Trump says banks discriminate against his supporters while White House prepares order
'They totally discriminate against, I think, me maybe even more, but they discriminate against many conservatives,' he told CNBC in an interview. 'I think the word might be Trump supporters more than conservatives.'
Trump made the comments when asked about a report by the Wall Street Journal that said he planned to punish banks that discriminated against conservatives, but did not address the order specifically.
The order instructs regulators to review banks for 'politicized or unlawful debanking' practices, according to a draft reviewed by Reuters.
'Well, they did discriminate,' Trump said of actions taken by JPMorgan Chase after his first term in office. 'I had hundreds of millions, I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash … and they told me, 'I'm sorry sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out.''
Trump said, without providing evidence, that he believed that the banks' refusal to take his deposits indicated that the administration of former President Joe Biden had encouraged banking regulators to 'destroy Trump.'
Trump said he subsequently tried to deposit funds with Bank of America and was also refused, and eventually split the cash among a number of smaller banks.
'The banks discriminated against me very badly,' he said.
In a statement, JPMorgan did not address the president's specific claim that it had discriminated against him.
'We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed,' JPMorgan said. 'We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right.'
Bank of America also did not address Trump's specific claims in the CNBC interview.
'REPUTATIONAL RISK' ISSUE
During President Joe Biden's administration, regulators could have asked the banks why they were providing banking services to Trump because of the 'reputational risk' issue, a source familiar with the matter said.
Another source said that banks were under intense scrutiny and pressure with regards to what qualified as a reputational risk for banks and they needed to be careful due to Trump's legal entanglements.
The source also added that at present JPMorgan continues to have a banking relationship with members of the Trump family that dates back to years ago and that they also bank a number of campaign accounts related to Trump.
After President Trump took power, the Federal Reserve announced in June it was directing its supervisors to no longer consider 'reputational risk' when examining banks, scrapping a metric that had been a focus of industry complaints.
The Wall Street Journal reported late Monday that the expected executive order would instruct regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions breach the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws by dropping customers for political reasons.
It said the order could be signed as early as this week, authorizing monetary penalties, consent decrees or other disciplinary measures against violators.
The White House had no immediate comment on the reported order.
'What the White House is doing is telling the banks not to hide behind regulations to deny loans or banking relationships,' said Wells Fargo bank analyst Mike Mayo. 'The banks can use their normal underwriting standards and deny services, but not blame regulators or use reputational risk as a justification.'
Bank of America said it welcomed the Trump administration's efforts to provide regulatory clarity to banks.
'We've provided detailed proposals and will continue to work with the administration and Congress to improve the regulatory framework,' the bank said.
Trump in January said the CEOs of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America denied services to conservatives. At the time, the two banks denied making banking decisions based on politics.
'This seems to be rhetoric that will likely be forgotten by lunchtime,' said David Wagner, head of equities at Aptus Capital Advisors. 'I don't see any material impact on banks, as there are many other drivers that will ultimately presage performance for banks, such as deregulation.'
JPMorgan and Bank of America shares both fell over 1%, in line with a decline for the broader S&P Bank index.
Banks have consistently argued that any complaints about 'debanking' should be aimed at regulators, as they argue onerous rules and bank supervisors policing firms can discourage them from engaging in certain activities.
'The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion,' the Bank Policy Institute, an industry group, said in a statement.
'The banking agencies have already taken steps to address issues like reputational risk, and we're hopeful that any forthcoming executive order will reinforce this progress by directing regulators to confront the flawed regulatory framework that gave rise to these concerns in the first place.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Will US cut down India tariff if Russia-Ukraine deal goes through? US President says ‘will determine'
US President Donald Trump refused to give a specific answer about whether additional tariffs on India would be dropped if a deal between Russia and Ukraine were reached. Although he indicated it could happen, the US President was quoted by the Associated Press as saying during a press conference in the White House on Wednesday: 'We'll determine that later. But right now they're paying a 50% tariff.' Trump had earlier announced that the US will impose an additional 25% tariff on India because it continues to import Russian oil. The move raised tariffs on some Indian goods to as high as 50% — among the steepest faced by any US trading partner Trump said on Wednesday that India is "very close" to China in terms of its purchases of Russian oil and will pay tariffs of 50 per cent. ".... As you know, we put a 50-per cent tariff on India on oil. They are the second largest, they are very close to China in terms of the purchase of oil from Russia," Trump said in the Oval Office on Wednesday. He also threatened "secondary sanctions" on India. "It's only been 8 hours. So let's see what happens. You're going to see a lot going to see so much secondary sanctions," Trump said. He also hinted that the US administration could impose "more" similar sanctions on China. On being asked, "On the Indian penalties, do you have any similar plans to enact more tariffs on China', US President Donald Trump said, "Could happen. Depends on how we do. Could happen The additional 25 per centtariffs on India would go into effect 21 days after the signing of the order, meaning that both India and Russia might have time to negotiate with the administration on the import taxes. India's Ministry of External Affairs [MEA] on Wednesday called the additional tariffs 'unfortunate." 'We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' MEA spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said in a statement, adding that India would take all actions necessary to protect its interests. Meanwhile, the White House said Wednesday that Trump could meet in person with Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as next week as he seeks to broker an end to the war.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Gold price today: Rates rise on mounting Trump tariffs worries; what should investors do?
Gold price today: Gold rates climbed in the domestic futures market Thursday (August 7) morning on rising concerns that US President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff policies will impede global economic growth. Mounting uncertainty about Trump tariffs is a key positive factor for safe-haven asset gold. MCX Gold October 3 contracts were up 0.16 per cent at ₹ 1,01,423 per 10 grams, while MCX Silver September 5 contracts were up 0.47 per cent at ₹ 1,14,187 per kg around 9:10 AM. Trump has imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, taking the total US tariff to 50 per cent. Moreover, he has hinted at the imposition of 'secondary sanctions,' which remain unclear whether they will be imposed solely on India or on other countries as well. "The US President imposed an additional tariff of 25 per cent on India, giving an indication for imposing more tariffs on countries with which a trade deal is not yet finalised. Safe-haven buying is supporting gold and silver prices. Gold is trading near its long-term resistance of $3,454 per troy ounce, and if prices cross and sustain above these levels on a closing basis, could show further strength towards $3,480-3,509 per troy ounce," said Manoj Kumar Jain of Prithvifinmart Commodity Research. (This is a developing story. Please check back for fresh updates.) Read all market-related news here Read more stories by Nishant Kumar Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations expressed are those of individual analysts or broking firms, not Mint. We advise investors to consult with certified experts before making any investment decisions, as market conditions can change rapidly and circumstances may vary.
Economic Times
28 minutes ago
- Economic Times
50% tariffs: Here's how India can flip the script on Trump's trade offensive
Synopsis India is preparing to counter the impact of Trump's 50% tariff through alternative markets and dedicated fund support, as key sectors such as textiles, gems & jewellery, and shrimp brace for the impact. With the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement at a standstill despite several rounds of negotiations, industry leaders and experts are exploring ways to contain the tariff impact. As US President Donald Trump hit India on Wednesday with an additional 25% tariff for purchasing Russian oil, raising the total tariff to 50%, Indian businesses and exporters are bracing for the economic repercussions. In response, experts and industry leaders are actively discussing measures to mitigate the impact of these tariff US is a major trading partner of India. In FY25, India exported products valued at $86.51 billion to the US across various categories, including shrimp, textiles, and gems and jewellery. With the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement at a standstill despite several rounds of negotiations, industry leaders and experts are exploring ways to contain the tariff Indian government is reportedly preparing a Rs 20,000 crore export promotion mission aimed at protecting exporters from global trade uncertainties. This mission is being jointly implemented by the ministries of commerce and industry, micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME), and finance. It is expected to be finalised by August and come into effect by mission, according to sources, will have five components—trade finance, non-trade finance dealing with regulation, standards and market access, better brand recall for Brand India, e-commerce hubs and warehousing, and trade facilitation. Ajay Sahai, DG & CEO of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO), explained that when the mission was announced in the Union Budget this year, it aimed to increase access to export credit. From that perspective, there may be some softening of collateral on one hand; there may also be an element of the Interest Equalisation Scheme. 'We have also requested that the Interest Equalisation Scheme for MSME manufacturers be extended to all countries, with a specific emphasis on ensuring that all exporters receive this support for exports to the US, as it will enhance their competitiveness,' he said. He noted that there is a temporary problem, assuming that by September-October this year, India and the US are able to work out the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). However, he pointed out that any losses faced by Indian exporters will be for a limited duration. 'The good thing is that in that scenario, both buyers and sellers want to maintain the equation, and both sides want to look at absorbing the cost. They can look at increasing productivity.'However, 'they have been forced to be innovative' due to Trump tariffs, so there is always a silver lining in all these things as well,' he said. 'Even if the replacement of the US market happens, it will take time. If we are not through with the BTA, we must be prepared for some setbacks in exports. That is undeniable,' he Taneja, Professor, ICRIER, asserted that allocating a dedicated fund to support and shield exporters from the disruptions caused by US tariffs is a commendable and timely initiative. 'This is much in line with what countries like Australia, Spain, and South Korea are doing. The Australian government announced a $1-billion zero‑interest loan package to support businesses facing market disruptions. Spain has combined direct aid and soft loans in its proposed relief package. Similarly, the South Korean EXIM Bank manages the Supply Chain Resilience Fund (SCRF), allowing exporters to respond swiftly to trade wars and geopolitical conflicts,' she a similar view, Shravan Shetty, Managing Director, Primus Partners, said that the fund can prove beneficial, especially for vulnerable segments like textiles, gems & jewellery, and auto ancillaries, wherein production-linked schemes can help provide relief. 'The funds can also be deployed for strategic trade promotion activities and brand-building in alternate markets, such as Africa, the UK, the European Union, and Central Asia,' he Sen, Trade Policy Leader at EY India, emphasised the importance of understanding what percentage of this fund percolates down to the actual exporters who need it. This is important, given the undefined nature of the new Trump tariff regime, he said. 'The arbitrage possible between exports of the same product from different countries; the lack of finality in the rates; the definitional issues, such as what would be considered as 'transhipping', etc., make a structured support scheme difficult to formulate. In case we see a significant downturn in US demand, the amounts from the fund would be needed to explore newer markets,' he also noted the necessity of placing greater emphasis on countries with which we have recently signed FTAs, as they remain underutilised. 'We have one with the UK that will be operationalised; now is the time to start focusing on the UK market and the EU, where an early harvest is expected in the coming months.''So, I think the strategy should be focusing on diversification because with the kind of tariff that has been imposed by the US and the threat issued every day, we cannot rely on the US. Even if BTA happens and an additional tariff in the form of India's relations with Russia is imposed, we can be subjected to any kind of tariff. So, this is the time we should look at diversification in the medium to long term. And we should exploit opportunities with FTAs,' he mentioned that the fund relief and the development of alternative markets will only help in the short to medium term. India must build structural competitiveness and export reliance frameworks in the long term, he said. 'The answer lies in building an export ecosystem that can withstand geopolitical shocks, price wars, and shifting consumer preferences.'He proposed that the government should provide MSMEs and exporters with digital platforms and single windows to facilitate export credit, insurance, and risk cover, while noting that many smaller firms lack awareness or access to EXIM Bank schemes, ECGC support, or interest equalisation benefits. 'Digitising access and simplifying application processes can significantly boost participation,' he other measures, officials have indicated that lowering testing charges for smaller exporters, levied by the Export Inspection Council, can ease exporters' concerns. Additionally, measures like providing customs relief, accelerating GST for exports and increasing RoDTEP can also mitigate tariff impacts, as per industry RoDTEP and RoSCTL schemes, as per Sen of EY India, should be expanded to cover all exports between them. He said that increasing the RoDTEP/RoSCTL rates to directly refund a wider range of embedded taxes and duties not covered by other schemes would reduce overall production costs for exporters, enhance the price competitiveness of their products in the international market and partially alleviate the tariff Kumar Gulati, Chairman at the Compound Livestock Feed Manufacturers Association (CLFMA) of India, said that lowering the charges and simplifying the process for mandatory testing and certification (especially for food, agriculture, pharma, and chemicals) significantly reduces compliance costs. 'It's particularly vital for smaller exporters and for sectors with low margins, directly supporting their ability to remain price-competitive internationally,' he said. Sector-specific Looking at the sectors, textiles could be one of the worst hit with $4 billion of business, such as t-shirts and home textiles bearing the brunt, especially due to lower tariffs imposed on India's rivals—Bangladesh and Vietnam at 20%. At 50%, US tariffs on India are now the highest Thakur, Secretary General of the Apparel Export Promotion Council, commended the 'expected' export promotion mission and suggested an increase in the mission budget, which is currently set at Rs 20,000 crore. He also recommended including specific measures for the textile sector in the mission, considering that the sector is the second-largest employer after agriculture in the country.'We need incentives to offset India's cost disadvantage vis-à-vis competing countries,' he said, adding that 'reviving the Interest Equalisation Scheme for five years at an enhanced rate of 5% for all exporters, without any value cap, is crucial.' He emphasised the need for continuity of schemes such as RoSCTL, a moratorium on loan repayments, expedited India-EU trade negotiations, and the quick disbursal of outstanding dues and claims from shrimp exports, totalling nearly $7 billion, to the US could suffer significantly. Even before the new tariffs, Indian seafood exporters were facing stiff price competition and falling prices thanks to increased supply from Ecuador (which faces only a 10-14% tariff).'Shrimp prices dipped by 20-25% in the last year. The oversupply continues to depress global prices, which further erodes profits and export earnings for Indian producers. It's estimated that Indian exporters are already facing losses of Rs 600 crore due to order cancellations and containers stuck in transit as these tariffs take effect. Margins in the industry are a slim 4-5%, making it impossible to absorb such steep tariff hikes, and exporters fear a significant long-term loss of market share, with Ecuador likely to replace India as the top shrimp supplier to the US,' pointed out added that the government's Rs 20,000-crore scheme will focus on making export credit accessible, enhancing brand building, and addressing non-tariff barriers. The aim is to provide liquidity, promote market diversification, and support value addition. 'While this injection can help tide over some immediate financial distress, industry experts warn it cannot fully compensate for the cost disadvantage created by the high US tariffs and ongoing oversupply and price drops due to Ecuador's surge in production and exports,' he said.
