&w=3840&q=100)
Is Trump setting up a surveillance database on Americans?
The Trump administration has already pursued access to extensive data points on citizens and others, including bank account numbers, student debt amounts, medical claims, and disability status read more
US President Donald Trump might be on the way to creating a master database on every single American, giving him 'untold surveillance power.' According to reports in US media, the US administration's work with Palantir Technologies Inc to gather data of American citizens from several federal agencies has raised concerns over privacy and potential misuse.
Trump in March passed an executive order to implement federal data sharing. That order is now being enforced by the US administration with support from Palantir. A New York Times report revealed Friday that several federal agencies have already started using the Palantir platform, including the Department of Health and Human Services as well as the Social Security Administration.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Moreover, there are speculations that the Internal Revenue Service might also launch talks with Palantir over potential onboarding. Now, the US government can easily compile date from all these different federal agencies into one mega database.
The idea of creating detailed profiles of Americans using government data is not far-fetched.
The Trump administration has already pursued access to extensive data points on citizens and others, including bank account numbers, student debt amounts, medical claims, and disability status from government databases.
In its justification, the US administration says it's looking to 'eliminate information silos and streamline data collection across all agencies to increase government efficiency and save hard-earned taxpayer dollars.'
More about Palantir
In recent years, Palantir has emerged as a top data and analytics firm.
While it serves corporate clients, its most notable and controversial work is with the US government, particularly the military and intelligence agencies, as well as foreign governments.
Founded in the early 2000s by right-wing billionaire Peter Thiel, along with venture capitalists and entrepreneurs Joe Lonsdale, Stephen Cohen, and Alex Karp—who is currently CEO—Palantir has become a key player in this space.
However, the firm is being labelled as 'controversial' in US media. It has been notorious for being highly secretive about its data mining and surveillance work.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump sends military force to LA over immigration protests
US President Donald Trump ordered National Guard troops to Los Angeles, a rare deployment expected Sunday against the state governor's wishes after sometimes-violent protests against immigration enforcement raids. Trump took federal control of California's state military to push soldiers into the country's second-biggest city, a decision deemed "purposefully inflammatory" by California Governor Gavin Newsom and of a kind not seen for decades according to US media. The development came after two days of confrontations during which federal agents fired flash-bang grenades and tear gas toward crowds angry at the arrests of dozens of migrants in a city with a large Latino population. "It's up to us to stand up for our people," said a Los Angeles resident whose parents are immigrants, declining to give her name. "Whether we get hurt, whether they gas us, whatever they're throwing at us. They're never going to stop us. All we have left is our voice," she told AFP as emergency services lights flashed in the distance. An AFP photographer saw fires and fireworks light up the streets during clashes, while a protester holding a Mexican flag stood in front of a burnt-out car that had been sprayed with a slogan against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. "President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, blaming what she called California's "feckless" Democratic leaders. "The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs." Trump congratulated the National Guard for "a job well done" shortly before midnight on Saturday in a post on Truth Social. However, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said on social media platform X the troops had not yet been deployed, while AFP journalists have so far not seen them on the ground. Trump took a swipe at Bass and Newsom, saying in his post they were "unable to handle the task," drawing a comparison with deadly fires that hit the city in January. The National Guard a reserve military is frequently used in natural disasters, such as in the aftermath of the LA fires, and occasionally in instances of civil unrest, but almost always with the consent of local politicians. California's governor objected to the president's decision, saying it was "purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions." Federal authorities "want a spectacle. Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully," Newsom said on X. Trump's Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to involve nearby regular military forces. "If violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized they are on high alert," he wrote on social media. Law professor Jessica Levinson said Hegseth's intervention appeared symbolic because of the general legal restriction on the use of the US military as a domestic policing force in the absence of an insurrection. "The National Guard will be able to do more than provide logistical personnel support," she said. Trump has delivered on a promise to crack down hard on the entry and presence of undocumented migrants who he has likened to "monsters" and "animals" since taking office in January. The Department for Homeland Security said ICE operations in Los Angeles this week had resulted in the arrest of "118 aliens, including five gang members." Saturday's standoff took place in the suburb of Paramount, where demonstrators converged on a reported federal facility that the local mayor said was being used as a staging post by agents. Masked and armed immigration agents carried out high-profile workplace raids in separate parts of Los Angeles on Friday, attracting angry crowds and setting off hours-long standoffs. Fernando Delgado, a 24-year-old resident, said the raids were "injustices" and those detained were "human beings just like any." "We're Spanish, we help the community, we help by doing the labor that people don't want to do," he told AFP. Mayor Bass acknowledged that some city residents were "feeling fear" following the federal immigration enforcement actions. "Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable," she said on X. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said multiple arrests had been made following Friday's clashes. "Law and order will prevail," he said on X. hg/mtp/tc/rsc/pbt IntercontinentalExchange
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
This 30-year-old billionaire still shops at Shein, drives old Honda: ‘I don't like wasting money'
At 30, Lucy Guo has dethroned Taylor Swift as the world's youngest self-made billionaire. Despite her staggering net worth – Forbes estimates it to be $1.3 billion – this 30-year-old college dropout does not believe in wasting money. In fact, Lucy tells Fortune that her wardrobe is dominated by free clothes or fast fashion - barring the odd designer dress. She still drives a Honda Civic and flies commercial. 'I don't like wasting money,' the 30-year-old told Fortune. Lucy Guo is an American social media influencer and co-founder of Scale AI. She founded the company in 2016 and was fired two years later following a disagreement with co-founder and CEO Alexandr Wang. Lucy was just 21 when she launched the AI startup. A computer science student at Carnegie Mellon, she had dropped out of college and interned with Facebook before she built Scale AI. Despite being fired, Guo retained an estimated 5% stake in Scale AI. It is this stake that gives her her status as the world's youngest self-made billionaire at age 30. 'Everything I wear is free or from Shein,' Guo, now the founder of OnlyFans competitor Passes, told Fortune. 'Some of them aren't going to be that great quality, but there's always like two pieces or so that really work out, and I just wear them every day,' she added. Her thriftiness does not end at clothes - this Miami and Los Angeles-based billionaire still drives an old Honda Civic and doesn't believe in private jets. If it's a long flight, Guo does splurge on a business class ticket. 'I still literally buy buy-one-get-one-free on Uber Eats… in terms of like daily life, my assistant just drives me in a pretty old Honda Civic. I don't care,' she says. 'Who you see typically wasting money on, designer clothes, a nice car, et cetera, they're technically in the millionaire range,' Guo explains. 'All their friends are multimillionaires, or billionaires and they feel a little bit insecure, so they feel the need to be flashy to show other people, 'look, I'm successful.''
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Chhattisgarh high court declines to intervene in tata projects and CHiPS bank guarantee dispute
RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh high court disposed of a writ petition filed by Tata Projects Limited, directing the company to seek remedy before the Commercial Court. The petition concerned the encashment of a performance bank guarantee of Rs 167.46 crore by the Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society (CHiPS), the nodal agency for driving IT growth and implementing IT and e-Governance initiatives in the state. A division bench of Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas and Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad heard the petition filed by Tata Projects. The company sought restoration of the status quo ante, asking for the return of the Rs 167.46 crore to State Bank of India and the issuance of an identical bank guarantee. Alternatively, Tata Projects requested CHiPS to deposit the amount in an interest-bearing account until the dispute's resolution. According to court records, CHiPS issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the selection of a Master System Integrator (MSI) for the BharatNet Phase-II Project in Chhattisgarh. A dispute arose between Tata Projects and CHiPS during the commercial contract. Previously, Tata Projects filed a writ petition, in which a single bench of the high court on 2 July 2024, granted interim protection, restraining respondents from encashing the performance bank guarantee. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo This writ petition was later disposed of on 30 April 2025, with the court re-delegating the parties to approach the Commercial Court. Subsequently, Tata Projects filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Commercial Court, on 3 May 2025, ordered an interim status quo regarding the invocation of the bank guarantee. However, after the respondents filed their reply, the Commercial Court disposed of the application on 6 May 2025, vacating the status quo order. The initiation of the bank guarantee encashment process led Tata Projects to approach the highcourt. Senior Counsel Kishore Bhaduri, appearing for Tata Projects, argued that CHiPS's conduct was fraudulent and high-handed, misleading the court and misusing its power by attempting to invoke the bank guarantee. Counsel for the respondents and the state argued that the writ petition was not maintainable, as Tata Projects had remedies available under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, or under the Chhattisgarh Madhyashtham Adhikaran Act, 1983. The high court observed that an arbitration clause existed in the agreement and that Tata Projects already approached the Commercial Court. The court ruled that the writ petition was not maintainable at this juncture. However, it granted Tata Projects the liberty to pursue statutory remedies before the Commercial Court. The court also clarified that the respondents were free to raise objections regarding the maintainability of any application. The high court directed the Commercial Court to consider and decide any interim application or application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the petitioner expeditiously and in accordance with the law. The high court also made it clear that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the case, leaving it to the Commercial Court to decide independently.
