logo
Introducing omakase: The ultimate guide to Japanese dining concept

Introducing omakase: The ultimate guide to Japanese dining concept

The Hindu25-04-2025
Omakase, the archetypal antithesis of the French-style à la carte menu, is taking India's food and beverage industry by storm. With restaurants and bars kowtowing to the Japanese dining concept that quite literally translates to 'I leave it up to you', Omakase has takers from Amritsar to Bengaluru.
Customarily, an omakase experience demands the diners to relinquish control over their choice of dishes and allows chefs to dish out elaborate courses made with seasonal produce at a fixed price. According to Encyclopedia Britannica, 'the omakase tradition began in Japan in the 1990s to accommodate nouveau riche customers who knew little about sushi and seafood and did not want to reveal their lack of knowledge'. The term was coined in 1967, but the trend piqued my curiosity in 2024, when two of the three restaurants and bars I visited whispered the magic word.
For instance, pan-Asian restaurant Shiso flung its doors open to Amritsar, last year in June. Amidst teppanyaki (a post Second World War style of Japanese cooking with iron griddle) and yakitori (Japanese-style skewered chicken), their omakase counter stood out. The memory of a friend and I savouring nigiri and laphing while taking swigs of whisky-based cocktail called Trippy Fungi, still reminds me of the comfort that the counter offered. Predominantly, it ruled out any chance of an argument that could break out while placing the order; and clearly, the chefs stood in the firing line if one did not relish the dish. To Vansh Aggarwal, the co-owner of Shiso, my observations are amusing. 'We wanted to have a live-cooking space. So, at the omakase counter, we decided to have sushi, teppanyaki and yakitori made right in front of our guests,' he says.
The omakase menu at Shiso features 12 dishes and three cocktails. 'We have eight to 10 courses, priced at ₹4,500 per person. Every course covers one dish from an Asian country — Thai betel leaf roll from Laos and Malay tofu curry from Indonesia to China's dan dan udon and Japan's karaage chicken,' informs Vansh.
Wildcard versus menu card
Typically, omakase comprises traditional Japanese food, like oysters, bluefin tuna and sea urchin, but chefs may also combine Asian cuisine with other culinary traditions. The selection of dishes is based on the restaurant's or the chef's culinary philosophy. In that sense, Nikkei cuisine takes centre stage at Japanese-Peruvian restaurant Koishii at The St. Regis, Mumbai.
Chef Paul Kinny, culinary director of The St. Regis, explains: 'When Japanese migrants went to Peru, they married their cooking techniques with Peruvian ingredients; that's how Nikkei was born. Koishii's omakase menu comprises all its signature dishes. It includes vegetarian, meat-based and mixed options in a meal that comprises ceviche (a dish consisting of fish or shellfish marinated in citrus and seasonings), tiradito (a Peruvian dish of raw fish slices marinated in a spicy citrus sauce), sushi, robata grill (Japanese fireside-cooking), mains and desserts. Ceviche is different from Japanese sashimi because its dressing is done with leche de tigre (that translates to tiger's milk), which essentially is a spicy, citrus-based marinade.'
Koishii's omakase offerings, available till April, include dishes like forest mushroom and chicken tropical sour as part of robata grill, chupe prawn ramen, salmon salad nikkei, yellowtail nikkei for ceviche, unagi maki roll for sushi, asado negro nikkei for mains and desserts like inka gold (made with raspberry caviar, 64%, dark chocolate, chocolate mousse and sable cracker base). While the vegetarian menu is priced upwards of ₹4,900 per person, the non-vegetarian menu starts at ₹6,900.
Both, Shiso and Koishii are fairly new restaurants, with Koishii turning three this year, but Chef Mayank Kulshreshtha, the executive chef of ITC Grand Chola, Chennai, observes that omakase garnered eyeballs about a decade ago. 'Most five-star restaurants, including ITC, serving Japanese cuisine, embraced omakase in the 90s, but in the last 10 years, it has become a trend,' he says. He credits the dining concept's popularity to the availability of Japanese ingredients and access to cooking techniques. 'Besides, the political and business camaraderie between India and Japan has grown over the years. A lot of people are now travelling to Japan, following the food cults on social media and trying new cuisines, which may have sparked their interest in Japanese food, especially omakase,' he avers.
ITC's omakase offerings include sashimi, robatayaki grill, hotate katsu and nimono (traditional dashi stock simmered with kombu kelp and bonito flakes). 'Generally, an omakase experience has seven to 20 courses. In our pan-Asian restaurant, an omakase meal costs somewhere between ₹15,000 and ₹20,000 per head,' he adds.
Selling like hot cakes!
Last year, in August, a multi-city chain of pan-Asian cuisine, Nasi and Mee, introduced omakase experience at its outlet in Bengaluru. Dilip Krishnan, the co-founder and CEO (India) of Foodsta Kitchen which owns and operates Nasi and Mee, observes that the omakase experience has picked up slowly but anyone who experienced it has had only good things to say. 'We have a six-to-eight-seater live sushi bar with just one 45-minute dinner slot six days a week (Tuesday to Sunday), and we've had a few sold-out weeks. On average, we've had two-four people and most of them have come as couples celebrating a milestone or for some intimate or new dining experience,' he notes. The restaurant takes omakase bookings on 24-hour reservation deadline, imports a whole Norwegian salmon for its carpaccio and nigiri, and procures eels from Japan.
The seasonal menu, packed with surprise element may have also accounted for the concept's popularity. Much recently, Shiso pulled off the courageous stint of introducing Kashmiri wazwan, a week-long pop-up it hosted, to its omakase counter. 'We get eight to 10 tables trying Omakase, in a month. The bookings are made for special occasions. But having an omakase experience establishes the food-forward ideology of our brand. So, it works as much for us as it does for our guests,' says Vansh.
For Paul though, omakase irons out the creases when it comes to managing operations in the kitchen, and reduces wastage too. He says, 'Omakase is a pre-set meal, it needs required quantities as the number of guest is known and the dishes are also fixed. Koishii has two sit-and-dine slots a day (7.30pm and 10.30pm), omakase is pre-decided. Nearly four to five tables are booked for the experience on weekdays and eight to 10 on weekends. It's a convenient format of dining for two main reasons: first, it saves the diner the hassle of choosing dishes. Second, since it comes at a fixed-price, it allows the host to manage the budget.'
What's your poison?
Delhi-based bars PCO (Pass Code Only) and Call Me Ten have taken a fancy to omakase as well. In August, last year, I visited PCO, India's first speakeasy, as it renovated its interiors and launched a new cocktail menu, called The Forbidden. Accompanied with Ignorance Is Bliss, a Chyawanprash-infused bourbon (Chawanprash has been banned in certain countries, which explains its inclusion as the forbidden ingredient in the menu), I entered the bar's new addition, an omakase counter, on the bar's top floor.
Since its launch in October, the counter, which can house nearly 13 guests, has seen a full house, says Rakshay Dhariwal, the bar's co-owner. 'We try and gauge the taste profile of our guests through their visual and olfactory preferences and by presenting them with certain cues to help us establish what type of cocktail they would most enjoy. For instance, we may present a range of postcards, with pictures of mountains, beaches etc. and have them choose the one that they resonate with most. Or we offer them half a dozen fragrances and ask them to pick their favourite. We also keep these changing — for instance, for New Years, we asked people what their new year's resolutions. And, of course, we ask the guest to choose their base liquor. We have a profile of over 85 cocktails which can be created by the mixologist at the counter, depending on the description given by the guests,' he says. A cocktail at PCO's omakase counter is priced at ₹1,500.
The choice of seven base liquor options (from rum to whisky) at the nine-month-old Call Me Ten comes with seven taste profiles (from umami to sweet) and three levels of potency (strong, light and no preference). The bar's co-owner, Karann R Chawla, says, 'We started the omakase experience at the bar in September. The idea of having an omakase bar is also to educate our guests on different cocktails, spirits and flavours. We have been getting as many as 200 customers a day.' An omakase drink at Call Me Ten is priced at ₹850.
Since the Michelin Guide describes omakase experience as 'revered and intimidating', it makes for a perfect must-try for adventurous food aficionados. Do you agree?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fatal blast at US steel's Clairton plant sparks doubts over its future
Fatal blast at US steel's Clairton plant sparks doubts over its future

Business Standard

time12 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Fatal blast at US steel's Clairton plant sparks doubts over its future

The fatal explosion last week at US Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the US along with profits, share prices and steel prices have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anti-competitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Donald Trump's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, like Clairton, and he approved US Steel's nearly USD 15 billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley, David Burritt, US Steel's CEO, told a news conference the day after the explosion. You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time. Will the explosion change anything? The explosion killed two workers and hospitalised 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the US. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. Rather, a spokesperson for the company said its commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong and that it sent technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support. Meanwhile, Burritt said he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay. US Steel officials maintain that safety is their top priority and that they spend USD 100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. However, repairing Clairton could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get US Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens and two where the explosion occurred were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the explosion. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, US Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odour into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organisation, said US Steel has been forced to pay USD 57 million in fines and settlements since January 1, 2020 for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at the Clairton plant in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he found no indication that US Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance programme for the Clairton plant. The Clairton plant, he wrote, is inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design. US Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said US Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. Will Clairton be modernised? It's not clear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest USD 11 billion into US Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the USD 2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, US Steel had signalled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple years and whispering that US Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. Relics of steelmaking's past In many ways, US Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, US steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the US has built a blast furnace since then, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favour. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the US, there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, since they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Centre for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said. I'm not quite sure it's all set in stone as people believe, Briem said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Fatal explosion at U.S. Steels plant raises questions about its future, despite heavy investment
Fatal explosion at U.S. Steels plant raises questions about its future, despite heavy investment

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Fatal explosion at U.S. Steels plant raises questions about its future, despite heavy investment

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The fatal explosion last week at U.S. Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the U.S. — along with profits, share prices and steel prices — have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anti-competitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Donald Trump's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, like Clairton, and he approved U.S. Steel's nearly $15 billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. 'We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley," David Burritt, U.S. Steel's CEO, told a news conference the day after the explosion. 'You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time.' The explosion killed two workers and hospitalized 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the U.S. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. Rather, a spokesperson for the company said its 'commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong' and that it sent 'technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support.' Meanwhile, Burritt said he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that 'this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay.' U.S. Steel officials maintain that safety is their top priority and that they spend $100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. However, repairing Clairton could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get U.S. Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens and two — where the explosion occurred — were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the explosion. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, U.S. Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odor into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organization, said U.S. Steel has been forced to pay $57 million in fines and settlements since Jan. 1, 2020, for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at the Clairton plant in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he 'found no indication that U.S. Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance program for the Clairton plant.' The Clairton plant, he wrote, is "inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design." U.S. Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said U.S. Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. It's not clear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest $11 billion into U.S. Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the $2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, U.S. Steel had signaled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple years and whispering that U.S. Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. In many ways, U.S. Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, U.S. steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the U.S. has built a blast furnace since then, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favor. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the U.S., there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, since they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Center for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said. 'I'm not quite sure it's all set in stone as people believe,' Briem said. 'If the market does not bode well for U.S. Steel, for American steel, is Nippon Steel really going to keep these things?'

Samsung, which is now worth Rs 29450786400000, once used to sell fish and noodles, once burnt crores of phones due to...
Samsung, which is now worth Rs 29450786400000, once used to sell fish and noodles, once burnt crores of phones due to...

India.com

time4 hours ago

  • India.com

Samsung, which is now worth Rs 29450786400000, once used to sell fish and noodles, once burnt crores of phones due to...

New Delhi: Today, Samsung is a big name in the world of gadgets, especially smartphones. Samsung Galaxy smartphones are very popular with consumers. In the year 2024, this company sold more than 22.3 crore phones. Apart from phones, this company has proved its mettle in appliances like TVs, LED, chips, cameras, laptops, and home appliances. The valuation of Samsung is 336 billion dollars, i.e. about 2,94,50,78,64,00,000 rupees. How big is Samsung's empire? But Samsung did not have such a great start. Samsung, which is today among the topmost brands in the electronics market, has dozens of offices all over the world and has lakhs of employees. Samsung started as a grocery store, where its owner used to sell flour, rice, noodles, and fish. Today, this company has become so big that if it incurs a loss, the economy of the whole country is shaken. Samsung's revenue dominates the GDP of the entire South Korea and has a 17% share in the country's GDP. From grocery shop to tech czar South Korean company Samsung started from a small rental store. In 1938, Lee Byung-chul of South Korea opened a small grocery shop on his street. He used to sell fish, flour, sugar, and noodles in the shop. Lee Byung-chul had understood that he would not be able to do much with this. Along with selling flour and rice, he started selling insurance to the customers who came there for shopping. Exported fish and noodles Byung-chul started exporting fish and noodles. He also started exporting noodle-making material and dry fish to other countries. Byung expanded the grocery shop to insurance, export-import, and textile business by 1950. Byung understood that if he wanted to do something big, he would have to enter the technology sector. In 1969, Byung Chul started expanding his foot in the technology sector. How did Samsung start? Byung adopted technology and started expanding his foot in the technology sector. He entered this sector under the name of Samsung Electronics. In 1970, he launched a black and white TV in collaboration with a Japanese company. When he achieved success in TV, he started making mobile phones in 1980. After years of hard work, he launched Samsung mobile in the market for the first time in 1988. The first Samsung phone came to the market with the name SGH-100, but there was a problem with it. Crores of Samsung phones were burnt Samsung came into the market, launched a phone, but people did not like their first phone as they found many flaws in it. When this complaint reached Byung Chul, he set fire to crores of Samsung phones kept in the factory. He immediately issued an order to improve those phones and apologised to the people. After the death of Lee Byung-chul, his son Lee Kun took over the reins of Samsung. Byung had understood the importance of semiconductors in that era, so before his death, he had ordered the merger of Samsung Electronics and Samsung Semiconductor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store