Opposition, petitioners call SC order a big step forward
Supreme Court
's order on the
Bihar Special Intensive Revision
(SIR) exercise a "significant advantage," saying it puts the onus on the
Election Commission
(EC) to include Aadhaar, EPIC, and ration card among accepted documents for
voter verification
.
"The Honourable Supreme Court has clearly suggested that three documents-Aadhaar, EC voter ID and ration cards-be considered by the EC in the enumeration process. These were alleged by us to have been excluded across Bihar. This is a significant advance," said senior advocate and
Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi
, who is representing eight
political parties
, Mahua Moitra, and PUCL in the matter.
Singhvi said all other contentions remain open and the EC has time to file its reply till the end of July. The court will hear the matter again on July 28.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
He further argued that the EC had, for the first time, reversed the presumption of eligibility for existing voters by putting all electors enrolled after 2003 in a "state of suspended animation" until they proved their status. He also pointed out that the EC was demanding birth certificates, including those of parents, as proof-something the petitioners contended was outside the EC's jurisdiction.
"These and other substantive points will be considered by the court after pleadings are completed. It is an ongoing, sub judice exercise," he added.
Live Events
RJD MP Manoj Jha, also a petitioner, told ET that the order "has shown a path of inclusion."
"Prima facie, the SC believes Aadhaar, EPIC, and ration card must be part of the accepted documents. There was widespread fear of exclusion, and the court has pointed to a way forward," he said.
Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), another petitioner in the case, echoed similar sentiments. ADR founding member Jagdeep Chhokar said, "We didn't get all that we expected, but it could have been worse. The court has suggested the inclusion of Aadhaar, EPIC, and ration card. We will watch the EC's response. If these are not included, the hearing is on July 28."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Sustainable development also has to be permitted': SC refuses to halt felling of trees for Mumbai tunnel project
The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to intervene with the permission granted for clearing trees to dig a shaft for lowering a boring machine to construct a tunnel linking Goregaon and Mulund in Mumbai. However, it said that the permission will be subject to the project proponents submitting a plan for compensatory afforestation and a report by experts on the need to cut the trees. 'Environment has to be protected, but sustainable development also has to be permitted,' Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, presiding over a two-judge bench, said. The Supreme Court then granted permission to the Maharashtra tree authority 'to proceed further with the application of the project proponent seeking permission for felling of the trees'. 'However, we clarify that no trees shall be actually felled without the permission of this court. We direct the project proponents to place on record the report of the experts showing that no other alternative than felling of 95 trees for digging of the shaft is available. The project proponent will also place on record the plan for compensatory afforestation to compensate for the loss of trees that would be felled for digging the shaft,' the bench also comprising Justice Vinod Chandran said in its order. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the project proponent, said the expert report is ready and will be submitted to the court. He pointed out that, as per the report, 11,000 trees will have to be planted as compensation. While only 95 trees are planned to be cut in the first phase, the entire project would necessitate 1,094 trees to be cut. 'No doubt that the protection of environment is important, as has been consistently held by us that the resources are held in trust for the future generations. However, at the same time, the necessity for carrying out developmental activities cannot be ignored,' the bench said. 'If the country has to progress, the development of infrastructure is also necessary. Unless a proper infrastructure is put in place, the country cannot progress. No doubt that while permitting such development, steps needs to be taken that least damage is caused to the environment. Further compensatory measures which has to compensate the loss caused to the environment have to be undertaken. It has already been insisted that the number of trees to be planted is in multiples of the trees felled. Taking into consideration this aspect of the matter, we are inclined to allow the application,' the bench added. Appearing for activists opposing the tree felling, senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan said the shaft area fell in the environmentally fragile Aarey colony, where a controversy had risen some years ago over the felling of trees for constructing a car shed for Phase 3 of the Mumbai Metro Line project. He pointed out that in the course of the proceedings in the Aarey matter, the Supreme Court had on December 20, 2024, asked Maharashtra if there was any proposal to fell more trees in Aarey colony. Pointing out that the proponent of the tunnel project had moved the tree authority much earlier than this, on March 4, 2024, Sankaranarayanan said that the state in its reply affidavit filed on January 8, 2025, said, 'As per reports from MMRCL [Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Ltd], at present there is no tree cutting proposal of MMRCL pending with the tree authority of the municipal corporation.' Countering this, Rohatgi said, 'That was for Metro carshed project, nothing to do with the tunnel project.' He added that the place where the shaft is to be dug is not in Aarey colony, but is a part of the Film City area. 'This not part of Aarey colony. This is Film City… though it falls within Film City area, as a matter of abundant precaution, application was moved (before SC),' he said. 'This is literally death by a thousand cuts. Every three months, they will come with an application,' Sankaranarayan said. To this, CJI Gavai said, 'We also have a concern for the environment. See Coastal Road, how much it was opposed and how it has facilitated residents of Mumbai. A person can come from airport to South Mumbai within 30 to 35 minutes. Earlier, it used to take 1.5 hours. If one uses Atal Setu, one can go to South Mumbai from Vashi within 40 minutes. We have always advocated that environment has to be protected, but at the same time, sustainable development also has to be permitted.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
CM's bid to quell unrest backfires: Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah meets MLAs without DK Shivakumar; faction war erupts in Congress
BENGALURU: CM Siddaramaiah's attempt to ease internal unrest in Congress by holding a series of meetings with party MLAs has instead intensified the ongoing power tussle within the governing party, particularly between him and his deputy, DK Shivakumar. The meetings, which started Tuesday, were intended to address legislators' grievances and distribute sanction letters for special development grants of Rs 50 crore. However, it exposed clear signs of factionalism. MLAs loyal to Siddaramaiah and those backing Shivakumar clashed openly, with differences surfacing even in the CM's presence. Although Shivakumar, also Bengaluru development minister and KPCC president, was not formally invited to the meetings, he dropped by briefly and held a discussion with the CM while he was meeting MLAs to discuss Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's proposed protest in Bengaluru on Aug 4. The protest is aimed at highlighting alleged voter fraud in Bangalore Central and Bangalore Rural Lok Sabha segments. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Parallel meet Nevertheless, Shivakumar has announced plans to convene a separate meeting with Congress legislators, focusing on issues specific to Bengaluru. "I've no issues with the CM meeting the MLAs. I will hold a separate meeting with our legislators as we have a different agenda for Bengaluru city. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indian NRIs Are Getting Eligible For INR 2 Lakh Monthly Pension On Retirement. Invest 18K/M Get Offer Undo I have held discussions with many MLAs already," Shivakumar said. Acting on directions from the Congress high command, Siddaramaiah has scheduled district-wise interactions with MLAs in presence of district ministers. On the first day, Siddaramaiah distributed grant letters to MLAs from Mysuru, Chamarajanagar, Mandya, Kodagu, and Hassan districts - once again, without Shivakumar's participation, which upset his supporters. "We were dismayed over the absence of Shivakumar," said Kunigal MLA HD Ranganath. Shivakumar sought to downplay the perceived friction. "Calling a legislators' meeting is well within the power of the CM. What is wrong with it? Surjewala, who had held meetings with MLAs, has given his feedback to the CM. The legislators' meeting is regarding that. I have no problem with the meeting, not sure why it is troubling the media," he said.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Panthers Party chief files plea seeking by-polls for Nagrota, Budgam seats
President of the Panthers Party (India), Harsh Dev Singh on Tuesday filed a writ petition before the high court of Jammu & Kashmir for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Election Commission of India (ECI) to hold assembly elections in Nagrota and Budgam constituencies immediately. The petitioner further submitted that the ECI did not seem to have any intention of holding the elections in J&K as it was behaving as a mute spectator while having activated its election machinery in Bihar. (File) The two assembly constituencies were declared vacant on October 1, 2024, in conformity with the law laid down on the subject by the Supreme Court and in consonance with its mandate of Section 151 A of Representation of Peoples' Act. Alleging inordinate and inexplicable delay, Singh, said, 'Writ petition in person has stated that by-elections in the said two assembly constituencies have been denied on extraneous considerations and in violation of plethora of rulings of various courts and the provisions of Section 151 A of RPA Act, which mandate holding such elections within a period of six months from the date of occurrence of such vacancies.' He pointed out in the petition that existing laws required the said elections to be held before ending March 2025. 'The said elections were arbitrarily denied while issuance of election notification on January 7, 2025, and the ECI had given a statement that by-elections on the said two seats can't be held due to massive snowfall deliriously oblivious of the fact that Nagrota constituency has never ever experienced snowfall in its history,' stated Singh in his petition. The petitioner further submitted that the ECI did not seem to have any intention of holding the elections in J&K as it was behaving as a mute spectator while having activated its election machinery in Bihar. He stated that the Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud in a significant ruling had observed that: ' There must be some duty cost on the Election Commission to proceed with alacrity the moment a vacancy arises'. The ECI having failed to initiate the election exercise for the last 10 months and giving lame excuses has brazenly defied not only the SC but also the prevalent law on the subject. Seeking indulgence of the HC, Singh pointed out that elections are never held in J&K until and unless the court intervenes and orders restoration of democracy.
