‘Shoot them': Sheikh Hasina ordered firing on Bangladesh protesters in 2024
Hasina, who ruled Bangladesh for 15 years, resigned from office and fled to India on August 5 after weeks of bloody protests and brutal action by government forces killed nearly 1,400 people and wounded more than 20,000, according to the country's International Criminal Tribunal (ICT).
The Al Jazeera Investigative Unit (I-Unit) had the recordings analysed by audio forensic experts to check for AI manipulation, and the callers were identified by voice matching.
In one call, recorded on July 18 by the National Telecommunications Monitoring Centre (NTMC), Hasina told an ally that she had ordered her security forces to use lethal force.
'My instructions have already been given. I've issued an open order completely. Now they will use lethal weapons, shoot wherever they find them,' she said.. 'That has been instructed. I have stopped them so far … I was thinking about the students' safety.'
Later in the call with Sheikh Fazle Noor Taposh, the mayor of Dhaka South and a relative of Hasina, the former PM talks about using helicopters to control demonstrations.
'Wherever they notice any gathering, it's from above – now it's being done from above – it has already started in several places. It has begun. Some [protesters] have moved.'
At the time, Bangladeshi security forces had denied firing on protesters from the air, but Shabir Sharif, an accident and emergency doctor at the Popular Medical College Hospital in Dhaka, told the I-Unit that shots were fired from a helicopter 'targeting our hospital entrance'.
He added that doctors attended to student protesters with unusual bullet wounds.
'The bullets entered either the shoulder or the chest, and they all remained inside the body. We were receiving more of these types of patients at that time,' he said. 'When we looked at the X-rays, we were surprised because there were huge bullets.' Al Jazeera has not been able to verify what type of bullets were used.
Dr Shabir Sharif [Al Jazeera]
The calls may be presented by prosecutors as evidence before the ICT, which has charged Hasina, her ministers and security officials with crimes against humanity. Hasina and two other officials were indicted on July 10, and the trial is scheduled to begin in August.
Hasina's surveillance network, the NTMC, recorded these conversations. The NTMC has previously been accused of spying on not just opposition figures but even Hasina's political allies.
Tajul Islam, chief prosecutor for the ICT, said the former prime minister knew she was being recorded.
'In some cases, the other side [would say we] … 'should not discuss this over telephone'. And the reply was from the prime minister, 'Yes, I know, I know, I know, I know, it is being recorded, no problem.''
'She has dug a very deep ditch for others. Now she's in the ditch,' Islam said.
Student protests started peacefully in June 2024 after the high court reintroduced an unpopular quota system that reserved state jobs for the families of veterans who fought in Bangladesh's war of independence in 1971. Many students felt the system favoured supporters of the ruling Awami League party, which had led the freedom movement, and that many jobs in the civil service were not awarded on merit.
On July 16, student protester Abu Sayed was shot dead by police in the northern city of Rangpur. His death was a turning point in the July uprising, leading to a national outcry and intensifying the protests.
In one secret phone recording of Hasina's ally and economics adviser, Salman F Rahman, he is heard trying to get hold of Sayed's postmortem report. During the call, Rahman quizzes inspector general of police, Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun, wanting to know what had happened to the report.
'Why is it taking so long to get the postmortem report? Who's playing hide and seek? Rangpur Medical?' he asked, referring to Rangpur Medical College and Hospital, which was carrying out the autopsy on Sayed.
Rangpur Medical College Hospital's Dr Rajibul Islam told Al Jazeera that police forced him to change Sayed's postmortem report five times to remove any reference to multiple bullet wounds.
'They wanted to write a report stating that Abu Sayed Bhai died due to injuries from stone-throwing … [whereas] he died from police bullets.'
Twelve days after Sayed's death, his family were flown to Dhaka for a televised event with the prime minister. In all, about 40 families were gathered – all of them had relatives killed in the protests.
'Hasina forced us to come to Ganabhaban,' said Sayed's father, Maqbul Hossain, referring to the PM's residence. 'They forced us to come; otherwise, they might have tortured us in another way.'
As the cameras recorded the event, Hasina handed out money to each family. She told Sayed's sister, Sumi Khatun: 'We will deliver justice to your family.'
Khatun replied to the PM: 'It was shown in the video that the police shot him. What is there to investigate here? Coming here was a mistake.'
In a statement to Al Jazeera, an Awami League spokesperson said Hasina had never used the phrase 'lethal weapons', and did not specifically authorise the security forces to use lethal force.
'This [Hasina's phone] recording is either cherry-picked, doctored or both.'
The statement added that government efforts to investigate Abu Sayed's death were 'genuine'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
‘The tide is shifting': Massive Australian protest over Gaza crisis seen as a sign of growing global alarm
When Australia wants to put on a show, it turns to the sweeping expanse of Sydney Harbour, home to the Opera House and the iconic bridge that connects the city with its northern suburbs. So, when organizers of usually small pro-Palestinian protests held every two weeks since Israel's 2023 invasion of Gaza detected a shift in community attitudes towards the grinding conflict – at home and abroad – they chose the bridge to make a global statement. 'We thought that the kind of bold and somewhat audacious idea that we were going to march over Sydney Harbour Bridge would capture the imaginations of everyone out there who was horrified by what we were seeing,' said protest organizer Josh Lees, from the Palestinian Action Group. The group had been emboldened by artists making pro-Palestinian statements at Glastonbury and the victory of Democratic New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, who received backing from some of the city's Jewish population despite his criticism of Israel. 'We felt it here in Australia, too,' said Lee, adding that the 'real uptick in horror and anger' had translated into pledges of support from church groups, unions and members of parliament representing 'a much broader section of society' than had previously engaged in the group's protests. Last Sunday, at least 90,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge clutching umbrellas, signs and flags, lashed by cold winds and heavy rain, according to police estimates. Organizers put the figure at closer to 300,000. That so many people braved the elements for the hastily organized event – conceived just seven days before – suggests that Australians want their government to act, Lees said. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Tuesday she wasn't surprised about the scale of the turnout. 'I think the distress of Australians on what we are seeing unfolding in Gaza, the catastrophic humanitarian situation, the deaths of women and children, the withholding of aid, I anticipated that we would see marches of this scale,' she told ABC Radio National. 'They do reflect the broad Australian community's horror at what is going on in the Middle East, and the desire for peace and a ceasefire, which is what the government is seeking.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's Labor government is under increasing pressure to join other US allies, the United Kingdom, France and Canada, in pledging formal recognition of a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in New York in September. Albanese and senior ministers have in recent weeks laid the groundwork for a public announcement saying it's a matter of 'when, not if.' Wong said Tuesday talks are being held with the international community ahead of the UNGA, as she underscored the urgency of the situation. 'There is a risk there will be no Palestine left to recognize if the international community don't move to create that pathway to a two-state solution,' she said. The US now stands increasingly alone from many of its closest Western allies on the issue of recognizing a Palestinian state and has condemned the moves by the UK, France and Canada. Recognition by Australia would add to that isolation. Calling for recognition of Palestinian statehood wasn't on the list of four demands submitted by the Palestinian Action Group before Sunday's march. 'What we marched for on Sunday, and what we've been protesting for two years, is not recognition of a non-existent Palestinian state that Israel is in the process of wiping out,' said Lees. 'What we are demanding is that the Australian government sanction Israel and stop the two-way arms trade with Israel.' The group also called for aid to be allowed into Gaza, an immediate ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal. The Australian government says it hasn't supplied weapons or ammunition to Israel during the latest Gaza war or for at least the past five years. However, Australian businesses are part of a supply chain that provides parts for F-35s, the type of fighter jet that Israel uses to bomb Gaza. 'Australian industry contributes components and parts, but the Australian Government does not have a direct bilateral arrangement with the Government of Israel in relation to the F-35 program,' a defense ministry spokesperson said. The F-35 supply chain is centrally coordinated by Lockheed Martin and the US government, the spokesperson added. 'Once they go to the United States, Australia has no control over them,' said Ian Parmeter, Research Scholar and Middle East Expert at the ANU Centre of Arab and Islamic Studies in Canberra. 'The Australian government could refuse export permits for these components, but the contribution we make to the manufacture of F-35s would almost certainly be picked up elsewhere without any trouble.' To date, Australia has sanctioned two far-right Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank, in a joint move with Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom in June. It previously sanctioned individuals over their involvement in settler violence in the West Bank. But whatever Australia does in response is likely nowhere near enough to pressure Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu to end the conflict, which his security cabinet agreed to extend Thursday with the occupation of Gaza City. 'Frankly, the one person who has leverage over Netanyahu is (US President Donald) Trump,' said Kenneth Roth, former Human Rights Watch executive director and visiting professor at Princeton University's School of Public and International Affairs. 'He alone could condition the arms sales and military aid on an end to the mass atrocity being committed in Gaza,' Roth told public broadcaster ABC Tuesday. Parmeter said Trump is prepared to disagree with Netanyahu, but 'whether he's prepared to rein in Netanyahu and make him stop the war in Gaza, to go to a ceasefire, and to essentially allow as much aid to flow as is needed, is very hard to say.' They may be thousands of miles away but the conflict in Gaza has been deeply felt by members of Australia's Muslim and Jewish communities. Reports of both antisemitism and Islamophobia have surged in Australia since October 2023, according to the offices of two separate envoys appointed to address the issue. Last month, antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal presented a sweeping plan to combat what she said was a 'wave of hate.' It included education campaigns, police and immigration reforms, and penalties for public institutions, particularly universities, who fail to act At the time, the government said it would consider the recommendations, as critics pointed to their potential threat to free speech in a country that values freedom of expression. The size of Sunday's march was considered by some a victory over attempts to silence criticism of Israel. Days before the event, New South Wales Police tried to block the march in the Supreme Court on the grounds of public safety, after similar objections from state authorities. The bid failed when a judge ruled that, on balance, the prosocial nature of the event and experience of the organizers meant that banning it would not make it any safer, as thousands would still likely turn up. Police warnings of a crowd crush didn't eventuate, though there were so many people on the bridge that at one stage officers issued text messages and orders from loudspeakers on helicopters telling protestors to stop and walk back towards the city. Perceptions of the event ranged from a soul-restoring display of public compassion to a misguided attempt to wade into a complex debate with a cast of Hamas sympathizers. 'Obviously, we don't politically support Hamas,' said Lees, of the Palestinian Action Group. Australian media reflected the opposing views in vastly different front-page treatments. Alongside an image of a woman in a headscarf, The West Australian's headline read: 'Bloody chaos: Baby dolls smeared in fake blood and Aussie flag burned as wild protests become our norm.' The same day, the Sydney Morning Herald, owned by a rival media group, ran an image of crowds on the bridge with the headline, 'Sydney says 'enough'.'' The march was noticed from Israel where Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar urged Australians to 'wake up!' 'The distorted alliance between the radical Left and fundamentalist Islam is sadly dragging the West toward the sidelines of history,' he wrote on X with an image of a protester holding a photo of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In a statement, the Australian Iranian Community Alliance also pointed to the photo and other imagery at the march and asked whether participants were 'truly part of a movement seeking peace, or inadvertently amplifying forces opposed to it?' Co-CEO of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Peter Wertheim noted in a letter to The Australian newspaper that none of the protesters called for the release of Israeli hostages. The day before the march, images of two emaciated Israeli hostages were released by the group, including video of one who said he was digging his own grave. 'If people want to see Israeli hostages return, then they should also be fighting to end this genocide and for Israel to get out of Gaza,' said Lees. After the march, the Australian government committed an extra 20 million Australian dollars ($13 million) in aid to Gaza, taking the total to 130 million Australian dollars ($84 million) since October 2023, but it stopped short of granting any of the other demands. Hoping to build on the momentum, Lees says the group's planning a nationwide event on August 24. 'I think we have, by holding this like immense demonstration on Sunday, helped to inspire people around the world to see that the tide is shifting, that masses of people now have seen through all of the kind of pro-Israel lies and propaganda that we've been bombarded with for so long, and are prepared and willing to stand up in bigger numbers than ever before to try to stop this genocide.'
Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Pakistan Enjoys a Trump High as India Sweats
Welcome to Balance of Power, bringing you the latest in global politics. If you haven't yet, sign up here. Virtually alone in the world, Pakistan seems to have played its cards right with President Donald Trump.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A temple elephant was finally rescued after decades of suffering and one priest's death. But locals now demand her return
Tens of thousands of people have joined protests in western India in the past week demanding the return of a temple elephant who was rescued and relocated to a sanctuary run by a powerful industrialist's family. Nearly 30,000 people in Maharashtra marched on 3 August calling for the return of Mahadevi, a 36-year-old female elephant also known as Madhuri who was recently relocated from a shrine in Kolhapur to Vantara. Vantara is a wildlife rehabilitation centre in neighbouring Gujarat state run by the Radhe Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust. The trust is backed by Reliance, a business conglomerate owned by Mukesh Ambani, one of Asia's richest people. Vantara was conceived by the billionaire industrialist's son Anant Ambani. The Ambani family have long enjoyed close relations with India's prime minister Narendra Modi, who inaugurated the facility on 3 March this year. As part of the protest this week, locals have launched a boycott of Reliance's Jio telecom service. In just four days, The Hindu reported, over 150,000 mobile users across Kolhapur, Sangli and Satara ported their numbers to other networks. 'We plan to carry out similar protests in north Karnataka since it is a border region and several temples there also have elephants,' Raju Shetty, a former parliamentarian from Maharashtra, said. The march for Mahadevi ended after a formal appeal for the elephant's return was lodged with the local authorities. Mahadevi had been kept at Swastishri Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya Mahaswamy Sanstha, a shrine for the Jain community at Nandani village in Kolhapur, for over three decades. In October 2023, after tracking the elephant's condition for over a year, PETA filed a complaint with the High Powered Committee of the federal environment ministry, according to a statement by Vantara. The complaint, which reportedly included veterinary reports and photographs, documented Mahadevi's physical injuries and psychological trauma and alleged that she had been put to illegal commercial use by the shrine. The committee launched an investigation and eventually ordered Mahadevi's transfer to the rehabilitation facility, citing her continued neglect and poor welfare conditions at the shrine. It noted reports documenting her use in religious processions, unlawful public events, and unsafe practices like lifting children with her trunk. It also stated that several expert inspections, including assessments by a panel appointed by the committee, had found the elephant was suffering from advanced foot rot, ulcerated wounds, overgrown toenails, and displayed clear signs of psychological distress. The shrine contested the decision to relocate her, but to no avail. The Supreme Court last month upheld the Bombay High Court's decision to relocate Mahadevi for better care and rehabilitation. The court backed PETA India's argument that 'the sentiments of devotees cannot override the fundamental right of an animal to health and dignified care'. Protest leaders, including Mr Shetty, accused PETA of acting in collusion with Anant Ambani to target temple elephants under the guise of animal welfare. Mr Shetty alleged that the relocation of Mahadevi was part of a broader strategy by PETA to 'seize' elephants from religious institutions and hand them over to corporate-backed facilities like Vantara. 'This is a tactic by PETA, acting as a slave to Ambani's interests, to seize temple elephants,' he alleged. 'We will file a formal complaint with PETA's head office in the US, and seek cancellation of their licence in India.' PETA India rejected accusations of collusion, pointing out that Mr Shetty himself previously supported Mahadevi's relocation and veterinary care. 'It's disheartening to now see him opposing her rehabilitation when she's finally living free of chains, receiving treatment for painful ailments caused by years of neglect, and finding companionship among other elephants, and retired after a hard life,' the group said in a statement to The Independent. It emphasised that the elephant was suffering from irreversible physical and psychological trauma after decades of isolation and mistreatment at the shrine and that her transfer to Vantara was ordered by the High Powered Committee, not by PETA. The Independent has contacted Vantara for comment. On the day of Mahadevi's relocation, residents of Kolhapur clashed with the Vantara staff who had come to collect her. The Hindustan Times reported that when people from Vantara, PETA and the forest department arrived, they were pelted with stones by some of the protesting residents. The clash resulted 'in broken car windows, wounds and a PETA India staff member sustaining a serious rib injury', PETA said. The unrest was brought under control with police intervention. Once the situation had calmed, the locals gave Mahadevi an emotional send-off, the newspaper noted. The shrine wanted to retain the elephant 'despite Mahadevi's arthritis and other severe health problems from spending most of her life on concrete', PETA claimed. 'Elephants are intelligent, emotional beings who require a life without chains and an elephant family for their mental wellbeing,' it said. 'PETA India is grateful to the Supreme Court for recognising Mahadevi's right to live the rest of her years free from pain, weapons, fear and isolation.' PETA was also 'immensely grateful to Vantara's Radhe Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust for giving her the opportunity to finally experience life as an elephant should'. Mahadevi was apparently taken from her mother as a calf and spent years in isolation at the Jain shrine. In 2017, she fatally attacked the shrine's chief priest, repeatedly slamming him against a wall, an incident which animal rights groups linked to her psychological distress from prolonged captivity. PETA said she had been left 'disturbed' by decades of 'deteriorated health and psychological suffering'. A 2023 National Geographic article pointed out that even though elephants were worshipped as sacred beings in India, many temple elephants endured harsh treatment and neglect, a truth, it said, that animal welfare advocates were increasingly working to expose. By some estimates, nearly one in three Asian elephants lives in captivity. 'Lord Ganesha is a Hindu god with an elephant face. Because of that reverence, elephants had always been considered holy. That's the tragic paradox because on the one hand, elephants are revered and worshipped. And on the other hand, they're enslaved,' Sangita Iyer, who made the documentary Gods in Shackles about elephants in captivity in 2016, told the outlet. After Mahadevi's relocation caused a public backlash, Vantara said it had neither initiated nor requested her transfer. The decision was made by the High Powered Committee based on the facility's capacity and track record. 'It's unfortunate that, despite full legal closure, misinformation is being spread to vilify Vantara and its supporters,' the facility said. 'When courts have ruled, continuing to target a neutral organisation that merely followed orders undermines faith in the judiciary.' Maharashtra's chief minister, Devendra Fadnavis, said on Wednesday that his government would explore legal options to bring Mahadevi back. 'Considering the public sentiments, the state government will intervene in the legal process to bring back the Mahadevi elephant,' he said after chairing a meeting to discuss the matter. 'The Jain shrine will submit a review petition in the Supreme Court and the government will help them by submitting an intervention application.' Vantara reportedly told the chief minister they were willing to help set up a satellite rehabilitation centre for Mahadevi near the Jain shrine on land selected by the forest department. Two days ago, Vantara had posted a video of Mahadevi on Instagram titled 'A day in the life of Madhuri'. 'Every elephant deserves a life led by instinct, not instruction,' it said. 'That is the life Madhuri is finally discovering at Vantara.' While PETA and the courts have defended her transfer on grounds of health and welfare, they have not convinced everyone. Some animal rights groups have expressed concern over Vantara's value as a genuine conservation initiative, pointing to a lack of transparency over its acquisitions, as well as its emphasis on rare species and grand infrastructure. Animal rights groups have also questioned the impact on existing public zoos due to the transfer of animals from states like Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh. In March this year, several Indian media outlets removed reports highlighting concerns from a South African wildlife coalition, Wildlife Animal Protection Forum of South Africa, about the transfer of wild animals to Vantara. The group had urged the South African government to investigate the legality of animal exports from the country to the private Indian facility, citing possible violations of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) treaty. Vantara has rejected such criticisms as 'entirely false and baseless', and said its transfers of animals from South Africa were conducted in full compliance with the country's federal and provincial rules. It said the concerns raised had been 'thoroughly investigated and conclusively closed by CITES' and accused the South African forum of being 'seemingly driven by vested interests'.
