Man killed in suspected hit-and-run on major Perth highway
A man in his 40s was found with 'significant injuries' on Tonkin Highway in Perth's northeast just before 2.30am on Thursday.
Emergency services responded but the man was pronounced dead at the scene.
Major Crash Investigators closed the highway for most of the day as they investigated how the man ended up on the road.
'It is believed the deceased man was struck by a vehicle that left the scene,' police said.
'A woman is currently assisting police with their inquiries.'
The northbound stretch of Tonkin Hwy between Morley Dr and Reid Hwy was due to reopen about 4pm, but authorities said congestion remains heavy.
Police are urging anyone with information about the incident to contact Crime Stoppers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
28 minutes ago
- ABC News
Bruce Lehrmann's defamation appeal wraps up
Bruce Lehrmann's appeal against the result of his failed defamation case has wrapped up in the Federal Court after hearing arguments Mr Lehrmann was denied procedural fairness.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Matt Wright's friend accused of 'ridiculous', 'nonsensical' evidence during TV star's trial
A close friend of Matt Wright has insisted he "wouldn't remember" if the Netflix star had asked him to destroy a document sought by investigators probing a fatal helicopter crash in 2022. Mr Wright has pleaded not guilty in the Northern Territory Supreme Court to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice following the crash that killed his television co-star Chris "Willow" Wilson. Catch up on today's live coverage of Matt Wright's Supreme Court trial. Prosecutors do not allege Mr Wright was responsible for the crash but that he feared the ensuing investigation would expose systemic under-reporting of flying hours for his company's helicopters. On Thursday, Crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC played a covert recording of a conversation between Mr Wright and Jai Tomlinson from seven months after the crash, while Mr Tomlinson was in the witness box. Mr Tomlinson said he had no memory of the conversation or being worried about his friend "being implicated" and denied he had asked him to destroy documents. "If that had happened, would you expect that you'd remember it?" Mr Gullaci asked. "Maybe," Mr Tomlinson replied. "How many times in your life, prior to September 2022, has someone asked you to destroy a document in connection with an investigation?" Mr Gullaci asked. "I don't know." "What, it's happened a few times?" "As I said, I don't remember back." "Is that something that has ever happened in your life?" "Probably not." Mr Tomlinson denied he was protecting Mr Wright out of a "sense of loyalty", saying he would not remember if someone asked him to destroy a helicopter's maintenance release (MR) form. "If Mr Wright, in September 2022, said to you, 'Jai, old mate, I want you to find and destroy the original MR for [the crashed helicopter] because I'm worried the authorities are going to get their hands on it', if that happened, you would have to remember it, wouldn't you Mr Tomlinson?" Mr Gullaci asked. "I wouldn't remember the conversation," Mr Tomlinson replied. "That's your serious evidence?" Mr Gullaci asked. "100 per cent." "Have you ever been asked to commit a criminal offence before by destroying documents that might be related to an investigation?" "I don't remember." "And it would stand out starkly if it had happened, wouldn't it?" "Not in my mind, no." Mr Gullaci played Mr Tomlinson part of the recording in which Mr Wright allegedly says "everyone's starting to put the pressure on, start squealing" and Mr Tomlinson allegedly replies "one word against another's". But Mr Tomlinson said he did not know what the word "squeal" might mean in that context, saying "I have two daughters and if they were to squeal, there's something going on". "Yeah, thanks for that," Mr Gullaci replied. "Everyone starting to put the pressure on, start squealing — what does squeal mean in that context Mr Tomlinson?" Mr Gullaci asked. "I don't know, I don't remember the conversation." "Is that a serious answer?" "It is a serious answer." "Do you know any other definition of the word squeal?" "No, I haven't looked it up." Mr Gullaci suggested Mr Tomlinson had changed his evidence from a pre-trial hearing when he had been unable to offer a definition for the word, and realising "how ridiculous your answers were", tried to "come up with an explanation". "Are you seriously suggesting, as a man of 45 years of age, that you've never heard the concept of someone squealing, that is giving someone up?" he asked. "Not to my knowledge," Mr Tomlinson replied. "I suggest to you that that's just a flat-out lie, that you have heard and you do know that meaning," Mr Gullaci said. "And the reason why you are taking this nonsensical position is because you know that if you know what the word 'squeal' means, there can only be one thing you were talking about on this recording." "No," Mr Tomlinson replied. The trial continues in Darwin on Friday.
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Men who gang raped teens during bucks party weekend fight convictions
WARNING: Distressing content. The credibility of teenagers who were gang raped by a group of men on a bucks party weekend has been called into question, as the men fight their convictions and sentence over the horrific assaults. Maurice Hawell, 31, Andrew David, 31, and Marius Hawell, 24, gang raped two 18-year-old friends on the first night of a bucks party weekend at an Airbnb in Newcastle in February 2022. The following night, they raped a 19-year-old girl. The men were found guilty last July of engaging in a joint criminal enterprise to sexually assault the women following a trial in the NSW District Court. All three men were jailed and have maintained their innocence. David and Maurice have launched fights against their convictions in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, while Marius is pushing against both his conviction and sentence. The credibility of the complainants, who cannot be identified, was called into question during an appeal hearing on Thursday. A short video allegedly taken as one of the women was leaving the Airbnb was played to the court, showing the teenager smiling. Maurice's lawyer claimed this was inconsistent with evidence the teens were 'scared'. 'In our submission she has a massive smile on her face and she gives evidence that she was smiling and laughing … this is inconsistent with …(evidence) that they were scared,' she said. She also claimed one of the teens had initially told police she had given 'full consent' and had said she 'started to enjoy myself' after initially being scared. The court was told the teen later said her statement about consent was because 'she had acted in a way as though she was consenting', and she agreed during the trial she felt as though she needed to give the impression she was enjoying herself. Maurice's lawyer also claimed this gave rise to the possibility her client had a lack of knowledge of consent, and that the woman had given accounts to others that were not consistent with her evidence in the trial. It was also argued sexual activity that occurred on the first night of the joint criminal enterprise could not have 'anything to say about what happened on the Saturday night, and vice versa', with evidence from the Friday night not admissible on the trials of the remaining counts. Each of the men argue directions given about the joint criminal enterprise were 'erroneous', while David and Maurice claim the Crown's direction for the jury to reject the evidence of a trial witness resulted in a miscarriage of justice, among several other grounds of appeal. The three men beamed into court through an audiovisual link on Thursday, with the hearing set to continue on Friday. Maurice Hawell was sentenced to a maximum term of 14 years, with an eight-year and six-month non-parole period. Marius Hawell was given a nine-year sentence, with a non-parole period of five years and five months.
