China Trolls JD Vance by Turning His Own Insult Against Him
In a TV address, Xia Baolong said that China was hitting back at the Trump Administration's overbearing tariffs by instating import duties of 125 percent on U.S. imports.
'Let those peasants in the U.S. wail before the 5,000 years of Chinese civilization,' he said, commandeering the term Vance used in a Fox News interview earlier this month when he referred to 'Chinese peasants.'
Baolong, according to Reuters, noted how Trump had singled out China when he reneged on super-charged 'Liberation Day' tariffs, but kept a 145 percent tax on Chinese goods. The director of China's executive arm in Hong Kong said the trade war is 'extremely shameless' and aims to 'take away Hong Kong's life.'
Saying that China, including its special administrative region Hong Kong, does not buckle under pressure from 'bullying,' Baolong then used Vance's 'peasants' jibe against the U.S.
He added, 'The Chinese people do not cause trouble, nor are they afraid of trouble. Pressure, threats, and blackmail are not the right way to deal with China.'
Baolong's official title is Director of the Hong Kong and Macao Work Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee. He made the retort during a speech for Hong Kong's National Security Education Day.
It comes after the U.S. Vice President used the term during an interview on Fox News two weeks ago. 'I think it's useful for all of us to take a step back and ask ourselves, what has the globalized economy gotten the United States of America?' he said.
'Fundamentally, it's based on two principles, incurring a huge amount of debt to buy things other countries make for us… We borrow money from Chinese peasants to buy the things that Chinese peasants manufacture,' he said, in an attempt to defend Trump's controversial tariff measures.
Clapping back days later, Beijing said Vance lacks 'knowledge and respect.' Beijing 'has made its position perfectly clear on its trade relations with the U.S.,' Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said during a press conference.
'To hear words that lack knowledge and respect like those uttered by this vice president is both surprising and kind of lamentable,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US weekly jobless claims rise to highest since June
(Reuters) -The number of Americans filing new applications for jobless benefits rose by the most in about three months last week in an initial signal that layoffs may be picking up and adding to signs the labor market is weakening. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits climbed 11,000 - the largest increase since late May - to a seasonally adjusted 235,000 for the week ended August 16, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 225,000 claims for the latest week. The labor market had split into low firings and tepid hiring as businesses navigate President Donald Trump's protectionist trade policy, which has raised the nation's average import duty to its highest in a century. Employment gains averaged 35,000 jobs per month over the last three months, the government reported in early August. Domestic demand grew in the second quarter at its slowest pace since the fourth quarter of 2022. The number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, rose 30,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.972 million - the highest since November 2021 - during the week ending August 9, the claims report showed. The elevated so-called continuing claims align with consumers' rising perceptions that jobs are hard to find. Economists said the continuing claims trend was consistent with the unemployment rate rising to 4.3% in August from 4.2% in July. Sign in to access your portfolio
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The 1600: Dems Want a Fighter. Is Newsom It?
The Insider's Track Good morning, We've got a late entry for The Craziest $#*! I Read This Week. It's a local story here in the Big Apple, but it's a good one and comes courtesy of the great journalists over at The City: A close advisor to Eric Adams, our illustrious mayor, has been suspended from his re-election campaign after she gave a reporter a wad of cash tucked inside a bag of Sour Cream & Onion potato chips. The failed payoff, which she brushed off as a cultural misunderstanding, comes as even more of Adams' associates are expected to be indicted on corruption charges in the coming days. If you enjoy a good trainwreck election, I really recommend following the New York City mayoral race. It's got everything. A cartoonishly corrupt incumbent polling in the single digits. A disgraced former governor attempting and failing the world's most half-hearted political comeback. A charismatic rich-kid socialist with no experience whose first real job will be running a $2T economy. And on the GOP side, a beret-wearing perennial also-ran most famous for staging vigilante subway rescues in the 80's, who now lives in a studio apartment with six cats. Greatest city in the world, baby! On the topic of elections, there have been some notable developments this week while we've spent our time together focused on geopolitics. Today, the Texas Senate will likely pass the state's new mid-cycle congressional map, after the House rammed it through yesterday. This kicks off a new redistricting war that California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed to answer with his own redrawn map. The move got the blessing from Barack Obama, who weighed in from his perch in Martha's Vineyard that Newsom was taking a "smart and measured" approach ahead of the midterms. If you haven't been following, Newsom is the toast of the town at the moment—at least among liberals—for the aggressive posture he's adopted, both in policy and style. On social media, the governor has crafted this new persona as a Trump-esque troll, posting in ALL CAPS and in Trump's signature style, generating AI memes at Trump's expense, excoriating MAGA as a bunch of lemmings and essentially playing POTUS' own game against him. And it's working. He has rocketed to the top of the (very early and still meaningless) 2028 polls with this strategy, which tells you that Democratic voters badly want a fighter. I can see why Newsom is an attractive choice to go up against what will likely be JD Vance in '28. He is one of the few Dems who is able to play in the mud with Trump and come out clean. Michelle Obama was famous for that saying, "When they go low, we go high" even though it was precisely the wrong political advice for the Trump era. Newsom understands that it should actually be, "When they go low, we go lower." But he has two big problems. One is that he runs what is arguably the most dysfunctional state in the country, and that comes with a lot of baggage. The other is that he comes across as just a little too slick for his own good. As a buddy of mine put it, "Newsom looks like he'd lay off your dad and then post on LinkedIn about how difficult it was." Maybe I'm wrong. If Vance is the nominee, maybe Newsom is the perfect candidate to run against him. Both of them seem like they're willing to say or do anything to get elected, with no deep or apparent convictions. Remember, Vance called Trump "America's Hitler" not all that long ago, and now he's his VP! That's still crazy to me. Newsom is also a very good fundraiser, and there are reports this week that Elon Musk has already pumped the brakes on his brief attempt at building a third party and is now leaning toward backing Vance instead. That is going to be formidable: an incumbent veep, with Trump's blessing and Musk's unlimited cash. But I think Democrats have a way to win in such a scenario. We'll get into that tomorrow. The Rundown Thirty minutes into conversing with Ohio College Republican Federation President Spencer Mandzak, I was compelled to ask why he was a Republican instead of a Democrat. After nearly three years in Washington, D.C., I found the answer to that question generally materialized within five minutes of meeting a politico. Mandzak was different, however. He introduced himself by sharing an op-ed he'd written on the importance of curating bipartisanship online. He said that economics and foreign policy were his top political issues, and he offered no charged opinions on topics like religion or sexuality. "You're not going to get a lot of probably interesting viewpoints from me, just because I try to stay in my lane," he responded. "But I can tell you why I'm not a Democrat." Read more from Newsweek's Alex J. Rouhandeh. Also happening: Election 2028: Elon Musk is considering backing Vice President JD Vance in the 2028 presidential election, according to reports on the billionaire's political movements. The tech CEO formed a new party and pledged to contest both Republicans and Democrats at the 2026 midterms, but his relationship with Vance, who considers Musk a personal friend, may not be as damaged as it seems. Read more . Elon Musk is considering backing Vice President JD Vance in the 2028 presidential election, according to reports on the billionaire's political movements. The tech CEO formed a new party and pledged to contest both Republicans and Democrats at the 2026 midterms, but his relationship with Vance, who considers Musk a personal friend, may not be as damaged as it seems. . Immigration: A federal appeals court on Wednesday sided with the Trump administration in its bid to end humanitarian protections for tens of thousands of immigrants from Central America and Nepal. The ruling puts on hold a lower court's order that had temporarily preserved Temporary Protected Status for nearly 60,000 migrants. Read more. This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.
New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
US keeping lofty EU car tariffs until levies on American goods lowered — as large economies lock in trade deal
The US will keep higher tariffs on European carmakers in place until the EU lowers tariffs on American goods — as two of the world's largest economies on Thursday finally locked in a framework trade deal hammered out last month. The two sides fired off a joint statement listing the commitments made after President Trump and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal on July 27 following months of negotiations. Washington will make moves to reduce the current 27.5% US tariffs on European cars and car parts once Brussels introduces the legislation needed to enact the promised tariff cuts on US goods, they said in a joint statement. Advertisement The current tariff that the US puts on European cars and car parts is 27.5%. AFP via Getty Images As a result, carmakers could see relief from the current tariffs within 'hopefully weeks,' a senior administration official told Reuters. 'As soon as they're able to introduce that legislation — and I don't mean pass it and fully implement it, but really introduce it — then we will be in a position to provide that relief. And I will say that both sides are very interested in moving quickly,' the official said. It wasn't immediately clear when Brussels would start the legislative process. Advertisement As part of the framework deal, the EU also pledged to eliminate tariffs on all US industrial goods and to provide preferential market access for a wide range of US seafood and agricultural goods. The US agreed to apply a 15% US tariff on most EU imports, including autos, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber. The joint statement was 'a play to hold each other accountable' and ensure that both sides carried out the pledges announced last month, the admin official said. Advertisement 'We are trying to sequence with the European Union to make sure that … they feel sufficient pressure to obtain the mandate they need to begin the legislative process for reducing their tariffs, as they've promised,' the official said. 'We're confident that they'll do that. It's just good for all parties to make sure that everyone's on the same page and taking actions around the same time.' With Post wires
