Council eyes easing rules for responsible news media in upcoming Democracy Shield
The Commission has said its forthcoming Democracy Shield communication will focus on fighting risks to EU democracy, such as misinformation and foreign information manipulation.
In its draft conclusions, the Council document asks the Commission and member states to clarify "the notion of editorial responsibility" in order to ensure that reliable news can circulate in democracies.
The Council's conclusions identify increasing pressure on the news sector and public information sphere from online platforms, big tech companies and algorithm-driven content.
Furthermore, the document flags the huge challenges posed by foreign disinformation and misinformation (FIMI) – a position also voiced recently by the Parliament's report on the same topic.
The conclusions ask authorities to ensure that services curating news content – such as AI systems like large language models, search engines and online platforms – are sufficiently accountable to do so.
Simplifying burdensome requirements
The Council also wants the Commission and national authorities to simplify rules for "editorially responsible" media to help them compete with online platforms that monetise informational content without abiding by such standards.
The Commission's upcoming evaluation of the Audio-Visual Media Directive – which is expected in 2026 – should also focus on simplifying the rules for media, the Council concludes.
Furthermore, the document asks authorities to "map ways" in which "editorial news media" might be made exempt from any "burdensome regulatory requirements", as it puts it.
The Council also wants to see efforts to ensure a level playing field between online platforms and new media-like actors, on the one hand, and editorially responsible news media services on the other – to ensure a more sustainable, independent, pluralistic and free media sector.
The draft Council conclusions are set to be presented in the Audiovisual and Media Working Party on 11 July.
Euractiv's Claudie Moreau contributed reporting.
(nl)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
OpenAI wants US-wide AI rules with an eye on Europe's rulebook
The company says it wants federal AI rules to avoid 'a patchwork of state rules' Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maximilian Henning Euractiv Aug 13, 2025 15:00 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. OpenAI is urging California, a trendsetter in US regulation, to align its AI rules with existing national or international frameworks, including the EU's, to avoid conflicting regulations across the country. The EU passed its AI Act last year and introduced a voluntary Code of Practice for providers of large AI models, a non-binding framework signed by almost all major US and European companies, including OpenAI. In a letter to California Governor Gavin Newsom, OpenAI said the state should treat AI companies as compliant with its own rules if they have signed up to the EU's code, or if they work with the US's federal AI Centre. In the letter, OpenAI's chief lobbyist Christopher Lehane recommended policies 'that avoid duplication and inconsistencies' with those of similar democratic regimes. In a blog post accompanying the letter, the company warned the US must choose between setting clear national standards for AI and 'a patchwork of state rules', adding: 'Imagine how hard it would have been to win the Space Race if California's aerospace and tech industries had been tangled in state-by-state regulations'. At a US Senate hearing in May, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said having 50 different regulatory regimes would be 'quite bad' and warned that adopting the EU's approach to AI regulation would be 'disastrous', instead calling for a 'light touch' federal approach. California, the most populous and wealthiest US state, often seeks to set an example for others through its regulation. But tensions over AI rules between Washington and state capitals have been brewing for some time. At the start of July, the US Senate scrapped a decade-long ban on state-level AI laws from President Donald Trump's broad budget bill. Weeks later, the Trump administration published an AI Action Plan seeking to block federal funding for AI in states with 'burdensome AI regulations'. (de)
Euractiv
6 hours ago
- Euractiv
Commission targets reform of its food chain rules in 2026
Some farmer organisations have called on Brussels to tighten up the rules and ban sales below production cost Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maria Simon Arboleas Euractiv Aug 13, 2025 13:52 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The European Commission is preparing an overhaul of legislation on unfair trading practices (UTPs) to prevent farmers from selling below production cost. The EU executive announced this week that it will launch a consultation on the revision this autumn with the aim of presenting a proposal a year later. In his blueprint for the agri-food sector, EU farm chief Christophe Hansen promised that the Commission would overhaul the UTPs directive to address one of farmers' key concerns: not covering production costs. Not everyone welcomed the announcement, with EU supermarket lobby Eurocommerce saying that the Commission should not have pre-empted the outcome of the ongoing evaluation of the rules, due to be completed in November. The directive currently distinguishes between 'black' and 'grey' unfair market practices – the former being unconditionally prohibited, such as payment delays of one month, and the latter permitted if agreed between parties, such as the return of unsold products. Some farmer organisations have long called on Brussels to tighten up the rules by including the purchase of agricultural products below production cost in one of the two categories. Countries including Belgium, Croatia, France and Spain have similar measures in place. But in a debate at the Special Committee on Agriculture (SCA) in June, member states could not agree on what to do with the colour scheme. In parallel, EU lawmakers are currently working on a 'quick fix' to the UTPs directive that the Commission proposed last December. The goal is to ensure cross-border enforcement and tackle international purchasing alliances. The Council reached an agreement on the proposal in April and the Parliament's AGRI committee adopted its position last month. MEPs wants to kick-start institutional talks as soon as the plenary gives its green light in September. (jp) CORRECTION: This story's headline has been changed to reflect the fact that the legislation is due to land in late 2026.
Euractiv
13 hours ago
- Euractiv
Merz's first 100 days by the numbers
Spoiler: If Merz's first 100 days are any indication, prepare for the worst Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Nick Alipour Euractiv Aug 13, 2025 06:00 6 min. read Analysis Based on factual reporting, although it Incorporates the expertise of the author/producer and may offer interpretations and conclusions. BERLIN – By the yardstick of recent history, Friedrich Merz's first 100 days in office have been a cake walk. His predecessor, Olaf Scholz, faced Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine just 78 days into his term. Angela Merkel, who had four separate 100-day starts during her 16-year tenure, had to cope with everything from the Greek debt crisis to Russia's annexation of Crimea to Donald Trump. That isn't to say Merz's challenges have been trivial since he was sworn in on 6 May. The threat from Moscow continues to loom large, as does economic malaise, the continued influx of asylum seekers, not to mention Israel's war in Gaza. The new chancellor approached those challenges with grand pronouncements, rolling out not a 100-day programme, but an 'immediate action plan', promising that by mid-year, it would be "clear to everyone that Germany is moving forward." As Merz reaches both the middle of the year and the 100-day mark on Wednesday, here are the numbers that indicate whether he is delivering on his grand mission. The angry 18 Merz vowed to end the infighting that plagued the previous three-party 'traffic light' coalition. But his coalition, consisting of his Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats (SPD), has one of the slimmest majorities in post-war history, leaving it vulnerable to rebellions. It took Merz an unprecedented second attempt just to get elected by the parliament, as he received 18 fewer votes than his majority in the first ballot, leaving him six MPs short overall. The secret vote left the rebels' motivation in the dark, but it's no secret that Merz's polarising style and poor management have made him many enemies among his own ranks. He failed to get frugal Christian Democrats onboard with his sudden decision to ditch Germany's strict debt rules, a fundamental departure from conservative orthodoxy. Left-leaning SPD lawmakers are wary of his hardcore conservatism. Merz has not helped his reputation in office. He stumbled into a historic U-turn on Germany's stance on the Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip, imposing the first ever country-level sanctions on Israel since the 7 October massacre – without consulting the cabinet or his own outraged MPs, which is bound to profoundly damage his internal standing. He also failed to diffuse a conservative rebellion that thwarted the election of a liberal judge to Germany's top court, leaving the SPD angry. Given this erratic leadership style, coalition drama is here to stay. The trillion-dollar man Merz's most dramatic measure came before he even set foot in the chancellery, when he ended the fiscal orthodoxy that had shaped German policy since the 2008 financial crisis. Germany's constitutional borrowing limit, the debt brake, had severely constricted the fiscal leeway of the previous government, effectively bringing it down. Merz's future coalition, instead, carved out a reform that exempts defence spending above 1% of GDP from the debt brake, and also set up a €500 billion infrastructure fund outside the regular budget. The result: Germany is on track to rack up a record €850 billion – or $1 trillion – in debt during Merz's term, according to the government's budget drafts – a third more than over the five years before. Between 2014 and 2020, Germany took on no new debt at all. Much of the debt will go towards plans to hit NATO's new 3.5% defence spending target six years ahead of the 2035 deadline – a notable turnaround for a country reluctant to rearm and struggling to reach the old 2% target. Though the jury is still out on the economic impact of these moves, there are some early signs of optimism. Business confidence picked up moderately since Merz's election, confirming an upward trend. Modest growth is forecast for 2025–26 after two years of recession. Yet Donald Trump's tariffs on EU imports, especially on cars, now threaten Germany's export-led economy, with experts warning that Merz's spending spree lacks structural reforms. Nine, not nein When it comes to travel, Merz outperformed all his predecessors, as he became the first post-war chancellor to drop by nine European capitals in his first month and to visit Poland on his first full day in office. It underlines the former EU lawmaker's personal ambition to restore German leadership in Europe. He has generally lived up to this goal: When ever Europe needs to coo rdi n ate, the chancellor is ready to convene and guide his peers. That isn't always to Brussels' benefit, however, as Merz prefers small-circle leadership – usually with Britain, France, and sometimes Poland – instead of working with the EU institutions. Good intentions also don't necessarily equal delivery: Merz's bromance with French President Emmanuel Macron and his marriage of convenience with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen are already hitting policy roadblocks. 475 Auf Wiedersehens Merz's promised Migrationswende look more like window dressing. He had vowed to effectively close the border to all refugees after a string of violent attacks – some linked to rejected asylum seekers – during the election campaign. The measure took effect on his first full day in office without making a detectable difference so far. Merz's government is pulling out all the stops, however, to accelerate the drop in irregular migration instigated by the previous government. Diplomatic accord The German press has dubbed Merz the Außenkanzler, a mix of foreign minister and federal chancellor, for his prolific diplomacy. Merz's smart way of handling Trump is reportedly partly to credit for the US president's decision to let Europeans buy new weapons for Ukraine, though Merz failed to keep his key promise of delivering Taurus cruise missiles to Kyiv. His aforementioned decision to limit weapons exports to Israel marked another dramatic shift from an earlier position but aligns him with public opinion: 73% back at least some limits. Making Scholz look popular Merz's biggest deficit hasn't changed during his first 100 days, however: Many Germans simply don't like him. Dissatisfaction with Merz is higher now than with Scholz after his first 100 – 65% versus 40%, according to the latest Deutschlandtrend poll. A key problem is Merz's many U-turns, most notably his reform of the debt brake, which conservative critics see as a broken promise. His erratic coalition management has fed into pre-existing doubts over his leadership qualities . The long and short (mm)
