logo
Mid-air brawl erupts on AirAsia X flight from KL to Chengdu

Mid-air brawl erupts on AirAsia X flight from KL to Chengdu

The incident saw punches thrown mid-way through the four-hour journey on flight D7326 on Monday, prompting an investigation by Chinese authorities.
PETALING JAYA : A mid-air brawl broke out on an AirAsia X flight from Kuala Lumpur to Chengdu on Monday after a group of women reportedly refused to quiet down during a dimmed cabin period.
Daily Mail reported that the incident saw punches thrown mid-way through the four-hour journey on flight D7326, prompting an investigation by Chinese authorities.
Witnesses said the incident started when a male passenger seated behind three young women became visibly frustrated when they continued talking loudly after the cabin lights were turned off.
He reportedly asked them to lower their voices so he could sleep, but the group refused to comply. The situation escalated when the man allegedly called the women 'stupid' and told them to 'shut up'.
Footage captured by a fellow passenger shows a woman in a green outfit and baseball cap repeatedly punching the man, who was seen shielding himself with a food tray as the scuffle intensified.
The cabin crew stepped in and managed to defuse the situation. Police were stationed at the Chengdu airport to question those involved in the incident upon arrival.
In a statement, AirAsia X said its cabin crew acted swiftly and professionally to manage the situation in line with established safety protocols.
It also said the incident did not impact the return flight schedules or disrupt operations.
'AAX would like to remind all guests to be respectful throughout their journey,' it said.
'The airline maintains a zero-tolerance policy towards any behaviour that may affect the comfort, safety, or experience of others onboard.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Home minister: Police to exhume Zara Qairina's body for post-mortem after AGC directive
Home minister: Police to exhume Zara Qairina's body for post-mortem after AGC directive

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

Home minister: Police to exhume Zara Qairina's body for post-mortem after AGC directive

MACHANG, Aug 9 — The Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) will exhume the body of Form One student Zara Qairina Mahathir as soon as possible to complete the investigation into her death. Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said this followed instructions issued by the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) yesterday for the exhumation of the girl's body to allow a post-mortem procedure to be carried out. 'The police will implement the decision. I was briefed by the Inspector-General of Police (Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail) this morning that the police will immediately carry out the procedure. 'Of course, the focus by the police is to update the investigation, collect all evidence and in carrying out this task, the police will not compromise on the principle of justice because we need to be fair to everyone involved, including the family of the late Zara and the school,' he said here today. He was met by reporters after the opening of the 'Ijtimak Madani Ulama dan Guru Pondok Kelantan 2025' by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim at Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) Machang campus here. Saifuddin Nasution assured that the police will keep the public informed with the latest updates on the case from time to time. In a statement yesterday, the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) announced that the body of Zara Qairina would be exhumed to allow a post-mortem examination to be conducted. The AGC stated that further investigations by the police were necessary to ensure all aspects of the case were thoroughly examined. Zara Qairina, 13, was confirmed dead at Queen Elizabeth I Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, on July 17. She had been rushed to the hospital after being found unconscious in a drain near the dormitory of a religious school in Papar at about 4 am on July 16. — Bernama

Singapore law graduate who hid plagiarism in Bar application named after court ruling
Singapore law graduate who hid plagiarism in Bar application named after court ruling

Malay Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Singapore law graduate who hid plagiarism in Bar application named after court ruling

SINGAPORE, Aug 9 — A Singapore law graduate who failed to disclose past plagiarism incidents when seeking admission to the Bar — the process to become a qualified lawyer — has been publicly named after the court lifted an anonymity order, according to CNA. Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon on Thursday republished his grounds of decision in the case, identifying Pulara Devminie Somachandra. 'I make this order because, in my judgment, the principle of open justice is the predominant and overriding interest in this case, and there are insufficient grounds for departing from it,' he said in his judgment, as cited by the Singapore-based media organisation. He added that anonymisation orders were 'a derogation' from the general rule that parties' identities be made public. Somachandra had plagiarised in Singapore's Part A Bar examinations in 2020 — a conversion exam for overseas-trained law graduates — and 'on occasion' in university, but did not disclose these offences in her Bar application. The court rejected her admission and imposed a minimum five-year exclusion period before she can reapply. According to CNA, she initially persuaded the court to temporarily withhold her identity, citing mental health risks. She submitted a memo from a private doctor stating she had suicidal thoughts and warning that a non-anonymised judgment posed an 'immediate risk' to her safety. The Chief Justice ordered interim anonymity while awaiting a psychiatric report from the Institute of Mental Health (IMH). The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) and the Singapore Institute of Legal Education (SILE) argued against continued anonymity. The Law Society proposed she undergo consistent psychological and psychiatric treatment at IMH, with a risk management plan, and that her anonymity be preserved until she reapplied for admission. Somachandra countered that revealing her name would mean her past misconduct would 'come back to haunt her, regardless of the progress she has made or may hope to make'. However, CNA reports that Chief Justice Menon said the 'default rule' of naming lawyers was of 'great importance' because the public must be assured that those admitted to the Bar are 'morally competent' to meet the profession's high standards. He stressed that withholding a name should only occur to 'avert an imminent and credible threat of real harm' — a 'high threshold' that had not been met. 'There is insufficient evidence to suggest that there is a substantial risk that Ms Somachandra's condition will likely deteriorate to such an extent that it would be a disproportionate consequence of lifting the anonymisation,' he said. Addressing her concerns about her past resurfacing, he said: 'It is contrary to the notion of repentance and rehabilitation for Ms Somachandra to now seek to sweep her past misconduct under the rug… While second chances ought to be given, the journey to repentance, rehabilitation and reintegration begins with the willingness to confront and to be honest and open about her past misconduct.' The Chief Justice also rejected the Law Society's suggestion to revisit the issue only if she reapplied for admission in five years, noting that delaying the decision could worsen matters by allowing the fear of eventual exposure to linger. CNA reported that Somachandra graduated from a UK university in 2019. She failed two Part A papers in 2020 and was found to have collaborated with another candidate, who was named as 'Ms Tan', when she resat the exams. The SILE concluded their answers contained matching passages. She passed the Part A exam in 2022 and the Part B exam — the final stage before Bar admission — in 2023, but omitted the plagiarism incidents from her application. In 2024, after the AGC contacted her university, she consented to release of information confirming 'moderate plagiarism' during her studies. The AGC, SILE and Law Society all opposed her admission and recommended the five-year exclusion.

Police investigations free from political interference, says home minister
Police investigations free from political interference, says home minister

Free Malaysia Today

time16 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Police investigations free from political interference, says home minister

In April, Sin Chew Daily courted controversy for publishing an illustration featuring the Jalur Gemilang without the crescent moon, leading to a police investigation. PETALING JAYA : Home minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail says police investigations are free from political interference, including in its probe against editors of a Chinese daily over the incorrect depiction of the Jalur Gemilang. Saifuddin said that police had investigated two Sin Chew Daily editors under Section 3(1)(c) of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 1963; Section 4(1)(b) of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984; and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. Section 3(1)(c) deals with the use of an emblem without the permission of the minister, while Section 4(1)(b) deals with producing publications that cause hostility, enmity, hatred, disharmony or disunity. Section 233 deals with improper use of network facilities. 'The police carry out their duties professionally, independently without any political interference, at all times,' he said in a written parliamentary reply. Saifuddin said this in response to Lim Lip Eng (PH-Kepong) who wanted to know why the two editors were remanded over the gaffe but no arrests were made for a similar blunder by a PAS politician and the education ministry. Lim had questioned the alleged double standards in the investigations. In April, Sin Chew courted controversy for publishing an illustration featuring the Jalur Gemilang without the crescent moon, leading to a police investigation. Its two top editors were subsequently detained. The daily swiftly apologised for the 'technical mistake' and suspended its chief editor and deputy chief sub-editor pending the outcome of the investigation. A week after Sin Chew's snafu, the education ministry had to apologise for a mistake in the design of the Jalur Gemilang printed in its Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) results analysis report. The report contained an image of a Jalur Gemilang with two stars, instead of one, hanging on a classroom wall. The flag had eight alternating red and white stripes instead of 14. In May, PAS secretary-general Takiyuddin Hassan acknowledged the incident involving the logo for the Himpunan Teguh Memimpin Terengganu (TMT 1.0) 2025, which depicted an incomplete national flag with incorrect star points and stripes. He then called for a thorough investigation and firm action over the blunder.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store