declined to comment Friday.
New Zealand officials said Friday they would keep lobbying Trump to cut the 15% tariff he announced for their country's exports to the U.S., up from the original 10% baseline set in April.
'We don't think this is a good thing. We don't think it's warranted,' Trade Minister Todd McClay told Radio New Zealand. The exporter of meat, dairy, wine and farm machinery ran a $1.1 billion trade surplus with the U.S. in 2024, according to U.S. Trade Representative data.
McClay said New Zealand exporters had reported they could absorb a 10% tariff or pass it on to U.S. consumers through increased costs. A further increase would 'change the equation,' he said.
Neither New Zealand nor its neighbor Australia have struck tariff deals with the Trump administration. Australian steel and aluminum exports have faced a steep 50% tariff since June.
Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said the 10% overall tariff on Australia's exports to the United States was a vindication of his government's 'cool and calm negotiations.' But he said even that level was not justified. The U.S. exports twice as much to Australia as it imports from its bilateral free trade partner, and Australia imposes no tariffs on U.S. exports.
Objecting to a 15% tariff rate, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre told the newspaper VG the Scandinavian country should have 'zero tariffs.' He said talks were continuing.
Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi was cautious in welcoming Trump's executive order setting Japan's tariff at 15% after the two sides worked out an agreement, much to Tokyo's relief.
'We believe it is necessary to carefully examine the details of the measure,' Hayashi said. 'The Japanese government will continue to urge the U.S. side to promptly implement measures to carry out the recent agreement, including reducing tariffs on automobiles and auto parts.'
Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te said the self-ruled island had yet to engage in final negotiations with the U.S. side owing to scheduling difficulties and that he was hopeful the final tariff rate would be reduced even further after a final round of talks.
The Trump administration lowered its tariff for Taiwan to 20% from the originally proposed 32%. Taiwan is a key supplier of advanced semiconductors needed for many products and technologies.
'20% from the beginning has not been our goal, we hope that in further negotiations we will get a more beneficial and more reasonable tax rate,' Lai told reporters in Taipei Friday.
The U.S. is Taiwan's largest ally even though it does not formally recognize the island. 'We want to strengthen U.S. Taiwan cooperation in national security, tech, and multiple areas,' Lai said.
Cambodia's Deputy Prime Minister Sun Chanthol, who led his nation's trade talks with the United States, thanked Trump for setting the tariff rate on Cambodian goods at 19% and said his country will impose zero tariffs on American goods.
The rate for Cambodia that Trump proposed in April was 49%, one of the highest in the world. He said the U.S. estimated average Cambodian tariffs on U.S. exports at 97%.
Cambodia has agreed to up purchases of U.S. goods. Sun said it would purchase 10 passenger aircraft from Boeing in a deal they hoped to sign later this month. Several other nations had already announced similar aircraft purchase deals as part of their trade packages.
Trump had threatened to withhold trade deals from Cambodia and Thailand if they didn't end an armed conflict over border territory. The two nations agreed on a ceasefire that began Tuesday.
Thailand also is subject to a 19% tariff, a rate that its Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira said 'reflects the strong friendship and close partnership between Thailand and the United States.' That was down from 36% proposed earlier.
'The outcome of this negotiation signals that Thailand must accelerate its adaptation and move forward in building a stable and resilient economy, ready to face global challenges ahead,' he said.
Pakistan welcomed a trade deal that sets a 19% duty on its exports, lower than the initial plan for 29%, saying in a government statement that it was a 'balanced and forward-looking approach' that could boost trade and economic growth.
For Bangladesh, a new 20% tariff warded off an earlier threat of a 35% import duty for the South Asian exporter of garments and other light manufactured goods. 'That's good news for our apparel sector and the millions who depend on it,' said Khalilur Rahman, the country's national security advisor and lead negotiator.
'We've also preserved our global competitiveness and opened up new opportunities to access the world's largest consumer market' Rahman said. 'Protecting our apparel industry was a top priority, but we also focused our purchase commitments on U.S. agricultural products. This supports our food security goals and fosters goodwill with U.S. farming states.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Nebraska U.S. Rep. Mike Flood holds town halls when GOP colleagues don't
Why Nebraska U.S. Rep. Mike Flood holds town halls when GOP colleagues don't

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Nebraska U.S. Rep. Mike Flood holds town halls when GOP colleagues don't

U.S. Rep Mike Flood, R-Neb., speaks during his town hall in Lincoln on Aug 4. 2025. (Juan Salinas II/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — Nebraska Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Flood faced a hostile crowd at a concert hall this week in his district's most Democratic city, Lincoln. Flood's third and final town hall of the year drew national headlines and eyes on social media sites including X, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok for the reception he received. Attendees jeered him as he defended voting for President Donald Trump's budget and tax bill the president calls 'big' and 'beautiful.' Flood was asked how much it cost to be a 'fascist' and faced chants of 'vote him out' and 'tax the rich' throughout the 90-minute affair. The national attention — particularly online, where voters increasingly get their news — might have been the point. Flood is a modern rarity among congressional Republicans, one who faces the electorate without pre-screening the crowd. He is the last among Nebraska's all-GOP delegation to host town halls that way. Dona-Gene Barton, a political science professor who studies political behavior at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, described the town hall as an opportunity for Flood, an attorney and former speaker of the Legislature from Norfolk, to showcase his debate skills. Flood also owns TV and radio news stations, so he is no stranger to a microphone. 'He may be feeling more comfortable having these conversations with constituents that may disagree with him, because he believes that a larger portion of the district is going to support his actions now,' Barton said of Flood. Lancaster County, home to Lincoln, is the second-most populous area in the state, behind only Omaha. Both are heavily Democratic cities that supported former Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election. Lincoln has a Democratic mayor and a Democratic city council. But Flood, as Barton pointed out, won his 2024 re-election bid with 60% of the vote against Carol Blood, which may be why he feels more bullish than other Republicans in the federal delegation. He won Lancaster County that year by nearly 5,600 votes. Flood acknowledged the GOP lean of the rest of the district near the end of the town hall, when he talked directly to viewers of a Nebraska Public Media livestream while getting booed, saying, 'For those of you who [are] watching from home, please know that I'm on your side. I never forget who I'm working for.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Earlier this year, national leaders advised House Republicans, including Flood, to avoid in-person town halls after several members hosting them since Trump's reelection faced public protests and angry constituents. Retiring U.S. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., who represents the Omaha-based 2nd Congressional District, had held town halls for years. He said he switched to telephone town halls because of 'large interest' and because it is more 'civil.' Democrats have argued Bacon feared facing the people he represents. The new format allows his staff to pre-screen callers and cut them off if they go too far. 'Frankly, it's more conversational,' Bacon told reporters in March. 'When you got moms and dads saying we can't bring our kids to a town hall, there's a problem.' Tuesday's event isn't the first of Flood's town halls to go viral this year. Parts of his town hall in Columbus were widely shared online after Flood told attendees that he hadn't read part of the Trump mega bill before passing it. Bacon said in March that Flood likes to do in-person town halls as a way to 'make the far left look bad.' Flood told reporters after his Lincoln town hall that he considers it his 'job to answer their questions,' and it's the 'town square.' 'You have an obligation to stand in the town square, regardless of your comfort level, and answer people's questions,' Flood told the Examiner after the event. 'I believe what I'm doing in Congress is the right thing.' Flood said he understands why other Republicans are holding tele-town halls and other more controlled events, as some communicate better in that format, but in-person events are the 'right thing' for him. 'Thank you for being here, Congressman Flood … I want to ask, why it seems like you make voting decisions based on capital rather than the working class,' an attendee asked during the Q&A part of the town hall. Some national Republican strategists said town halls don't help highlight the positive aspects of Trump's second administration and its signature piece of budget and tax legislation. The reason: News and social media coverage often focuses on the outbursts and congressional reactions to them instead of the cases Republicans are trying to make about the changes. The National Republican Congressional Committee released a memo in late July on how House Republicans can make 'August count' as they try to sell Trump's domestic agenda to constituents. It says they need to sell the strengths of Trump's new law, which much polling indicates is unpopular among Americans. The memo suggests congressional members host more focused events, such as the small business roundtables that GOP U.S. Sens. Pete Ricketts and Deb Fischer often hold, as a way to counter 'Democrats' efforts' with a 'disciplined and compelling communications effort.' Fischer, for example, has an agricultural roundtable planned for Saturday with Trump's Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins in rural Saunders County. 'This is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering,' the memo reads. 'The playbook is simple: Focus on President Trump and House Republicans' efforts to improve voters' everyday lives and show the contrast with out-of-touch Democrats.' Most of the state's federal delegation recently praised the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' during a question-and-answer session with business leaders in Ashland. Nebraska's congressional delegates spoke optimistically about federal policies helping the state's economic future, despite some warning signs that Nebraska's ag industry is struggling. State and national Republican strategists have acknowledged the poor polling of Trump's domestic agenda, but said focusing on specific provisions, such as new temporary tax breaks for workers earning less, could help improve public perception of the law, as they bank on the idea that long-term messaging about the bill could shape the 2026 midterms. Nebraska Democrats also see potential advantages in Flood holding town halls, where activists and regular people can ask questions and frame his answers for social media sharing, which reaches more voters than a typical news story. Some also argue that much of the anger at the town halls is organic. 'Nebraskans, like Americans all across the country, are sending a loud and clear message to Republicans: You voted against us. Now we'll vote you out,' said Nebraska Democratic Party Chair Jane Kleeb in a statement. Flood's Democratic challenger, Eric Moyer, attended the Lincoln town hall and posted on Instagram, 'This isn't going to be a friendly crowd.' Moyer's official campaign kickoff event is next week. National and state Democrats point to the tax and spending bill's unpopularity, but the party has its own problems, as recent polling shows the Democratic Party has a worse approval rating than Trump, whose approval rating remains underwater. Still, Democrats hold a slight lead in the party head-to-head RealClearPolitics polling average for the generic congressional ballot — a poll that basically asks voters which candidate for Congress they would prefer if the choice were between a generic Republican and a generic Democrat. Barton, the UNL political scientist, said only time will tell if the energy from Flood's Lincoln town hall continues and if discontent from the bluest part of Flood's district is widespread. Midterms are over a year away. 'These are unusual political times where you have a Nebraska congressman being called a fascist at his own town hall,' Barton said. Flood responded to the comment during the event, saying, 'Fascists don't hold town halls with open question-and-answer sessions.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

4 chip stocks well positioned for Trump's 100% tariff threat
4 chip stocks well positioned for Trump's 100% tariff threat

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

4 chip stocks well positioned for Trump's 100% tariff threat

President Trump has threatened 100% tariffs on semiconductors except for companies that are building in the US. Bernstein managing director and senior analyst Stacy Rasgon joins Market Domination with Yahoo Finance Markets Reporter Josh Schafer to share the four semiconductor names he believes are well-positioned despite Trump's threats. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination. And, and, and Stacy, I want to broaden this out because I don't think Intel is the only chip company that might be confused by what the president is saying today. The president also saying yesterday that they'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors but then saying that if you're building in the US, or planning to build in the US, then maybe you're exempt. How do you make sense of, of that language? What, what are you getting at? Yeah, it's, it is, it is tough. So like, you know, he made some comments yesterday and that's what we have to go on. Um, you know, this is all part of what's, what was called a 232 investigation, um, in, into semiconductors and, and other things. And we actually haven't seen the report from the 232 investigators. So once we see that, I think we can start to be a little more, you know, prescriptive about what the actual impacts are, will be. Like right now, we're just trying to decipher his comments and, and, look, this is Trump, you know, he makes comments all the time and sometimes they lack detail and, and nuance, right? Um, and so we, we, we don't actually know like what it means. Um, you know, what he did say, you're right, he said there's going to be a hundred percent tariffs on semis, but if you're building here in the US then you'll be exempt. And there's a bunch of stuff in, but there's questions, what does building in the US mean? How much do you have to build? Like what's the timeframe? You know, is it, is it, is he talking about semiconductors? Is he talking about the end devices? Will there be tariffs on just raw semiconductors coming into the US, which is actually not that much? We don't import that much. Or is it tariffs on semiconductors in devices? You know, can customers still use, you know, TSMC manufacturing capacity in Taiwan with no tariff because TSMC is building a lot in the US? Like, I, I don't know. I don't know exactly how to, to parse this yet. Um, we will have to wait until we, we, we see, uh, the actual report. I think though, the reason the stocks are up is it does look like there, there will be some loopholes or some reprieves from this, the blind hundred percent tariffs. And, you know, there are semiconductor companies and other, like tech companies that are investing a lot in the US and trying to build here. And so I think there's a perception, which hopefully it's, at least there's some, some truth to it that, um, there will be some reprieve from this. We, we won't know for sure, we won't be able to really, um, be specific about it until we actually see what is, what is going on, uh, when they actually file the, the regulations. And, so, I, I know this then makes the, the final question sort of hard to answer, right? But as an investor in the space, is there a winner or loser from sort of what we've just laid out or who's kind of best positioned then given that? I mean, like the knee jerk reaction, you, you'll say, look, companies, at least on the semiconductor side, companies that are actually actively building here, presumably would be, you know, perceived as, as relative winners. I mean, you've got companies like Texas Instruments, for example, who are building a significant amount of capacity in the US. That is their plan and they've been delivering on it and, and there's more to come. You have companies like, like Nvidia. Like Nvidia doesn't build chips, like they're, they're fabless, they outsource manufacturing, but they're investing a lot of money in the AI supply chain, at least they're giving headlines so you, you have that. Um, I mean, you've got fabless companies like, like AMD or, or, or Qualcomm or whatever that actually can use in, in, at TSMC in Arizona. And, you know, there is a read of the comments that suggests maybe they could continue to use the Taiwan stuff tariff free, like, we, we don't know yet, but like, maybe. Um, you've got the semi caps. Like again, if we have to build more capacity here in the US at the margin, that's probably incrementally positive for the US semi cap players. Um, so those are the kinds of like knee jerk reactions that I mean in some sense are probably going on today. Um, and again, we'll know more like when we get more specifics. Related Videos Two things this top strategist is watching now US Surprises Gold Bullion Market With Gold Bar Import Tariff Kalyan Jewellers ED on Business Expansion Modi Weighs Options As US Ties Sour Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

College endowment tax is leading to hiring freezes and could mean cuts in financial aid
College endowment tax is leading to hiring freezes and could mean cuts in financial aid

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

College endowment tax is leading to hiring freezes and could mean cuts in financial aid

A big increase in the tax on university endowments is adding to financial uncertainty for the wealthiest colleges in the U.S., leading several already to lay off staff or implement hiring freezes. Spending more endowment money on taxes could also lead colleges to reduce financial aid, cutting off access to elite institutions for lower-income students, colleges and industry experts have warned. President Donald Trump signed the tax increase into law last month as part of his signature spending bill. The new tax rates take effect in 2026, but colleges such as Harvard, Yale and Stanford already are citing the tax as one of many reasons for making cuts across their universities. Each will be on the hook to pay hundreds of millions more in taxes, while also navigating reductions in research grants and other threats to funding by the Trump administration. A tax on college endowments was introduced during Trump's first administration, collecting 1.4% of wealthy universities' investment earnings. The law signed by Trump last month creates a new tiered system that taxes the richest schools at the highest rates. The new tax will charge an 8% rate at schools with $2 million or more in assets for each enrolled student. Schools with $750,000 to $2 million will be charged 4%, and schools with $500,000 to $750,000 will continue to be charged the 1.4% rate. The tax applies only to private colleges and universities with at least 3,000 students, up from the previous cutoff of 500 students. 'The tax now will really solely apply to private research universities,' said Steven Bloom, assistant vice president of government relations for the American Council on Education. 'It's going to mean that these schools are going to have to spend more money under the tax, taking it away from what they primarily use their endowment assets for — financial aid.' This small group of wealthy colleges faces a tax increase The law will increase the endowment tax for about a dozen universities, according to an Associated Press analysis of data from the National Association of College and University Business Officers. Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Princeton and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are expected to pay the 8% rate next year. The schools facing the 4% rate include Notre Dame, Dartmouth College, Rice University, University of Pennsylvania, Washington University in St. Louis and Vanderbilt University. Some universities are on the edge of the law's parameters. Both Duke and Emory, for instance, were shy of the $750,000-per-student endowment threshold based on last fiscal year. Endowments are made up of donations to the college, which are invested to maintain the money over time. Colleges often spend about 5% of their investment earnings every year to put toward their budgets. Much of it goes toward scholarships for students, along with costs such as research or endowed faculty positions. Despite the colleges' wealth, the tax will drastically impact their budgets, said Phillip Levine, an economist and professor at Wellesley College. 'They're looking for savings wherever possible,' Levine said, which could impact financial aid. 'One of the most important things they do with their endowment is lower the cost of education for lower- and middle-income students. The institutions paying the highest tax are also the ones charging these students the least amount of money to attend.' For example, at Rice University in Houston, officials anticipate the college will need to pay $6.4 million more in taxes. That equates to more than 100 student financial aid packages, the university said, but Rice officials will explore all other options to avoid cutting that support. How colleges are adjusting to financial pressures In the meantime, some universities are going forward with staff cuts. Yale University says it will have to pay an estimated $280 million in total endowment taxes, citing the tax in a campus message implementing a hiring freeze. Stanford University announced plans to reduce its operating budget by $140 million this upcoming school year, which included 363 layoffs and an ongoing hiring freeze. The university spent months trying to determine where to reduce its budget, but said it would continue to support undergraduate financial aid and funding for Ph.D. students. Research universities are under increasing financial pressure from reductions in funding from the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation and other federal agencies. No university knows this pressure better than Harvard, the country's wealthiest college. Its $53 billion endowment puts it at the top of the list for the new tax, but it's also seeing massive portions of research funding under threat in its ongoing battle with the White House. The federal government has frozen $2.6 billion in Harvard's research grants in connection with civil rights investigations focused on antisemitism and Harvard's efforts to promote diversity on campus. But the impact of other administration policies on the university could approach $1 billion annually, Harvard said in a statement. 'It's not like Harvard is going to go from one of the best institutions in the world to just a mediocre institution. That's probably not going to happen," Levine said. 'But that doesn't mean it's not going to be a bad thing — that there won't be pain and that students won't suffer.' ___ Mumphrey reported from Phoenix. Associated Press writer Sharon Lurye in Philadelphia contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Cheyanne Mumphrey, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store