logo
Small colleges pursue endowment tax carveouts

Small colleges pursue endowment tax carveouts

Politicoa day ago

Presented by National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities
THE TAXMAN COMETH — The country's small, private liberal arts colleges are speaking out about what they want from the Senate's anticipated take on a revised college endowment tax.
— College presidents, particularly those in states whose lawmakers work on the Senate's finance committee, of course would rather have Congress make no changes to the existing 1.4 percent tax on university investment income first adopted to finance President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts.
— Another idea floated by a coalition of 24 small colleges in 17 states: Spare schools that enroll fewer students.
— 'Have a different tax rate for schools under 5,000 students,' Anne Harris, the president of Grinnell College in Iowa, told your host of the coalition's proposals. 'That gets you to make that bright line of distinction between the financial model of a large research institution and the financial model of a small, liberal arts college.'
— More complex proposals would be based on the percentage of annual school endowment distributions devoted to student financial aid — insulating schools that use more of their endowments on student aid from higher tax rates. Institutions have also proposed an exemption for schools with a religious affiliation.
— Such ideas could also base endowment tax rates on the number of students who pay full tuition and favor schools with high proportions of students who are eligible for Pell Grants. The Wall Street Journal reported some of the country's wealthiest schools are also supporting a requirement to distribute 5 percent of their endowments' value annually.
— 'The most fundamental perspective we're trying to offer is that the endowment tax is a burden on students,' said Douglas Hicks, the president of Davidson College in North Carolina. 'So, our first position is to not increase the endowment tax for anyone.'
— Hicks added: 'Schools that are meeting those goals of affordability, low indebtedness, high achievement, and high graduation rates should receive breaks from this tax.'
— The small schools are working with the OGR government relations firm, which was hired by the American Council on Education to lobby on endowment tax issues and is serving as a coordinator for the individual work of the coalition's members. Some schools have also hired their own lobbyists, including Davidson College, which is working with Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck.
— 'This is a coalition that's nationwide, that's being represented by both Democratic and Republican senators and Congress folks — and who have very different communities that they're operating within,' said Harris, who said she has spoken with Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) about the issue.
— Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) and other senators are pushing to reduce the proposed tax hike on university endowment earnings included in the Republican megabill, POLITICO's Brian Faler reported Thursday. Lankford declined to discuss details, saying 'we don't have consensus,' though he expressed confidence they would reach an agreement.
IT'S MONDAY, JUNE 9. WELCOME TO WEEKLY EDUCATION. Russ Vought, the two-time director of the Office of Management and Budget, is just hitting his stride as his agenda to fundamentally remake government from the ground up remains in high gear.
Reach out with tips to today's host at jperez@politico.com and also my colleagues Becca Carballo (rcarballo@politico.com), Bianca Quilantan (bquilantan@politico.com) and Mackenzie Wilkes (mwilkes@politico.com).
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
Higher Education
CAUGHT IN A VISE — President Donald Trump's campaign against two of the planet's best-known universities is laying bare just how unprepared academia was to confront a hostile White House.
— Schools never imagined facing an administration so willing to exercise government power so quickly — targeting the research funding, tax-exempt status, foreign student enrollment and financial aid eligibility schools need to function.
— 'Perhaps it's a failure of imagination on the part of universities,' Lee Bollinger, the former president of Columbia University, told your host. 'It feels now like there has been a naïveté on the part of universities. There's been no planning for this kind of thing.'
— That leaves schools right where the president wants them.
— Even as Ivy League schools, research institutions, and college trade associations try to resist Trump's attacks in court, campus leaders are starting to accept they face only difficult choices: negotiate with the government, mount a painful legal and political fight, or simply try to stay out of sight.
— 'Every school has had an option to correct course and work with the administration, or stand firm in their violations of the law,' a senior White House official told your host. 'They have an option, they know very well what to do.'
— The real question, according to Bollinger, is how far the White House will go and how much resistance the schools are willing to put up.
— 'The power of government is so immense that if they want to destroy institutions, they can,' he said. 'What you do in that kind of environment is you stand on principle.'
NCAA
NEW ERA, OLD PROBLEMS — Welcome to the new, professionalized era of college sports.
— U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken gave her final approval on Friday to a landmark legal settlement on college athlete pay that will rewrite the rules of the industry — and open a new period of congressional lobbying and litigation.
— Athletic leaders will address the media today to discuss a newly-established College Sports Commission — an organization led by a longtime Major League Baseball executive — that will be responsible for implementing the settlement's terms on player revenue sharing, endorsement deals, and roster limits. Schools are racing to meet a set of looming deadlines needed to implement the deal in time for the coming academic term.
— But again: The transformative settlement does not grant college overseers their desired protection from antitrust laws, nor does it ban classifying athletes as employees, or stop conflicting state laws. Expect more pressure from schools on Congress in the weeks ahead, NCAA President Charlie Baker said Friday.
— 'The NCAA and college sports leaders have made tremendous, positive change in recent years, but only Congress can address these issues,' Baker said in a letter to schools.
— A House commerce subcommittee is scheduled to hold a hearing Thursday to discuss the latest conservative-led legislative proposal for the industry.
Education Department
BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO — The Education Department is trying to determine if employees it decided to terminate have accepted other jobs in recent weeks.
— The agency is setting out plans to 'reintegrate' workers cut during a massive reduction in force that sparked a federal court injunction that the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court on Friday.
— Employees who were placed on administrative leave in March will not be formally separated from the department as planned this week, according to an email to workers sent Friday by the department's top human resources officer, your host reports.
— Part of the plan also includes finding out how many employees are left to bring back to work.
— The agency asked affected employees to voluntarily disclose any 'current outside employment or offers' they may have accepted since March, when the Trump administration announced it was cutting roughly half of the department's workforce.
— Friday's announcement was prompted by a federal judge's order last month to block the administration from firing department workers, after ruling the announced terminations were a thinly veiled effort to dismantle the entire Education Department without congressional approval.
— The Trump administration is pressing the Supreme Court for approval to carry out the firings.
— 'We have all expectations to believe we'll be successful there, but until then we're complying with the court's ruling and abiding by the law,' department spokesperson Madi Biedermann told POLITICO.
NEW HIRES — Meanwhile, a new set of political appointees are headed to the department.
— Lindsey Burke, until now The Heritage Foundation's top education policy official, was tapped to serve as the department's deputy chief of staff for policy and programs.
— Jeffrey Andrade, a former senior Republican staffer for the House education committee, will serve as a deputy assistant secretary for policy in the department's Office of Postsecondary Education.
— Christopher McCaghren, who served as a department official during the first Trump administration, will be the agency's deputy assistant secretary for higher education programs.
— Nicholas 'Nick' Moore, Alabama's workforce office director under Republican Gov. Kay Ivey, will serve as the department's deputy assistant secretary for career, technical, and adult education.
— Jason Delisle, a widely-known expert on higher education finance and policy, will be the chief economist and a senior adviser, in the department's undersecretary office. Office of the Under Secretary.
— Casey K. Sacks, a former department deputy assistant secretary for community colleges, will be a senior policy adviser on workforce and AI issues.
— Meir Katz, a former senior counsel in the department's civil rights office, will be a senior civil rights adviser.
Syllabus
— Chinese students want an American education less than they used to: The Economist
— The maker of ChatGPT plans to embed its tools in every facet of campus life: The New York Times
— State Department tells consulates to resume processing Harvard visas: The Washington Post
— College students are using 'no contact orders' to block each other in real life: The Wall Street Journal
— Trump's NIH budget plan would make competing for grants much harder: POLITICO Pro

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reports: Virginia Democrats outdoing Republicans in raising campaign contributions
Reports: Virginia Democrats outdoing Republicans in raising campaign contributions

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Reports: Virginia Democrats outdoing Republicans in raising campaign contributions

Democratic House of Delegates hopeful Kimberly Pope Adams raised the second-highest amount in Virginia of contributions to House campaigns for the latest campaign reporting period, according to the nonpartisan Virginia Public Access Project. Pope Adams, who has already locked up the Democratic nomination in the 82nd House District, reported a total of $262,048 in money raised for the April 1-June 5 window, based on data from the Virginia Department of Elections that was compiled by VPAP. That trailed only House Speaker Don Scott of Portsmouth, who raised just over $344,000 for the period. Political watchers were keeping a close eye on this round of reports, the last before the crucial June 17 party primaries across Virginia. Like Pope Adams, Scott already has the Democratic nod sewn up. He also does not appear to have any GOP opposition this year. The only House primary next week in the Tri-City area is in District 75 where three Democrats are vying to oppose Republican incumbent Carrie Coyner. In that contest, Lindsey Dougherty continues to outdistance Dustin Wade and Stephen Miller-Pitts. For the reporting period, Dougherty raised $171,695, compared to $136,276 for Wade and $4,471 for Miller-Pitts. As of June 5, Wade showed more than $100,000 in cash on hand over Dougherty and five times more than Miller-Pitts. VPAP reported Dougherty raising the sixth-highest amount of contributions for the period, and Wade the 12th. Dougherty and Miller-Pitts ran against Coyner in the 2019 and 2023 elections, respectively. The 75th District covers all of Hopewell and portions of Chesterfield and Prince George counties. More: The primary menu for June 17: Heavy on the state races and a first time for Petersburg In the 82nd District [Petersburg, Surry County, portions of Dinwiddie and Prince George], Pope Adams continues to run away from GOP incumbent Kim Taylor in campaign contributions. For the latest reporting period, Pope Adams' total was more than four times that of Taylor, who listed receiving $64,489 in donations. Her cash-on-hand amount of $289,468 was eight times more than Taylor's $34,502. The race is a rerun of 2023's race, one of the top three most expensive contests in recent Virginia political history. Taylor squeaked out a victory over Pope Adams by only 53 votes following a recount, and Democrats are clocking the 2025 race as pivotal in holding their slim majority in the House for the next two years. Pope Adams' contributions included $25,000 from the Clean Virginia Fund on April 23, $7,500 from the Jane Fonda Climate PAC on May 14, and three $5,000 donations from Elizabeth Simons on May 29, The Next 50 PAC on April 30 and Fund Her PAC on April 29. Taylor's largest contributions for the period were $20,000 from the Dominion Energy PAC on May 8, $10,000 from the Wren Williams for Delegate campaign on April 24, and identical $7,500 amounts from Friends of Scott Wyatt on April 2 and Chris Runion for Delegate on June 5. The reports indicate Taylor getting three donations of $100 or less, and Pope Adams receiving 1,461. More: House GOP incumbent lauds endorsement from local Democratic group. Democrats cry 'foul' In the 75th District primary, Dougherty received two contributions totaling $80,000 from the super PAC Secure Progress and $35,000 from the campaign of Democratic Del. Dan Helmer. Wade's top donations were $5,000 from himself and two donations from Anita Thurston totaling $4,500. Miller-Pitts' sole contribution of over $100 for the period was $250 from Rhonda Clanton-Davis. Coyner, a Republican seeking her fourth term in the House, received $69,056 in contributions over the period. Her largest donations were $10,000 from Carolyn Williams, $7,500 from Strong Start PAC, and three of $5,000 each from Thomas McInerney, Vision Management Services, and Clean Virginia Fund. Records indicate her having $315,350 in cash on hand as of June 5. The district traditionally leans Republican. Coyner has won re-election with as much as 55% of the vote, but Democrats still target her as vulnerable. In Petersburg, history is being made with the first-ever Democratic primary for the constitutional officer Commissioner of the Revenue. Incumbent Brittani Flowers is being challenged by Mary 'Liz Stith' Howard for the right to be the Democrat on the November ballot. Five years ago, the Virginia General Assembly voted to allow any local-office candidate [except School Board] to seek official party backing. The law went into effect last year, as Petersburg Vice Mayor Darrin Hill received the Democratic nomination for his Ward 2 seat by acclimation. The commissioner primary is the first contested one in Petersburg. Campaign records show Flowers receiving just shy of $3,000 in contributions for the reporting period. Her largest donations were $500 from former state Senate candidate Waylin Ross and $300 from Bernard Flowers Jr. Howard did not record any contributions for the reporting period. Petersburg City Councilor Marlow Jones, who is running as an independent for Virginia's lieutenant governor, raised $700 in donations during the latest reporting period. Five hundred dollars came from three contributions of more than $100. The remaining $200 was split among five contributions of less than $100. To see the latest donation data for any race this year, click on the VPAP website. Bill Atkinson (he/him/his) is an award-winning journalist who covers breaking news, government and politics. Reach him at batkinson@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @BAtkinson_PI. This article originally appeared on The Progress-Index: Virginia primary 2025: Campaign finance reports show money pouring in

House to vote on repealing DC local laws on noncitizen voting, policing, immigration enforcement
House to vote on repealing DC local laws on noncitizen voting, policing, immigration enforcement

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House to vote on repealing DC local laws on noncitizen voting, policing, immigration enforcement

The Brief House Republicans are voting on three bills that would override D.C. laws on noncitizen voting rights, limiting police powers, and restricting immigration enforcement cooperation. One bill, HR 884, repeals D.C.'s 2022 law allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections. HR 2056 would dismantle D.C.'s sanctuary city protections by mandating cooperation with federal immigration authorities. WASHINGTON - The House of Representatives are voting Tuesday on three Republican-backed bills that would override several local D.C. laws. The bills would roll back D.C. efforts expand voting rights for non-citizens, restrict police and force the District to work with immigration enforcement efforts on a federal level. D.C. passed the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act in 2022, granting noncitizens in D.C. the right to vote in local elections. That includes mayoral races, D.C. Council positions, attorney general, ANC members, attorney general and D.C. ballot measures. Noncitizens can also run for elected office in the D.C. government. HR 884 would repeal the act, removing voting powers from noncitizens. Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton released a statement, pushing back at Congress' power of local D.C. matters. "Last Congress, Republicans introduced 14 bills or amendments to prohibit noncitizens from voting in D.C. or to repeal, nullify or prohibit the carrying out of D.C.'s law that permits noncitizens to vote," said Norton. "Yet, Republicans refuse to make the only election law change D.C. residents have asked Congress to make, which is the right to hold elections for voting members of the House and Senate." The Protecting Our Nation's Capital Emergency Act, would dismantle parts of D.C.'s Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022. HR 2096 would allow D.C. police officers to negotiate disciplinary matters through collective bargaining. It would also restore a statute of limitation for claims against the Metropolitan Police Department. "This bill was introduced three days after House Republicans passed a continuing resolution that cut D.C.'s local budget by one billion dollars. That act of fiscal sabotage, which did not save the federal government any money, has led to a freeze on overtime, hiring and pay raises, and furloughs or layoffs may be next," said Norton. "Nine weeks ago today, the Senate passed the D.C. Local Funds Act to reverse the cut. The D.C. Local Funds Act is just sitting in the House. Like President Trump and the National Fraternal Order of Police, I call on the House to pass immediately the D.C. Local Funds Act." READ MORE: Congress' spending bill error leaves DC scrambling to cut $400M from budget HR 2056 would strike down D.C. policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. It would prohibit DC officials from "sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchanging with any Federal, State, or local government entity information regarding the citizenship or immigration status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual." The bill would effectively dismantle D.C.'s sanctuary city policies. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser made moves to quietly overturn a law that prevents local police from cooperating with ICE, including it in a provision of her 2026 budget proposal. Big picture view The D.C. Home Rule Act of 1973 allows the city to elect its own mayor and council. It's also allowed for D.C. to choose Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners to handle community concerns. Congress still maintains control over D.C., including the ability to review all local legislation and appoint the city's judges. D.C. has no voting member in Congress, though it has a nonvoting Delegate. In February, legislators from Utah and Tennessee introduced a bill to strip D.C. of its ability to govern itself. The bill is named after D.C.'s Mayor Muriel Bowser – the "Bringing Oversight to Washington and Safety to Every Resident (BOWSER) Act." The bill would eliminate D.C. Home Rule Act of 1973 and would place D.C. under the full control of Congress. The Source This story includes information from the US House of Representatives, Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, and previous FOX 5 DC reporting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store