The millennial case against having baby number 3
Experts say it's not just financial and logistical. It's down to changing values, too.
Millennial parents who considered having more kids share the roadblocks they came up against.
Victoria Lamson and her husband once entertained the idea of having a third child. Then, they considered the logistics.
Even having their two children was a challenge. To alleviate financial strain, they "intentionally put five years in between" having children, Lamson, 38, told Business Insider.
The couple is raising them in San Francisco, the most expensive US city. They send their 7-year-old son to a nearby parochial school because the public school system in San Francisco is "definitely struggling," Lamson said. When her 2-year-old daughter is old enough, she will attend the same school. Private school costs in the city average $26,000 per child annually. Moving, in order to afford a third child, would also be difficult — both her and her husband's families live nearby.
Plus, she and her husband's careers have undergone many changes. Lamson pivoted from sales to PR, ending her first contract PR role when she gave birth to her second child. She spent part of her maternity leave looking for a new job. Meanwhile, her husband, who works in tech recruiting, has experienced a decline in business with the recent tech layoffs.
"Putting all those factors together, it really just doesn't make sense for us anymore," Lamson said.
Lamson and her husband join other millennials, who are between the ages of 29 and 44, averaging two kids max. Along with the millennials who are having fewer kids or remaining child-free, the generation is often blamed for America's shrinking birth rate.
There isn't one economic or cultural reason as to why so many millennials are two-and-done with having kids. While childcare costs and fertility issues play substantial roles, there has also been a sea change in what an ideal family — and family size — looks like.
Barely making do with two
When it comes to family size, millennials aren't that different from their predecessors. According to a 2020 Pew Research Center Report, millennial women average 2.02 kids. At similar ages, Gen X women had 2.05 kids and boomers 2.07.
Pamela Smock, a professor of sociology at the University of Michigan, said having two kids has been an American ideal since the 1960s. The difference between the generations is that millennials are less likely to have kids than previous generations. In that sense, a young family with two kids is no longer the norm, but, for some, a symbol of luxury.
"People see marriage and childbearing as something to do once they feel economically comfortable," Smock said.
To many, that means not having any debt and being able to afford a mortgage. The average millennial borrower owes $42,000 in student loan debt, part of why it's so difficult for millennials to buy their first homes. Comparatively, 45% of baby boomers bought their first homes between the ages of 25 and 34.
Work has also changed, Smock said. Gone are the lifelong jobs that require a basic college degree. Millennials are known as the "job-hopping generation," which also impacts their sense of security as costs keep rising.
Stephanie Fornaro, a 40-year-old mom of two in Dallas, has a 20-year-old daughter in college and a 7-year-old son. She had her daughter when she was 20, but delayed having her son until her early 30s.
"Financially, I was in a different season in my life to afford a second child," she said, adding that she divorced a few years after giving birth to her daughter. It was only when she remarried in 2017 that she felt secure enough to have another kid.
Wendie N. Choudary, a sociologist and lecturer at Binghamton University, told BI that in addition to rent or housing costs, millennial parents also have to deal with astronomically high childcare costs, paying an annual average of $11,000 per child.
Fornaro, who founded and runs a national childcare agency, said a third child would have a huge financial impact on her family. To keep up with her job, she would need a full-time nanny — roughly $80,000 a year in Dallas.
Childcare costs are so high that some parents struggle to even have their second child. Katie Waldron, who lives in Long Island, New York, previously told Business Insider that she and her husband want a second child soon, but are considering moving to the UK to be closer to his family and find more affordable childcare services.
"The burden of childcare costs and, equally, the lack of emotional support as we go through our parenting journey make it impossible to have another," she said.
Millennials are having kids later
Economic uncertainty also plays a role in millennials having kids later than past generations, Smock said, thus affecting how many they have. Millennials' median age for first-time parents is 27.3, a significant increase from the 1970s when it was the norm to have kids at 21.
Depending on when they start having kids, timing the third can be tricky. More parents are having kids in their 40s, past the fertility peak at 37 years old. Even if the plan is to have more than two kids, it's not necessarily in the parents' control, Smock said. Not everyone can afford IVF, which can cost $12,000 and require six rounds to achieve success.
Having kids past 35 also increases the chances of conditions like preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, premature birth, or genetic disorders in the fetus. Parents considering a third child in their late 30s or early 40s might not feel the risk is worth it.
Sometimes, a rough pregnancy is enough to deter wanting more kids. Lamson, who had her first child at 31 and second at 36, felt a huge difference in those five years. At 31, she said it was easy to stay very active and exercise four times a week. The second time was more challenging.
"I had really low energy throughout my entire pregnancy," she said. "I struggled with a lot of pain, so even when I would try to just get out and walk, I could only kind of do so for a period of time before I didn't feel all that well."
"I attribute it a lot to age," she said, adding that she ended up going to physical therapy to alleviate some symptoms.
With more choice, parents choose fewer kids
After World War II, it was normal to get married at 19 and have kids in rapid succession, Smock said. But with more choices, millennials realized "they don't have to follow the path that their parents and grandparents took," she said.
In recent years, there's been an increased online interest in "trad wives" and the merits of large families. However, it hasn't shown much of a dent in what most people want, Julia A. Behrman, an associate professor of sociology at Northwestern University who researches how values shape a person's ideal family size, told BI.
"We are pretty consistently seeing these average ideal family sizes of about 2.5," Behrman said. Most actually plan to have fewer: roughly 1.8 on average among people in their 20s and 30s.
In Behrman's research, she's found that people with more progressive views on gender norms and household labor tend to want fewer kids — often because they are aware of how childrearing disproportionately falls on mothers.
Even if parents want two or more kids, Behrman's research found that it doesn't mean it's their top priority. Other aspects of family life, like financial stability, rank higher.
For the parents who can technically swing three kids, it could mean a notable decline in their quality of life. Fornaro, who grew up as one of eight children and felt neglected because her dad and stepmom struggled to raise them all, doesn't want her kids to experience the same. She said having a third wouldn't just impact how much she could contribute to her kids' college tuition or inheritances. It would also change how much time she gets to spend with them.
"We are a pretty active family," she said. Traveling and going on their boat would be harder with an infant. Taking her son to his extracurriculars — jujitsu, baseball, and football — would also be much harder with a newborn. And with Fornaro's daughter in college, caring for a baby would make it difficult for Fornaro to visit her.
Lamson even felt a big difference in what she could do after having a second kid. She and her husband took their son to Europe when he was 10 months old because he had an easygoing demeanor. "My daughter doesn't have the same personality; she's a little bit more challenging," Lamson said.
They've opted for more staycations and plan to travel more when their daughter is older. Having a third child would be financially "really limiting" for vacations, not to mention the logistics of wrangling three kids onto a flight.
It's not that millennial parents don't love parenting or a house full of kids. Fornaro fell in love with being a mom after her first child. Lamson wanted a third. They just wanted to give more to their existing family.
"I wanted my kids to have my undivided attention," Fornaro said. "I felt like that was one thing that I didn't get out of my parents."
Read the original article on Business Insider
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Backlash to Delta's AI pricing shows the tightrope companies walk when it comes to AI
When Delta last month said it was ramping up its use of AI to set fares, the backlash from customers was swift. It demonstrated a common problem companies face in the age of AI: how to adopt new technology (and brag about it to please shareholders) without freaking out consumers. Delta has said it is not using AI to set different prices for different individuals based on their personal data. Instead, the airline says AI is being used to improve existing dynamic pricing practices that are already used across the industry. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing, or plans to use that targets customers with individualized offers based on personal information or otherwise," the company said in a statement provided to Business Insider. Travelers were still spooked. Online, they complained about the potential for price gouging, and lawmakers sent a letter demanding answers from Delta, citing concerns about data privacy and the potential for price discrimination. "It sounds very dystopian to me," Brent McDonald, a lawyer based in Salt Lake City and a frequent Delta flyer, told Business Insider. McDonald said in cities like Salt Lake, which is a major hub for Delta, there are not a lot of options for direct flights. "With that monopoly power, it could be very abusive to use AI to maximize the amount of money they'll get from each customer," he said. Tim Sanders, vice president of research insights at G2, told Business Insider, "When you say you have artificial intelligence in a consumer product, it raises red flags with consumers." Investors, on the other hand, tend to love it since it can lead to efficiency gains. "Delta, in an effort to impress its investors, stepped into a PR backlash," he said. Consumers don't trust AI, so messaging is key Industry experts who spoke to Business Insider said Delta's lack of details in its initial public discussions of using AI led some consumers to worry about potential worst-case scenarios. On Investor Day in November, Delta said about 1% of its network had fares set using AI. Delta President Glen Hauenstein said, "The initial results show amazingly favorable unit revenues" and that, eventually, "we will have a price that's available on that flight, on that time to you, the individual." On Delta's second-quarter earnings call in July, Hauenstein said AI was now being used to set prices on about 3% of its domestic network and that the goal was to get to 20% by the end of the year. "We're in heavy testing phase," he said. "We like what we see." After Sen. Ruben Gallego sent a letter to Delta requesting answers about its AI pricing, the airline responded and said much of what was being said about their process was false. "Your letter presupposes that we are using, and intend to use, AI for 'individualized' pricing or 'surveillance' pricing, leveraging consumer-specific personal data, such as sensitive personal circumstances or prior purchasing activity to set individualized prices," the airline said in a letter dated July 31. "To clarify, this is incorrect, and this assumption, unfortunately, has created confusion and misinformation in the public discourse." Delta also shared more details about how it's using AI. The airline said AI is assisting human analysts by forecasting demand for specific routes, aggregating purchasing data, and factoring in thousands of variables at once — though not personal data. Sanders said being transparent about how AI is being used could help address the issue of consumer trust. He said companies should look toward the transparency practices at AI industry leaders like OpenAI, which he noted has introduced features that have ChatGPT show its work and explain its reasoning. One way airlines could do that would be to show fare factors on its ticket prices, or to provide some explanation about how a price was set. He also said airlines could allow users to opt out of AI-priced seats and make it clear that could mean some seats may not be offered to them. Companies should talk about how they're using AI to improve their service Clint Henderson, managing editor at the travel website The Points Guy, said he's worried that AI being used in pricing could actually lead airlines to penalize their most loyal customers by upcharging them because they will pay more to stick to the airline and get the points. But he said AI pricing could potentially be used for good, too, like by giving a discount to a new customer or offering cheaper upgrades to first or business class by finding just the right price for someone to splurge. Zack Kass, an AI advisor and former head of go-to-market at OpenAI, said rather than talk vaguely about how AI is boosting profits, companies need to talk about how they are using AI to improve the customer experience. "Talk about how your wait time on customer support is coming down. Talk about how you're improving on time arrivals. Talk about how you're using AI to lose fewer bags," Kass told Business Insider. Kass said many consumers might even approve of an airline charging wealthy passengers, like those who always opt for first-class, a bit more in order to provide lower prices to others. However AI is being used to improve the actual product or provide goods and services at a lower cost, he said it's incumbent on companies to tell that story. The way individual companies talk about AI doesn't just impact their business either, Sanders said, but can also slow adoption across the board if it creates broader distrust among consumers. "Trust in AI arrives by a mule," he said. "It leaves on a Maserati."


New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Why Even Basic Airline Seats Keep Getting More ‘Premium'
Basic economy once ruled the airplane. Aside from those few rows in the business class cabin, what most passengers got was a bare bones, bottom-rung experience. Now, even on budget airlines, premium seating is taking over. Wealthy leisure travelers have proven most resilient to economic turbulence. So airlines are finding new ways to profit from customers who are willing to pay for some perks. Sometimes that means turning previously included options, like a seat in the front half of the main cabin, into paid upgrades. It has also involved expanding the cabin between first class and coach, and introducing a torrent of small luxuries to justify higher fares in the not-quite-business class. For example: American Airlines introduced a Boeing 787-9 plane this summer with redesigned premium economy seats that have headrest wings for 'additional privacy,' water bottle storage, and calf and footrests. It has said it plans to expand its lie-flat and premium economy seating by 50 percent before the end of the decade. Delta expanded its premium economy service — which comes with amenities kits, meals and more legroom — to transcontinental flights last fall. Glen Hauenstein, the airline's president, said in the company's recent earnings call that it used segmentation of the main cabin (think fees for extra leg room) as 'the template that we're going to bring to all of our premium cabins over time.' United Airlines said in July that it would add more premium economy seats between business class and economy-plus seats on its wide-body jets. 'That's the cabin, I think, that is generating very good returns,' Andrew Nocella, the airline's chief commercial officer, said during the company's earnings call. Revenue growth in the premium cabin is outpacing the main cabin at all three carriers. As airlines add premium options, they have also made moves to further distinguish their top-tier tickets from other rungs. This summer, American Airlines debuted an aircraft with first-class suites that have privacy doors — a feature Delta already offered on some flights and that United will soon include in a new international business class that also comes with caviar service and designer pajamas. 'It's all about giving people more choice, more pricing options, and more products and services in every cabin,' Delta's Hauenstein said about expanding premium offerings on the earnings call. Meanwhile, basic fares are dropping. Airfares overall have decreased by 3.5 percent in the last year as inflation overall increased by 2.7 percent, according to the Department of Labor. Price drops at major airlines have caused a problem for budget airlines, which historically compete on price alone. Their response? You guessed it, also more perks. Spirit Airlines, once the largest ultra-low-cost airline in North America, emerged from bankruptcy protection this year with plans to rebrand as a premium airline. Southwest Airlines, which joined American and Delta in withdrawing its financial forecast for 2025, has created premium seats with more legroom on all flights. And even no-frills carrier Frontier Airlines is planning to debut 'first-class style' seats in late 2025. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Retail Traders Bet Big on Europe and See Meme Stock-Like Returns
By and Claire Ballentine Save The recent return of meme-stock froth to markets saw risk-loving retail traders riding the fleeting spikes in shares of Krispy Kreme and Kohl's as they hunt for gains that can beat the S&P 500. But for much of this year, a cohort of investors has been betting on a new, potentially more enduring trend: that European stocks will finally outperform their American counterparts, driven by a fundamental case for shifting some investment dollars elsewhere.