Your favorite alcoholic beverage could be linked to deadly form of cancer, study finds
The research, which was recently published in the journal PLOS Medicine, classified alcohol as a carcinogen, highlighting a particular increased risk of pancreatic cancer.
The surgeon general's previous advisory named cancers of the breast (in women), colorectum, esophagus, voice box, liver, mouth and throat.
The researchers associated the pancreatic cancer risk with beer and spirits/liquor, but not with the intake of wine.
"Alcohol consumption is a known carcinogen, but until now, the evidence linking it specifically to pancreatic cancer has been considered inconclusive," said senior study author Dr. Pietro Ferrari, head of the IARC Nutrition and Metabolism Branch, in a press release.
"Our findings provide new evidence that pancreatic cancer may be another cancer type associated with alcohol consumption, a connection that has been underestimated until now."
For the study, researchers recruited 2.5 million participants with a median age of 57, following them for about 16 years.
Out of the group, 10,067 cases of pancreatic cancer were recorded.
Each increase of 10 grams of ethanol per day in alcohol consumption was associated with a 3% increase in the risk of pancreatic cancer, the study found.
Women who consumed 15 to 30 grams of alcohol (about one to two standard drinks) per day had a 12% increase in pancreatic cancer risk.
Men who consumed 30 to 60 grams (two to six standard drinks) per day had a 15% increased risk of pancreatic cancer, and intake of over 60 grams per day was associated with a 36% greater risk.
"There really isn't a safe level of drinking when it comes to cancer risk."
The research did have some limitations.
"This observational study examined alcohol intake evaluated at a single time point during mid-to-late adulthood and included a limited number of Asian cohorts," the researchers wrote.
"Further research is needed to better understand the role of lifetime alcohol consumption — for example, during early adulthood — and the influence of specific consumption patterns, such as binge-drinking."
Dr. Adam Scioli, an addiction psychiatrist at Caron Treatment Centers in Pennsylvania, previously commented to Fox News Digital that "alcohol is a toxin."
"There have been reports for years that it could be beneficial for one's health — but we know now that alcohol ingestion is one of the modifiable risk factors for cancer," Scioli, who is not affiliated with IARC, told Fox News Digital.
Dr. Marc Siegel, senior medical analyst for Fox News, was not involved in the study, but spoke with Fox News Digital about the findings.
"This is in keeping with alcohol as a toxin that directly inflames and damages pancreatic cells," he confirmed.
Around 75,000 Americans each year are diagnosed with a cancer that is in some way linked to alcohol use, according to Scioli.
Dr. Neha Pathak, WebMD's chief physician editor of health and lifestyle medicine, noted that the study highlights a new, independent risk factor for pancreatic cancer.
"What's important to know is that there really isn't a safe level of drinking when it comes to cancer risk," Atlanta-based Pathak, who also did not participate in the research, told Fox News Digital.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"This study reinforces that message — but it also shows how complex these links are, and how we need to keep digging deeper into the role of alcohol and different drinking habits in cancer development," she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
AstraZeneca Launches At-Home FluMist as Vaccination Rate Drops
AstraZeneca PLC released its flu vaccine nasal spray for at-home use on Friday, an option that comes at a contentious time for vaccine access in the US. FluMist Home is the same product as the pharmaceutical company's seasonal influenza vaccine spray, which has been offered by clinicians for the past two decades. FluMist Home received approval for patients ages 2 and up from the US Food and Drug Administration last fall.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Deepfake videos impersonating real doctors push false medical advice and treatments
Dr. Joel Bervell, a physician known to his hundreds of thousands of followers on social media as the "Medical Mythbuster," has built a reputation for debunking false health claims online. Earlier this year, some of those followers alerted him to a video on another account featuring a man who looked exactly like him. The face was his. The voice was not. "I just felt mostly scared," Bervell told CBS News. "It looked like me. It didn't sound like me... but it was promoting a product that I'd never promoted in the past, in a voice that wasn't mine." It was a deepfake – one example of content that features fabricated medical professionals and is reaching a growing audience, according to cybersecurity experts. The video with Bervell's likeness appeared on multiple platforms – TikTok, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube, he said. A CBS News investigation over the past month found dozens of accounts and more than 100 videos across social media sites in which fictitious doctors, some using the identities of real physicians, gave advice or tried to sell products, primarily related to beauty, wellness and weight loss. Most of them were found on TikTok and Instagram, and some of them were viewed millions of times. Most videos reviewed by CBS News were trying to sell products, either through independent websites or well-known online marketplaces. They often made bold claims. One video touted a product "96% more effective than Ozempic." Cybersecurity company ESET also recently investigated this kind of content. It spotted more than 20 accounts on TikTok and Instagram using AI-generated doctors to push products, according to Martina López, a security researcher at ESET. "Whether it's due to some videos going viral or accounts gaining more followers, this type of content is reaching an increasingly wider audience," she said. CBS News contacted TikTok and Meta, the parent company of Instagram, to get clarity on their policies. Both companies removed videos flagged by CBS News, saying they violated platform policies. CBS News also reached out to YouTube, which said its privacy request process "allows users to request the removal of AI-generated content that realistically simulates them without their permission." YouTube said the videos provided by CBS News didn't violate its Community Guidelines and would remain on the platform. "Our policies prohibit content that poses a serious risk of egregious harm by spreading medical misinformation that contradicts local health authority (LHA) guidance about specific health conditions and substances," YouTube said. TikTok says that between January and March, it proactively removed more than 94% of content that violated its policies on AI-generated content. After CBS News contacted Meta, the company said it removed videos that violated its Advertising Standards and restricted other videos that violated its Health and Wellness policies, making them accessible to just those 18 and older. Meta also said bad actors constantly evolve their tactics to attempt to evade enforcement. Scammers are using readily available AI tools to significantly improve the quality of their content, and viewing videos on small devices makes it harder to detect visual inconsistencies, ESET's chief security evangelist, Tony Anscombe, said there are some red flags that can help someone detect AI-generated content, including glitches like flickering, blurred edges or strange distortions around a person's face. Beyond the visuals, a voice that sounds robotic or lacks natural human emotion is a possible indicator of viewers should be skeptical of the message itself and question overblown claims like "miracle cures" or "guaranteed results," which are common tactics in digital scams, Anscombe said. "Trust nothing, verify everything," Anscombe said. "So if you see something and it's claiming that, you know, there's this miracle cure and this miracle cure comes from X, go and check X out ... and do it independently. Don't follow links. Actually go and browse for it, search for it and verify yourself." Bervell said the deepfake videos featuring his likeness were taken down after he asked his followers to help report them. He also said he's concerned videos like these will undermine public trust in medicine. "When we have fiction out there, we have what are thought to be experts in a field saying something that may not be true," he said. "That distorts what fact is, and makes it harder for the public to believe anything that comes out of science, from a doctor, from the health care system overall." Passenger arrested after allegedly causing disturbance midair and forcing flight to divert Tropical Storm Erin expected to become a major hurricane When could Tropical Storm Erin become a hurricane? Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
We Talked to 6 Derms and They All Agreed: This Common SPF Misconception Is Putting Your Skin at Risk
Sunscreen is easily the most effective way to protect your skin from the sun, which unrelentingly emits damaging UV-A and UV-B rays that can cause cancer and signs of premature aging (like wrinkles, sun spots, and sagging skin). The thing is, you've got to know how and when to apply it well if you want to reap the full rewards of SPF. 'Using sunscreen properly is what really keeps your skin safe,' explains Ellen Marmur, MD, FAAD, a board-certified dermatologist and founder of MMSkincare. 'You should apply at least an SPF 30, apply it generously, and reapply every two hours or after swimming or sweating.' There are tons of sunscreen myths out there—like not needing to wear SPF if it's cloudy or that sunscreen in your makeup is enough (both wrong)—but today we're diving into one of the most pervasive out there! Related: 8 Spots You're Forgetting to Apply Sunscreen, According to Derms Myth: If You Wear a High SPF, You Don't Need as Much One of the biggest sunscreen myths is that if you apply a higher SPF—like a 50, 75, or even 100—you don't need to apply as much or as often. This is not the case, and failing to reapply enough every two hours will inevitably hurt your skin. We surveyed six dermatologists about this, and here's exactly what they have to say. Tanya Kormeili, MD, FAAD 'Do not be fooled to think that applying SPF 50 thinly might still give you about SPF 30-level protection. That is not true,' warns Tanya Kormeili, MD, FAAD, board-certified dermatologist and founder of the Derm and Rejuvenation Institute. 'The trick to better protection beyond the choice of SPF number is in the proper and adequate amount that you use. If you don't have adequate protection, you are being irritated by UV rays. It is that simple.' Related: Black Skin Still Needs Sunscreen—Here's Why Brooke Jeffy, MD, FAAD 'Higher SPF does not mean you can apply less or use less frequently. Think of it as a bit of a hedge against our natural tendency to not use or reapply adequately,' says Brooke Jeffy, MD, FAAD, a board-certified dermatologist. When applied incorrectly, 'you do not get the level of coverage possible from the product and are more likely to experience burns and cumulative damage from radiation that leads to skin cancers, wrinkles, and hyperpigmentation.' Kseniya Kobets, MD, FAAD 'Both SPF 15 and 100 will get rubbed off or sweated off, and the increased protection assumes immediate sunburn delivered, not over time as it naturally happens,' explains Kseniya Kobets, MD, FAAD, board-certified dermatologist at Montefiore Einstein Advanced Care. She adds, 'Obviously, applying inadequate amounts of SPF will deliver lower SPF than promised on the bottle, plus it will wear away faster than two hours, putting you at risk for painful blistering sunburn, damaging your skin cells' DNA that not only predisposes your skin to age prematurely, but also increases risk of skin cancers like melanoma (the deadlier one), basal cell, and squamous cell.' Related: Does Sunscreen Prevent Tanning? Here's What a Dermatologist Has to Say Alexandra Bowles, MD, FAAD 'High SPF sunscreens can offer slightly more UVB protection than SPF 30, but the difference isn't as dramatic as many people think,' notes Alexandra Bowles, MD, FAAD, a board-certified dermatologist at MONA Dermatology. 'For example, SPF 30 blocks about 97% of UVB rays, while SPF 50 blocks around 98%, a small difference that can create a false sense of security. What matters most is applying sunscreen generously and reapplying every two hours, no matter the SPF.' Ellen Marmur, MD, FAAD 'SPF 30 already blocks most UV-B rays, so it's more important how you use sunscreen than the number on the bottle,' Dr. Marmur says. 'Go for the highest number SPF that you will genuinely use well enough to cover your skin. Now that formulations are more elegant, search for an SPF 50. It's best to use a lotion for your face, ears, neck, and a spray for your body and hands and feet and scalp.' Nazanin Saedi, MD, FAAD 'I most commonly see SPF 30, 45 and. 50, and the difference is admittedly marginal. If you have fair skin that burns easily, melasma, rosacea, or a higher skin cancer risk, it's always best to choose the higher SPF level,' says board-certified dermatologist Nazanin Saedi, MD, FAAD. 'But regardless of what level of SPF you choose, you must reapply every two hours for it to remain effective.' Read the original article on Real Simple
