Trump Says Fell Out With Epstein Because He Was Taking Mar-a-Lago Spa Staff
The White House has said previously that Trump threw Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club two decades ago "for being a creep" and US media has reported that they became estranged over a Florida real estate deal.
Speaking to reporters on Air Force One while flying home from Scotland, Trump gave some of his most expansive public comments yet about his falling out with Epstein, the wealthy and well-connected financier who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking underage girls.
"People were taken out of the (Mar-a-Lago) spa, hired by him, in other words gone," Trump said. "When I heard about it, I told him, I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people.'
"And then not too long after that, he did it again. And I said, 'Out of here.'"
Trump also confirmed that one of the Mar-a-Lago spa attendants taken by his longtime friend Epstein was Virginia Giuffre, who brought a civil case against Epstein friend Prince Andrew, accusing him of sexually assaulting her when she was 17.
Giuffre, who accused Epstein of using her as a sex slave, committed suicide at her home in Australia in April.
"I think she worked at the spa," Trump said. "I think that was one of the people. He stole her."
Before taking office in January, Trump promised to release more information about Epstein, who right-wing conspiracy theorists allege trafficked young girls for VIPs.
Trump infuriated some of supporters, however, when the FBI and Justice Department announced in early July that they had not discovered any new elements warranting the release of additional information about Epstein.
Scrutiny has been intensifying ever since on Trump's own relationship with Epstein.
Seeking to tamp down the furor, the Justice Department has sought the release of grand jury transcripts from the investigation into Epstein and interviewed Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's imprisoned accomplice, last week.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche -- who is also Trump's former personal attorney -- met with Maxwell over two days but declined to say what was discussed in the highly unusual meetings between a convicted felon and a top Justice Department official.
Maxwell, 63, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted in 2021 of recruiting underage girls for Epstein, offered meanwhile to testify before a House of Representatives committee but only if granted immunity.
Maxwell's lawyers, in a letter to the House committee which has subpoenaed her to testify next month, said she would be prepared to do so "if a fair and safe path forward can be established."
"If Ms Maxwell were to receive clemency, she would be willing -- and eager -- to testify openly and honestly, in public," they said.
Without clemency, the former British socialite would only testify if granted immunity.
"Ms Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity," her lawyers said.
Maxwell would also need to see potential questions in advance and would not agree to be interviewed at the Florida prison where she is being held, they said.
Finally, her lawyers said, any testimony could only come after the Supreme Court decides whether or not to hear Maxwell's appeal seeking to have her conviction overturned.
They said that if the conditions could not be met Maxwell would invoke her Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
35 minutes ago
- DW
How Trump's high tariffs against Brazil could backfire – DW – 08/01/2025
Brazil will pay as much as 50% tariffs on goods exported to the United States. But experts say the tariffs, along with sanctions on a Brazilian judge, indicate this isn't about economics but about Trump's politics. The newly announced tariffs by the US government on Brazilian imports, as well as Washington's move to sanction Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes "for serious human rights abuse," has caused a strong reaction in Brazil. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has condemned American interference in the Brazilian legal system, calling it "unacceptable." The political motivation behind these measures undermines Brazil's sovereignty and threatens the relationship between the two countries, Lula said. From August 6, the US will impose tariffs of 50% on Brazilian imports into America. Somewhat surprisingly, around 700 Brazilian products were exempted. But experts have said this still puts the average tariff on Brazilian goods at around 30%. The European Union and Japan are only paying 15% tariffs. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The US government, under President Donald Trump, has justified its new global tariffs by blaming a bilateral trade imbalance. The Trump administration has also given the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro as an explanation for the punitive tariffs. Judge de Moraes is presiding over the trial of Bolsonaro, who is accused of masterminding a plot to stay in power despite his 2022 election defeat. The personal sanctions on de Moraes come under the US' Magnitsky Act, which allows the American government to sanction foreign government officials worldwide for human rights offenses. Among other things, de Moraes could see any assets he has in the US frozen. The US government had already prevented de Moraes and other Brazilian Supreme Court judges from entering the country. "The Magnitsky Act was previously used against the US' enemies but it always used to have a basis in human rights," said Demetrio Magnoli, a sociologist and foreign affairs columnist in Brazil. "But by using it for the first time against a judge in a democracy, Trump is shattering the human rights foundations of this law." As for the high tariffs, Magnoli told DW it's not unusual for Trump to use tariffs as a weapon in his trade war and deal-making. "But in the case of Brazil, he is using both tariffs and the Magnitsky Act for political and ideological reasons," the commentator noted. "A unique case worldwide and a direct attack on a democratic country and a US ally." Judge de Moraes has been seen as a nuisance by American right wingers since he ordered social media platform, X (formerly Twitter) blocked for several weeks in late 2024. De Moraes demanded that user accounts that violated Brazilian law be removed, part of an attempt to crack down on anti-democratic, far-right voices. Billionaire Elon Musk, the owner of X, tried to get around the court-ordered block and called for de Moraes to be impeached. But de Moraes actually became a target for Trump earlier than that, because of Bolsonaro. In late 2022, the former president was accused of planning a coup against his successor, Lula, something that could carry a sentence of up to 40 years in prison. Bolsonaro and his co-defendants have disputed this charge, and Trump has described it as "a witch hunt." De Moraes has also investigated Bolsonaro for, among other things, manufacturing disinformation and has convicted Bolsonaro's supporters for storming the government district in Brasilia in January 2023. As a result, the judge has been celebrated as a defender of democracy in Brazil, particularly by those on the left. But perhaps because of the parallels to Trump's own past — his supporters also stormed government buildings in January 2021, and Trump previously insisted the 2020 election was "stolen" from him — de Moraes' actions have been like a red rag to Brazil's bullish right wingers, and now also to Trump supporters. However, Guilherme Casaroes, a professor at the Sao Paulo School of Business Administration at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, sees a bright side. The fact that, contrary to his initial announcement two weeks ago, Trump is allowing numerous tariff exemptions means that Brazil did well in negotiations with the US, he said. "But it also clearly shows that Trump's motivation is not so much commercial and more political," said Casaroes. "Especially because Brazil actually has a trade deficit with the US." The expert believes there are three key factors influencing Trump's attack on Brazil. Firstly, the country's closer ties with China, which makes Brazil a battleground in the geopolitical conflict between the US and China. Secondly, this fight is ideological: Trump wants to be seen supporting his allies around the world. That includes Bolsonaro. And thirdly, the economic interests of US tech giants: "They don't want social media regulation," said Casaroes. In Brazil, Trump's onslaught has triggered Brazilian nationalism, especially on social media. That's fair, said sociologist and political commentator Celso Rocha de Barros. He described what he calls the "American intervention against the Brazilian Supreme Court" as "unacceptable imperialist aggression" and insisted that in the future, Brazil must "negotiate economic agreements without giving an inch on democratic and political issues." Rocha de Barros believes de Moraes is actually looking stronger after this episode. Even Supreme Court justices who felt more favorably about Bolsonaro don't want to be giving anybody the impression that they support foreign intervention in their own court, he said. But Demetrio Magnoli believes the US' attacks on de Moraes could actually find favor with parts of the Brazilian population. Many locals are unhappy with their Supreme Court, he pointed out. This is partially because what some think are the judges' too-high salaries, but it's also because of the high penalties meted out to what Magnoli called "the useful idiots of the Bolsonaro camp," those who participated in the January 2023 rioting. Some Brazilians also believe de Moraes became too powerful during the trial against Bolsonaro. In other ways, Trump's attacks actually offers the Brazilian president an opportunity. Lula is polling badly, but if he manages to convince the Brazilian parliament to help an economy badly hit by Trump's tariffs, he might become more popular again. And that would be the opposite of what the US leader was hoping for, Magnoli said.
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Ukraine updates: Trump deploys nuclear subs near Russia – DW – 08/01/2025
President Donald Trump said he ordered two nuclear submarines near Russia after what he called "foolish and inflammatory" statements from a former Russian president. DW has more Russia has intensified its attacks on Ukraine, even as US President Donald Trump threatens tougher sanctions unless President Vladimir Putin agrees to a ceasefire in the coming days. A day of mourning was being held in Ukraine's capital on Friday a day after Russia launched waves of missiles and drones on Kyiv, killing 31 people and wounding over 150 others., On Thursday, Trump slammed Russia's military actions in Ukraine as "disgusting." He has given Putin until August 8 to reach a ceasefire or face President Donald Trump said Friday that he had ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines in response to "provocative" comments by a senior Russian official. "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev... I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances," he added. Trump's comments continue an ongoing war of words on social media between the US president and Russian former President Medvedev. Medvedev served as Russian president from 2008 to 2012, between President Vladimir Putin's terms in power, and is now deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video He attracted Trump's ire when he said the US president's threat to impose tariffs on buyers of Russian oil, such as India, constituted an "ultimatum game" whereby "each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war" between Moscow and Washington. On Thursday, Medvedev wrote in a post on Telegram that, "if some words from the former president of Russia trigger such a nervous reaction from the high-and-mighty president of the United States, then Russia is doing everything right and will continue to proceed along its own path." He also said Trump should remember "how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be" — a reference to a secretive, semi-automated, Soviet-era command system designed to launch Moscow's nuclear missiles in the event of its leadership being eliminated. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reiterated on Friday his willingness to sit down with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. Zelenskyy was reacting to the Russian president's statements on Friday that Moscow hoped for more peace talks with Ukraine. Zelenskyy said Ukraine wants to "move beyond" statements and lower-level meetings on the matter. "If these are signals of a genuine willingness to end the war with dignity and establish a truly lasting Ukraine once again reaffirms its readiness to meet at the level of leaders at any time," he wrote on social media. Earlier, Putin said the momentum of the war was in Russia's favor, signaling no shift in his stance despite a looming sanctions deadline from the United States. US President Trump said he would impose sanctions on Russia unless it stopped the war by August 8. "We need a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries," Putin told reporters, adding: "The conditions (from the Russian side) certainly remain the same." Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that he hopes peace talks between Russia and Ukraine will continue. He said talks should be conducted "without cameras and in a calm atmosphere." He mentioned that working groups could discuss possible compromises. However, he made it clear that Moscow's goals have not changed. At the same time, Putin said Russian troops were attacking Ukraine along the entire front line and that the momentum was in their favor. He cited his Defence Ministry's statement that it had captured the town of Chasiv Yar in eastern Ukraine after nearly 16 months of fighting. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Thursday dismissed Russian claims of capturing Chasiv Yar as "disinformation." "Ukrainian units are holding our positions," Zelenskyy said in his daily video address on Thursday evening. "It is not easy, but it is the defense of Ukrainians' very right to life." European Union foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas said tougher sanctions on Russia are the fastest way to end the war in Ukraine. She also said Kyiv needs more weapons. "Getting more air defenses to Ukraine fast is our priority," she said after a deadly Russian attack on Kyiv. She described the Russian attacks as "depraved" and posted a photo of the bloc's flag at half-staff. The United States welcomed over 180,000 Ukrainians fleeing war under a program started by the previous Joe Biden administration. With Donald Trump back in office, the program has been suspended, and Ukrainians are quietly being pressured to leave. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany will deliver two Patriot systems to Ukraine after reaching an agreement with the United States, the Bundeswehr said. In return, Germany has agreed with the US Defense Department that it will be the first country to receive expedited delivery of new-generation Patriot systems. The Patriot is one of the world's most advanced air defense systems, capable of intercepting aircraft and missiles. Germany had delivered three Patriot systems to Ukraine earlier in the war. Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said the announcement "shows once again that Germany is by far Ukraine's strongest supporter when it comes to air defense." The two launchers will head to Ukraine in the coming days, followed by additional system components to be handed over in two to three months. Patriot systems are fully mobile batteries that include a command center, a radar station to detect incoming threats, and launchers. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described India's continued oil imports from Russia as a "point of irritation" for Washington. Speaking to Fox News Radio, Rubio said, "Unfortunately, that is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India, not the only point of irritation." US President Trump has signed an order imposing new tariffs set to take effect August 7, including 25% duties on goods from India. He also added penalties due to India's reliance on Russia for oil and military equipment. India has faced pressure from Western countries, including the United States, to reduce its ties with Russia since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. New Delhi has resisted, citing its longstanding relationship with Russia, through the BRICS alliance and bilaterally, and its economic needs. Russia used over 3,800 drones and nearly 260 missiles for its attacks on Ukraine in July, according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In a post on social media, he urged "increased pressure on Moscow and additional sanctions." "They must target everything that enables such attacks to continue," he wrote in the wake of a deadly attack on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv. Zelenskyy added that the Russian attacks can only be stopped through joint efforts by the US, Europe, and other global actors. US President Donald Trump criticized the latest Russian missile and drone attack on Ukraine, suggesting that new sanctions against Moscow were coming. "Russia, I think it's disgusting what they're doing," Trump told journalists as he took questions after an executive order signing at the White House. Trump, who initially gave Russia 50 days to reach a ceasefire with Ukraine or face tariffs, shortened the deadline to "10 or 12 days" on Monday and said Tuesday the countdown was now at 10 days. On Thursday, he said, "I don't know that sanctions bother him," referring his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. White House envoy Steve Witkoff was expected to travel to Russia, but it was not clear if he would meet with Putin. The death toll from Russian missile and drone strikes on Kyiv on Thursday has risen to 31, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Friday. The toll was revised upward after rescuers recovered more bodies, including a two-year-old child from a residential building in the Sviatoshynsky district. "Once again, this vile strike by Russia demonstrates the need for increased pressure on Moscow and additional sanctions," Zelenskyy wrote on social media. "No matter how much the Kremlin denies their effectiveness, sanctions do work – and they must be strengthened. They must target everything that enables such attacks to continue." The mayor of the Ukrainian capital, Vitali Klitschko, said more than 150 people had been injured, including 16 children. Klitschko said it was the highest number of children wounded in a single night since Russia's full-scale invasion began. Russia's Defense Ministry said it had targeted Ukrainian military airfields and ammunition depots linked to Kyiv's military-industrial complex. However, officials reported that schools and hospitals were damaged in 27 locations across the city. City authorities have declared Friday a day of mourning. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Kyiv is observing a day of mourning following Thursday's deadly bombardment, one of the worst attacks since Russia launched its full-scale offensive in February 2022. In this blog, we'll take a closer look at the geopolitical fallout. US President Donald Trump's patience with Russian President Vladimir Putin appears to be wearing thin. Over the past few days, Trump has repeatedly shortened the deadline to impose sanctions on Russia over its actions in Ukraine. His envoy, Steve Witkoff, is expected to travel to Russia after his current stop in Israel. The outcome of the trip could be telling.
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Musk's X Accuses Britain Of Online Safety 'Overreach'
Elon Musk-owned social network X on Friday accused Britain's government of "overreach" with a new law designed to protect children from harmful online content such as pornography. The Online Safety Act's "laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach," X said in a post to its Global Government Affairs account. "A plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression," it added, arguing that the impact "shows what happens when oversight becomes overreach". Beyond the law, X criticised a separate new code of conduct for online platforms as "parallel and duplicative" as well questioning the free-speech impact of a new police unit tasked with monitoring social media. The social network nevertheless last week introduced formal systems for age verification in response to the British law as well as new rules in Ireland and the wider European Union. Its options range from estimating the age of a user based on the date their account was created or their email address, to requesting a selfie whose age would be determined by artificial intelligence, or uploading an official ID document. Media regulator Ofcom says such age checks -- required since July 25 -- must be "technically accurate, robust, reliable and fair". Platforms failing to comply risk fines of up to 18 million pounds ($24 million) or 10 percent of their global revenue -- whichever is larger. Serious infringers could be blocked from British territory. The fight over age verification to access sensitive content in Britain echoes months of debate in France over new rules requiring pornography sites to verify users' ages -- a step also required by many US states. While hailed by child safety campaigners, opponents say such requirements risk compromising legitimate users' privacy -- or even exposing them to scams such as identity theft if the personal details used to verify their age were to be hacked. Many people resort to virtual private networks (VPNs) to get around territorial restrictions on access to online content. The most popular free apps on Apple's UK download store since last week have been VPNs, with one, Proton, reporting earlier this week a 1,800 percent rise in downloads, according to British media.
