
Colombian Presidential Hopeful Uribe Dies Two Months after Shooting
Uribe, a member of a prominent political family and a lawmaker for the right-wing opposition, was shot in Bogota on June 7 where he was speaking to try to secure his party's nomination for 2026 elections.
His wife, Maria Claudia Tarazona, announced his death on social media. 'I ask God to show me the way to learn to live without you,' she wrote. 'Rest in peace, love of my life, I will take care of our children.'
The attack was the worst outbreak of political violence in some two decades and evoked memories of the turbulent years of the 1980s and 1990s, when four presidential candidates were murdered in separate attacks blamed on drug cartels.
'The investigation should be deepened. It will be the appropriate authorities, helped by international experts, who will give information when the time comes,' President Gustavo Petro said in a post on X. 'Every time a Colombian is murdered, it is a defeat for Colombia and for life.'
The capital's Santa Fe Foundation hospital – where supporters held regular vigils during Uribe's treatment and repeated operations – said over the weekend his condition had worsened because of a hemorrhage in his central nervous system. On Monday, it said he had died at 1:56 a.m. (0656 GMT).
Former President Alvaro Uribe, the leader of the senator's Democratic Center party and no relation to the deceased lawmaker, wrote on X that 'evil destroys everything; they killed hope'.
'May Miguel's fight be a light that illuminates Colombia's right path,' added the former president, who was sentenced by a judge earlier this month to 12 years of house arrest for abuse of process and bribery of a public official.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X he was deeply saddened by the news. 'The United States stands in solidarity with his family, the Colombian people, both in mourning and demanding justice for those responsible.'
Six people have been arrested over the shooting, including two men that the attorney general's office says met in Medellin to plan the assassination.
A 15-year-old accused of carrying out the shooting was arrested within hours of the crime, but police have said they are pursuing the 'intellectual authors' of the attack.
In a video of the boy's June arrest, independently verified by Reuters, he can be heard shouting that he had been hired by a local drug dealer.
FRAUGHT FAMILY HISTORY
Defense Minister Pedro Sanchez vowed on Monday to catch those responsible. 'We will not allow the violent to intimidate or silence political voices needed in our democracy,' he wrote on X.
His ministry has said there is a 3 billion-peso (about $740,000) reward for information leading to the identification and capture of the culprits, and that the United States, Britain and the United Arab Emirates are helping with the investigation.
The death of Senator Uribe, a father and stepfather, adds further tragedy to his family's fraught history.
His mother, journalist Diana Turbay, was killed in 1991 during a botched rescue mission after she was kidnapped by the Medellin Cartel, headed by drug lord Pablo Escobar.
Uribe himself enjoyed a rapid political rise, as a lawmaker for the right-wing Democratic Center party and presidential hopeful known for his sharp criticism of leftist President Gustavo Petro's administration.
In videos posted on social media the day he was shot, Uribe called for respect of the separation of powers and rejected a referendum pushed by Petro on a labor reform bill.
He had also criticized the president's restrictions on the oil industry, promising a plan to attract investment and give companies legal security.
At 25, he was elected to Bogota's city council, where he was a prominent opponent of Petro, then the capital's mayor, criticizing his handling of waste management and social programs.
In the 2022 legislative elections, Uribe led the Senate slate for the Democratic Center party. Since the shooting, Uribe's seat in the Senate has been draped with a Colombian flag.
His maternal grandfather, Julio Cesar Turbay, was Colombia's president from 1978 to 1982, while his paternal grandfather, Rodrigo Uribe Echavarria, headed the Liberal Party and supported Virgilio Barco's successful 1986 presidential campaign.
Besides his wife, son and stepdaughters, Uribe is also survived by his father and sister.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asahi Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
VOX POPULI: Concerns linger after the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska
U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin, as they meet to negotiate for an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Aug. 15. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque) There are two islands in the middle of the Bering Strait—Big Diomede Island and Little Diomede Island. They are only about 4 kilometers apart, but there lies an invisible divide between them. When the clock shows 11 a.m. on Sunday on Big Diomede and it's getting close to lunchtime, the clock on Little Diomede shows 3 p.m. on Saturday. Why is that? It's because the International Date Line runs between the two islands, placing the islands in different time zones—Big Diomede is 20 hours ahead of Little Diomede. This man-made demarcation sets the two islands apart quite decisively. While Little Diomede is part of the United States, Big Diomede is Russian territory, and its official name is Ratmanov Island. Both belonged to Russia until 1867, when dire financial straits forced Russia to sell what is now Alaska to the United States, and an international border was drawn between the two Diomedes. U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin conferred in Alaska. I thought about those two islands when Putin gleefully said during a news conference that his country and the United States are 'close neighbors only 4 kilometers apart.' I strongly believe in the necessity of dialogue between Trump and Putin, if the war in Ukraine is to end. But I have serious doubts about Trump's decision to roll out the red carpet for the leader of the aggressor nation. In fact, I worry that Trump may well be allowing himself to play into Putin's hands. In the history of the 19th century world where territories were 'defined' arbitrarily by the great powers, the people who originally inhabited Alaska were as good as nonexistent. And we cannot allow that sort of absurdity in our 21st century world. There must be no deal that will leave the people of war-torn Ukraine languishing in their misery. —The Asahi Shimbun, Aug. 17 * * * Vox Populi, Vox Dei is a popular daily column that takes up a wide range of topics, including culture, arts and social trends and developments. Written by veteran Asahi Shimbun writers, the column provides useful perspectives on and insights into contemporary Japan and its culture.


Yomiuri Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Intel Gets $2 Billion Lifeline in the Form of SoftBank Equity Investment
Aug 19 (Reuters) – Intel INTC.O is getting a $2 billion capital injection from SoftBank Group 9984.T in a major vote of confidence for the troubled U.S. chipmaker that is in the middle of a turnaround effort. The equity investment, announced by the two companies on Monday, is a lifeline for the once-iconic U.S. chipmaker which has struggled to compete after years of management blunders that left it with virtually no foothold in the booming artificial intelligence chip industry. It will make SoftBank a top-10 shareholder of Intel and add to the Japanese tech investor's ambitious bet on artificial intelligence that includes the $500 billion Stargate U.S. data center project. 'SoftBank's investment helps, but it is not what is going to move the dial for Intel,' said Amir Anvarzadeh, Japan equity strategist at Asymmetric Advisors. 'It's more to maintain this very good relationship he has with Trump,' he said, referring to Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son. The deal follows media reports last week that the U.S. government may buy a stake in Intel, after a meeting between new CEO Lip-Bu Tan and President Donald Trump that was sparked by the President's demand for Tan's resignation over his ties to Chinese firms. It also comes as Tokyo pledged a $550 billion investment package into the U.S. last month as part of a trade deal with Washington. The Intel investment is not currently part of that package, a Japanese government source with knowledge of the negotiations said. SoftBank's decision to invest in Intel is not connected to Trump, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role,' Son said in a statement. It will pay $23 per Intel share, a slight discount to Monday's closing price of $23.66. SoftBank's investment will come via a primary issuance of common stock by Intel, and, based on the U.S. company's market capitalisation at close of trading on Monday, represent an equity stake of just under 2%, an Intel spokesperson said. The Japanese company would become the sixth largest investor in Intel, according to LSEG data. SoftBank shares dropped more than 5% on Tuesday following the announcement, while Intel surged 5.6% in after-market hours trading. The Japanese company will only take an equity stake in Intel and will neither seek a board seat nor commit to buying Intel's chips, the person familiar with the matter said. MULTIPLE CHALLENGES Intel has struggled financially and recorded an annual loss of $18.8 billion in 2024, its first such loss since 1986, as it grapples with multiple challenges. Its longtime rival AMD AMD.O has been gaining share in Intel's mainstay personal computer and server semiconductor markets, while its ambitious and costly plan for a chip contracting business that rivals that of Taiwan's TSMC has failed to take off. The company is now considering a significant change to its contract chip manufacturing business to win major customers, Reuters reported last month, in a potentially expensive shift from its previous strategies. 'Intel's dual role as designer and manufacturer/fabricator uniquely positions it as potentially the best platform in the U.S. to compete with TSMC,' said Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo. Bloomberg News reported earlier on Monday that the U.S. government is in talks to take a 10% stake in Intel. SoftBank declined to provide more details on the Intel investment when asked to comment by Reuters. Tan, a chip industry veteran who also served as a SoftBank board member before quitting in 2022, thanked Son for 'the confidence he has placed in Intel with this investment.' The Intel funding is the latest in the Japanese company's run of mammoth investment announcements in 2025, which include committing $30 billion to ChatGPT maker OpenAI as well as leading the financing for Stargate.

Nikkei Asia
4 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump opens door to selling version of Nvidia's next-gen AI chips in China
(Reuters) -- U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday suggested he might allow Nvidia to sell a scaled-down version of its next-generation advanced GPU chip in China, despite deep-seated fears in Washington that China could harness American artificial intelligence capabilities to supercharge its military. Trump also confirmed and defended an agreement calling for U.S. AI chip giant Nvidia, led by Jensen Huang, and Advanced Micro Devices to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from sales of some advanced computer chips in China, after his administration greenlit exports to China of less advanced AI chips known as the H20 last month. "Jensen also has the new chip, the Blackwell. A somewhat enhanced-in-a-negative-way Blackwell. In other words, take 30% to 50% off of it," Trump told reporters in an apparent reference to slashing the chip's capability. "I think he's coming to see me again about that, but that will be an unenhanced version of the big one," he added. Trump's administration halted sales of Nvidia's H20 chips to China in April, but the company said last month it had won clearance to resume shipments and hoped to start deliveries soon. "The H20 is obsolete," Trump said, saying China already had it. "So I said, 'Listen, I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you, for the country'," he added. The deal is extremely rare for the U.S. and marks Trump's latest intervention in corporate decision-making, after pressuring executives to invest in American manufacturing and demanding new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan resign over ties to Chinese companies. Analysts said the levy may hit margins at the chipmakers and set a precedent for Washington to tax critical U.S. exports, potentially extending beyond semiconductors. The U.S. Commerce Department has started issuing licenses for the sale of H20 chips to China, another U.S. official said on Friday. Both the U.S. officials declined to be named because details have not been made public. The China curbs are expected to cost Nvidia and AMD billions of dollars in revenue, and successive U.S. administrations have sought in recent years to limit Beijing's access to cutting-edge chips that could bolster China's military. Washington does not feel the sale of H20 and equivalent chips compromises national security, said the first U.S. official. The official did not know when or how the agreement with the chip companies would be implemented, but said the administration would be in compliance with the law. The U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from laying taxes and duties on articles exported from any state. The Export Clause applies to taxes and duties, not user fees. When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15% of revenues to the U.S., a company spokesperson said: "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets." "While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide," the spokesperson added. A spokesperson for AMD said the U.S. approved its applications to export some AI processors to China, but did not directly address the revenue-sharing agreement and said the company's business adheres to all U.S. export controls. The Commerce Department did not immediately comment. China's foreign ministry said the country has repeatedly stated its position on U.S. chip exports. The ministry has previously accused Washington of using technology and trade measures to "maliciously contain and suppress China." The Financial Times, which first reported the development, said the chip firms agreed to the arrangement as a condition for obtaining the export licenses for their semiconductors, including AMD's MI308 chips. It added that the Trump administration had yet to determine how to use the money. "The Chinese market is significant for both these companies so even if they have to give up a bit of the money, they would otherwise make it look like a logical move on paper," AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould said. Still, analysts and experts questioned the logic of resuming sales if the chips could pose a national security risk. "Decisions on export licenses should be determined by national security considerations and the tradeoffs of U.S. policy goals, not a revenue-creating possibility," said Martin Chorzempa, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, an independent research institution. "What it ends up creating is an incentive to control things, to then extract a payment, rather than controlling things because we're actually concerned about the risk to national security." U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month the planned resumption of sales of the AI chips was part of U.S. negotiations with China to get rare earths and described the H20 as Nvidia's "fourth-best chip" in an interview with CNBC. He said it was in U.S. interests for Chinese firms to use American technology, even if the most advanced chips remained barred, to keep them on a U.S. "tech stack". Some elements of Trump's trade policy are already facing legal scrutiny, with a federal appeals panel skeptical of his claim that a 1977 law, traditionally used to sanction enemies or freeze assets, also empowered him to impose tariffs. "We aren't sure we like the precedent this sets," Bernstein analysts said of the revenue-share deal. "Will it stop with Chinese AI? Will it stop with controlled products? Will other companies be required to pay to sell into the region?" "It feels like a slippery slope to us." The analysts estimated the deal would cut gross margins on the China-bound processors by 5 to 15 percentage points, shaving about a point from Nvidia and AMD's overall margins. Nvidia generated $17 billion in revenue from China in the fiscal year ending January 26, representing 13% of total sales. AMD reported $6.2 billion in China revenue for 2024, accounting for 24% of total revenue. Nvidia has warned a China sales halt for H20 chips could cut $8 billion from July quarter revenue, while AMD has projected a $1.5 billion annual hit from the curbs