Do Mainframes Have A Role In The AI Era?
Francis Sideco
A couple of years after generative AI first entered mainstream consciousness, every industry segment is attempting to leverage it to improve efficiency and offer new products and services. While training will continue to evolve and drive innovation, inferencing will drive value creation through advanced AI capabilities such as chain of thought reasoning, multi-modal functionality and multi-model support combining different types of generative AI models with predictive AI. Most of the conversations on delivering these inferencing solutions gravitate around AI data centers, edge infrastructure, and/or on-device processing. This begs the question: Does the mainframe have a role in the AI Era?
What Is A Mainframe?
While servers are designed more for supporting general-purpose applications and multiple clients or functions like website hosting and email servers, mainframes are designed for high-volume, mission-critical tasks such as financial transaction processing and are often used in heavily regulated industries. As such, mainframes require a higher degree of capacity, reliability and security enabled with advanced virtualization, disaster recovery, backwards compatibility and built-in redundancy. Additionally, workloads are typically handled by a centralized mainframe system whereas a distributed architecture to spread workloads over many systems is commonly used in a server architecture.
With the capacity, reliability and security that mainframes provide along with their ubiquity in supporting high-volume, high-value transactions and data processing, the answer to whether mainframes have a role in the AI Era is an unequivocal 'Yes!' IBM, the leader in mainframe solutions with 70% of all global financial transactions going through their mainframes, is a prime example.
A Mainframe For The AI Era
Telum II By The Numbers
Francis Sideco
IBM recently announced the latest in its Z family of mainframes, the Z17, with the goal of addressing the needs of the AI Era while still delivering on the rigorous expectations associated with mainframes. According to IBM, this Z17 generation is powered by its 5nm 5.5GHz Telum II CPU, which, compared to the previous generation, delivers an 11% increase in single-thread performance, up to 20% capacity expansion and up to 64 TB of memory, while also doing so with up to 27% power reduction. Additionally, Telum II has an enhanced on-board AI accelerator capable of predictive and some generative AI workloads. For the generative AI workloads that require more acceleration, the Z17 can also be upgraded with the new Spyre Accelerator PCIe card.
Spyre Accelerator By The Numbers
Francis Sideco
Based on IBMs reported performance numbers, the Z17 provides 7.5x more AI throughput than the Z16 generation delivering up to 450 billion AI inferences with 1ms response times per day.
What AI Workloads Need A Mainframe?
Due to their heavy use in financial transactions and mission-critical data processing, mainframes are most effective when using a combination of predictive and generative AI models. For example, because of the high-volume, central processing, and multi-model capabilities, mainframes can effectively and efficiently analyze patterns from the transactions and data passing through the system and infer conclusions that can be used in advanced fraud detection and anti-money laundering applications for improved accuracy and fewer false positives. Mainframes also combine these capabilities with mission-critical business data to help enable business, code and operations assistants to increase productivity and reduce the time needed for skills training, and autonomous agentic AI applications like automated trading and healthcare applications. Other areas where AI-enabled mainframes are being used include, but are not limited tom loan risk mitigation, insurance claims fraud detection and prevention, payments fraud, geospatial analysis, climate change impact, loan risk mitigation, cybersecurity and sentiment analysis.
These are just a small subset of applications where predictive, generative and even agentic AI leverage the mainframe for business outcomes that would otherwise be inefficient or not available because of the data and/or security requirements on standard server configurations especially in heavily regulated industries in which mainframes are typically deployed.
The Future Of Mainframes In The AI Era
According to IBM, there are already more than 250 client-identified AI use cases on the Z mainframe platform and growing. But it's not all about the hardware. IBM leverages its other AI assets like watsonx, Granite, InstructLab and even their consulting services, across IBMs solutions, including the Z platform, positioning the company as a strong partner for the age of enterprise AI. Competitors such as Dell, Fujitsu, and Unisys are also looking to leverage AI for mainframe workloads. Next generation mainframe development typically takes 5-7 years and if they're anything like IBM, it is safe to say that the next few generations of AI-enabled mainframes are already in the works. Not only are mainframes surviving in the AI Era, they are thriving.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why IBM's High Valuation Has Analysts Concerned
International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:) is one of the On August 14, Erste Group analyst Hans Engel downgraded the stock from Buy to Hold, reflecting the challenges IBM is facing in accelerating its revenue growth to contest broader technology sector performance. According to the analysts, IBM's sales growth is 'well below' the sector average which isn't expected to change this year. They believe that current valuation is 'high in view of the below-average growth prospects.' 'IBM's sales growth is well below the sector average. This is not expected to change this year either. The Group's latest forecast for 2025 assumes moderate revenue growth of at least +5% (y/y). The free cash flow forecast has been left at USD 13.5 bn. The current P/E ratio of the stock is high in view of the below-average growth prospects.' JuliusKielaitis / International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) is a multinational technology company and a pioneer in artificial intelligence, offering AI consulting services and a suite of AI software products. While we acknowledge the potential of IBM as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
The Real Trade Emergency—Why the Business Community Must Lead Again
U.S. trade policy is adrift—not for lack of activity, but for lack of leadership coordination and vision. The recent use of emergency authorities like the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs reflects a broader challenge. It's not just about policy complexity in an uncertain global economy; it's also about the absence of strong, unified input from the American business community. For decades, U.S. companies helped shape an open, rules-based trading system. Today, that collective voice is missing, and the consequences are mounting. American businesses once led boldly on trade. They were instrumental in building a global system that expanded prosperity, lifted millions out of poverty, and cemented U.S. economic leadership. Organizations like the Emergency Committee for American Trade (ECAT), founded in 1967 by executives from IBM, Ford, John Deere, and Chase Manhattan Bank, stood at the center of that effort. These leaders understood that trade policy wasn't just a Washington exercise; it was a business imperative. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters in the Oval Office on Aug. 14, 2025, in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters in the Oval Office on Aug. 14, 2025, in Washington, when ECAT closed its doors in 2018, it signaled, perhaps prematurely, that business had declared victory on trade. What followed was fragmentation: sector-by-sector advocacy, each focused on its own narrow interests. Now, the tech industry lobbies for digital priorities. Agriculture and food companies navigate their own trade challenges. Financial firms carve out separate agendas. Branded consumer companies defend their global reputations. But few speak with a unified voice about the broader U.S. trade strategy or the need for one. A siloed approach has weakened America's global negotiating position and eroded public support for open markets. The result? Incoherent policies, rising costs, and missed opportunities. While large multinationals can often absorb or shift the impact of tariffs, smaller businesses and households are less fortunate. Trade policy built on ad hoc decisions and political expediency doesn't deliver for the broader economy. Greg Page, former chairman and CEO of Cargill, once said in a meeting with government officials while we were advocating on the Transpacific Partnership in Washington, DC: "When it's every company and every country for itself, the poor suffer most." Greg's warning rings louder today. The erosion of collaborative business leadership on trade isn't just an economic issue; it's a moral and strategic one. Trade has always been about more than market access. It's about building bridges, deepening alliances, and strengthening the backbone of democracy through shared prosperity. In the absence of business leadership, policy risks becoming reactive and politicized. Consider this: America's own revolution was sparked in part by opposition to unfair tariffs. Advocating for modern trade liberalization isn't anti-American; it's deeply in line with the nation's founding ideals. Eliminating harmful trade barriers and investing in rules-based trade enhances our independence and global standing. Meanwhile, other nations aren't standing still. The European Union, China, and regional blocs across Asia and Africa are forging new trade agreements, shaping global standards without U.S. leadership at the table. As others write the rules of tomorrow's economy, America risks becoming a rule-taker, not a rule-maker. To reverse this drift, the business community must once again act as a strategic stakeholder; not just a special interest. CEOs must move beyond zero-sum thinking and reassert themselves as advocates of a coherent, forward-looking trade agenda. It means reengaging in Washington not simply to protect their own sectors, but to help shape a national strategy that benefits the full economy to include workers, consumers, and companies alike. Trade isn't just about exports and deficits. It's about values. It's about whether the U.S. will lead a world built on cooperation and fair competition, or retreat into fragmented, transactional relationships that benefit the few at the expense of the many. The real emergency in trade today isn't the deficit. It's the dangerous silence of the private sector. If U.S. businesses want a stable, predictable, and open global economy, they must help rebuild it. That begins with speaking out—not as isolated sectors, but as one business community, united by the shared understanding that long-term prosperity requires open markets, strong institutions, and principled leadership. It's not too late—but it's later than we think. Devry Boughner Vorwerk is CEO of DevryBVSustainable Strategies and former corporate vice president of global corporate affairs at Cargill and head of corporate affairs at Grubhub. She has more than 25 years of experience in international trade, including roles at the U.S. International Trade Commission, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the World Bank, and Akin Gump. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Entrepreneur
5 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
AI Frees Up Your Time — Here's Why You Should Spend It With Your Employees
You don't have to micromanage — but you do have to show up. Here's why presence is the underrated superpower of AI-era leaders. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Recently, I traveled to an event with a handful of Jotform colleagues. The proceedings were livestreamed, but it felt important to go in person, and I'm glad I did. After the day's presentations concluded, attendees drifted up to the rooftop where appetizers were being served by bow-tied staff and spontaneous conversations began organically and flowed naturally. I'm not an especially outgoing person, but even an introvert like me could plainly see the benefits of spending time with my colleagues in person, outside the office. While I couldn't quantify the exact value in ROIs or KPIs, the opportunity to talk in a relaxed environment became the perfect setting to workshop ideas, ask deeper questions and connect in ways that structured meetings rarely allow. We came away inspired, aligned and re-energized — not because of anything formal, but because of the rare opportunity to simply be present. Technology has fundamentally transformed how we communicate and collaborate, and it's tempting to believe that faster tools automatically mean better outcomes. But in the push for optimization, we also risk losing something essential: real human connection. To be clear, I absolutely believe in the power of automation. It frees us up from work that depletes us, making space for what really matters. But I also know that going too far down the rabbit hole risks creating distance between ourselves and our teams. That's why, especially in the age of AI, spending time with your employees isn't just a nice-to-have — it's a critical part of leading well. Related: How to Keep Teams Connected When We're Apart The cost of over-delegating to machines There's no question that automation has made our lives easier. AI-powered schedulers handle meetings with a few clicks. Smart inbox tools prioritize what needs your attention. Assistants draft responses, summarize threads and even flag trends in team behavior. I use all of these tools, and think everyone else should, too. That said, I would never rely on these systems to replace my face-to-face interactions. I chatted recently with another founder who proudly told me he hasn't interacted with his team in person in months. I tried to hide a cringe. To me, effective leadership does not mean delegating it away. When we do, leadership risks becoming transactional, and that's not the way to develop trust or build a healthy workplace culture. How AI can enhance empathy Empathy — the ability to understand and share the feelings of another person — is a distinctly human trait. It's also the cornerstone of effective leadership. A good leader can recognize when someone is feeling overwhelmed, needs encouragement or the time and space to cultivate an idea. For busy leaders, AI can actually enhance our empathetic abilities. Tools like Affectiva can analyze employee sentiment and surface insights that might otherwise go unnoticed. A sudden dip in engagement scores or a change in tone across messages can signal that something's off, giving managers a chance to intervene before small issues become major problems. But as helpful as AI can be in these scenarios, it's important to remember the word "enhance" is not the same as "replace." I like the analogy used by Harvard Business Review contributors Rasmus Hougaard and Jacqueline Carter, who point out that relying only on AI without doing the inner work of human development would be like buying a top-of-the-line Ferrari while ignoring our driving skills. "To get the best from AI, we need to equally invest in the development of our human potential," they write. "Alone, neither is sufficient. Both are necessary." Related: Why Empathy Is One of the Most Overlooked Skills in Business Your presence is required No matter how powerful the AI tool, nothing can replace the impact of a present leader. And by "presence," I don't mean micromanaging or constantly hovering over your team. It's about showing up with intention, listening without distractions and asking the follow-up questions that get to the heart of the matter. Presence builds trust. And trust is what allows teams to take risks, admit mistakes and do their best work. In a world that's increasingly asynchronous, automated and remote, the leaders who succeed won't necessarily be the ones who rush to adopt the most sophisticated tools first. They'll be the ones who make time to connect. In fact, research finds that such leaders are the ones who are best equipped to successfully implement AI into their operations. As HBR notes, leaders with high awareness, wisdom and compassion tend to be best at contextualizing AI-based strategy shifts, and are able to use AI tools with discernment and care. As AI takes tasks off your plate, use some of that newly freed-up time to really connect with your teams. That might mean blocking off a few hours each week for impromptu conversations, or dropping a thoughtful comment or compliment in Slack. These things might seem small, but they're the sort of thing that people remember. In a time when technology can do more than ever, the most impactful thing you can do as a leader is actually the simplest: Show up. AI is a powerful force, but only a strong leader can guide a company through the big changes on the horizon.
