Sec 179(4) Customs Act: Power of FBR to grant extension ‘narrower': SC
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court noted that the power of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) under Section 179(4) of the Customs Act, 1969 to grant extension of time is much narrower and circumscribed.
A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Munib Akhtar, ruled that while hearing an appeal of Director, Directorate General, Intelligence and Investigation (Customs) against the decision of the Sindh High Court (SHC), and dismissed it.
Dr Farhat Zafar, representing the petitioner (DG Intelligence and Investigation (Customs) submitted that in this case an extension of time was granted by the FBR and therefore, the impugned decision of the SHC is not sustainable. She relied on paragraphs 11 and 12 of the judgment of larger bench of the Supreme Court, which upheld the principles laid down in the case of Collector of Sales Tax, Gujranwala and others v Messrs Super Asia Mohammad Din and Sons and others 2017 SCMR 1427 (Super Asia).
SHC judgment: SC reserves verdict on DG Customs Valuation's pleas
The court noted that these paras dealt with Section 74 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and considered the possibility of the grant of an extension of time in terms thereof. Section 74 was held to apply in terms as stated in para 12 of the judgment in Super Asia.
The judgment said this matter (extension of time) has arisen under the Customs Act, 1969, which Section 179 (4) says; 'The Board shall have the powers to regulate the system of adjudication including transfer of cases and extension of time-limit in exceptional circumstances.'
The court noted that the power to grant an extension by the Board under Section 179(4) of the Customs Act, 1969, is circumscribed, and is to be exercised only in 'exceptional circumstances'. On the other hand, Section 74 of the 1990 Act provides that the Board is empowered to grant an extension to the extent found 'appropriate'.
The court said that there is an obvious and clear difference between the two provisions; the power under Section 179(4) is much narrower and circumscribed. Therefore, the paragraphs of Super Asia sought to be relied upon by counsel for the petitioner have no relevance. It stated that the Larger Bench has also made some observations with regard to Section 74 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.
The judgment also said that, on a query from the Court, the counsel for the petitioner has candidly stated that the permission/ letter of extension that was granted by the Board was not placed on the record before the Appellate Tribunal. The judgment said that indeed, this was specifically noted by the Tribunal in its order; i.e., 'However, the plea taken by the respondents is that they have taken approval from FBR as mentioned in Section 179(4) but no such approval was placed before the Tribunal'.
The court noted that the matter came before it from a tax reference and it is well established that beyond the stage of the Appellate Tribunal, it is only questions of law that can be taken to the High Court. It is also well settled that the record on the basis of which the questions of law can be decided is in terms of the record as it stood before the Appellate Tribunal.
The judgment said that record cannot be added to and certainly not on a point that requires factual determination. Since the position is that the FBR letter by which it is claimed extension of time was granted by the Board was never placed on the record before the Appellate Tribunal, it is impermissible for any reliance to be placed on the same in this Court.
The Court; therefore, declined to entertain this point, saying; 'Any departure from the well settled position would allow a party to a tax reference to alter the record either before the High Court or this Court which is not permissible.'
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan leather industry seeks cut in import duties on chemicals
Pakistan's leather industry has proposed lowering of customs duties on the import of chemicals used in leather manufacturing, saying it will help make the sector regionally competitive and viable, it was learnt on Wednesday. Hamid Arshad Zahur, Central Chairman of the Pakistan Tanners Association (PTA), proposed to reduce customs duty from 20% to 16%, and Additional Customs Duties (ACD) from 4% to 2% across all chemical imports. The development comes as Muslims around the world are to celebrate Eid-ul-Adha this week. In Pakistan, the first day of Eid will fall on Saturday, June 7. According to Zahur, around 40% of Pakistan's total leather production is sourced through sacrifice of animals during Eid-ul-Adha. Sharing statistics, PTA central chairman said tanners received around 0.7 million animal hides, including 4.5 million goats, 2.5 million cows, 0.5 million sheep, and 25,000 camels last year. The total value of the collected hides was estimated at Rs10 billion, he said. Zahur further stated that around 25% of the hides, worth approximately Rs4 billion, were spoiled due to 'mishandling and the failure to preserve them with salt in a timely manner'. 'Tanners have been urging both the federal and provincial governments to establish proper abattoirs to prevent the wastage of hides,' he said. 'The country lost hides worth Rs4 billion due to improper handling, which constitutes 40% of total local production.' PTA central chairman emphasised that the government should establish centralised slaughterhouses for carrying out religious sacrifices similar to other Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Türkiye, Indonesia, and others. In its budget proposals, PTA requested to keep the export sector under the original Fixed Tax Regime, but to increase the turnover tax from 1% to 1.5% to increase government revenue. Eid-ul-Adha 2025: trade peaks at Asia's largest cattle market in Karachi The leather sector is normally working at a 4-8% profit margin in general and hence a 1.5% turnover tax will actually be a net 25% tax on profit and in line with the Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR) revenue generation targets, according to the PTA. Zahur urged not to bring the export sector under the final tax regime. He opposed the proposal to apply sales tax at the import of raw materials under the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) in the next budget. 'This step by the FBR/Ministry of Finance will totally negate the basic principal of no duty, no drawback under which the EFS was originally developed,' he said. 'One wrong has been done last year by imposing sales tax on domestic sales under EFS and it will be a second wrong to impose sales tax on import of raw material under the EFS, going forward. 'This will lead to a cash flow crunch, defeat the very purpose of the EFS and be detrimental in increasing the exports any further,' PTA official said. He urged the government to bring the EFS back to its original form as on June 30, 2024, whereby purchase of domestic and imported raw materials under EFS was exempt from any duties or taxes. Meanwhile, PTA suggested to bring down the rate of sales tax down to 17% in the next budget from the current 18%. It also proposed minimum tax threshold for salaried individuals at Rs1.2million per annum.
Express Tribune
18 hours ago
- Express Tribune
IMF rejects wealth tax, chicken duty
Listen to article The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has objected to the government's contentious proposals to impose a capital value tax on moveable assets and to slap a 5% federal excise duty on one-day-old chicks — measures that underscore the business-as-usual approach of the tax machinery. While the IMF did not endorse the tax on moveable assets and one-day-old chicks, it did agree to the imposition of a tax on digital services aimed at raising Rs10 billion in revenue, according to sources in the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). There is also a budget proposal to increase the tax on dividend income of mutual funds from 15% to 20%. The withholding tax on interest income may also go up from 15% to 20%, according to officials of the FBR. Among the proposals that may be announced on budget day is the withdrawal of income tax exemption for venture capital companies and funds, according to senior FBR officials. The income tax exemption for the cinema business may also be withdrawn. There has so far been no relief in reducing the income tax rates for the highest slab of 35%, and the 10% surcharge on monthly incomes exceeding Rs500,000 may also remain, said FBR sources. However, the IMF has agreed to reduce the income tax rates for the remaining four slabs, providing some relief on monthly incomes below Rs500,000. It has not agreed to increase the income tax exemption threshold to Rs1.2 million but has approved cutting the rate from 5% to 1%. The sources said that the government wanted to reintroduce the wealth tax in the form of a capital value tax on all moveable assets, excluding shares of listed companies. The proposal had also been presented at the level of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, said FBR officials. The proposal to impose tax on moveable assets such as cash and gold was also shared with the IMF, said the officials. However, the IMF did not endorse the proposal on the grounds that the government should tax income instead of taxing wealth. The FBR wanted to target cash balances in banks to raise revenue, according to FBR officials. Through the Finance Act 2022, the government had introduced a 1% CVT on foreign assets worth over Rs100 million owned by resident Pakistanis, but it has been challenged in the courts. The finance ministry and the FBR on Tuesday gave a briefing to PM Sharif about the budget contours, including measures that the IMF has cleared so far, the sources added. Some issues were still outstanding, including the relief for the real estate sector and the capital value tax. President Asif Ali Zardari on Tuesday convened a National Assembly session for June 10, where Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb will deliver his second budget speech. The Economic Survey of Pakistan is expected to be unveiled on June 9, the third day of Eid. The FBR also wanted to introduce a 5% federal excise duty on one-day-old chicks, but the IMF did not support the idea. It pointed out that, on one hand, the FBR claims there are high taxes on food in Pakistan, and on the other hand, it recommends such proposals. Proposals like the tax on one-day-old chicks and moveable assets indicate that the FBR has run out of ideas. The IMF's concern was that taxing one-day-old chicks was not aimed at broadening the tax base; rather, it targeted a specific industry, said the sources. The FBR did not conduct any study before proposing the tax on chicks, which are an essential food item. The measure was rooted in a tax case involving just one company among hundreds, revealing the shallowness of the proposal. Last month, President Zardari issued the Tax Laws Amendment Ordinance, 2025, and one of the reasons was a poultry sector company. The government inserted a new section, 175C, in the Income Tax Ordinance through ad hoc legislation. The sources said that proposals to impose a 5% federal excise duty on all processed foods — including chips and biscuits — were also considered. Effectively, the 5% FED means the sales tax rate will increase to 23%, and after adding further tax and withholding taxes, the overall cost of taxation will jump to 29%. The prime minister was not in favour of doubling the federal excise duty on fertiliser and raised the issue with the IMF at the highest level. However, during last month's talks, the IMF asked the government to fulfil its commitment to increase the tax, said the sources. The sources said there was still a likelihood that the government may double the federal excise duty on fertiliser to 10% and introduce a 5% excise duty on pesticides in the budget. The sources said the prime minister was told that the budget numbers had been locked with the IMF. The FBR's annual target is likely to be Rs14.130 trillion, and the non-tax revenue target is Rs4 trillion. This brings the total tax and non-tax revenue target to Rs17.1 trillion. The federal government has been allowed to allocate Rs1.186 trillion in budget subsidies, including Rs1.036 trillion for the power sector. For IMF programme purposes, the federal development budget may be Rs873 billion, while provincial budgets are estimated at Rs2.1 trillion — about Rs700 billion less than what the four provincial governments indicated in the Annual Plan Coordination Committee meeting. The IMF has allowed all federal and provincial governments to spend Rs22 trillion on current expenditures. The total expenditures by all five governments for IMF programme purposes are estimated at Rs25 trillion for the fiscal year 2025-26.
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Taxing savings – a recipe for stagnation
EDITORIAL: The tax bureaucracy's propensity of coming up with measures that purportedly aim to enhance revenue collection, but instead end up producing crippling economic outcomes reveals a dangerous cycle of incompetence, where basic economic principles are routinely ignored. There is an entire history of the FBR resorting to knee-jerk taxation measures that squeeze the compliant, reward the untaxed and sabotage economic growth with depressing consistency. The latest in a long line of self-defeating proposals under consideration is to hike the tax rate by two percent on interest income from commercial bank deposits and savings schemes in the upcoming budget. This proposal risks further weakening of a key pillar of economic stability that is already the weakest in the region, i.e., national savings. By discouraging savings, the FBR will be essentially starving the economy of vital capital, reducing investment levels and crippling long-term economic growth, all while doing very little to widen the tax net. It is pertinent to note that the current tax rate on interest income for filers of tax returns is already a pretty hefty 15 percent. For non-filers, the rate is even higher at 35 percent. Moreover, for filers, the 15 percent rate applies only to interest income of up to Rs 5 million annually. Any income beyond this threshold is taxed at the applicable slab rate on the individual's total income, including interest earnings, further squeezing those who are already part of the tax net. A further two percent hike in the tax rate would only deepen this distortion. Pakistan already has one of the lowest savings rates in the region — a structural weakness that has severely undermined the country's economic uplift. With insufficient domestic savings, the economy relies heavily on external borrowing to meet its needs, creating a dangerous cycle of debt dependency. Increasing the tax rate on interest incomes from bank deposits and savings schemes effectively amounts to penalising the act of saving, as people will think twice before parking their money in formal financial instruments, and will instead opt for untaxed or low-tax alternatives, further shrinking the formal savings pool. The result will be an even greater reliance on borrowing and an even more urgent need to raise additional revenue just to service the growing debt. Far from strengthening public finances, this policy would be profoundly counterproductive. The fundamental challenge confronting the economy is the glaring gap between expenditures and earnings, and addressing this deficit should be the government's singular focus. While curbing expenditure is one way forward, however, options on this front are limited. Debt servicing, by far the largest outlay, is a pass-through item of expenditure, while cuts in defence spending are also unlikely in the near term, given regional tensions, and the turmoil in Balochistan and parts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. Still, the government can trim its substantial current expenditure levels in other areas. At the very least, a leaner cabinet, with fewer ministers and advisors is both fiscally prudent and symbolically necessary. The authorities can't credibly preach austerity to the public while maintaining the glaring optics of an indulgent state apparatus. On the revenue side, Pakistan needs a tax system that effectively taxes incomes and consumption and not assets and savings. Instead, we have a regime that disproportionately taxes transactions. Businesses are forced to navigate a labyrinthine withholding tax structure, where multiple tax rates apply at different stages of business transactions. On top of that, virtually every economic activity faces a minimum tax on turnover regardless of profit or loss. The convoluted tax system, therefore, actively discourages compliance while punishing law-abiding taxpayers, with this dysfunction starving public coffers and leaving critical areas of the economy underfunded. The proposed tax on savings if implemented would simply double down on this same flawed approach. The finance minister's stated goal of bringing a budget of structural reforms cannot be met through a measure that is fundamentally at odds with economic vitality. Government policy must encourage savings, not drive them underground. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
